Quotes of the day
posted at 10:48 pm on November 8, 2011 by Allahpundit
“It is striking to me that in 2012 there is broad based popular angst against Wall Street and Washington and the Republican Party is on the verge of nominating a multi-millionaire scion of the Rockefeller Wing of the Republican Party whose closest encounters with the common man are accidentally touching one of the many hired hands in one of the many rooms of one of his many mansions. But then many of the DC-NYC Republican ‘conservatives’ who support Romney are the same, only coming into contact with regular people when they are served their breakfast by a steward in the first class car on the Acela Express.
“Neither Romney nor the Washington GOP crowd who loves him have very much at all in common with fly over country conservatives who see the GOP and Democrats both as out to lunch tools of K-Street and Wall Street. The party that could lead a conservative, populist campaign against Wall Street and Barack Obama, the former getting fat off the latter, will instead nominate a guy more at home on Wall Street than Main Street.
“And enough conservatives will be cheerleaders and rally around him that by November of 2012 the ideological underpinnings of the modern American conservative movement will be coming apart.
“I’m starting to think I need to walk it back on my rejection of Jon Huntsman. Because I’m starting to think even he would be more faithful in his conservative convictions than Mitt Romney.”
“Newt Gingrich’s rise in the polls—from near zero to the third slot in several polls—should come as no surprise to people who have been watching the Republican debates, now drawing television viewers as never before. The former speaker has stood out at these forums, the debater whose audiences seem to hang on his words and on a flow of thought rich in substance, a world apart from the usual that the political season brings.
“‘Substance’ is too cold a word, perhaps, for the intense feeling that candidate Gingrich delivers so coolly in debates. Too cold too, no doubt, to describe the reactions of his listeners, visible on the faces of the crowds attending these forums—in their expressions, caught on C-SPAN’s cameras, in the speed with which their desultory politeness disappears once a Gingrich talk begins. Their disengagement—the tendency to look around the room, chat with their neighbors—vanishes. The room is on high alert…
“Whoever his competitors are in Iowa and beyond, Mr. Gingrich faces a hard fight for the nomination. His greatest asset lies in his capacity to speak to Americans as he has done, with such potency, during the Republican debates. No candidate in the field comes close to his talent for connection. There’s no underestimating the importance of such a power in the presidential election ahead, or any other one.
“His rise in the polls suggests that more and more Republicans are absorbing that fact, along with the possibility that Mr. Gingrich’s qualifications all ’round could well make him the most formidable contender for the contest with Barack Obama.”
“Gingrich often says he is running an unconventional campaign. Republicans here in Iowa would probably agree, since they don’t see him all that much at traditional stump events. But most have no idea just how unconventional the Gingrich campaign really is.
“On this day, Gingrich’s plan is to integrate his longtime interest in health issues, and in particular brain research, into his appeal to voters. In an interview after the session, Gingrich says he wants to reach ‘everybody who’s worried about Alzheimer’s — and over 55 years of age, it is a more common fear than cancer.’ Here in Iowa, the organization Iowa Against Alzheimer’s estimates there are 69,000 people over the age of 65 with the disease. Take their spouses and children and relatives and friends, and add other people so far unaffected by the disease but worried about it — take all of them, and you’ve got a very large group. They vote, and Gingrich wants to reach them…
“Whatever Gingrich is doing these days, it’s working. Thanks in part to impressive performances in several GOP debates, he is moving up in the polls, both nationally and in key early states. He’s raising money again after a meltdown — a massive staff defection and damaging stories about big-spending habits at Tiffany — that nearly killed his campaign a few months ago. And voters appear to appreciate his sticking with it. In discussions across Iowa in the last week, it is striking how many voters volunteer Gingrich’s name as someone they’re finding more and more appealing. If either of the current frontrunners, Herman Cain or Mitt Romney, were to falter, Gingrich is in a position to benefit greatly.
“And he’s doing it his own way. What other candidate would take a large part of a critical day to talk science when the campaign trail beckons, with local officials to meet and hands to shake? ‘We’ll see if it works,’ Gingrich says with a laugh. ‘It’s a great experiment.’”
Click the image to watch.
Via the Daily Caller.
“Yes RT @pahana2 @Bret_Baier Is it true that Gov. Romney has declined the invite to Center Seat?”










