New-home sales fall 2.3% to six-month low
posted at 11:30 am on September 26, 2011 by Ed Morrissey
We have more good news/bad news from the housing market. Sales of new single-family homes hit a six-month low in August, according to the Departments of Commerce and HUD today, falling 2.3% from July. But this dark cloud has a long-awaited silver lining:
Sales of new single-family houses in August 2011 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 295,000, according to estimates released jointly today by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. This is 2.3 percent (±13.9%)* below the revised July rate of 302,000, but is 6.1 percent (±18.8%)* above the August 2010 estimate of 278,000.
The median sales price of new houses sold in August 2011 was $209,100; the average sales price was $246,000. The seasonally adjusted estimate of new houses for sale at the end of August was 162,000. This represents a supply of 6.6 months at the current sales rate.
The bolded part is the silver lining. Thanks to a sharp drop in construction activity over the last two years, we have finally begun to approach a rational inventory level in new single-family homes. That is the lowest inventory level in years, and is a sign that the market may be approaching its bottom.
For once, Reuters accurately predicted the output — which readers here might consider unexpected:
New single-family home sales in the United States fell in August to a 6-month low but the supply of homes available on the market dropped to a record low. …
Economists polled by Reuters had forecast a 295,000-unit rate in August.
The silver lining isn’t exactly a signal of a boom, however. Thanks to the long-delayed resolution of foreclosures from 2008-9, the resale market will face a glut of cheap inventory over the next year or so. That’s been expected for a long time, and it shouldn’t shock the markets, but it will put some extra downward pressure on resale prices, and that will attract buyers who might otherwise have interest in new builds.
Until resale and foreclosure inventories approach normal levels, there still won’t be much profit in new construction. And the inventories won’t move until we produce more qualified buyers through job creation, and that cycle appears to be at least several months from beginning. Don’t expect to see any significant expansion in new-home construction until next year. However, after probing for almost three years for a floor in the housing market, we may be finally seeing it.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Unexpectedly.
Washington Nearsider on September 26, 2011 at 11:34 AM
BofA might have started to push foreclosures through, I’m waiting for the September data in about 3 weeks. More price drops coming. Another day in Obama’s America.
Also my buddy is an agent in CA. No buyers are under 35 and they can’t qualify due to income, debt, and jobs! The Lost Obama generation. In CA it will drop A LOT more.
Oil Can on September 26, 2011 at 11:35 AM
Who wants to buy house today when the heating bills and property taxes are higher than your mortgage?
Knucklehead on September 26, 2011 at 11:37 AM
It’s still the price stupid. Lower the price, your house will sell. This goes for builders selling new homes and people trying to sell their homes.
I’m seeing houses on the market for over 2 years. No price decreases. The owners still think it’s 2006. On the other hand I’ve seen houses sell in less than a week. Difference? Price. The houses selling in a week are $400K. The exact same house down the road not selling in 2 years i $550K.
angryed on September 26, 2011 at 11:40 AM
Why buy when President Recovery is going to phase out the mortgage deduction? Just a matter of time…
That’ll really crash the market…
Khun Joe on September 26, 2011 at 11:40 AM
6.6 months would be a good supply in normal times. However there is a record number of people in their 20s and 30s now living at home with mom and dad. 6.6 months assumes these people forming families and looking for housing. But when you take that pool of potential buyers out of the market 6.6 is relatively speaking a lot higher than it would seem.
angryed on September 26, 2011 at 11:42 AM
You’re right. But you’re right for the wrong reason.
70% of tax filers do not itemize. Which means 70% of tax filers do not take the mortgage deduction. But the real estate industry has so drilled it into the heads of people that buying a home = tax savings, most people don’t even realize they get no tax benefit from home ownership.
So yes, I think you’re right, a lot of people might think the deduction taken away will hurt them. In reality for the majority of people it will not have any effect.
angryed on September 26, 2011 at 11:45 AM
Many of those 70% don’t own a house…
right2bright on September 26, 2011 at 11:48 AM
Can we please get another graphic? At the very latest, after Obama leaves office, when it stops being funny?
HitNRun on September 26, 2011 at 11:58 AM
For a lot of people, itemizing doesn’t make sense. It doesn’t for me. The standard deduction for my wife and I covers a ton more than any itemizing might do. Sure, the mortgage deduction would be big, but unless you are paying a lot in interest (and who is, after three years now of really low rates?), chances are by itself it won’t pay.
