New Haven mayor: Let illegal immigrants vote!
posted at 5:30 pm on December 14, 2011 by Tina Korbe
You read that headline right. While the GOP candidates squabble about whether support for in-state tuition or a path to citizenship might as well be support for amnesty, the mayor of New Haven, Ct., comes right out with it. He supports amnesty — and not even stealthily. NBC Connecticut reports:
New Haven Mayor John DeStefano plans to ask the state Legislature to allow illegal immigrants who live in the city to be able vote in municipal elections.
DeStefano said on Tuesday that the proposal would build a more engaged community and follows the lead of other cities, the New Haven Independent reports.
Immigrants who are in the U.S. legally or illegally and cannot vote now would still be unable to vote in state or federal elections.
DeStefano, a Democrat, said illegal immigrants pay taxes indirectly through rent and send their kids to New Haven schools and should be able to vote.
I know, I know. He didn’t really propose amnesty. After all, his plan wouldn’t allow undocumented immigrants citizenship — and it still bars them from voting in state and national elections. But what is citizenship if not the right to participate in government at any level? This should be so self-evidently counterproductive and undermining as to need no response at all.
Every timid half-measure that is ever proposed as a solution to “deal with” illegal immigration ignores the fundamental problem. At some point, we will have to revisit the quota system and the process to become a citizen of this country, in general. We will have to ask ourselves seriously what the meaning of United States citizenship really is — and what it takes to earn it. We will also have to decide how welcoming we want and can afford to be. Sound immigration policy need not be inhumane, but it also need not be determined solely by compassionate considerations.
The issue is decidedly complex, but only because we haven’t clearly defined what our priorities should be.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


Bobby Jindal: Paternalistic, big-government liberalism is the biggest loser here

Super Nannies: EU bans olive oils, Germany ponders Autobahn speed limit






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
uhoh…
“Gay rights push threatens immigration deal…
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) has told advocates that he will offer an amendment during the bill markup next week allowing gay Americans to sponsor their foreign-born partners for green cards, just as heterosexual couples can. The measure is likely to pass because Democrats face pressure from gay rights advocates to deal with it in committee, rather than on the Senate floor, where the odds of passage are far less favorable.
The provision has the potential to immediately fracture the senators and a diverse alliance of backers that includes conservative evangelicals and liberal union chiefs. It’s the focus of an intense lobbying push this week by the United States Conference of the Catholic Bishops, the Southern Baptist Convention, the Human Rights Campaign and others as senators map out strategy ahead of the markup.
The amendment, known as the Uniting American Families Act, would address an inequity in immigration law by permitting “permanent” partners of U.S. citizens or legal residents to apply for a green card. The term “permanent partner” is defined as someone who is older than 18 and involved in a financially interdependent, committed relationship.
The legislation could help as many as 40,000 same-sex couples, including some who have left the country in order to stay with their partners who can no longer live here legally. But Republicans are skittish about dealing with too many controversial issues all at once…”
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/gay-rights-push-threatens-immigration-deal-90807.html#ixzz2S3JTYDau
workingclass artist on May 1, 2013 at 10:46 AM
As to the House plan, they should have to plead guilty to a felony. No voting and no guns.
cptacek on May 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM
I don’t think that accusation is the conversation-stopper it once was…….
SailorMark on May 1, 2013 at 11:12 AM
Probably can’t pass? Maybe because the boarder isn’t closed and the laws that exist are not enforced. Add to that the fact that most in power or press will not even refer to illegals as just that, illegal. Clean up that mess and maybe then we can talk.
Pardonme on May 1, 2013 at 11:22 AM
VorDaj on April 30, 2013 at 10:19 PM
I quit listening to Limbaugh & Levin after the election last Nov. They both blow a lot of hot air (no pun intended) but no real solutions to all the problems we have. So why waste time listening to these guys on talk radio. They are a part of the problems almost as much as the idiot politicians.
We need a 3rd party with real conservatives. The demonrats and the repubs for the most part are all the same, lying, thieving crooks.
johnny reb on May 1, 2013 at 4:00 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2