New e-mails: ATF officials discussed using Fast & Furious to … push gun control

posted at 4:15 pm on December 7, 2011 by Allahpundit

The logical extension of Rahm’s famous remark about never letting a serious crisis go to waste. If a grave problem is an opportunity to push your agenda, imagine how much farther you can push it by making the problem graver.

Another F&F bombshell from CBS’s Sharyl Attkisson:

ATF officials didn’t intend to publicly disclose their own role in letting Mexican cartels obtain the weapons, but emails show they discussed using the sales, including sales encouraged by ATF, to justify a new gun regulation called “Demand Letter 3″. That would require some U.S. gun shops to report the sale of multiple rifles or “long guns.” Demand Letter 3 was so named because it would be the third ATF program demanding gun dealers report tracing information.

On July 14, 2010 after ATF headquarters in Washington D.C. received an update on Fast and Furious, ATF Field Ops Assistant Director Mark Chait emailed Bill Newell, ATF’s Phoenix Special Agent in Charge of Fast and Furious:

“Bill – can you see if these guns were all purchased from the same (licensed gun dealer) and at one time. We are looking at anecdotal cases to support a demand letter on long gun multiple sales. Thanks.”

On Jan. 4, 2011, as ATF prepared a press conference to announce arrests in Fast and Furious, Newell saw it as “(A)nother time to address Multiple Sale on Long Guns issue.” And a day after the press conference, Chait emailed Newell: “Bill–well done yesterday… (I)n light of our request for Demand letter 3, this case could be a strong supporting factor if we can determine how many multiple sales of long guns occurred during the course of this case.”

Follow the link and read the e-mails from a participating gun dealer to the ATF asking for a letter affirming that he was only selling these weapons at the agency’s behest. He was worried that the sales were shady and wanted legal cover in case the bureau later turned around and decided that the dealers were “irresponsible” or whatever in making the sales — which was awfully prescient given the ATF’s subsequent political opportunism. But then, none of this is surprising: Congressional Democrats and even Eric Holder himself have already used F&F as a pretext to call for more gun control. I thought the sleaziest bit of White House scandal spin we’d see this year was the Energy Department asking Solyndra to hold off on layoffs until after election day in 2010. Nope: Per the new F&F e-mails, they’re actually using their own scandals now as a pretext for greater regulation. Says Dan McLaughlin, “Obama Administration once again lives down to every paranoid caricature of itself.”

Darrell Issa said today he’s going to press Holder at tomorrow’s hearing to “clean house” at the DOJ. Chuck Grassley, for one, knows just where to start.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

“How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?” – Sherlock Holmes

NotCoach on December 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM

This just in! Water is wet! Details at eleven!

rogerb on December 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM

That’s what we call a “smoking gun”.

Socratease on December 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM

Didn’t @SarahPalinUSA mention this about an hour ago on her FB site?

Palin leading where the pack fears to tread1

ConservativePartyNow on December 7, 2011 at 4:18 PM

Unprecedented…

the_nile on December 7, 2011 at 4:18 PM

This is getting interesting.

NewtRomney on December 7, 2011 at 4:19 PM

Can we drag Holder to the dock NOW? Seriously, what the f**k does it take, how many corpses tossed in a pile is enough to finally drag that jackwagon before a judge? These thugs are throwing Americans and the Constitution into a bonfire in their efforts to circumvent rights, and we’re going to beg Holder to “clean house”?

Man, I hate all of these politicians and their lackeys more every day.

Bishop on December 7, 2011 at 4:19 PM

disgusting

rob verdi on December 7, 2011 at 4:20 PM

March 30, 2011:
Sarah Brady claims Obama pushing ‘under the radar’ gun control

During the meeting, President Obama dropped in and, according to Sarah Brady, brought up the issue of gun control, “to fill us in that it was very much on his agenda,” she said.

“I just want you to know that we are working on it,” Brady recalled the president telling them. “We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.”

