Video: The greatest constituent meeting ever?

posted at 8:47 pm on November 9, 2011 by Allahpundit

It’s freshman Rep. Joe Walsh of Illinois, and yes, he’s one of ours.

You know what I said in the other thread about a brokered convention? Dude, I think this might be the guy.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

You know what I said in the other thread about a brokered convention?

I didn’t catch it. Could you repeat it thirty more times in various media?

KingGold on November 9, 2011 at 8:52 PM

Is that Michelle Bachmann’s fat sister?

Lance Murdock on November 9, 2011 at 8:57 PM

I thought Four Loko was pulled off the market months ago?

cynccook on November 9, 2011 at 8:57 PM

We need a hundred Joe Walsh’s………I like this guy!

Rovin on November 9, 2011 at 8:57 PM

Can’t convince people by yelling at them.

NukeRidingCowboy on November 9, 2011 at 8:58 PM

Just what we need, a politician who is not afraid to tell those who elected him the truth.

pgrossjr on November 9, 2011 at 8:58 PM

I didn’t catch it. Could you repeat it thirty more times in various media?

KingGold on November 9, 2011 at 8:52 PM

Now, now, don’t take your Herman Cain pain out on Allah…

cynccook on November 9, 2011 at 8:58 PM

He’s a goner I think. Redistricting is forcing him into a primary with another GOP incumbent.

Mark1971 on November 9, 2011 at 8:59 PM

Now, now, don’t take your Herman Cain pain out on Allah…

cynccook on November 9, 2011 at 8:58 PM

Pardon? I’m having fun with him. He’s continuously harping on this brokered convention idea.

KingGold on November 9, 2011 at 8:59 PM

He was pretty good on The Eagles. I wonder how he could stand being around Don Henley?

Andy in Colorado on November 9, 2011 at 8:59 PM

He likes big t!ts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ET7wb651VFI

Mark1971 on November 9, 2011 at 9:01 PM

Behaves like a liberal.

MadisonConservative on November 9, 2011 at 9:01 PM

ROFL

I like this guy.

Bishop on November 9, 2011 at 9:01 PM

Any politician willing to scream at a middle-aged gal in a Canadian tuxedo is ok by me. Joe Walsh: 2012′s Joe Wilson!

elcapt on November 9, 2011 at 9:03 PM

I’m sticking with Newtie … but Joe could share some of that fire with a few of our GOP candidates.

MeatHeadinCA on November 9, 2011 at 9:03 PM

Can’t convince people by yelling at them.

NukeRidingCowboy

Try telling Ace that.

chimney sweep on November 9, 2011 at 9:03 PM

Behaves like a liberal.

MadisonConservative on November 9, 2011 at 9:01 PM

I didn’t see him spitting on anyone, choking anyone, hitting anyone, or any of the standard liberal go-to’s when losing a debate.

MeatHeadinCA on November 9, 2011 at 9:04 PM

Hmmmm….having now watched the entire, excruciating video I’m really surprised this didn’t end up coming to blows. I think that lady could have really hurt him if she’d needed to.

cynccook on November 9, 2011 at 9:04 PM

Sorry but how exactly did we go from hating the banks and their shenanigans that led to the bailouts to passing all the blame to Congress in just a few years? Yeah, Congress screwed up. You know when? When they worked with Clinton to remove regulation from these crooked banks.

I’m all for getting government out of the way provided it does more good to do so. The banks have proven they can’t be trusted. Give them an inch and they take a mile. Just look at what Bank of America has been pulling lately. You’re telling me we need less regulation over these crooks?

Benaiah on November 9, 2011 at 9:05 PM

Hmmmm….having now watched the entire, excruciating video I’m really surprised this didn’t end up coming to blows. I think that lady could have really hurt him if she’d needed to.

cynccook on November 9, 2011 at 9:04 PM

Naw… he was letting off some steam and I got the feeling they were more comfortable with each other than we may know.