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
The Fray – Over My Head (Cable Car)
carbon_footprint on November 8, 2011 at 11:42 PM
Great QOTD.
Gingrich and Romney represent extremes not of politics but of certain qualities of political personality, mainly engagement and risk. Gingrich engages and embraces the risk, avoids it whenever he can, minimizes it when he can’t. Romney is anal, Gingrich is oral, Romney a dam, Gingrich a river. Romney skitters away from conflict, Gingrich simply stumbles into it in pursuit of his point. Faced with the conflict, Romney unravels quickly as he plays out his well-rehearsed one-two punches; Gingrich is a nimble improviser whose energy coheres in the clutch. At his best in conflict, he’s a mongoose around the cobra. Romney’s cheerfulness is a brittle and one-note affect, a strenuous impersonation of Reagan “sunniness” which invariably wears thin exposing the insecure petulance just beneath it. Gingrich is more naturally merry (though he does at times seem to want overcompensate for his lethal wit with a daffy smile).
Romney is caution and calculation. Gingrich profusion and profundity.
I’d say Romney fears Gingrich, but Romney fears everybody, including himself. That’s why he didn’t win in 2008, and why he won’t win in 2012.
rrpjr on November 8, 2011 at 11:43 PM
I agree..It is out of control..:(
Dire Straits on November 8, 2011 at 11:44 PM
Steve Morse plays his ode to Ohio public employee unions.
John the Libertarian on November 8, 2011 at 11:45 PM
*Gasp!* Dr. Lecter…
Punchenko on November 8, 2011 at 11:45 PM
The GOP will betray you
True_King on November 8, 2011 at 11:46 PM
rrpjr on November 8, 2011 at 11:43 PM
Great description. My favorite line:
Romney’s cheerfulness is a brittle and one-note affect, a strenuous impersonation of Reagan “sunniness” which invariably wears thin exposing the insecure petulance just beneath it
KickandSwimMom on November 8, 2011 at 11:47 PM
Swan song.
Radiohead – Street Spirit (Fade Out)
carbon_footprint on November 8, 2011 at 11:49 PM
Wow. Sexy song!
John the Libertarian on November 8, 2011 at 11:50 PM
Ditto.
Punchenko on November 8, 2011 at 11:52 PM
LoL..Perfect..:)
Dire Straits on November 8, 2011 at 11:53 PM
Foghat serenades the delicate flower, Sharon Beilack.
John the Libertarian on November 8, 2011 at 11:53 PM
Erick Erickson….MORON.
csdeven on November 8, 2011 at 11:55 PM
I can hear them now…Seperation of church and state!
tmontgomery on November 8, 2011 at 11:55 PM
It’s time for Herman to call for a Chic Summit.
Or it’s going to end like this.
SlaveDog on November 9, 2011 at 12:00 AM
Really?
THAT is what the dopes at RedState got out of this?
Huntsman is the answer?
Logic throws them a hanging curve and they STILL whiff.
Let’s take a look at the GOP field…
The Massachusetts Bagel (doughy with a big hole in his moral center)
The Minnesota Croissant (extra flaky)
The Atlanta Pizza (deep dish or deep s!@#?)
Texas Toast (I’m savoring the Perrybots agony…)
Utah White Bread (although actual dry white bread out-polls Huntsman in ability to generate interest…)
The Paulnut Log (extra nutty, just in time for the holidays and Iran’s first nuclear bomb test!)
Newt Loops…Breakfast of Champions?
That’s quite a spread the GOP’s laid out for us, ain’t it?/
SuperCool on November 9, 2011 at 12:03 AM
Calista might not have been his only side dish. Who knows.
lorien1973 on November 9, 2011 at 12:09 AM
LoL!..I just wish this would stop..:)
Dire Straits on November 9, 2011 at 12:11 AM
That Huntsman video is awesome. I am thinking even that guy looks better than Romney. Sad state of affairs.
antisocial on November 9, 2011 at 12:18 AM
Newt Gingrich Herman Cain Debate Transcript,
Video
Nov 8 2011
**********
The following is the actual transcript from last weeks debate between Newt Gingrich and Herman Cain.
======================================
http://www.maggiesnotebook.com/2011/11/newt-gingrich-herman-cain-debate-transcript-video/
canopfor on November 9, 2011 at 12:19 AM
Vote Obama and get Benito Mussolini, King Louie, Joe Izzusu and Bozo the Clown all in one package.