Brat on December 7, 2011 at 4:20 PM

Darrell Issa said today he’s going to press Holder Obama at tomorrow’s hearing to “clean house Holder” at the DOJ.

FIFY

hillsoftx on December 7, 2011 at 4:20 PM

Attkisson to be hired by Fox News in 5…4…3…

John the Libertarian on December 7, 2011 at 4:21 PM

That’s what we call a “smoking gun”.

Socratease on December 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM

Careful, or they’ll ban those too.

John the Libertarian on December 7, 2011 at 4:22 PM

Careful, or they’ll ban those too.

John the Libertarian on December 7, 2011 at 4:22 PM

They should. Second-hand smoking guns cause cancer in 1 out of 1 billion cases.

NotCoach on December 7, 2011 at 4:24 PM

This story just gets worse and worse. I expected this but what shocked me even more was that we are making fully legal weapons sales to Mexico for their military. That makes about as much sense as selling weapons to Iran or Pakistan (ooops we do). It will only come back to bite us on the posterior…

CorporatePiggy on December 7, 2011 at 4:25 PM

Wow, helping create crime so you can restrict something…any chance anybody will go to jail for this? I mean, really? Really?

austinnelly on December 7, 2011 at 4:25 PM

The ultimate aim of every Socialist is to disarm the People. A political “ideal” which is founded upon force and compulsion must recognize that, when the People revolt, it is best that they are unarmed.

OhEssYouCowboys on December 7, 2011 at 4:26 PM

The swine, with apologies to the good pigs

Schadenfreude on December 7, 2011 at 4:27 PM

Wow, helping create crime so you can restrict something…any chance anybody will go to jail for this? I mean, really? Really?

austinnelly on December 7, 2011 at 4:25 PM

Can anyone say “protection racket”?

Unbelievable!

mlicausi on December 7, 2011 at 4:28 PM

Wow, helping create crime so you can restrict something…any chance anybody will go to jail for this? I mean, really? Really?

austinnelly on December 7, 2011 at 4:25 PM

/sarc – there I fixed it!

See… the created panic that lead to TARP… see… panic that lead to bailout number one… see manufactured people are dying by the minute health care stories – … still dying now but they have only to wait until 2014 doncha know!

glidingone on December 7, 2011 at 4:29 PM

They really think they are above the law.

I really hope we see a lot of officials in orange jumpsuits soon. I have just about lost my faith that the law will ever be applied to these corrupt, criminal government officials.

Merovign on December 7, 2011 at 4:29 PM

Rush was righ…again.

SouthernGent on December 7, 2011 at 4:29 PM

It’s getting harder for the MSM to ignore this story one would think. One would be wrong though.The MSM is too busy telling us about how OWS is the number one story of the year and —-insert any Republican Candidates name here,is a drooling Neanderthal,Woman hating,Religious zealot,Billionaire loving, poor hating ,gun toting fanatic.

sandee on December 7, 2011 at 4:29 PM

New e-mails: ATF officials discussed using Fast & Furious to … push gun control

Did anyone NOT know this already?

Physics Geek on December 7, 2011 at 4:30 PM

Geez…. never saw that coming.

tru2tx on December 7, 2011 at 4:31 PM

Kind of makes you want to question every white house policy decision and appointment to see what special cause they’re trying to further “under the radar”.

AltTuning on December 7, 2011 at 4:32 PM

That’s what we call a “smoking gun”.

Socratease on December 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM

That is also what we call prima facie evidence of constructive manslaughter.

pedestrian on December 7, 2011 at 4:32 PM

There are very few crimes against the state and the citizenry than this – abusing their powers in order to create a lie (and increase danger and violence) in order to use that lie to restrict the proper Constitutional rights of Americans.

You just don’t get any lower than this. They should all be punished appropriately, from the top to the bottom – every single one.