MeatHeadinCA on November 9, 2011 at 9:06 PM

The government undoubtedly played a huge role in the mortgage crisis with its policies encouraging unrealistic home ownership. But it is unbelievable that anyone with knowledge about the crisis could fail to also blame the banks. They got huge fees to make as many predatory and subprime loans as possible, then passed of the risk in the secondary mortgage market. Investors in mortgage-backed securities relied on ratings agencies in assessing their risk… those agencies were paid by the banks, a clear conflict of interest. The banks engaged in very bad behavior by taking fees for loans they knew could never be repaid, then passing on the risk to someone else. There is plenty of blame to go around in this crisis; just because you don’t want to ignore the role of big government doesn’t mean you have to accept the notion that the financial world was blameless.

IU_Conservative on November 9, 2011 at 9:07 PM

Yeah, Congress screwed up. You know when? When they worked with Clinton to remove regulation from these crooked banks.

*scratches head

Fannie and Freddie were created because regulations were removed?

MeatHeadinCA on November 9, 2011 at 9:07 PM

Old liberals will vote for him because they’ll think he’s the Joe Walsh from the Eagles.

radjah shelduck on November 9, 2011 at 9:08 PM

*scratches head

Fannie and Freddie were created because regulations were removed?

MeatHeadinCA

Do some research on the repeal of Glass-Steagall.

Benaiah on November 9, 2011 at 9:10 PM

Naw… he was letting off some steam and I got the feeling they were more comfortable with each other than we may know.

MeatHeadinCA on November 9, 2011 at 9:06 PM

Mmmmkay. My take was more like he was being belligerent and antagonistic toward people who were being unbelievably tolerant. They were indulging him like you do a crazy person or a drunk.

cynccook on November 9, 2011 at 9:10 PM

Santelli!

Mark1971 on November 9, 2011 at 9:11 PM

Try telling Ace that.

chimney sweep on November 9, 2011 at 9:03 PM

It can be fun for the faithful, but how many converts has he racked up?

NukeRidingCowboy on November 9, 2011 at 9:12 PM

Do some research on the repeal of Glass-Steagall.

Benaiah on November 9, 2011 at 9:10 PM

The research I’ve done has shown that corruption is rewarded when gov’t and business get in bed together.

MeatHeadinCA on November 9, 2011 at 9:12 PM

The research I’ve done has shown that corruption is rewarded when gov’t and business get in bed together.

MeatHeadinCA on November 9, 2011 at 9:12 PM

And on occasion, several times in one night!

cynccook on November 9, 2011 at 9:14 PM

“You worked with Ted Kennedy…”

Eat it, Mitt.

beatcanvas on November 9, 2011 at 9:14 PM

I’m very glad for Joe’s passion but the idea is to make the trolling liberal mad as hell.

Speakup on November 9, 2011 at 9:15 PM

This guy’s a jackass. Shouting at people does not persuade them. And it may cause you to lose support amongst the undecided, who will assume that you are shouting because you can’t reason. can’t explain, can’t persuade.

The fact that I may agree with almost everything he said doesn’t change that.

And, frankly, I have the same problem with Chris Christie at times.

Blunt is good.
Direct is good.
Honest is good.
Shouting? Not.

SwampYankee on November 9, 2011 at 9:16 PM

MeatHeadinCA on November 9, 2011 at 9:12 PM

Just go ahead and say repealing Glass-Steagall was a giant mistake. Your walking around the notion is just silly. Cmon, Gingrich admitted it, just admit it.

ernesto on November 9, 2011 at 9:16 PM

Behaves like a liberal.

MadisonConservative on November 9, 2011 at 9:01 PM

Yes. I don’t get the appeal. I should like it because I agree with the sentiment? If he shouted at me while waving his fingers in my face, he’d pull back a bloody stump.

Ronnie on November 9, 2011 at 9:17 PM

Perry is dying…

beatcanvas on November 9, 2011 at 9:17 PM

Mmmmkay. My take was more like he was being belligerent and antagonistic toward people who were being unbelievably tolerant. They were indulging him like you do a crazy person or a drunk.

cynccook on November 9, 2011 at 9:10 PM

Eh, we might both be right, then. From what I’ve seen of Walsh in the past, I’m not surprised by this. Definitely not going to be bringing any new sheep into the fold, though.

MeatHeadinCA on November 9, 2011 at 9:17 PM

Just go ahead and say repealing Glass-Steagall was a giant mistake. Your walking around the notion is just silly. Cmon, Gingrich admitted it, just admit it.

ernesto on November 9, 2011 at 9:16 PM

Rar. I guess you’re feeling butt hurt (again). Sorry, ernie … not going to give meaning to your life or something by “just admitting” it. Gotta run for now. I’m sure someone here will play with you, tonight.

