Imports and exports slump in October

posted at 9:15 am on December 9, 2011 by Ed Morrissey

The new report on the US trade balance from the Census Department sounds like good news … if you don’t read farther than the first sentence.  The top line trade deficit fell in October by 1.6%, but that didn’t come from renewed strength in American exports, which fell 0.8% along with a 1.0% decrease in imports.  In fact, the only reason that the overall trade deficit fell at all was because of a revision to the previous month that added more than a billion dollars:

The U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, through the Department of Commerce, announced today that total October exports of  $179.2 billion and imports of $222.6 billion resulted in a goods and services deficit of $43.5 billion, down from $44.2 billion in September, revised.   October exports were $1.5 billion  less than September exports of $180.6 billion.   October imports  were $2.2 billion less than September imports of $224.8 billion.

In October, the goods deficit decreased $0.7 billion from September to $58.8 billion, and the services surplus  was virtually unchanged at  $15.3 billion.  Exports of goods decreased $1.5 billion to $127.8 billion, and imports of goods decreased  $2.2 billion to $186.6 billion.  Exports of services were virtually unchanged at  $51.4 billion,  and imports of services increased $0.1 billion to $36.1 billion.

The goods and services deficit increased $4.0 billion from October 2010 to October 2011.  Exports were up $19.7 billion, or  12.3 percent, and imports were up $23.7 billion, or  11.9 percent.

The chart from the BEA on trade deficits shows that American exports have flattened out over the last several months, and dropped slightly over the last two:

Of course, imports have also dropped off, but they’re not being replaced by sales of American goods.  As Reuters notes, this report is an indication of further slowing in the economy … or at least the American economy:

The U.S. trade deficit narrowed in October to its lowest in 10 months, but imports from China hit a record high, a government report showed on Friday.

The trade gap totaled $43.5 billion, in line with a consensus estimate from analysts before the report. However, the Commerce Department revised its estimate of the September trade deficit to $44.2 billion from $43.1 billion.

As a result, the October trade gap narrowed 1.6 percent from September, instead of widening, as most analysts expected.

Both U.S. imports and exports declined in October, in a possible sign of weakening demand in the United States and abroad.

The AP, via CBS, offers a somewhat less honest assessment.  They don’t get around to mentioning that exports dropped off as well as imports until the third paragraph, and then fail to connect the dots, as Reuters at least does in the fourth paragraph above.  In fact, their fifth paragraph offers this laughable lecture:

A lower deficit can boost economic growth because it typically means foreign nations are buying more American goods. That can lead to more jobs and higher consumer spending, which fuels 70 percent of economic activity.

Yeah … except that they’re not buying more American goods in this case.  That’s what a decline in exports means.  This report shows weakening global demand, not a boost in American fortunes.

Regarding China, there was some good news for the US as well.  American exports to China increased to their highest level in ten months at $9.7 billion.  However, their imports totaled $37.8 billion, which would account for more than half of the overall trade imbalance.  Japan has recovered from its tsunamis as well, with their imports to the US spiking to their highest level in more than three years.  Whatever weakness remains in the American economy can no longer be assigned to disruptions in the supply chain from Japan, as was the case earlier this year.

The decline in demand demonstrates the kind of weakness we would normally associate with an economy running at a 2.0% GDP or worse, and since October is the first month in Q4, this gives a fair indication that we should not expect a better GDP report for the end of this year.  We are essentially back to the status quo before the tsunamis wracked Japan and the oil-price shock at the beginning of the year, which means that we have not seen any structural improvement whatsoever in the American economy.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

As Reuters notes, this report is an indication of further slowing in the economy …

The Obama Recession, you bone it you own it.

Chip on December 9, 2011 at 9:19 AM

Obama did promise a transparent administration.

You can see right throw it ..him…them…whatev…unexpectedly

Skandia Recluse on December 9, 2011 at 9:23 AM

You know who will have the toughest job in 2012– the GOP’s nominee for President’s ad writer…how do you sort thru a gazillion stats, all failures…

hillsoftx on December 9, 2011 at 9:24 AM

this gives a fair indication that we should not expect a better GDP report for the end of this year.

