Newsmax: Christie’s thinking of getting in; Update: Christie advisor denies

posted at 7:00 pm on September 23, 2011 by Allahpundit

I lost patience with the Christie speculation weeks ago but I’m going to make an exception for this for three very good reasons. One: It’s late Friday afternoon and I need some easy traffic bait. Mission accomplished. Two: Perry reeked last night. A month ago, it seemed entirely possible that he’d stomp Romney in the debates and have the nomination locked up by early fall. As it is, Romney’s at 44.9 on InTrade right now while Perry’s wheezing along at 27. Plenty of room for an even alpha-er alpha male (or female) to jump in and start stomping. Three: Newsmax is a player in right-wing media and might have an inside track here. And they’re not the only ones. Perennial Christie booster Bill Kristol told a CPAC audience this afternoon in Florida, “I know Chris Christie is thinking about it,” and earlier today at the Heritage Foundation Mitch Daniels called Christie “the best example that I can think of” when asked who fits the bill for bold conservative leadership that the country needs. My sense is that these guys are pushing because they have reason to believe that Christie’s still ever so slightly open to running. Verrrrry slightly. But slightly.

Anyway. As disappointment with Perry mounts, so does the pining for ChristieRyanDanielsRubio:

Newsmax has learned that the effort to draft Christie culminated in a hush-hush powwow held in the past week with Christie and several notable Republican billionaires.

A source familiar with the meeting suggested that Christie seemed inclined to enter the race but said he needed more time.

Christie promised to make a final decision “within two weeks,” the source said…

Senior aides to Christie have been quietly urging his supporters not to commit to Perry, indicating Christie was still mulling a bid and would make a final decision after New Jersey’s legislative races are completed in November.

That last bit suggests either that the story’s wrong or that Christie’s a doofus since the deadline to get on the ballot in Florida is October 31. Anyway: Explain to me again why he’d supposedly be such a gangbusters candidate in the primary. He is, to be sure, a supremely gifted messenger on entitlements and public-employee unions, and he’s already accomplished something significant vis-a-vis the latter. Beyond that, what’s the argument for his candidacy? He’s been governor for just two and a half years, he believes in global warming, he’s questionable on guns, he seems to support comprehensive immigration reform, he backed Castle over O’Donnell (RINO!), etc. That’s not to say he can’t win — if we were willing to nominate McCain, we could nominate Christie — but I’m not sure why anyone thinks he’d necessarily settle far north of, say, 25 percent. He’d be dynamite at the debates, but the debates don’t matter much except to hardcore political junkies like you and me. Why risk running now and flaming out instead of staying put as governor, building a record, and then steamrolling into the 2016 primaries when he wouldn’t have to face a Democratic incumbent in the general?

Update: And here’s the obligatory official denial.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 3 4 5

I like Christie as Republican Governor of New Jersey; we are unlikely to get anything better in that state. As a national candidate, however, I don’t think he’s a good fit. Don’t know why Ann Coulter, who used to have pretty solid conservative credentials, would be so enthusiastic about his candidacy.

HTL on September 24, 2011 at 1:05 AM

An honest answer…

Gohawgs on September 24, 2011 at 12:57 AM

The same may not be said about the excuse given for the D grade.

rukiddingme on September 24, 2011 at 1:13 AM

I guess NumbersUSA will be dicounted as a hack organization by unseen… LOL…

TheRightMan on September 23, 2011 at 9:52 PM

Numbers USA was founded by a population control advocate who believes in abortion to limit third world populations.

unseen on September 24, 2011 at 1:46 AM

You DO know what kind of mess Christie inherited, correct?

And unlike Obama, Christie hasn’t made NJ worse. His state’s on the road to recovery. Quit using amateurish arguments.

nickj116 on September 23, 2011 at 9:51 PM

So when Obama says he inherited the mess from Bush that will be a good argument for him to disavow the downgrade?

And maybe you missed it NJ was downgraded LAST MONTH so much for Chrisite is making it better crap…..

unseen on September 24, 2011 at 1:48 AM

the only way mitt gets above 20% is if Palin isn’t polled.

Unseen

Pfft.