MeatHeadinCA on November 9, 2011 at 9:20 PM

Behaves like a liberal.

MadisonConservative on November 9, 2011 at 9:01 PM

I wouldn’t go that far, though I’d agree this isn’t OK. For the most part he sounds like I do after an hour of being polite with my socialist half truther friend. It’s not OK, and I should do better, and I expect even more of a politician, especially one in elected office; however, he sounds more exasperated than someone truly interested in shutting down public debate. That could entirely be my bias, but he isn’t calling names and does actually listen for a second when people disagree. He just sounds like someone who’s heard these arguments too often.

Esthier on November 9, 2011 at 9:20 PM

The research I’ve done has shown that corruption is rewarded when gov’t and business get in bed together.

MeatHeadinCA

Which is exactly what happened with the repeal of Glass-Steagall. It was done by a Congress and President that were bought off by the banks because the banks could bend us over and have their way with us with it gone.

The same reason, for instance, that NAFTA was supported and passed by both parties. Big corporations paid off our elected officials so they could start moving their jobs to countries with cheaper labor. It’s too bad there wasn’t some third party candidate who was warning us about that around 20 years ago. Oh wait…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rkgx1C_S6ls

Benaiah on November 9, 2011 at 9:22 PM

Blunt is good.
Direct is good.
Honest is good.
Shouting? Not.

SwampYankee on November 9, 2011 at 9:16 PM

Agreed, but if you’re doing any of the first three and truly care, then I imagine it’s easy to cross into the last one. You shouldn’t if you’re a professional, but if he apologizes and just admits he’d got carried away but shouldn’t have, I’d believe him.

Esthier on November 9, 2011 at 9:24 PM

He pointed out that his “Cup of Joe with Joe” events are “always passionate, spirited affairs” but admitted he might have gone a bit far.

“Did I go over the line on Sunday? Yeah, but I think in general most people find it refreshing that a congressman is so accessible,” he said.

Cavuto asked whether Walsh thought his actions might contribute to the image of the Tea Party as a bunch of “over-caffeinated freaks.”

“There is no doubt Neil that I was a bit too wound up at this one,” he said, pointing out that his events always allow others to express differing opinions.

cynccook on November 9, 2011 at 9:40 PM

Can’t convince people by yelling at them.

NukeRidingCowboy on November 9, 2011 at 8:58 PM

I agree, but frustration levels are at an all time high.
If only the MEDIA would start reporting this stuff. Instead
they repeat the DNC talking points which completely brainwashes people.

Only the people that have critical thinking skills… will ‘get it’.

ooonaughtykitty on November 9, 2011 at 9:41 PM

Send this guy to Zuccotti Park with a coffee urn and a few dozen glazed donuts.

The Ugly American on November 9, 2011 at 9:54 PM

Send this guy to Zuccotti Park with a coffee urn and a few dozen glazed donuts.

The Ugly American on November 9, 2011 at 9:54 PM

LOL!!! Perfect!

cynccook on November 9, 2011 at 9:56 PM

Go Joe!

JellyToast on November 9, 2011 at 9:58 PM

Bravo. . . .Rep. Joe Walsh of Illinois.

Shake-em up. Some in that group have no more
sense of how the market woeks than the Occupiers at Wall St

Texyank on November 9, 2011 at 9:58 PM

Sorry but how exactly did we go from hating the banks and their shenanigans that led to the bailouts to passing all the blame to Congress in just a few years? Yeah, Congress screwed up. You know when? When they worked with Clinton to remove regulation from these crooked banks.

I’m all for getting government out of the way provided it does more good to do so. The banks have proven they can’t be trusted. Give them an inch and they take a mile. Just look at what Bank of America has been pulling lately. You’re telling me we need less regulation over these crooks?

Benaiah on November 9, 2011 at 9:05 PM

Ah, look – someone’s gotten the DNC talking points memo and is working it over as hard as they can. LOL

Midas on November 9, 2011 at 10:00 PM

Can’t convince people by yelling at them.

NukeRidingCowboy on November 9, 2011 at 8:58 PM

Talking nice to them hasn’t been working either, so… screw it.