ThePrimordialOrderedPair on December 7, 2011 at 4:33 PM

I’m sitting hear recalling a professor that was a guest on the Mark Levin Show who said he had a short convo with Obama before he was president. He had said that Obama said he didn’t think people should be allowed to have guns.

robertlbryant on December 7, 2011 at 4:33 PM

Most transparently corrupt administration ever.

rbj on December 7, 2011 at 4:34 PM

Proves why we need a second amendment.
It also proves that the only way our gun freedoms can be abused is if government does it.
Yeah, we need gun control… for government! No government official, outside of the military, should ever be allowed to own a gun.

Hey, maybe we ought to send all of these people to an NRA gun safety class… just before they go to jail.

JellyToast on December 7, 2011 at 4:35 PM

Darrell Issa said today he’s going to press Holder Obama at tomorrow’s hearing to “clean house Holder” at the DOJ.

FIFY Issa..

hillsoftx on December 7, 2011 at 4:35 PM

So Issa and Grassley want a justice department that is so corrupt that they keep sending them documents with every word on them redacted, to clean their own house?

Yea, the fix is clearly in, Issa and Grassley have no intention of getting to the bottom of Fast and Furious, they are just stocking up on political favors they can call in on another day.

SWalker on December 7, 2011 at 4:37 PM

Cool scandal name!

Chip with a prog in her throat on December 7, 2011 at 4:38 PM

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-4937389-503544.html


April 12, 2009 12:10 PM
Mexico: U.S. Supplies 90% Of Cartel’s Guns

(CBS)
Mexican Ambassador Arturo Sarukhan argued against doubts raised by the National Rifle Association that ninety percent of all assault weapons seized in northern Mexican originate from the United States.

The key issue, Sarukhan reiterated on CBS News’ on Face The Nation Sunday, is to stop the flow of U.S. firearms and cash, “which is providing drug cartels in Mexico with the wherewithal to corrupt, to bribe, to kill.

“Ninety percent of all weapons we are seizing in Mexico, Bob, are coming from across the United States,” he said, citing the high number of Federal firearms licenses a few miles north of the border. “Just on the Arizona and Texas borders with Mexico alone there are approximately 7,000 FFLs, federal firearms licensees. And weapons bought by the drug syndicates, directly or proxy purchases, are coming from those gun shops.”

Pushed by Schieffer about how Mexican authorities can be so sure the majority of the weapons originated in the States, Sarukhan said through research with AFT they discovered that most the grenades are coming from Guatemala, while most of the assault weapons come from the United States.

Schieffer asked if the ambassador would support the U.S. reinstating the ban on assault weapons.

“The assault weapons ban ran out in 2004, Bob,” he said, “and since then we have seen a rise of assault weapons being seized in Mexico.

“There is a direct correlation between the expiration of the assault weapons ban and our seizures of assault weapons,” he argued.

Sarukhan admitted that the Mexican government cannot determine how Congress and the Obama administration would move on the ban, but he did say that reinstating the ban “is one of the instruments … that could have a profound impact on the number and the caliber of weapons doing down to Mexico.”

the_nile on December 7, 2011 at 4:38 PM

Side Note: Has any of this Fast and Furious stuff been tied to Mayor Bloombergs timing of the Arizona gun show shenanigans he was pulling a year ago? Or has this already been addressed in past posts and I missed it?

multiuseless on December 7, 2011 at 4:39 PM

Kind of makes you want to question every white house policy decision and appointment to see what special cause they’re trying to further “under the radar”.

AltTuning on December 7, 2011 at 4:32 PM

yep. scary!!

I’m sitting hear recalling a professor that was a guest on the Mark Levin Show who said he had a short convo with Obama before he was president. He had said that Obama said he didn’t think people should be allowed to have guns.

robertlbryant on December 7, 2011 at 4:33 PM

not surprised!

Sachiko on December 7, 2011 at 4:39 PM

Demand Letter 3 was to be much more sweeping, affecting 8,500 firearms dealers in four southwest border states: Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas. ATF chose those states because they “have a significant number of crime guns traced back to them from Mexico.” The reporting requirements were to apply if a gun dealer sells two or more long guns to a single person within five business days, and only if the guns are semi-automatic, greater than .22 caliber and can be fitted with a detachable magazine.