New Hampshire Republican Presidential Primary

Romney 39, Perry 18, Paul 13, Huntsman 7, Bachmann 5, Palin , Gingrich 4, Cain 4

Florida Republican Presidential Primary
Perry 28, Romney 22, Palin 8, Bachmann 5, Gingrich 7, Cain 7, Paul 6, Santorum 2, Huntsman 2

New Hampshire Republican Presidential Primary
Romney 41, Perry 8, Paul 14, Huntsman 10, Bachmann 5, Palin 6, Gingrich 4, Cain 1

Michigan Republican Presidential Primary
Romney 40, Perry 17, Bachmann 3, Palin , Gingrich 8, Cain 7, Paul 5, Santorum 2, Huntsman 0

South Carolina Republican Presidential Primary
Perry 31, Romney 27, Cain 8, Bachmann 4, Palin 6, Gingrich 5, Paul 4, Santorum 2, Huntsman 2

Connecticut Republican Presidential Primary
Romney 37, Perry 19, Bachmann 8, Palin 4, Paul 3, Cain 3, Gingrich 3, Huntsman 2, Santorum 1

xblade on September 24, 2011 at 1:51 AM

As I stated above, I like Cain, but Perry is my Governor. It is interesting to see some dump on him for some of the very same things their preference has done.

rukiddingme on September 23, 2011 at 10:59 PM

Oh really? Palin has called for open borders like Perry? Has Palin allowed AK to increase its illegal population by 60% like Perry did in TX? Has Palin signed a dream act like Perry did? Has Palin distanced herself from AZ SB1070 like Perry did?

Has Palin called for a foolproof biometric id so the gov can track individuals like Perry has? Has Palin said a fence would be idiotic like Perry has?

unseen on September 24, 2011 at 1:57 AM

The reason is, that he never even knew that he WASN’T a U.S. Citizen. I had to break it to him.

Key West Reader

Yeah, I know what you mean. My friend’s daughter was busted for shoplifting recently. Poor girl had no idea there was a stolen sweater under her shirt.

I feel for both of them.

xblade on September 24, 2011 at 2:18 AM

The same may not be said about the excuse given for the D grade.

rukiddingme on September 24, 2011 at 1:13 AM

If you mean that her “D” grade is due to her statements when she was the VP Nominee, I’d say that that wouldn’t be an accurate assessment…

Gohawgs on September 24, 2011 at 2:43 AM

Good question – the “smartest” people in the country have yet to find one that is reasonable and will work.

gophergirl

That’s just not true. Plenty of workable solutions have been offered. The problem is they aren’t PERFECT solutions. How many times have you heard morons say we shouldn’t build a fence because it won’t stop EVERY illegal?

Therefore, since the solutions aren’t PERFECT, well then, it’s just not reasonable to implement them, because implementing an imperfect solution to the illegal immigration problem just isn’t reasonable….in fact, it’s down right heartless.

There must be some sort of a solution to the Mexican illegal immigration issue. This should be debated and discussed, but it is not and has not been discussed. All we are doing is re-hashing debatable talking points without proposed solutions.

Key West Reader

There are solutions, but no one is willing to do them. That’s what happens when you’re more concerned about votes than doing what’s right.

He was brought to the US at the age of 12 or 9. And now he finds out he’s illegal. And will be deported.

If he came here at 12, he didn’t just find out he was illegal. And he won’t be deported. Apparently we don’t do that any more.

xblade on September 24, 2011 at 3:37 AM

Until we have approx 6 candidates drop out the numbers will continue to look this way as if we do not have a strong candidate and frankly Romney, Perry, et al would be better than Obama…There is no need to have MORE people jump in as if we do not have the RIGHT candidate when we have strong candidates with just votes spread out…

g2825m on September 24, 2011 at 6:12 AM

Besides Christie is LESS of a conservative than many of the current crop so don’t get yer hopes up mates!

g2825m on September 24, 2011 at 6:13 AM

12 million illegals. At least 1/3 of them have a job. So if you kick out the illegals (all of them) thats 4 million jobs right? or is that 4 million potential voters?