Deleting the mortgage deduction would, however, KILL the real estate industry and rental industry.
Vanceone on September 26, 2011 at 11:58 AM
This is all just demographics. Just as soon as those great grandchildren of the baby boomer generation start having children, all those single mothers with all those babies to take care of will need a new house.
So not to worry, Government Housing will be hiring all those construction workers to build all those residential apartments that will be needed. Everything is going to be just fine.
Skandia Recluse on September 26, 2011 at 11:58 AM
Poor crr6.
rogerb on September 26, 2011 at 12:07 PM
I do not think you have to itemize to get the tax deduction… I will check on this.
astonerii on September 26, 2011 at 12:13 PM
Sure you do. If you take a standard deduction you don’t itemize your deductions such as state income tax, local property taxes, charitable donations and mortgage interest. It is either or. Now in 2009 they had a gimmicky enhanced standard deduction where you got an extra $1,000 added to your standard deduction if you paid property taxes, but this was not extended. It was just a gimmick so Congress could run on a focus group tested issue of “property tax relief” when the feds have nothing to do with that.
Mortgage interest would still be deductible as an expense against rental income. They are just talking about abolishing the deduction for home (and second home) mortgage interest, not for rental income producing property.
Ted Torgerson on September 26, 2011 at 12:24 PM
And many of them do.
Home ownership is around 65%.
angryed on September 26, 2011 at 1:17 PM
You most certainly do.
At least on federal taxes. States? Who knows, each of the 57 has its own rules.
angryed on September 26, 2011 at 1:18 PM
No it won’t. You just said that you don’t itemize because you don’t pay enough interest to make it worthwhile.
Even if everyone got the deduction, it doesn’t help the buyer at all. It only helps the seller. It allows the seller to charge more knowing the govt will subsidize the purchase via the tax deduction. It’s no different than GM selling the Volt for $40K with a $7500 govt tax credit. Take away the credit and guess what happens? GM sells the volt for $32,500. The consumer is not affected. The only thing that happens is GM loses $7500 profit.
Same with a house. With the deduction in place someone who could afford $X house can now afford $X + $Y tax deduction. Take away the tax deduction and the seller will drop the price by $Y. The consumer comes out the same in the end and still pays $X.
I don’t want my tax dollars subsidizing Toll Brothers. Do you?
angryed on September 26, 2011 at 1:24 PM
Yes it will.
Old Fritz on September 26, 2011 at 2:38 PM
I guess we were weird in that our house buying decision, which included how much mortgage we could afford (as opposed to how much we were qualified for), did not take income tax filing into consideration at all.
I would think that if the only way you can afford your mortgage is because you pay less tax itemizing than not, you really can’t afford your mortgage to begin with.
LibraryGryffon on September 26, 2011 at 2:47 PM
Obama said this over the weekend: “The GOP alternative is an approach to government that will fundamentally cripple America”
What does he call what is happening right now under his leadership?
Health?
Opposite Day on September 26, 2011 at 2:48 PM
That isn’t quite how it works. The benefit ends up being split between the buyer and the seller in the same way that the cost of a sales tax is split between the buyer and seller. How equal a split is determined by the relative flexibility of supply and demand. To see how, draw supply and demand curves, and then see what happens when you shift the demand curve vertically by the amount of the credit or tax.
Count to 10 on September 26, 2011 at 3:34 PM
There are a couple of million foreclosures still out there, nobody can be sure when they will come to market.
Some the banks are holding back to keep from further depressing prices. Some are tied up in the various “robo-signing” snafus or other issues of transfer – but the people aren’t paying, so those houses will eventually come to foreclosure.
Another indeterminate number are those in limbo due to one or another federal program designed to “help” . . . nearly all of these will also end up on the block, too.
So it’s a little good news, because our construction industry, especially homebuilding, is the domestic leader for recoveries. It drives demand for materials like lumber, brick and mortar, wiring and pipe, durable goods like appliances, and of course labor. But uncertainties abound, and a continued weakness in our economy tends to stifle demand, and the Euro-bubble is going to burst all over our recovery soon, so I wouldn’t plan any parades just yet.
Adjoran on September 26, 2011 at 4:26 PM