InkyBinkyBarleyBoo on November 9, 2011 at 12:20 AM
OK, Newtie, you got me on your filthy couch. Now don’t make me regret it.
MeatHeadinCA on November 9, 2011 at 12:22 AM
Me too. The amateurism of Herman Cain and Mark Block are occupying space that could be better used to discuss Eric Holder’s latest round duplicitous statements and Obama’s new Christmas Tree Tax.
SlaveDog on November 9, 2011 at 12:25 AM
Yeah, but if Newt is getting on the side now he is definitely paying for it. :-)
Punchenko on November 9, 2011 at 12:28 AM
You can sit next to me. :-D
Punchenko on November 9, 2011 at 12:28 AM
So we’re rejecting the current RealConservative™ over allegations of adulterous behavior… for a known adulterer, all because the front runner is just that bad.
Why are we even spending money on 2012?
spmat on November 9, 2011 at 12:28 AM
Woow, you are a fickle lot.
promachus on November 9, 2011 at 12:33 AM
Great punchline! Jon Huntsman for President? He’d be a much better “Romney” than Romney, but then I’ll just end up voting for the most likely not-Huntsman.
Gingrich is looking increasingly sweet as Cain falters because of what increasingly looks like an unfortunate pattern of behavior which is making it increasingly difficult to overlook Cain’s shortcomings.
Herman was never a solid candidate, but he offered potential to attract and win the middle, even to attract and win a significant portion of the black vote (Democrats). If these advantages are to be lost, then on to Gingrich. Watch, wait, and see for the moment.
Though if Cain must go, I hope every woman he ever offended (allegedly) gets together for a group photo and story swap. Just do it and get it over with so we can get back to electing a President.
exdeadhead on November 9, 2011 at 12:43 AM
This guy says he had sex with Obama in the back of a limo…
ramrants on November 9, 2011 at 12:48 AM
Gingrich and Perry. Pick one.
Bill C on November 9, 2011 at 12:48 AM
I think a lot of folks are missing the REAL point re Herman Cain:
Watch out for female lobbyists. This seems to be a pattern and I wonder how many legislators have been threatened with accusations.
MaggiePoo on November 9, 2011 at 12:51 AM
Any R candidate who is not fatally flawed with major moral baggage can beat Captain 9% Unemployment.
There ain’t many left.
As long as this isn’t their campaign theme song they have a chance to knock out Barry the Lightweight.
profitsbeard on November 9, 2011 at 12:53 AM
Huh? Fickle because I’m not sure about Newt’s Couch?
MeatHeadinCA on November 9, 2011 at 12:53 AM
Check out the Daily Caller clip above.
John the Libertarian on November 9, 2011 at 12:56 AM
I’m on board the Newt train as of a few days ago, though I think Romney would beat Obama as well.
nickj116 on November 9, 2011 at 12:56 AM
As someone said here earlier, Newt should torch that couch for a commercial.
Anyway, my big problem with Newt is I want him to be my second choice; that is, I’m not convinced he is the leader we really need but more a policy wonk influencing the leader we need.
But, you can’t be too picky. He seems to know how to handle the media a tad better than Herman (who has more charisma).
MeatHeadinCA on November 9, 2011 at 1:02 AM
Wow a Christmas Tree Tax?!?! Whiskey..Tango..Foxtrot..:(
Dire Straits on November 9, 2011 at 1:12 AM
Well, one benefit from all of this stuff about Cain is that the debate should have a huge audience. Hope the candidates are up to it.
Vince on November 9, 2011 at 1:43 AM
Of course he will. He always does (calling Ryan’s plan “right-wing engineering”) and then it will be back to Perry.
-Aslan’s Girl
Aslans Girl on November 9, 2011 at 2:03 AM
O/T
====
Anyone Catch This??!!
++++++++++++++++++++
Video: Happy Go-Lucky Sharon Bialek Moments Before Life-Changing Press Conference
November 9, 2011
*****************
*****************
This is interesting. Via the Bulletproof Patriot, here’s video of Sharon Bialek and her attorney, Gloria Allred, moments before Bialek came out and publicly accused presidential candidate Herman Cain of sexual assault. My, how chipper she looked. At least until the attorney shut her up.
