Good news: OWS sets up women-only tent to help cut down on rapes

posted at 4:16 pm on November 5, 2011 by Allahpundit

Grim perfection from Glenn Reynolds: “I guess they really are taking Tahrir Square as their model.”

Let it sink in: Their protests now need rape shelters. This is actually happening. And New York City lets it go on.

Zuccotti Park has become so overrun by sexual predators attacking women in the night that organizers felt compelled to set up a female-only sleeping tent yesterday to keep the sickos away.

The large, metal-framed “safety tent” — which will be guarded by an all-female patrol — can accommodate as many as 18 people and will be used during the day for women-only meetings, said Occupy Wall Street organizers.

“This is all about safety in numbers,” said Becky Wartell, 24, a protester from Portland, Maine…

Some of the male OWS protesters remained in denial over the growing number of sex attacks.

“Sexual harassment gets called rape, and it’s not,” one scoffed when told of the women’s tent.

This can’t be repeated enough: With a few exceptions, foremost among them the New York Post, the coverage of OWS protests compared to the coverage of tea-party protests is the worst media double standard in recent history. Nothing compares, because nothing else involves this much distortion on both ends of the coverage. It’s not just that most press outlets (like the protesters themselves) look the other way at depravity happening inside Obamaville, it’s that for years they treated the tea-party movement as some sort of feral mob that was forever on the brink of rampaging through the streets — like, say, Occupy Oakland just did. If you missed it when I posted it last week, go watch the ad the DNC ran in August 2009 when tea partiers first started showing up to town halls on ObamaCare. That set the tone. We began the year with tea-party pols being smeared as killers over a shooting they had nothing to do with and we end it with actual rapes being shrugged off by the press because they’re bad PR for a movement they support. Disgrace.

Via the Daily Caller, watch the not-at-all feral or mobbish revolutionary heroes of Occupy D.C. do their thing last night outside AFP. The video doesn’t capture the extent of the menace, either. For that, read R.S. McCain’s interview with D.C. reporter Michelle Fields, who at one point found herself surrounded by a group of men screaming “F*** Michelle Fields.” No wonder she doesn’t want to go back. Tahrir Square indeed.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Separating out the nuts and chews — or is it just the nuts?

unclesmrgol on November 5, 2011 at 10:48 PM

The Sons of Liberty were not everyday regular folks, they were the incendiaries and provocateurs who stirred things up and set things in motion. They are very much the OWS counterparts.

BL@KBIRD on November 5, 2011 at 6:32 PM

That’s really a bit much.

I’ll grant you they were incendiaries, but they weren’t aimless trust fund babies, and they didn’t go around raping women

INC on November 5, 2011 at 11:54 PM

“Somebody just ran over a bunch of us…in a Mercedes!”

Talk about adding insult to injury!

Dr. Mercury on November 6, 2011 at 8:17 AM

Occupy claims its first fatality in Vancouver, apparently from a heroin overdose.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2011/11/05/bc-occupy-vancouver-death.html

fusionaddict on November 6, 2011 at 8:18 AM

This can’t be repeated enough: With a few exceptions, foremost among them the New York Post, the coverage of OWS protests compared to the coverage of tea-party protests is the worst media double standard in recent history. Nothing compares, because nothing else involves this much distortion on both ends of the coverage. It’s not just that most press outlets (like the protesters themselves) look the other way at depravity happening inside Obamaville, it’s that for years they treated the tea-party movement as some sort of feral mob that was forever on the brink of rampaging through the streets — like, say, Occupy Oakland just did. If you missed it when I posted it last week, go watch the ad the DNC ran in August 2009 when tea partiers first started showing up to town halls on ObamaCare. That set the tone. We began the year with tea-party pols being smeared as killers over a shooting they had nothing to do with and we end it with actual rapes being shrugged off by the press because they’re bad PR for a movement they support. Disgrace.

You said it, AP. Could not agree more.

Cylor on November 6, 2011 at 9:27 AM

Check out some of Anonymous’ religious beliefs, pretty freaky!http://www.oneism.org/

jollybird on November 6, 2011 at 11:17 AM

Occupy claims its first fatality in Vancouver, apparently from a heroin overdose.

Nope. The OWS body count now stands at two, or roughly one per month.

CO2 Producer on November 6, 2011 at 3:16 PM

Oh, sorry. You meant the first one in Vancouver.

CO2 Producer on November 6, 2011 at 3:18 PM

They’re getting all upset in the video about two people getting run over but I tend to think that’s exactly what they wanted to happen.

Yakko77 on November 5, 2011 at 5:52 PM

If they’re stupid enough to stand in traffic and tell people they’re not allowed to drive on the road, then a) legally, this is considered arrest, b) any driver could justifiably claim to be in fear of his life, and c) how can they stand in a public roadway and complain because they were hit by a car?

There Goes The Neighborhood on November 7, 2011 at 12:26 AM

But…I thought these protesters were peaceful idiots!

zoyclem on November 7, 2011 at 7:28 AM

Comment pages: 1 2