Midas on November 9, 2011 at 10:01 PM

Maybe it is a good idea to have these conversations in a bar…

/

Seven Percent Solution on November 9, 2011 at 10:02 PM

Ah, look – someone’s gotten the DNC talking points memo and is working it over as hard as they can. LOL

Midas

Or, ya know, just using common sense. Which kind of proves I’m not a liberal.

Benaiah on November 9, 2011 at 10:06 PM

Unfortunately, the Dems redistricting in Illinois put Joe Walsh against another Republican freshman, and the establishment Republicans (who also support Romney *gag*) in the 14th district are working against Joe. I adore him.

Fallon on November 9, 2011 at 10:06 PM

Walsh 2012

Send me the bumper sticker.

mankai on November 9, 2011 at 10:07 PM

Ah, the same guy who owes over 100k in child support?.

Rainsford on November 9, 2011 at 10:11 PM

As an Illinois resident I am indifferent to Walsh, don’t know much about him, but I can tell you that our local Left-wing bloggers are consumed and obsessed with everything he does/says on a daily basis.

visions on November 9, 2011 at 10:14 PM

If we got rid of “winner take all” primary elections, maybe we would have a convention that means something.

crosspatch on November 9, 2011 at 10:19 PM

Rainsford on November 9, 2011 at 10:11 PM

His ex-wife is a trial lawyer playing political games but believe what you want.

Fallon on November 9, 2011 at 10:19 PM

That sure looks like Ed Schultz back there on the barstool.

mrt721 on November 9, 2011 at 10:41 PM

Do some research on the repeal of Glass-Steagall.

Benaiah

Maybe you should do some research on Glass-Steagall.

xblade on November 9, 2011 at 10:50 PM

His ex-wife is a trial lawyer playing political games but believe what you want.

Fallon on November 9, 2011 at 10:19 PM

Sexual harassment is ok if your victim is poor and not paying child support is ok if your wife is a lawyer? A winning message.

Rainsford on November 9, 2011 at 10:56 PM

GOP’s monthly rockstar.

Crusty on November 9, 2011 at 11:07 PM

Daaaaa Bears !!

Hummer53 on November 9, 2011 at 11:26 PM

Behaves like a liberal.

MadisonConservative on November 9, 2011 at 9:01 PM

Where is the clip of him throwing urine and feces at people while screaming racist/anti-Semitic remarks?

The Notorious G.O.P on November 9, 2011 at 11:30 PM

That’s my congressman. I also made phone calls and canvassed for him. I think he won by less than 200 votes. Unfortunately, I am not in his district next time around.

Bill C on November 9, 2011 at 11:46 PM

Benaiah on November 9, 2011 at 9:05 PM

Listen closely. The banks used to have a policy called redlining. That means they would draw a red line around areas they did not want to lend because they thought it was too risky. The Democrats started using Alinsky tactics on them threatening the banks if they did not lend in those areas. To facilitate the lending Fannie and Freddie started buying up sub-prime mortgages and securitizing them. Securitizing means they are turned into bond-like instruments some of which were sold and some of which where held on the books of the stupider banks.

Remember the housing crisis started as the sub-prime crisis. No forced lending and securitizing and there would have been no housing bubble.

Bill C on November 9, 2011 at 11:51 PM

The same reason, for instance, that NAFTA was supported and passed by both parties. Big corporations paid off our elected officials so they could start moving their jobs to countries with cheaper labor. It’s too bad there wasn’t some third party candidate who was warning us about that around 20 years ago. Oh wait…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rkgx1C_S6ls

Benaiah on November 9, 2011 at 9:22 PM

God knows we all remember those horrible years after NAFTA was passed. The sky rocketing unemployment, high unemploy…oh yeah, that didn’t happen. What is there some kind of time delay on job losses caused by free trade agreements?

Bill C on November 9, 2011 at 11:53 PM

Was Mark Levine his debating coach?

NNtrancer on November 9, 2011 at 11:59 PM

He’s ok by me, but I’ll be damned if I’m going to see another Illinois freshman get elected president.

Scribbler on November 10, 2011 at 12:26 AM

Bears watching.

Just remember what happened the last time a dark horse came galloping out of the shadows.

Clinton.

Oh, and the time before that?

Carter.