You dont allow illegals in, then your being racist to hispanics, who are only here work. Perry lost me on this no heart sh it. Our americans are first not them. And they should’nt benifit from it.

Im sure Romney will flip to this soon. He sells snake oil. Eventually he and his Jimmer posse will come up to speed.

Gedge on September 24, 2011 at 6:20 AM

Jim Demint where are you?

Big Orange on September 24, 2011 at 7:48 AM

AH! The Coulter/Christie liberal wing of the elitist GOP lives on….

Don L on September 24, 2011 at 8:22 AM

Like it or not elections are in considerable part beauty contests and the GOP does not need a big fat blimp of a man as a candidate – especially one so friendly to the most extreme, most openly pro-HAMAS/Hezbollah Muslims…“.

A very foolish choice.

Chessplayer on September 24, 2011 at 8:30 AM

Don’t know why Ann Coulter, who used to have pretty solid conservative credentials, would be so enthusiastic about his candidacy.

I figure that such as smart independent arrogant lady could only find interst in a smart more arrogant blustery blowhard like Christie.

We had his type in CT under that 6′ 7″ GOP blusterer, Lowell weicker who ran aginst the income tax. The minute he was elected, he hired his pro-income tax opponent to put it into law.Liberal rupublicans are like that!

The place went wild and the vote came down to one conveniently missing republican(probably washing his car or some other emergency).

Such is the life with oversized blowhards who have spent their lives successfully pushing lesser folks around!

Christie and Obama are on the same level of undesireability in my book.

As far as Annis concerned -we have been deceive that the pundrity class of conservatives are really conservatives -they’re not -they are the souls of flip-flopping very rich RINOs.

Don L on September 24, 2011 at 8:33 AM

It is time for the Weight Challenged Replugger to join the black, female, democrat, BHO Bud, kookie Liberty, flipper, etc….BTW where’s the Gay/Lezzie CN?

el Vaquero on September 24, 2011 at 9:22 AM

Jim Demint where are you?

Big Orange on September 24, 2011 at 7:48 AM

+1000000

Lawdawg86 on September 24, 2011 at 10:10 AM

When Palin jumps in next week, her timing will look nearly as good as her positions.

Barnestormer on September 24, 2011 at 10:36 AM

Alternate headline: The Last Temptation of Christie

Lawdawg86 on September 24, 2011 at 10:50 AM

When Palin jumps in next week, her timing will look nearly as good as her positions.

Barnestormer on September 24, 2011 at 10:36 AM

I can see her waiting even a bit longer – let Christie ponder
for a couple of weeks – then if he announces, he can be properly
vetted and discarded.

If Palin announces Christie will never be vetted because all
attention, negative or positive, will be focused on her.

Besides, the trolls need something to jaw about – like the fact
that she didn’t announce by end of Sept. “She said she would,
bah, bah, bah……” Can you see it now – headlines:
“Palin is a liar – she said she would announce by late September
and she didn’t”………

I don’t think voters would be too upset – they are getting the
gist of her strategy by now. And we are all getting the gist
of the repub estab ABP theory – keep throwing him out there -
someone will resonate with the electorate – not happening yet!

Amjean on September 24, 2011 at 10:55 AM

Ann Coulter said this week on Hannity radio that people that said “what happened to Ann Coulter” belonged in mental institutions. (paraphrasing).

Ann, Ummm, if were talkin Koo Koo for Coco Puffs…….you’ve got a bowl that is quite a bit fuller than anyone else of late.

PappyD61 on September 24, 2011 at 11:02 AM

Something to consider: support for the Dream Act and opposition to SB 1070 aren’t among the 12 criteria the Numbers USA grading system is based on. If they were, Palin’s grade would be higher, Perry’s lower.

Kataklysmic on September 23, 2011 at 10:03 PM

Qualify that as the Texas Dream Act. I’m certain Perry was against the Federal version.

And Perry wouldn’t earn negative marks on SB1070, maybe neutral. He said it “wasn’t right for Texas” .. That’s hardly a ringing endorsement nor is it a serious deflection.

Also, let Palin be Gov of Texas and her positions on the TX Dream Act would most likely change. He allowed illegals to have the in-state tuition as long as they met the same standards an out of state student would.

