CBS poll shows Obama approval on economy still falling
posted at 12:30 pm on November 12, 2011 by Ed Morrissey
If the 2012 election will be won or lost on the economy, then the latest CBS poll shows that Barack Obama will lose it — badly. His approval rating on this measure has dropped to the lowest point of his presidency in the CBS series, with only 34% approving and a stunning 60% disapproving. That’s also after more weighting shenanigans by CBS in the sample, too:
President Obama’s ratings on the the most important issue for his re-election — the economy — have posted the weakest showing of his presidency, according to a poll released Friday by CBS News.
About 60 percent of voters said they disapprove of Mr. Obama’s handling of the economy, the highest on record. Just 34 percent approve of the job he is doing on the matter.
His overall approval ratings are just 43 percent, while 47 percent disapprove of the job he is doing as president.
Among independents, just 39 percent are satisfied with his performance, while 76 percent of Democrats and 12 percent of Republicans approve of his job performance.
This comes in a weighted sample that has a six-point Democratic advantage, too. The original survey sample had a D/R/I of 31/29/40, which would have been a better approximation of relative strength among registered voters — although it would have oversampled independents a little too much at the expense of both Democrats and Republicans. Instead, CBS weighted the results for a D/R/I of 32/26/42, which made the oversampling of independents worse at the explicit expense of Republicans. Don’t forget that the 2010 turnout model from exit polls showed a D/R/I of 35/35/29, and even the 2008 election that produced a seven-point popular-vote victory for Obama only had a seven-point Democratic turnout advantage.
Even that manipulation doesn’t make the situation any rosier for Obama. On the economy, though, the sense of failure hangs like the stench coming from the Obamavilles of the Occupy movement:
There appears to be little to look forward to for Mr. Obama and his campaign team.
About 86 percent of respondents think the economy is in bad shape now with just 13 percent who see it in good shape. And just 18 percent see it getting better while 32 percent see it getting worse.
Greg Sargent has a peek at how Team Obama plans to counter, er, reality, but he also tosses a little cold water on the strategy:
So how will Obama rebut the GOP charge that he failed on the economy? I posed the question to one of Obama’s senior advisers the other day, and he acknowledged it’s a central challenge.
“You start by saying, the high unemployment rate, the inequity, these derive specifically from the policies that Rick Perry or Mitt Romney want to bring back,” the adviser replied. “So, yeah, tough times. Central cause of the tough times? What they want to bring back. The president has done a lot of things: save the auto industry, staved off the worst. We’ve had 20 straight months of private sector job creation. Why on earth would we want to go back to that nightmare?”
Obama’s advisers well know that they will have to paint an extremely vivid picture of what our economic doldrums were like in the immediate wake of GOP control of the White House, to drive home the stakes of a return to failed GOP ideas. And they intend to do that. But will voters buy the idea that electing a new Republican president means a return to old GOP ways? That argument failed in 2010. Polls suggested people didn’t associate Congressional Republicans with the former president’s failings. The difference in a presidential race is that a single candidate’s ideas receive tremendous national scrutiny, and hopefully the economy will have turned around more. But there’s no telling whether it will work this time, either.
Meanwhile, the Republican primary numbers remain in flux. Herman Cain edges into a three-point lead over both Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich, 18/15/15, but that’s more or less a statistical tie — a good sign for the recently-resurgent Gingrich. But the internals clearly favor Romney and Gingrich at this point:
Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to a new CBS News poll.
Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain by a 2-to-1 margin with 40 percent support. …
Republican voters also ranked Romney as the most qualified Republican contender to be commander-in-chief, with 26 percent support. He was followed by Gingrich, with 21 percent, and then Cain, with 11 percent.
Gingrich, meanwhile, was ranked most trustworthy in handling an international crisis, earning 31 percent support to Romney’s 15 percent.
Tonight’s debate will probably add to the struggle for Republican voters to find a candidate they can enthusiastically back. Usually that relates to how well people feel a connection on values with a particular candidate. In that case, Romney actually leads with 17% in this poll, four points ahead of Cain and almost doubling Gingrich’s 9%. Michele Bachmann edges Gingrich for third place at 10%.
Tonight’s CBS debate may clarify choices in the minds of primary voters — or may just extend the muddle.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
The study shows that over 50% of Repubs think Israel is a good ally of the US while less than 1/3 of Dems think the same way.
georgealbert on November 12, 2011 at 12:34 PM
It’s the
economy, stupidstupid Keynesian economists.itsnotaboutme on November 12, 2011 at 12:36 PM
Herman The Liberator.
Obama. The Vacationer.
Key West Reader on November 12, 2011 at 12:39 PM
I know bho and team have the msm in their pockets, but how on God’s green earth will they spin all the krap bho has done since elected? People, r’s, i’s , and d’s are hurting and worse off. Nothing bho has suggested so far is going to fix this mess before the election.
L
letget on November 12, 2011 at 12:43 PM
34%. The percentage of people who know who Obama is, but nothing else.
BobMbx on November 12, 2011 at 12:47 PM
2:1 disapproving sounds about right
Trouble with the economy issue is, the really bad stuff may not break until after the elections.
petefrt on November 12, 2011 at 12:55 PM
If the 2012 election will be won or lost on the economy, then the latest CBS poll shows that Barack Obama will lose it — badly
Never underestimate the power of a President with Executive Order power and a Limp Handshake GOP opposition in Congress.
VIVA OBAMA!!
PappyD61 on November 12, 2011 at 12:55 PM
Obamacare for one. It is in full swing by 2013.
bazil9 on November 12, 2011 at 1:05 PM
As it was the American voters that voted for the 0bama economy it now falls on them to get rid of the problem they created.