If we’re hearing this correctly, the incredibly emotionally distraught Bialek looks to be bubbly and receptive to comments from the press, responding to one reporter’s question regarding her hair with, “I just got it done!” before being quieted by her attorney, Gloria Allred. This, of course, proves nothing other than she was primping for her press conference. Most people probably would. Of course, most people would also press charges if they were assaulted in the way Bialek claims. They would have also more than likely mentioned the prior “harassment” to their father and fiance when Cain was first publicly accused (e.g… “I can’t believe that SOB is on television lying his face off about those other women – he harassed me, too, back in the 90′s – I’m going to go put him in his place.”)
===========================
http://lonelyconservative.com/2011/11/video-happy-go-lucky-sharon-bialek-moments-before-life-changing-press-conference/
canopfor on November 9, 2011 at 2:01 AM
canopfor on November 9, 2011 at 2:06 AM
Is she still supposed to traumatized by something that happened 14 years ago?
sharrukin on November 9, 2011 at 2:12 AM
I listened to Gingrich on the 6 pm foxnews channel show Tuesady night. He admitted he was completely stupid to sit on that couch with pelosi. He began to tell us why he regretted it but ended up laughing at himself and then everyone moved on to something else. Well at least he admitted he had a complete brain fart at that time.
karenhasfreedom on November 9, 2011 at 3:25 AM
Sigh… I see Romney’s plan C (promote Gingrich as the Anybody-but-Perry should Cain falter) is in operation.
Make my day… I give Gingrich a maximum of two weeks. Yep, his baggage is that bad. And no media hype is going to overcome that.
I must confess that Perry is looking better and better everyday – positioned in the right spot and primed to surge just in time for when voting begins. :)
TheRightMan on November 9, 2011 at 5:19 AM
just had to switch over to morning joe didn’t i
the entire crew gloating about the ohio victory…
cmsinaz on November 9, 2011 at 6:09 AM
wow, tMJ gave 15 seconds to the obama/sarkozy comments about bibi…15 seconds???
another if a GOP president said this and the lsm 24/7 uproar afterwards…
cmsinaz on November 9, 2011 at 6:11 AM
who is this huntsman they keep talking about??
cmsinaz on November 9, 2011 at 6:19 AM
She was the one who said this whole thing upset her.
CW on November 9, 2011 at 6:30 AM
30 million dollars spent to defeat it and around half from outside the state of Ohio. If this was the other way around imagine their gnashing of teeth. As I have stated previously much of what was in SB5 will still come to fruition. The Ohio legislature including Dems will make sure of that. They cannot afford not to.
CW on November 9, 2011 at 6:32 AM
we’ll see, i just don’t to hear from these folks who voted against it asking for a bailout from the US because they can’t afford to pay their pensions and the like…
cmsinaz on November 9, 2011 at 6:37 AM
I do like Newt’s rhetoric, follow-through isn’t so hot.
Science is based on data and analysis, then formulating how that data represents physical processes. A hypothesis is something proposed to explain the data and then, as a side-light, must explain other phenomena and have new outcomes that can be tested. That means that it is falsifiable. Any hypothesis that not only explains phenomena but offers testable and repeatable new outcomes then gains a status of a theory. Over time data comes in that a theory cannot explain as its limits are tested. This happened with Newtonian physics, geological population distribution of past fauna and climates, and now with Einsteinian relativity.
AGW or GW is not even on the hypothesis range at this point as we have over a decade of cooling that is not explained by AGW or GW, and the present data do not deviate from expected norms seen during prior inter-glacial periods. To get such data will not take a few years or a century as we must be able to put the present climate regime in its context. You can’t make any policy based on that, nor offer ‘solutions’ without doing a major cost/benefit analys of what the ‘cost’ of trying to prevent something you can’t properly explain is versus the supposed ‘benefits’. Do notice that in this domain of reason the word ‘truth’ does not appear: just what is testable, verifiable and falsifiable. AGW and GW do not offer falsifiable outcomes, nor do they explain more than what current theories explain, nor do they offer a better way to explain other phenomena that may or may not be linked with AGW or GW.
If you want to talk about ‘pollution’ that is a different story, but you cannot link it to ‘climate change’ without hard and fast data that shows that the null hypothesis of nothing strange going on is wrong. That requires a lot more data than we currently have and a lot more measurements of all global temps from the Mariana’s Trench all the way to the world’s tallest peaks and then assembling that dataset over decades… plus having a good understanding of planetary albedo, solar output and what the actual chemical composition is of the atmosphere is and how that changes due to bio responses out of our control. This makes the Sun and the Earth the major cardholders in the game and we don’t even know what the set of cards looks like. That is a problem.