Live in TX for 3 years, pay sales/property tax … and you would be viewed as an in state student regardless of immigration status.

preallocated on September 24, 2011 at 11:45 AM

I would rather have another Conservative enter the race.

kingsjester on September 24, 2011 at 11:56 AM

. . . Christie and Obama are on the same level of undesireability in my book. . . .

Don L on September 24, 2011 at 8:33 AM

Well, that goes too far. Obviously from my last post I don’t like Christie and think he is an establishment RINOm, but nobody sinks to the level of Obama. Including several Democrats.

I would vote for any of the Republicans who would be nominated over Obama. The man is a disaster and is ruining this country (which I think he dislikes as it is) and he may even be doing it on purpose.

Even Hillary Clinton at least likes this country.

Elisa on September 24, 2011 at 12:32 PM

And Perry wouldn’t earn negative marks on SB1070, maybe neutral. He said it “wasn’t right for Texas” .. That’s hardly a ringing endorsement nor is it a serious deflection.

I live in Arizona and Perry’s reaction to 1070 when it was passed couldn’t be considered anything other than running away from it as fast as possible so that he didn’t lose Hispanic votes in his pending re-election. But if his support could at best be characterized as neutral, I wonder why he claimed he supported in in the debate Thursday night.

Also, let Palin be Gov of Texas and her positions on the TX Dream Act would most likely change. He allowed illegals to have the in-state tuition as long as they met the same standards an out of state student would.

Why? My governor Jan Brewer, someone Palin flew here to stand side by side with when Brewer had the most heat on her over 1070, doesn’t feel the need to enact an Arizona Dream act. Maybe she just has more courage thean Perry does. Or doesn’t feel the need to pander to get votes.

Live in TX for 3 years, pay sales/property tax … and you would be viewed as an in state student regardless of immigration status.

preallocated on September 24, 2011 at 11:45 AM

Well, you might be fine with rewarding illegal behavior–I’m not.

Kataklysmic on September 24, 2011 at 1:01 PM

Kataklysmic on September 24, 2011 at 1:01 PM

Me neither.

kingsjester on September 24, 2011 at 1:04 PM

Ok Perry comes out with an excuse for his terrible performance in the debate. “I was tired” Really? seriously? He was tired after one month of cmapaigning? He was tired? That’s it? Maybe he needs those 5 hour energy drinks mor ethen I thought. wonder would he would be if he ran a 13 mile run then flew across the country to deliver a speech?

unseen on September 24, 2011 at 1:09 PM

Well, you might be fine with rewarding illegal behavior–I’m not.

Kataklysmic on September 24, 2011 at 1:01 PM

As long as the illegals are here they are going to get their portion of the stash. It’s just a question of whether they will be on the dole and become a permanent fixture in the recipient class, or whether they will take some of that future dole and put it towards possibly making them part of the provider class.

I’m not saying that it’s a grand idea, or perfectly in line with conservative principle. However, I am saying that as long as the Federal government doesn’t enforce border security, as a society, we have to decide how to make the best of a bad situation.

preallocated on September 24, 2011 at 1:24 PM

. . . Christie and Obama are on the same level of undesireability in my book. . . .

Don L on September 24, 2011 at 8:33 AM
Well, that goes too far. Obviously from my last post I don’t like Christie and think he is an establishment RINOm, but nobody sinks to the level of Obama. Including several Democrats.

I would vote for any of the Republicans who would be nominated over Obama. The man is a disaster and is ruining this country (which I think he dislikes as it is) and he may even be doing it on purpose.

Even Hillary Clinton at least likes this country.

Elisa on September 24, 2011 at 12:32 PM

Yeah , I concede a bit too far, but I am far too aware that the end effect may be the same. Liberism is merely a more acceptable name for communism and they both have the same end -the control of everyone. The difference is like pushing your car in the ocean or leaving it outside near they ocean for years. Both cars rust out and become useless heaps. The end result is the same. Coronary or slow cancer-same effect.

Liberals, in case you haven’t noticed, have been completely behind Obama’s destroy America agenda-their coy voting games notwithstanding.

