Bret Baier: Romney complained after our interview that my questions were “uncalled for”

posted at 10:14 pm on November 30, 2011 by Allahpundit

Via the Right Scoop, I encourage you to watch the interview if you missed it last night or read the transcript. Here’s the sort of “uncalled for,” out-of-left-field word grenade that Bret Baier was lobbing at poor defenseless Mitt Romney:

BAIER: About your book, you talk about Massachusetts healthcare. We’ve heard you many times, in the debates and interviews, talk about how it is different in your mind than the president’s healthcare law, Obamacare. The question is, do you still support the idea of a mandate? Do you believe that that was the right thing for Massachusetts? Do you think a mandate, mandating people to buy insurance is the right tool?

Romney’s reply: “Bret, I don’t know how many hundred times I’ve said this, too. This is an unusual interview.” Actually, if there’s any criticism to be made of Baier’s questioning, I think that’s it — not that the questions were “uncalled for” but that they were a little too called for because they cut right to the heart of conservatives’ concerns about Romney. He’s been asked this stuff a thousand times on the trail. But the repetition is inevitable and even necessary when he’s stuck at 25 percent in the polls with Iowa 34 days away. There’s a reason for that, and Baier’s giving him a chance to address it. Another example:

BAIER: Like the “Union Leader,” your critics charge that you make decisions based on political expediency and not core conviction. You have been on the both sides of some issues, and there’s videotape of you going back years, speaking about different issues, climate change, abortion, immigration, gay rights.

How can voters trust what they hear from you today is what you will believe if you win the White House?

That’s a perfect distillation of the right’s objection to Romney. How is he not supposed to ask about it? How is Romney not expecting it? What was he expecting from this interview?

Is Gingrichpalooza starting to get to Mitt? There may perhaps be but one solution, my friends.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Great, another thin-skinned guy running for the White House.

Ward Cleaver on December 1, 2011 at 4:21 PM

Who hates Mitt?

The WH did an attack ad on Mitt.

In the meantime, the NYT in the magazine and TIME magazine have already done hit pieces on Mitt. This is serious.

I guess that this means he will not get the worship and foot licking bestowed on the Demo candidate from the last election.

And wow! They actually did research!

They really want him gone.

IlikedAUH2O on December 1, 2011 at 11:16 PM

Reagan. You know, the guy who supported gun control, abortion, amnesty, and signed the law that brought us Obamacare: EMTALA.

csdeven on December 1, 2011 at 7:53 AM

This compulsion to run down Reagan’s record to make Romney look a little better is the surest sign of how NON-conservative Romney actually is. We keep seeing this cherry-picking of every time Reagan accepted a compromise from a hostile Congress to try to defend Romney’s record. We know Reagan did everything he could to promote conservative principles, and Romney didn’t. In effect, the whole argument is one big lie.

didymus on December 1, 2011 at 11:32 PM

“He was irritated by the interview.”

When Romney speaks, it’s as if he’s a robot being run by remote control from the RINO command center. He changes positions so much he gets irritated when confronted about it.

apacalyps on December 4, 2011 at 8:23 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3