There’s a big lie in there somewhere. Such guns are legally deemed “assault weapons” in California and cannot be sold to civilians. So why would the ATF order California gun stores to report gun sales that are already outlawed and not taking place? Something doesn’t add up.

Socratease on December 7, 2011 at 4:39 PM

My only question is … and it is rhetorical … are most Americans smart enough to comprehend that a police state is possible, and that there are those in power who will do anything to create it?

Like I said, the question is rhetorical.

OhEssYouCowboys on December 7, 2011 at 4:39 PM

Wow. Never saw this coming!/

And remind me of something: T.R. was for gun control too, wasn’t he? All that stuff about hunting in Africa is just a GOP propaganda and never happened, right? I ask because I’m thinking that Obama really needs to fully embrace everything T.R., and he could have a cute new item on his campaign page:

Instead of Teddy Bears, which are so last century (except when it’s about being a “Progressive”) it’s time for…. Barry Bears.

And to go with the Barry Bear, how about an “authentic” Obama doll where he dresses up like T.R when he rode a horse up San Juan Hill?

Buy Danish on December 7, 2011 at 4:40 PM

“Obama Administration once again lives down to every paranoid caricature of itself.”

I really did want to give the benefit of the doubt, but after years of this, I’m all “given out”.

Lucky Pierre on December 7, 2011 at 4:41 PM

CAN WE IMPEACH THIS RABID SYCOPHANT ERIC HOLDER, YET????????????

locomotivebreath1901 on December 7, 2011 at 4:42 PM

Rahm Emanuel – “Never let a crisis go to waste!”
Eric Holder – “It’s a crisis this blew up in my face!”

We began blogging about this in Feb-March of this year. It has taken 10 months just to get it some play and my local paper (Houston Chonicle) will not print a story about it. We are going to be finding many more skeletons as the years go by.

DanMan on December 7, 2011 at 4:44 PM

Friends, what we have here is an American administration illegally selling guns to narco-terrorists, which resulted in the killing of hundreds-including a U.S. citizen- all for building a case against my and your participation in our Constitutionally protectd right to keep and bear arms. Let that sink in: this administration hates your Constitutional rights so much, it’s willing to have others killed in order to limit your rights…If you are so inclined, pray and fast for your nation.

Weight of Glory on December 7, 2011 at 4:44 PM

And to go with the Barry Bear, how about an “authentic” Obama doll where he dresses up like T.R when he rode a horse up San Juan Hill?

Buy Danish on December 7, 2011 at 4:40 PM

I see him dressed in mom jeans and a nerdy bike helmet on a bicycle.

tru2tx on December 7, 2011 at 4:45 PM

Can’t wait to hear more about this on the 6 o’clock news.

rudee on December 7, 2011 at 4:45 PM

Bottom line: Those people didn’t care that people were killed as long as their political agenda to disarm the law-abiding was fulfilled.

Mere words of condemnation don’t describe those people adequately.

Chip on December 7, 2011 at 4:45 PM

Yeah, “never let a crisis go to waste”. Or in this case, never avoid an opportunity to create a crisis to exploit.

Scrappy on December 7, 2011 at 4:46 PM

And to go with the Barry Bear, how about an “authentic” Obama doll where he dresses up like T.R when he rode a horse up San Juan Hill?

Buy Danish on December 7, 2011 at 4:40 PM

I think the Obama doll would be dressed in black leather and high heels and come with a Barry White album as a prop.

BaconEatingInfidel on December 7, 2011 at 4:46 PM

Damning.

labrat on December 7, 2011 at 4:47 PM

Cool scandal name!

Chip with a prog in her throat on December 7, 2011 at 4:38 PM

She’s just standing in for crr6 here.

Chip on December 7, 2011 at 4:47 PM

I admit it: I thought the HA commentators that very early-on linked F&F to gun-grabbers were on a conspiracy bender.