All I can say to Newt is: stop pushing ‘remedies’ and linking them to politics when there is no indication the null hypothesis is wrong. When you try to link science to politics you get very unfortunate side-effects, like Lysenkoism which did try to put forward that there was ‘truth’ in science… one for capitalists and one for communists… and I would much prefer that politicians don’t try to go down that path no matter how nice the smile, how warm the words or how sharp the sword is, tyvm. And that goes for the ‘scientific activists’ who should know better but are blind to past data on this score, and it is a dataset that goes far beyond Lysenko and isn’t all that pretty.
ajacksonian on November 9, 2011 at 7:11 AM
OT: bloomie on MJ, all is well at occupy wall street, no laws have been broken
and he said it with a straight face…
cmsinaz on November 9, 2011 at 7:16 AM
No matter who the GOP nominates that person will be destroyed by the Whoredog Media.
I say we nominate a Fearless Consistent CONSERVATIVE that can best Obama and repeal ObamaCare and tell the media to go ________.
PappyD61 on November 9, 2011 at 7:20 AM
Bloomie: “Raise taxes! Everybody’s taxes! Every tax!”
Tell me that guy isn’t running 3rd Party. And what is lovely – if anything he’s going to hurt Obama.
Perry v Obama v Bloomie. Just wait.
Marcus on November 9, 2011 at 7:22 AM
Morning Joe interviewing JOHN HARWOOD who “is moderating the debate tonight”.
Well that does it for me, no way am I watching (had dinner plans anyway). This is going to be epic, he’s a calm Keith Olbermann. LOL, the debate hosts on CNBC plan on propping up Huntsman! ENJOY.
Marcus on November 9, 2011 at 7:25 AM
You maybe right Marcus
cmsinaz on November 9, 2011 at 7:25 AM
You’re not kidding Marcus….huntsman 2012! For the lsm
cmsinaz on November 9, 2011 at 7:27 AM
You Hot Air guys really need to get this interview with the “moderators” of the debate tonight. John Harwood indeed plans on picking the nominee for the Republicans. He’s not going to moderate, this guy is talking like a man with a mission. He’s drooling and should have a “H” button on.
Marcus on November 9, 2011 at 7:30 AM
Well said (everything beyond that, too).
THIS is why I will not vote for Newt in the primaries.
I really used to like him. A lot. But he just talks a lot.
He philosophizes.
But doesn’t really do anything.
He sat with Pelosi on that damned couch & gave AGW credence.
I’m sorry, but that’s unforgivable IMO.
You don’t sit on the couch with the Devil, who you should know is nothing but an evil liar bent on domination at all costs.
If Newt doesn’t know that about the Democrats, then he is really an effing idiot.
Relegate him to VP. I’d be OK with that.
Badger40 on November 9, 2011 at 7:33 AM
The rape victims weren’t raped-raped.
Bishop on November 9, 2011 at 7:34 AM
And Newt shows really poor judgement with his affairs.
If you can’t keep it in your pants, sloppy in your private life, then how can you be competent for a monumental job as POTUS?
We’ve been setting the bar so low, a guy like Newt looks good.
How fricking sad.
Badger40 on November 9, 2011 at 7:35 AM
Marcus on November 9, 2011 at 7:30 AM
|-| ;)
Piers Morgan, I think it was, posited that Cain’s demise will open the door for “Gingrich and Huntsman”, LOL! Mr. 1% is going to suddenly catch fire? I really did lol and yelled at my tv that the talking head was forgetting the elephant in the room and that is Rick Perry. They wouldn’t even mention his name.
Aslans Girl on November 9, 2011 at 7:36 AM
Newt, God love him, has two failed marriages, is on wife #3, cheated on the other two. As for political baggage, he resigned his speakership (quitter?), sat on the couch with Pelosi, called Ryan’s plan “right-wing social engineering”, and attacked Sarah Palin after Tuscon, siding with those who thought the shooting was her fault. If he can be forgiven for things that just happened in January and April of 2011, Perry will be forgiven for telling people who don’t want children to have in-state rates that they have “no heart”.
-Aslan’s Girl
Aslans Girl on November 9, 2011 at 7:37 AM
O/T a tad,Early/Morning Intell Alert!