I’d think that if the reports had a relationship to reality.

forest on December 9, 2011 at 9:25 AM

China’s people are happy to be working and earning a living manufacturing products that it’s country sells all over the world. Meanwhile, back in The States, we have the entire media focused on a bunch of self-serving cry-babies who couldn’t sand a board or focus their attention long enough to keep an even menial job. Oh, also! They’re supported by our countries strongest political entity, Organized Labor Unions, who have made their billions representing said board sanders. Oh, also! Within the ranks of Organized labor Unions are hard core Marxists who used to look to Communist Russia and China as model societies and about now I think my head might explode.

hawkdriver on December 9, 2011 at 9:26 AM

Obama did promise a transparent administration.

You can see right throw it ..him…them…whatev…unexpectedly

Skandia Recluse on December 9, 2011 at 9:23 AM

You are correct. You just cannot trust this administration any further then you can throw it. ;-)

Yoop on December 9, 2011 at 9:31 AM

Is the use of “surprisingly” limited to employment figures?

Cindy Munford on December 9, 2011 at 9:34 AM

this really is not an administration in the constitutional vein.

This is a regime… complete with a propaganda machine that would
make goebels or…errr… “our” stalin proud.

don’t worry. hawai’s economy will pick up this month when obama shows up with 300-500 of their closest freinds on another tax payer funded junket.

acyl72 on December 9, 2011 at 9:35 AM

Oh, also! [...] and about now I think my head might explode.

hawkdriver on December 9, 2011 at 9:26 AM

But meantime, lots of us have dug in our heals. I can’t be specific, because I don’t want to become someone’s necklace, but if I was a farmer, I would have doubled my acreage and even diversified my crops this year and last.

Just … get … us … past … Obama.

There might even be a little roaring.

– or, as you suggested, I guess its all changed beneath our feet.

But the road is still forked, hawk. Wrap your head in that Jacob Marley thing — hang on :)

Axe on December 9, 2011 at 9:42 AM

Not good – prior to this report, the level of trade between both nations has been signalling that the U.S. has been skirting the edge of recession, while China’s economy has been slowing.

A full-fledged recession, which will likely be determined to have begun in the second quarter of 2012 sometime late in 2012 or early in 2013, is on the way….

ironman on December 9, 2011 at 9:52 AM

“In fact, the only reason that the overall trade deficit fell at all was because of a revision to the previous month that added more than a billion dollars:”

There is that word again…

… seems to follow Obowma around a lot.

Seven Percent Solution on December 9, 2011 at 9:54 AM

So will Biden call this a Recovery Recession?

Kakalak Pundit on December 9, 2011 at 10:03 AM

I import steel from China for a living. Yes, imports are up versus 2009, when they were in the toliet, or rather under the toliet, but compared to 2001-2004ish? Nuh uh. The problem is, sales here are still so slow. If it wasn’t for the fact more people are staying in their homes and just re-roofing, my residential sales would be near non-existent. It’s still a pretty big mess, all in all.

di butler on December 9, 2011 at 10:03 AM

So will Biden call this a Recovery Recession?

Kakalak Pundit on December 9, 2011 at 10:03 AM

My favorite this this whole week.

Axe on December 9, 2011 at 10:08 AM

“In fact, the only reason that the overall trade deficit fell at all was because of a revision to the previous month that added more than a billion dollars:”

There is that word again…

… seems to follow Obowma around a lot.

Seven Percent Solution on December 9, 2011 at 9:54 AM

I would wager a “small fortune” that some time in mid-November next year, the Dept. of Labor will publish a false report that unemployment had unexpectedly dropped to 7.9%—and will be revised the day after the election.

Rovin on December 9, 2011 at 10:09 AM

US corn exports are increasing. US gasoline exports are increasing. US coal exports are increasing. US natural gas exports are increasing.

My food costs are stuck on high. My gasoline costs are stuck on high. My electricity rates have increased.

Hmmm……

B-Ri on December 9, 2011 at 10:09 AM

But the road is still forked, hawk. Wrap your head in that Jacob Marley thing — hang on :)

Axe on December 9, 2011 at 9:42 AM

(Holding cheek)

Thanks, I needed that. And I’m better now.

hawkdriver on December 9, 2011 at 10:27 AM

I’d think that if the reports had a relationship to reality.

forest on December 9, 2011 at 9:25 AM

What’s really scary are journalists(I include bloggers in that group) who refer to the GDP as if it had any basis in reality. The number is a POLITICALLY DERIVED STATISTIC that is manipulated.