I stand corrected.

visions on December 7, 2011 at 4:48 PM

I remember all those stories about all those weapons that could be traced and how many were traced back to the US. I remember that the vast majority of weapons could not be traced (and were obviously manufactured outside the US, such as the AKs), but that was ignored. I remember those stories mysteriously falling silent as Fast and Furious became known.

Of course Fast and Furious was being used to push anti-Second Amendment gun control agendas, but most of the loud noise on that front got stifled when the news got out that the Obama Administration was heavily responsible for the illegal gun sales and border crossings.

A lot of people should be in prison for this, including Holder and Obama, but I doubt that will happen, what with the Democrat Stonewall machine and MSM Left-Wing agenda (pardon the redundancy).

John Hitchcock on December 7, 2011 at 4:49 PM

“Ninety percent of all weapons we are seizing in Mexico, Bob, are coming from across the United States,” he said, citing the high number of Federal firearms licenses a few miles north of the border.

That’s a lie.

Congressman Connie Mack (R-Fla.), however, challenged Rand’s claim that 90% of guns seized from the cartels are from the United States. Rand cited the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) for her claim. But the BATFE has only stated that 90% of the guns traced are from America. BATFE only traces a fraction of the guns seized; those firearms are not selected randomly, but are likely selected because they are the guns most likely to have come from the U.S. Trace data reveals nothing about the large number of guns that are not traced.

And:

(CBS News) Selling weapons to Mexico – where cartel violence is out of control – is controversial because so many guns fall into the wrong hands due to incompetence and corruption. The Mexican military recently reported nearly 9,000 police weapons “missing.”

Yet the U.S. has approved the sale of more guns to Mexico in recent years than ever before through a program called “direct commercial sales.” It’s a program that some say is worse than the highly-criticized “Fast and Furious” gunrunning scandal, where U.S. agents allowed thousands of weapons to pass from the U.S. to Mexican drug cartels.

“There is a direct correlation between the expiration of the assault weapons ban and our seizures of assault weapons,” he argued.

Well, DUH! If you ban red cars then you’ll see a decrease in the number of red cars involved in fatal accidents. A correlation can be perfectly true and yet perfectly useless. The real question is whether or not the federal assault weapon ban had any effect on rates of criminal violence in Mexico. We know from our own Justice Department survey that it had no detectable effect on ours.

Socratease on December 7, 2011 at 4:49 PM

Bishop on December 7, 2011 at 4:19 PM

We’re talking about hundreds of Mexicans murdered with F&F weapons. Evidently, their lives don’t matter enough, so nothing will happen to Barry or Eric.

Has Issa invited a single Mexican to testify?

Christien on December 7, 2011 at 4:50 PM

Most corrupt administration, evah!

GarandFan on December 7, 2011 at 4:52 PM

It almost seems as though Allah is suggesting that this crisis wasn’t orchestrated for this very purpose…

BKeyser on December 7, 2011 at 4:52 PM

I have no idea, but I do know that you guys come up with really cool names for your fake scandals.

crr6 on July 10, 2011 at 1:24 PM

Del Dolemonte on December 7, 2011 at 4:52 PM

Don’t forget that the State Department is involved in this too…

… which leaves this big pile of stinking sh%t right at Obowma’s door step.

The whole lot of them need to be kicked out of office and thrown in jail to rot…!

Seven Percent Solution on December 7, 2011 at 4:56 PM

The end justifies the means. So what else is new in Progressive ideology land?

Cloture on December 7, 2011 at 4:56 PM

I hope at some point Holder is faced with the following options:

1. Be extradited to Mexico to face charges for his complcity in the murder of hundreds of Mexican citizens (I would love to have him charged in the murder of U.S. Border Patrol agent Brian Terry, but Mexican prisons are way worse than even the Arizona Tent Cities)

OR

2. Turn evidence on Barack Obama’s direct involvement in setting up and executing Fast & Furious and the other similar operations throughout the border states.

joejmz on December 7, 2011 at 4:56 PM

I have no idea, but I do know that you guys come up with really cool names for your fake scandals.

crr6 on July 10, 2011 at 1:24 PM

Del Dolemonte on December 7, 2011 at 4:52 PM

Hey, I said that already!