Don L on September 24, 2011 at 1:43 PM

And Perry wouldn’t earn negative marks on SB1070, maybe neutral. He said it “wasn’t right for Texas” .. That’s hardly a ringing endorsement nor is it a serious deflection.

preallocated on September 24, 2011 at 11:45 AM

Why is it not right for Texas? Because Perry wants to keep that cheap, illegal, Mexican labor for his cronies? That’s what I’m starting to believe, and his lack of support for my state’s SB1070 earns him VERY negative marks.

Perry has lost me with his “heart” BS. He is pro-illegal, there is no denying that, now.

JannyMae on September 24, 2011 at 1:45 PM

However, I am saying that as long as the Federal government doesn’t enforce border security, as a society, we have to decide how to make the best of a bad situation.

preallocated on September 24, 2011 at 1:24 PM

As long as we continue to do nothing about the ones already here, border security will never be achieved, because they will get around it, somehow. That’s why Perry has a BIT of a point about the fence. If we don’t send them back when they come in illegally, then they have every incentive to continue to do so. Not punishing bad behavior leads to more bad behavior.

JannyMae on September 24, 2011 at 1:49 PM

Alternate headline: The Last Temptation of Christie

Lawdawg86 on September 24, 2011 at 10:50 AM

+1

Laura in Maryland on September 24, 2011 at 1:58 PM

Perry lost me too. I don’t want to here about amnesty, accommodation, or any “heart” until we seal the damned borders and ditch the anchor-baby laws. THEN we can have a conversation about what to do with the millions that are here.

Laura in Maryland on September 24, 2011 at 2:03 PM

sheesh! s/b hear, not here.

Ed, how ’bout a preview button so we can…nevermind.

Laura in Maryland on September 24, 2011 at 2:03 PM

God, no.

fossten on September 24, 2011 at 2:21 PM

As a reincarnation researcher, I believe Christie may be the reincarnation of Gunning Bedford Jr. and possibly Grover Cleveland. They certainly look alike and have common traits. See http://www.reincar-nation.com and go to the Republicans section. You can also check out the Obama Circle section to see who I think he and his cronies were.

NNtrancer on September 24, 2011 at 2:24 PM

Could this be Ann Coulter’s wet dream come true?

Winebabe on September 24, 2011 at 2:30 PM

As long as the illegals are here they are going to get their portion of the stash. It’s just a question of whether they will be on the dole and become a permanent fixture in the recipient class, or whether they will take some of that future dole and put it towards possibly making them part of the provider class.

I’m not saying that it’s a grand idea, or perfectly in line with conservative principle. However, I am saying that as long as the Federal government doesn’t enforce border security, as a society, we have to decide how to make the best of a bad situation.

preallocated on September 24, 2011 at 1:24 PM

A study came out last week showing that 81% of all those new Texas jobs being touted are going to immigrants, both legal and illegal. Won’t the Texas Dream Act simply ensure that percentage grows even higher? Especially among the higher paying positions? Seems like a bad idea.

Kataklysmic on September 24, 2011 at 2:40 PM

he believes in global warming, he’s questionable on guns, he seems to support comprehensive immigration reform, he backed Castle over O’Donnell (RINO!), etc.

Right on AP. Our “true conservative” brethren will sour on him quicker than they’ve soured on Perry…much quicker. I personally think he’d be much more conservative as President than he has been as Governor of one of the bluest states in our country. But unfortunately he probably wouldn’t survive the primaries.

ncconservative on September 24, 2011 at 2:57 PM

Still think he isn’t running, but he is enjoying the hell out of all the flattery.

I do think he would like to be President, but he cannot win the GOP nomination. The geography is totally wrong for him. No amount of money can overcome that; he is not conservative enough to win any of those early states except possibly New Hampshire. And if he runs and fails he is toast in New Jersey.

rockmom on September 24, 2011 at 3:05 PM

This little tease he’s doing is worse than a teenaged girl.

lonestar1 on September 24, 2011 at 3:10 PM

No Christie, please. He has too many liabilitie, and he is not a conservative.

Every time I see that Christie is reconsidering, I cannot help but think of this Elvis tune:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmNXXUmP8W0

onlineanalyst on September 24, 2011 at 3:41 PM

You know those photos you always see of candidates jogging…?