Yeah there was that Reagan guy in between who also came outta nowhere. But he’d paid serious dues for a few decades before. Spent time in the wilderness, to use a Biblical turn of phrase.

skydaddy on November 10, 2011 at 1:08 AM

To facilitate the lending Fannie and Freddie started buying up sub-prime mortgages and securitizing them. Securitizing means they are turned into bond-like instruments some of which were sold and some of which where held on the books of the stupider banks.

Remember the housing crisis started as the sub-prime crisis. No forced lending and securitizing and there would have been no housing bubble.

Bill C on November 9, 2011 at 11:51 PM

It’s late and I can’t sleep.

Yes, I agree. The system worked 70 years until the politicians figured out they could use Fannie and Freddie to further their political goals. The only way to cure this is to privitize Fannie and Freddie, that system is now broken.

Oil Can on November 10, 2011 at 4:01 AM

Man, I feel his frustration.

Far too many people that instinctively identify with conservatives are clogging up our political capital with their MSM induced understanding of the fundamental problem.

That said, he needs to redirect his passion into developing simple models of persuasive logic to exorcise these folks and get them to be able to explain it themselves.

Saltysam on November 10, 2011 at 6:38 AM

Was Mark Levine his debating coach?

NNtrancer on November 9, 2011 at 11:59 PM

Levin is passionate, yes, but he also knows how to break down concepts into bites that people can swallow.

So, NO.

Saltysam on November 10, 2011 at 6:40 AM

I got that Chris Matthews tingle down my leg watching this!

ConservativeMom on November 10, 2011 at 6:41 AM

That’s my congressman! Gosh, it feels good to say that after too many years of it being Melissa Bean-o :)

Aslans Girl on November 10, 2011 at 7:15 AM

What? A Repub with conviction? How can that be?

Get ‘em, Joe. More like him would be a good thing.

petefrt on November 10, 2011 at 7:21 AM

Bill C on November 9, 2011 at 11:46 PM

Me neither. What’s the word on the lawsuit that was filed to fight the redistricting? Anyway, he said he’d run for the 14th district, but I really wish he’d chosen the 8th (since the 14th already has a GOP Rep). No Republican has announced a run yet for the 8th as far as I know.

Aslans Girl on November 10, 2011 at 7:28 AM

I think I’m in love.

blue13326 on November 10, 2011 at 7:40 AM

Eh. Sorry Allah, but this one didn’t ring the bell. Too loud and too annoying. All it made me do was think of how much I prefer Newt and his calm, cool, sardonic demeanor.

fossten on November 10, 2011 at 7:48 AM

I know everybody is concentrating on what the guy is saying but what I really enjoyed is the body language of those in attendance. You did not see the young lady flinch or recoil when the representative continued talking loudly. Several times he was referred to as Joe. This means that this guy makes himself accessible to his constituents on a regular basis. They are comfortable around him and know how he acts. Wish my representative was that way. I just assumed he continued in a loud voice to make sure he was heard in all corners of the bldg.

Just A Grunt on November 10, 2011 at 7:50 AM

LOL at some of the comments here. If you aren’t screaming mad then you don’t get what’s happening. It’s 1932 and we’re all about to get raped in the shower…

blue13326 on November 10, 2011 at 8:03 AM

As much as ya’ll love him – he is a bit too agressive, namely with a woman for me.

Notice her first instinct is to smile… thats a nervous tick.

He then yells over her about “Dodd-Frank”… ah yeah – I am sure less than 1 person know what that is.

I like the concept of a fight – just came off a little creepy and aggressive. If that was my wife – the Rep would have had a time out.

Odie1941 on November 10, 2011 at 8:33 AM

Talking nice to them hasn’t been working either, so… screw it.

Midas on November 9, 2011 at 10:01 PM

How do you know? Everyone on the right had to be convinced at some point in time, and it probably wasn’t by an obnoxious screaming maniac. Yeah, we’re not going to convince the far left. God himself could appear to them and say, “Your ideology is garbage” and they would respond, “Well, obviously you don’t care about people like I do. Racist.” For them, we can only hope they’ll be mugged by reality at some point down the road, but for undecideds and low-information voters, sure, we can convince them. To calmly make a point like “Canada hasn’t had an equivalent of Glass-Steagall since 1987 and their housing market didn’t go boom and bust. Here’s why…” would be much more effective.

