Rick Perry obliquely critiques his opponents’ views on abortion

posted at 12:00 pm on October 23, 2011 by Tina Korbe

At the Iowa Faith and Freedom dinner yesterday, Rick Perry sounded exceptionally strong on social issues, emphasizing his own committed and clearly spoken position on abortion while obliquely critiquing Mitt Romney and Herman Cain, both of whose pro-life credentials remain somewhat questionable:

[Cain's] comments to CNN that put his position against abortion in doubt made him a target on the stage. Texas Gov. Rick Perry took a swipe at him, although he did not refer directly to the interview, in which Cain said that families should be able to abort a pregnancy in instances of incest and rape.

“It is a liberal canard to say, ‘I am personally pro-life, but government should stay out of that decision,’ ” Perry said. “That is not pro-life. That is pro-having-your-cake-and-eating-it-too.” …

“Being pro-life is not a matter of campaign convenience. It is a core conviction,” Perry said, drawing a contrast not only with Cain but also with Romney, who says he opposes abortion rights but who had supported them earlier in his political career.

“When it comes to faith, it is the core of who I am. It is an essential act as much as breathing is an essential act,” Perry said. “I found the true source of hope and change, and that is a loving God who changes hearts of stone into hearts of flesh.”

Incidentally, that last jab at Obama happens to be my very favorite.

Romney wasn’t even at the dinner to defend himself, but Cain took the event as an opportunity to clarify his views on the touchy topic yet again. He reaffirmed his support for life, saying he thinks abortion should be illegal throughout the country and promising not to approve any government funding for abortion. Cain’s clarifications have been at least as confusing as the original interviews he gave on the subject — but, overall, it does, at least, appear that he seeks to err on the side of life.

Nevertheless, the headlines about this event will focus on Perry for a reason. The Texas governor typically shines in a setting like the Faith and Freedom Dinner, and, from what I can gather, he was at his best again last night. For all that the guy can’t debate, he can hold captive an audience when he speaks sincerely on a subject about which he cares deeply — and when the crowd is exceptionally friendly. That sounds deceptively easy — but it’s a skill no less than any elocutionary ability. It’s reassuring, at least, to remember this Perry, the Perry of confidence and conviction.

In 2008, Perry piqued pro-lifers with his endorsement of Rudy Giuliani for president. Various other decisions he’s made could also be construed as less-than-perfectly pro-life. But, by and large, he has enormous credibility on the issue. Pro-life leaders in his state love him, for example.

“This issue really is dear to his heart, he understands it and he has always made it a priority,” one said. “He’s not necessarily going to put it in every speech because he knows he’s got to get elected, but … he’s not going to run from it, because it’s just who he is.”

Last night illustrates that, when he is able to put a little of “who he is” into a speech, he easily overshadows his competitors. Would that he could bring that self to debates …


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 4 5 6

INC on May 13, 2013 at 5:31 PM

Yes..long time ago.
Was a big story here..locally.

Yeah.. understatement. :(

bazil9 on May 13, 2013 at 5:33 PM

Trolls shown up yet?

annoyinglittletwerp on May 13, 2013 at 5:34 PM

Sachiko on May 13, 2013 at 5:29 PM

You’re welcome.

I have another quote for you. I think I got this one from the Priests For Life site.

Nothing has been as damaging to our cause as the advances in technology which have allowed pictures of the developing fetus, because people now talk about that fetus in much different terms than they did fifteen years ago. They talk about it as a human being, which is not something that I have an easy answer how to cure.
–Harrison Hickman
–1989 conference of the National Abortion Rights Action League.

Now with Gosnell, they have no answer. Jill Stanek has been writing this year about the increasing demoralization of abortionists. That’s how much they care about making abortion “rare”—they get down about it.

INC on May 13, 2013 at 5:35 PM

annoyinglittletwerp on May 13, 2013 at 5:34 PM

Just you…

cozmo on May 13, 2013 at 5:38 PM

Just you…

cozmo on May 13, 2013 at 5:38 PM

I opened THAT door up, didn’t I.

annoyinglittletwerp on May 13, 2013 at 5:40 PM

annoyinglittletwerp on May 13, 2013 at 5:40 PM

And walked ran right into it.

cozmo on May 13, 2013 at 5:41 PM

You’re welcome.

I have another quote for you. I think I got this one from the Priests For Life site.

Nothing has been as damaging to our cause as the advances in technology which have allowed pictures of the developing fetus, because people now talk about that fetus in much different terms than they did fifteen years ago. They talk about it as a human being, which is not something that I have an easy answer how to cure.
–Harrison Hickman
–1989 conference of the National Abortion Rights Action League.

Now with Gosnell, they have no answer. Jill Stanek has been writing this year about the increasing demoralization of abortionists. That’s how much they care about making abortion “rare”—they get down about it.

INC on May 13, 2013 at 5:35 PM

I bet they hate the ability to change your profile picture to your ultrasound picture on Facebook.

cptacek on May 13, 2013 at 5:52 PM

cptacek on May 13, 2013 at 5:52 PM

William Saletan of Slate wrote an article in 2007 on the impact of technology on abortion: “The fetus is squirming, and so are we.”

Yeah, they hate it.

INC on May 13, 2013 at 5:58 PM

9 of 12 Jurors in #Gosnell Trial Are ‘Pro-Choice’ http://ow.ly/kZwUn

Resist We Much on May 13, 2013 at 6:04 PM

Somebody ask for Humpbot?

http://tinyurl.com/humpgos

jmad on May 13, 2013 at 6:04 PM

Resist We Much on May 13, 2013 at 6:04 PM

I didn’t know that. Was that when they were being asked questions prior to being seated for the trial?