No big shock on the import/export news. The world’s economy is slowing down. Europe’s is about to implode by all indications.

dogsoldier on December 9, 2011 at 10:30 AM

B-Ri on December 9, 2011 at 10:09 AM

Natural gas exports? That would be only to neighboring countries as the only natural gas export terminal was in Alaska, was closed, and scheduled to be demolished.

Corn exports would likely include ethanol exports, which we are by far no. 1 worldwide in exports of it as well as the co-product from dry milling ethanol plants, DDGS, a high protein feed for aquaculture, poultry, and livestock.

Kermit on December 9, 2011 at 10:39 AM

BTW, we import 50% of our ammonia, used in almost all fertilizers. It is imported mostly from Trinidad, but also Venezuela, Egypt, Ukraine & Russia.

Kermit on December 9, 2011 at 10:40 AM

Kermit on December 9, 2011 at 10:39 AM

Indeed, the bulk of US natural gas exports are via pipeline to Canada and Mexico. The booming US shale gas sector is sparking renewed interest in Liquified Natural Gas terminals for export to other countries. WSJ

Corn exports rose last week to 708,000 tonnes, much higher than trade estimates. CBOT

B-Ri on December 9, 2011 at 11:19 AM

BTW, we import 50% of our ammonia, used in almost all fertilizers. It is imported mostly from Trinidad, but also Venezuela, Egypt, Ukraine & Russia.

Kermit on December 9, 2011 at 10:40 AM

Just curious. In what form? I mean, is there a raw material, or do we literally buy barrels?

Axe on December 9, 2011 at 11:48 AM

Imagine that: slight of hand government numbers and less than honest reporting from the lsm. I’m shocked I tell you, shocked!!

txdonboy on December 9, 2011 at 12:28 PM

Seems like our economy is going to

Helen A Handbasquet on December 9, 2011 at 12:43 PM

this article somehow forgot to mention that our job czar is goign to get this country hiring again… along with the “lasar like focus on jobs, jobs jobs” from our fearless leader.

that type of focus is going to create consumer demand since we’ll all be flush with cash.

acyl72 on December 9, 2011 at 1:20 PM

Those China trade stats would be just horrible news if, you know, bilateral trade balances reflected anything. The fact is – and it is a demonstrable fact – that the US-China trade balance tells you nothing about (a) the state of the US economy; or (b) the state of the bilateral trade relationship. Heck, even the overall US trade balance doesn’t tell us much, and expanding US trade deficits are positively correlated with an expanding US economy (and have been for decades now).

I know this isn’t an economics site, but, seriously, this is really basic stuff, and misreporting like this helps protectionists like Chuck Schumer impose new taxes on US consumers via import tariffs. I expect such misinformation from politicians like Schumer and Mitt Romney (or fools like Donald Trump and the AFL-CIO), but not HotAir.

Alas.

More here, if you’re interested.

Kim_Jong_Illin on December 9, 2011 at 1:44 PM

Double edged sword. American’s love to purchase the cheap goods flowing out of China, yet we have an unemployment problem, where’s the solution? When we moved away from being a heavy industrial manufacturing nation that is when our current problems began.

JLPicard on December 9, 2011 at 2:22 PM

I know this isn’t an economics site, but, seriously, this is really basic stuff, and misreporting like this helps protectionists like Chuck Schumer impose new taxes on US consumers via import tariffs. I expect such misinformation from politicians like Schumer and Mitt Romney (or fools like Donald Trump and the AFL-CIO), but not HotAir.

Kim_Jong_Illin on December 9, 2011 at 1:44 PM

Thank you, this needs to be said, and precisely in this way. I have been reading HotAir for years, and enjoy the site, but nothing bothered me more than my inability to comment every time I saw a blog post implying that a “trade deficit” is a bad thing. Now, in my first day commenting on here, I finally can.

Ed, respectfully, please read Chapter 12 of Henry Hazlitt’s excellent book, “Economics in One Lesson”, a conservative classic. This link has the entire book, but start with Chapter 12 to get a deeper understanding of how “trade imbalances” are both inaccurately described and meaningless.

Individual on December 9, 2011 at 5:06 PM