NukeRidingCowboy on November 10, 2011 at 9:48 AM

Rainsford on November 9, 2011 at 10:56 PM

So, you don’t think trial lawyers or people with money problems lie? Everybody lies.

Fallon on November 10, 2011 at 9:54 AM

I’ve had this exact conversation with some of my liberal and independent friends. Only difference is I used the “f” word liberally throughout my screed.

ButterflyDragon on November 10, 2011 at 10:00 AM

Talking nice to them hasn’t been working either, so… screw it.

Midas on November 9, 2011 at 10:01 PM

It’s 20 years past time to give them a taste of their own medicine, and there’s no better time like the Now.

Headlines from a “passionate” Rep. Joe Walsh meeting with constituents as reported by a leftard:

Video Captures Tea Party Congressman Joe Walsh Ranting, Raving, Screaming In Lady’s Face

Headlines from a “compassionate” Rep. Joe Walsh meeting with constituents as reported by a progressive:

Video Captures Tea Party Congressman Joe Walsh Ranting, Raving, Screaming In Lady’s Face

Yeah, playing nice and taking the high-road works… NOT

Roy Rogers on November 10, 2011 at 10:01 AM

Joe is my Rep. and I really like him. He’s had so many town halls, that most of the people that attend them (and do so often) are very comfortable with him. This vid is no big deal.

He’ll be sent to do battle in the new 14th dist. with Rep. Randy Hultgren.

Meanwhile, those of us in the 8th dist. can choose between Democrat Tammy Duckworth (does she ever go away?) who is Axelrod’s pet, and Republican Raja Krishnamoorthi.

I give up.

Tharn on November 10, 2011 at 10:14 AM

“There is no doubt Neil that I was a bit too wound up at this one,” he said, pointing out that his events always allow others to express differing opinions.”

Funny, my take on it from 1:59 is that expressing a different opinion gets “Quiet for a minute” yelled at you repeatedly, followed by “or I’m going to ask you to leave.”

Way to engage an argument, Joe.

VekTor on November 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM

Flailing away in her face makes him look insane. Points are good… but back away from peoples faces…
-

RalphyBoy on November 10, 2011 at 12:35 PM

He who raises his voice first loses.

Pablo Snooze on November 10, 2011 at 2:28 PM

Listen closely. The banks used to have a policy called redlining. That means they would draw a red line around areas they did not want to lend because they thought it was too risky. The Democrats started using Alinsky tactics on them threatening the banks if they did not lend in those areas. To facilitate the lending Fannie and Freddie started buying up sub-prime mortgages and securitizing them. Securitizing means they are turned into bond-like instruments some of which were sold and some of which where held on the books of the stupider banks.

Remember the housing crisis started as the sub-prime crisis. No forced lending and securitizing and there would have been no housing bubble.

Bill C

Listen closely, we are talking about two separate but related issues here. Yes, Fannie and Freddie were a huge part of the crash but so was the fact that the removal of Glass-Steagall allowed banks to merge two sides of banking that should never have been allowed to mix. Those being regular commercial banking and investment banking. That’s a big reason why the banks had such a mess on their hands over housing.

So Fannie and Freddie were more the cause of the crash and the removal of Glass-Steagall made the crash worse than it would have been.

Benaiah on November 10, 2011 at 4:36 PM

When the Congress pressured the banks to grant loans to people who didn’t have a clue as to how they were expected to pay the mortgage it became a problem for the banks that Congress ignored. Maybe some of you out there remember the Savings and Loan scandal years ago that allowed Congressman to get interest free loans and we the tax payers were billed with the bail out that amounted to many millions.

mixplix on November 10, 2011 at 6:59 PM

DAMN STRAIGHT!!! I too am tired of the brain dead selective logic diseased mindset parroting the typical OWS banksters propaganda. If the Republican National Committee purchased the rights to the YOUTUBE video “Burning Down The House: What Caused Our Economic Crisis?” and updated it and spent all their Presidential campaign money running this constantly the 2012 election would be a Republican landslide. This documented account of the PUBLIC RECORD leaves no doubt who the culprits and criminals are. Every conservative blog should be featuring this!!!

wtng2fish on November 10, 2011 at 8:21 PM