The media has recognized that the groups of people working under the TEA Party banner was most effective, so it stands to reason that people who really do care about the economy will sign on with their local chapter of the TEA Party.
IMHO, those who continue to stay home will greatly assist the 0bama regime in its efforts to steal 4 more years of deficit spending. ;o)
DannoJyd on November 12, 2011 at 1:06 PM
Obama is in the tank on the economy and the American people prefer Netanyahu to him, WINNING!!!!
Cindy Munford on November 12, 2011 at 1:14 PM
“His approval rating on this measure has dropped to the lowest point of his presidency in the CBS series, with only 34% approving and a stunning 60% disapproving.”
Just on raw numbers, that’s more approval and less disapproval than Rick Perry has.
David Blue on November 12, 2011 at 1:15 PM
Can you just imagine how annoyed Gov. Romney is? Even if he wins the nomination, what a weird way to get there.
Cindy Munford on November 12, 2011 at 1:18 PM
that comparison is forced though, more like comparing apples and oranges…Zero owns this economy, it’s all his doing (or most of it anyways), Perry has nothing to do with it…why would you poll Perry vs O on handling the economy, since Perry didn’t contribute in any way to the current state of the economy (I mean at national level anyways)…
jimver on November 12, 2011 at 1:21 PM
But, DIDN’T HE LOOK GREAT ON THAT AIRCRAFT CARRIER LAST NIGHT!!??
BTW, that would be:
“DING DING
DING DING
DING DING
DING DING
UNITED STATES, ARRIVING!”
when they bonged him on and off the ship yesterday…
Khun Joe on November 12, 2011 at 1:22 PM
If the class warfare barrage hasn’t worked yet is it ever going to?
Mark1971 on November 12, 2011 at 1:26 PM
They won’t be able to say that about Cain.
tinkerthinker on November 12, 2011 at 1:28 PM
Except that Perry’s state (and possibly Perry’s stewardship of that state did it’s level best to address the employment problem while the POTUS and THE MOOCHER vacationed, boogalooed, and generally lived high off the hog at our expense.
And don’t give me no gas about minimum wage jobs in TX. I ain’t no water-carrier for Mumbles Perry, but most of the BLS weekly/monthly stats over the last two years have been cooked with seasonal hires, strikers going back to work, McD’s 60K burger flippers, and other — er — stuff like that. Ask Ted C and AnnoyingLittleTwerp (IIRC) and others why they moved to Texas.
The War Planner on November 12, 2011 at 1:39 PM
Of course, one must understand that a good number of those who “disapprove” of Obama’s handling of the economy are also those who are very disappointed that Obama hasn’t paid off their mortgage, nor purchased them a new car, and they are being given more goodies from Uncle Sugar…and getting a job is not a priority for them.
Just because they “disapprove” of Obama does not equate to their jumping on the Tea Party bandwagon or will start sporting “Newt in 2012″ buttons.
They’ll vote again for Obama…Communism would have worked if the right people were in charge, right? If only those nasty right-wingers had allowed Obama to get the job done, everything would be wonderful.
Mindless sheep.
coldwarrior on November 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM
Wake up, boys and girls. This is the Obama campaign’s main strategy. Push bad news now, only to have the greatest comeback of all time just before the election. The Obamamedia has been briefed, and are cooperating.
“Wait, you want us to say he’s
on the economy? What?!”
“Yeah, but closer to the election you’ll start doing polls showing he’s coming back — that he was right all along!”
“Oooh. That’s good. Yeah, we are 100% on board. Just let us know when you need those other polls to start dropping. Hey, are those federal agencies in with us? Will they be dropping ‘good’ jobs data at the same time.”
“Oh, yeah. Don’t you worry about that. We’ll get the ‘data’ we need. Just make sure you cover it big when it happens.”
“No probs, bro.”
Rational Thought on November 12, 2011 at 1:50 PM
Pigs generally, and this one in particular, don’t look better no matter how much lipstick is applied.
RadClown on November 12, 2011 at 1:57 PM
They won’t be able to say that about Cain.
tinkerthinker on November 12, 2011 at 1:28 PM
Cain?…..you mean the new Secretary of Defense?
PappyD61 on November 12, 2011 at 1:58 PM
Lie, cheat and steal. Even I can figure that one out.
lynncgb on November 12, 2011 at 2:03 PM
Who the HELL are the 12% of Republicans who support Obama? Are they freaking INSANE?
Winebabe on November 12, 2011 at 2:15 PM
C-BS “Pollster”: “Who cares about facts? We don’t need no stinking facts!”
One of the “Top Comments” at the linked WaPo story:
Del Dolemonte on November 12, 2011 at 2:44 PM
Union members.
Del Dolemonte on November 12, 2011 at 2:45 PM
I believe CBS Polls about as much as I believe CBS News – which is to say, not at all.
Adjoran on November 12, 2011 at 3:00 PM
Economy, what economy? We don’t have no economy so why should I be held responsible for it? By the way what is an economy they didn’t cover that in my Ivy league classes.
chemman on November 12, 2011 at 3:04 PM
Speaking of Ivy League, Penn State wasn’t the only Ivy League school in the news this past week.
About a year ago, a dude named Adam Wheeler was sentenced to 10 years’ probation after he was bust for lying his way into, and then almost lying his way all the way thru, Harvard University.
Wednesday he was thrown back in jail-without bail-after violating his probation.
Here’s the Harvard Crimson to finish the tale:
2 “Reporters” worked on this story, but they obviously forgot to edit it.
Of course, Wheeler’s lawyer had this to say:
Poor Baby!
And here’s another angle I’d not heard before.
Yep, nothing like an Ivy League Education!
Del Dolemonte on November 12, 2011 at 4:04 PM