Chip with a prog in her throat on December 7, 2011 at 4:57 PM

Nothing will stick to this administration or its capos. The propagandists of the media may throw the masses a few bones but they will never crank up their machine as in watergate days. Not for The One.

nueces on December 7, 2011 at 4:58 PM

And this crap about Obama emulating TR. Fact: All those pictures of Teddy in the wild were taken in a photographer’s studio in Manhatten. Teddy was the original PR illusion. His grand visage of conquering the west was just that. He has been credited with fomenting such anger in the orient that many believe he planted the seeds of Japan’s motivation that culminated in their siding with Germany in WWII 50 years later.

Find a copy of “The Imperial Cruise”. The author James Bradley (Flags of Our Fathers and Flyboys) started out researching about the Pacific Wars and he got sidetracked with the myth that was Teddy Roosevelt. His comments about his follow historians are quite telling.

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6452811-the-imperial-cruise

DanMan on December 7, 2011 at 4:58 PM

I’m shocked.

To all those who suggested that my predictions about this bloody criminal conspiracy were exaggerated, I say:

I TOLD YOU SO.

And I’ll say again that we haven’t gotten close to the bottom of it yet. There is more to it than just promoting a gun control agenda, much more, and the blood trail goes straight to the Oval Office.

novaculus on December 7, 2011 at 5:00 PM

I see him dressed in mom jeans and a nerdy bike helmet on a bicycle.
tru2tx on December 7, 2011 at 4:45 PM

Oh, absolutely. That was my first reaction to this T.R. nonsense. But Obama is all about audacity, and pretending to be who he is not, so a cowboy hat, a gun, and a horse it will be.

Buy Danish on December 7, 2011 at 5:07 PM

F&F was the latest attempt to implement the Cloward-Piven strategy to create a crisis.

Henry Parsons on December 7, 2011 at 5:08 PM

Hey, I said that already!

Chip with a prog in her throat on December 7, 2011 at 4:57 PM

Say goodnight Gracie..

Chip on December 7, 2011 at 5:08 PM

But then, none of this is surprising: Congressional Democrats and even Eric Holder himself have already used F&F as a pretext to call for more gun control. I thought the sleaziest bit of White House scandal spin we’d see this year was the Energy Department asking Solyndra to hold off on layoffs until after election day in 2010. Nope: Per the new F&F e-mails, they’re actually using their own scandals now as a pretext for greater regulation.

What it shows is an administration and a Democratic Party in general that is so brazenly confident that the vast majority of the big media won’t call them on it that they basically have lost the ability to be shamed.

OK, they haven’t completely lost the ability yet, since if they had their answer to Attkinson’s stories would be “So what?” They still are trying to cover it up, so they know this could still fester into problems down the road, but it’s only a cover-up in the most perfunctory sense in providing Holder with some sort of plausible deniability. In terms of the final goal of the F&F operation, there’s no shame at all that gun control was their position before the scandal broke, and gun control will remain their position no matter what comes out.

(The one thing I would like to see is the reaction of Attkinson’s co-workers and higher-ups at CBS News. Some of them in the past may have bought into the idea that other Obama Administration scandals were minor kerfuffles over-hyped by Fox News and talk radio. But this is the scandal they’re taking the lead on uncovering, and in the rest of the traditional media the response has been … crickets. You’d think that would make them double-down on the effort to push forward on investigating the administration in the same way the Nixon Administration’s stonewalling made CBS reporters back in 1972-74 redouble their efforts. But I wouldn’t be shocked to learn there are people at the network not only against doing that, but wondering why they’re devoting their current time and effort to the story.)

jon1979 on December 7, 2011 at 5:12 PM

Time for the Holder, and everyone else involved in this to take a perp walk and join Blago in prison.