“And to give you some background on the jurors, of the seven women and five men who are on the jury, at least nine told the court that they are pro-choice. Two say that they are neither pro-choice nor pro-life.”

So only one is pro-life? That’s remarkable.

I wonder what they all think now.

INC on May 13, 2013 at 6:07 PM

bazil9 on May 13, 2013 at 4:50 PM

I agree with you … and a year or 2 ago I would agree with you.
and I feel the Bible supports this because as was pointed out…
an image bearer of GOD was murdered.

but then the cold eyed accountant shows up …
paying X amount for appeals x number of years …
*sigh* …. but I agree it meets the criteria IMHO
to be a DP award ….

conservative tarheel on May 13, 2013 at 6:09 PM

9 of 12 Jurors in #Gosnell Trial Are ‘Pro-Choice’ http://ow.ly/kZwUn

Resist We Much on May 13, 2013 at 6:04 PM

Seriously?!?!?!

ladyingray on May 13, 2013 at 6:09 PM

Even if given the death penalty, he won’t die from it. Take life without parole in general population.

He’s WANTING the death penalty at this point….

ladyingray on May 13, 2013 at 6:15 PM

I’m wondering how many other denizens of abortion clinics are closely watching this unfold. I also wonder what their pucker factor is right about now.

Oldnuke on May 13, 2013 at 6:24 PM

The one image that comes to mind is the scene in the movie “Ghost”. The bad guy dies at the end, and the black shadows come to get him, and drag him away.

I hope when they come for Gosnell, he goes kicking and screaming, and has to run the gauntlet of the faces of every baby he ever butchered…all the way to Hell!

grumpy_old_soldier on May 13, 2013 at 6:26 PM

His lawyer is a piece of work.

Speaking outside the courthouse moments after the jury handed down its decision, Gosnell’s attorney Jack McMahon said he had confidence in the legal system but acknowledged that the case presented particular difficulties, including what he called “The baby factor.” McMahon also claimed the media made his job toughter: ”The media has been overwhelmingly against [Gosnell],” he told reporters.

What media was that?

Cindy Munford on May 13, 2013 at 6:39 PM

grumpy_old_soldier on May 13, 2013 at 6:26 PM

yup .. and then at the great white throne … he is brought before the King of Kings and is tried … every baby he butchered is there and testifies against him …
he is judged by his works as everything is written down … then the lambs book is opened and his name is not written down … and at this point the King of Kings pronounces sentence “depart from me into everlasting fire prepared for the Devil and his angels!”
at this point he is picked up and cast into the lake of fire.

conservative tarheel on May 13, 2013 at 6:40 PM

9 of 12 Jurors in #Gosnell Trial Are ‘Pro-Choice’ http://ow.ly/kZwUn

Resist We Much on May 13, 2013 at 6:04 PM

Seriously?!?!?!

ladyingray on May 13, 2013 at 6:09 PM

Which tells you how truly ugly this was that even believers couldn’t turn away.

kim roy on May 13, 2013 at 6:40 PM

What media was that?

Cindy Munford on May 13, 2013 at 6:39 PM

oh come now … the throngs of reporters and tv and radio types down there
standing room only in the press area .. /s

conservative tarheel on May 13, 2013 at 6:41 PM

A just verdict. The jury has rightly convicted #Gosnell for his appalling crimes, ensuring no woman is victimized by him ever again.

PP is just as guilty as Gosnell. More guilty in fact, they have far more innocent baby blood on their hands.

Kjeil on May 13, 2013 at 6:43 PM

Silly ‘social conservatives’ ruining the party with their defense of the unborn. How many more babies do you want to save at the expense of the party!?eleventyone1one1!

LaughterJones on May 13, 2013 at 6:52 PM

PP is just as guilty as Gosnell. More guilty in fact, they have far more innocent baby blood on their hands.

Kjeil on May 13, 2013 at 6:43 PM

It’s a hollow statement by the leading, government authorized death camp in the USA.

You get to have freedoms in the USA! Just have to make it out of the womb first!

LaughterJones on May 13, 2013 at 6:55 PM

Trolls shown up yet?

annoyinglittletwerp on May 13, 2013 at 5:34 PM

.
Just you…

cozmo on May 13, 2013 at 5:38 PM
.

I opened THAT door up, didn’t I.

annoyinglittletwerp on May 13, 2013 at 5:40 PM

.
And walked ran right into it.

cozmo on May 13, 2013 at 5:41 PM

.
Why do I always miss the good stuff, in real time ?

listens2glenn on May 13, 2013 at 6:57 PM

Ok, now that the trial is over, will the Exalted One comment on it?

And will anyone in the media have the temerity to actually ask him to go on record?

Forgive me. I’ve been watching political movies, where these things actually happen…

Chris of Rights on May 13, 2013 at 7:35 PM

May they now Rest in Peace

txmomof6 on May 13, 2013 at 8:00 PM

May they now Rest in Peace

txmomof6 on May 13, 2013 at 8:00 PM

Another 3,288 today, and every day in the USA.

slickwillie2001 on May 13, 2013 at 8:14 PM

A just verdict. The jury has rightly convicted #Gosnell for his appalling crimes, ensuring no woman is victimized by him ever again.

Wow, can’t even bring themselves to mention the babies.

Dongemaharu on May 13, 2013 at 9:15 PM

If the bill Obama sponsored in the Illinois legislature had passed in Pennsylvania, would Gosnell have been convicted?

As I recall, Obama wanted to decriminalize killing a baby after a botched abortion.

jya lai on May 14, 2013 at 10:54 AM

Comment pages: 1 4 5 6