=====================================
Woman who settled sex harassment complaint against Herman Cain filed complaint at next job over unfair treatment – AP
2 Hrs.ago
Hot
Update
********
http://www.breakingnews.com/
canopfor on November 9, 2011 at 7:44 AM
O/T a tad,Early/Morning Intell Alert!
=====================================
Drudge has it up,as well!!
canopfor on November 9, 2011 at 7:45 AM
Love the pic on the Drudge.
The Grinch who stole Christmas.
Boo
Electrongod on November 9, 2011 at 8:01 AM
A lot of dems got elected yesterday and union-supported measures passed. This is a message to the GOP: get your act together or you’ll lose in 2012.
With this group of baggage-laden, flip-flopping, liars and unqualified dimwits competing for the nomination, my only hope is for a Dark Horse hero or Heroine, pawing the ground at the gate, waiting to be released at the GOP convention.
EL on November 9, 2011 at 8:18 AM
Could provide a link for that?
stenwin77 on November 9, 2011 at 8:19 AM
Speak for yourself. Perry’s an a**hole for what he said. I had high hopes for Perry…until I realized that he’s a moron.
Baggage notwithstanding, in an issue-oriented campaign, Newt could destroy Obama. All Obama might be able to trumpet are some half-a** anecdotes. Newt’s the only GOP candidate who can hammer home that the emperor has no clothes.
BuckeyeSam on November 9, 2011 at 8:27 AM
AP, point of order: Could you tag the quotes (e.g. “—So and So in the Daily Blabber”) rather than forcing us to click on a link and wait while the page loads, just to see who said what?
Thanks.
MrLynn on November 9, 2011 at 8:28 AM
The case for Newt: http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2011/11/the-case-for-newt.php
onlineanalyst on November 9, 2011 at 8:50 AM
No Newt. I will not vote for a two time adulterer.
Republicans are better than that.
scotash on November 9, 2011 at 8:51 AM
Yes, I missed Special Report yesterday, so thanks for the clip AP. I’m at least somewhat relieved to hear Newt say that ad with Miz Pelosi was “stupid.” I still don’t think he understands the political agenda behind the ‘global warming’/'climate change’ scam (ably described by AJacksonian above). If there’s anyone reading this thread from the Gingrich campaign, please sit Newt down with WattsUpWithThat.com, make him peruse the posts and comments daily, and have him read some of the references in the right column.
Newt is very bright, and a quick study. He just needs to learn why proclamations from the National Academy of Sciences and other in-the-tank establishments are not only erroneous, but dangerously misleading, because they are agenda-driven. You can’t do good science in service to a political agenda, ever.
MrLynn on November 9, 2011 at 9:10 AM
So you think Perry is damaged for his “have no heart” comment and initial poor peformance in the 1-/3- minute soundbite debates but Newt is all fine and dandy despite:
- A sordid personal life that makes Cain, even if his allegations are true, look like an angel
- His willingness to backstab conservatives for cheap publicity. Pelosi and couch? Scozzafava? Palin and Tucson? Attack on Ryan’s plan?
Sorry to burst your bubble but Newt will not last even two weeks under the spotlight. He can’t win in the primary and will be decimated in the general. Yes, his favorables are that bad.
TheRightMan on November 9, 2011 at 9:21 AM
Newt said the other night on Bret’s show that the couch thingy with Piglosi was the dumbest thing he’s ever done. His words didn’t overcome the visual we all have of the commercial. See what a mess Sarah left us with.
Kissmygrits on November 9, 2011 at 9:33 AM
Name some.
EL on November 9, 2011 at 10:05 AM
With a young unmarried mother whose betrothed was considering renunciation of the betrothald due to the pregnancy, can there be any doubt that the left would have counseled that Jesus be aborted?
KW64 on November 9, 2011 at 11:10 AM
Beware, REDSTATE – Huntsman is the favorite on MSNBC’s ‘Morning Joe’ with Mika in a swoon every time his name is mentioned. When her puppy, Mark Halperin was asked whom the Pubbies should root for, he dutifully replied that Huntsman should be the one, and she giggled and gurgled herself silly. Every time I flip channels from FOX to MSNBC to get the morning politics, MSNBC hosts can’t wait to promote Huntsman.
Bob in VA on November 9, 2011 at 12:24 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2