Raquel Pinkbullet on December 7, 2011 at 5:13 PM

Of course the State Dept is also allowing direct sales of military weapons from American manufacturers to corrupt Mexican law enforcement and military groups who divert the weapons directly to the cartels. Apparently, the Mexican government signs off on the official End User certificate and the cartels get full auto weaponry plus heaven only knows what else. Hillary doesn’t have clean hands in this thing either.

a capella on December 7, 2011 at 5:15 PM

I stand corrected. T.R. rode up San Juan Hill with a sword, not a gun. And I believe his horse was named, “Little Texas”, but perhaps Obama could call his horse “Little BO”.

CC: Obama campaign.

Alinsky rule: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also, it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.

Buy Danish on December 7, 2011 at 5:15 PM

shocked, shocked I tell you. Geez, what’ll it take for the supposed 40 odd % that still support these goons to wake up?

brn2rde on December 7, 2011 at 5:15 PM

Golly gee willikers, this fake scandal has just the coolest name.

lorien1973 on December 7, 2011 at 5:16 PM

I want to know if Bloomberg had a hand in this.

Connie on December 7, 2011 at 5:16 PM

I think I’ll try to watch that little hearing tomorrow…Holder: I know nothing…

d1carter on December 7, 2011 at 5:18 PM

And MSM still doesn’t think that this is an important issue, another piece on the religious views of the GOP candidates is definitely more important

TheOarsman on December 7, 2011 at 5:19 PM

But Obama is all about audacity, and pretending to be who he is not, so a cowboy hat, a gun, and a horse it will be.

Buy Danish on December 7, 2011 at 5:07 PM

Ed has a great pic of Obama wearing a cowboy hat that is about a size and a half too big. Fits right down over his ears, which, thankfully, are large enough to prevent further slippage. It’s always been my favorite. All hat and no cattle.

a capella on December 7, 2011 at 5:19 PM

This is a Big ****in’ Deal.

NukeRidingCowboy on December 7, 2011 at 5:20 PM

Is that a bus I hear?

cajun carrot on December 7, 2011 at 5:21 PM

Teddy Roosevelt?

This guy is more Woodrow Wilson than TR. Both were bad, Wilson was worse as a heavy-handed “progressive”. Although the best comparison is probably to Benito Mussolini, especially that chin-in-the-air pose they both favor(ed) and their “corporatism” (Benie’s style of fascism).

iurockhead on December 7, 2011 at 5:21 PM

Well that’s just a crazy conspiracy theory…

Clearly their plan when pushing thousands of untraceable guns into the hands of violent criminals was to…

Um…

Someone bail me out here? I’m trying to come up with a plausible rational plan they had that failed; but if it had worked would be useful; and would involve the actions we know happened…

Anyone?

I mean the “laundering drug money” scandal… I see how that could have worked. Follow the moeny isn’t new, and to follow it, you have to have it, then give it to them. Even though it failed, I see what the plan was.

The oft compared Operation Wide Receiver under Bush (where we told Mexico we were doing this) we had tracking implements on the guns; but the range & battery duration failed before we could get useful intel. But I at least see how the plan could have worked successfully.

Has anyone given a comparable plan for Fast & Furious (or Operation Castaway our of Florida)? I’d love to have one just so I don’t have to assume the only possible goal was to increase border violence and deaths for legislative and political gain in the arena of gun control.

Anyone got anything plausible? Anything at all?

gekkobear on December 7, 2011 at 5:23 PM

The repubics have no balls.

ultracon on December 7, 2011 at 5:26 PM

I have no idea, but I do know that you guys come up with really cool names for your fake scandals.

crr6 on July 10, 2011 at 1:24 PM

Del Dolemonte on December 7, 2011 at 4:52 PM

Hey, I said that already!

Chip with a prog in her throat on December 7, 2011 at 4:57 PM

I post that quote on every F & F thread here. Best to hear it from the horse’s….

Del Dolemonte on December 7, 2011 at 5:27 PM

Excellent piece by Sarah Palin.

“Smoking Gun” in Fast & Furious?

http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150414989148435

idesign on December 7, 2011 at 5:28 PM

The repubics

ultracon on December 7, 2011 at 5:26 PM

DU is down the hall. Last rathole on the Left.

Del Dolemonte on December 7, 2011 at 5:28 PM

Tends to call into question the whole concept of a DOJ, doesn’t it?
Weigh the bad against the good.

a capella on December 7, 2011 at 5:30 PM

Nice comment (one of only 6!) at the C-BS link:

Wow, it’s nice to see legitimate journalism and “CBS” on the same page.

Del Dolemonte on December 7, 2011 at 5:31 PM

Of course the State Dept is also allowing direct sales of military weapons from American manufacturers to corrupt Mexican law enforcement and military groups who divert the weapons directly to the cartels. Apparently, the Mexican government signs off on the official End User certificate and the cartels get full auto weaponry plus heaven only knows what else. Hillary doesn’t have clean hands in this thing either.

a capella on December 7, 2011 at 5:15 PM

This whole fiasco, and the administration for that matter, is like one big corrupt political Rube Goldberg machine. The whole thing stinks, but you can’t seem to pin it on any thing. There’s always a back up plan with them… and a back up plan for the back up plan, should that fail… and so on.

They know (and they’re right) that eventually it just gets so overwhelming and confusing, that most people just stop believing the whole mess can be that diabolical.

Luckily when they see the same type of bad result over and over again, folks start seeing the trend, and lose trust all together.

We keep peeling back the layers, and lo-and-behold, there’s a great shift back to common sense conservative values like we’re seeing now.

mlicausi on December 7, 2011 at 5:34 PM

Wait, now O is TR? First he was Lincoln, then he was FDR, then he was Reagan. This summer he was Truman, right? They just can’t get it to stick, can they.

Maybe he could try and emulate Silent Cal next.

Firefly_76 on December 7, 2011 at 5:40 PM

Hey, I said that already!

Chip with a prog in her throat on December 7, 2011 at 4:57 PM

Hook, line and sinker.

chemman on December 7, 2011 at 5:47 PM

Firefly_76 on December 7, 2011 at 5:40 PM

Maybe Obama is channeling TR & he’s going to do to Mexico what TR did to Columbia. Create a fake crisis & a fake revolution and then carve out part of a country to make a new country to protect the business interests of your friends (and donors).

batterup on December 7, 2011 at 5:54 PM

I post that quote on every F & F thread here. Best to hear it from the horse’s….

Del Dolemonte on December 7, 2011 at 5:27 PM

Yes you do! Don’t ever let it go away either. I actually look for this post, it always brings a smile to my face.

Oldnuke on December 7, 2011 at 5:57 PM

batterup on December 7, 2011 at 5:54 PM

Yeah, but instead of something — you know, actually useful — like the Panama Canal, we’ll get a new treaty on global warming or EPA regs designed to line the pockets of his ‘green’ cronies.

Firefly_76 on December 7, 2011 at 5:59 PM

la la la, I can’t hear you
-holder

absolute scum of the earth…

cmsinaz on December 7, 2011 at 6:01 PM

The Obama Administration couldn’t successfully operate an organ grinder and monkey act.

LaserBeam on December 7, 2011 at 6:02 PM

In related news, the Obama administration is classifying the Fort Hood shooting as a “workplace shooting”:

If I didn’t know better, I would think the Obama admin. doesn’t want to remind us that the shooter was named Nidal Hasan, and shouted “Allahu Akbar” as he killed American soldiers.

/s

MidniteRambler on December 7, 2011 at 6:07 PM

How very Stalinist of this regime.

AZfederalist on December 7, 2011 at 6:14 PM

So, was the F&F project an effort to create a “mass casualty event” within the United States to generate an pretext to impact the second amendment?

“Reichstag” comes to mind. (hey, SOMEONE had to say it).

kurtzz3 on December 7, 2011 at 6:15 PM

Comment pages: 1 2