Akzed on September 24, 2011 at 4:18 PM

He’d be better than Romney, and that’s who we will end up with as the pile on of Perry continues. All these so-called “true conservatives” bitching and moaning about Gardasil, or tuition for illegal aliens, will ensure that someone even farther from their definition of a true conservative will win the nomination. It’s really that simple. How that is better is beyond me, but a certain segment of the base just loves cutting off their nose to spite their face.

changer1701 on September 24, 2011 at 4:37 PM

Romney——Looks and talks like a used car salesman.

Perry—–Talks like he has OCD and his stance on immigration is not good for the country. That alone makes him useless and a punk.

Bachman——Just unelectable and too dizzy.

Newt——-Looks like Colonel Sanders and your typical white banker. Even if he is smart.

Cain—–unelectable. Blacks cannot and will not vote for him cause he’s an Oreo or a Tom.

and making him the VP candidate won’t get the GOP more than 2 or 3 extra votes. Blacks are chained to the dems.

Paul——-too truthful.

Christie——-kiss your 2nd amendment rights goodbye. NJ is one of the least free states in the country. Refuses to recognize gun rights like the feds refuse to recognize illegal immigrants. Even while the major cities in NJ are overrun with gangbangers murderers and flash mobs. “YOU VILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO DEFEND YOURSELF!!!

And he’s still a big supporter of unions. And NJ….is one of the most mobbed up, corrupt states in the US.

The Pillsbury dough boy might get some traction from Coulter and crew….but alongside the slim Jim, dumbo Barry O….he’s the poster boy for obesity and indulgence.

Twana on September 24, 2011 at 4:41 PM

This little tease he’s doing is worse than a teenaged girl.

lonestar1 on September 24, 2011 at 3:10 PM

You never could finish the deal eh?/

CW on September 24, 2011 at 4:42 PM

Yawn. Wait, I thought it was too late to jump in the race? Tease much? Breaking all his supporters hearts for leading ‘em on? I say – jump in, the more the merrier and let the people decide. I guess when SHE gets in, their arguements won’t work, right?

conmo on September 24, 2011 at 4:49 PM

And when she does, guiliani has said he will get in too. Come on, everybody in!

conmo on September 24, 2011 at 4:52 PM

CC would be a nightmare. He may be doing fine by NJ standards …. that isn’t relevant. He is left of RINO on almost every issue other than his skill at bitchslapping reporters and stupid libtards.

David in ATL on September 24, 2011 at 4:58 PM

Paul——-too truthful.

More like … nuts. Part of the Blame America First crowd. Quasi-9/11 Troofer as well. Also nutty enough to consider putting Dennis Kookcinich in his cabinet.

pdigaudio on September 24, 2011 at 5:14 PM

TOOOOOOO FAT TO RUN … NO PUN INTENDED !!!!!

aniladesai on September 24, 2011 at 5:20 PM

unseen on September 24, 2011 at 1:57 AM

Yes, really. She has said nothing about either open or closed borders. Perry didn’t allow anything, the federal government did. She wasn’t presented one with 97% legislative approval to sign. No. No. No.

Notwithstanding this quiz, she still has a D.

rukiddingme on September 24, 2011 at 11:58 PM

Don L on September 24, 2011 at 1:43 PM

I agree with your points.

Elisa on September 25, 2011 at 12:52 AM

And when she does, guiliani has said he will get in too. Come on, everybody in!

conmo on September 24, 2011 at 4:52 PM

Bring ‘em all in and let’s see where they stand. I’ve got no problem with that. If one of them manages to answer a few questions right — and hasn’t answered the same questions differently in the past — he/she will find a very enthusiastic electorate.

Rational Thought on September 25, 2011 at 1:03 AM

I don’t think voters would be too upset – they are getting the
gist of her (Palin) strategy by now. And we are all getting the gist
of the repub estab ABP theory – keep throwing him out there -
someone will resonate with the electorate – not happening yet!

Amjean on September 24, 2011 at 10:55 AM

That’s because we want our own pick. It will be interesting to see who it ends up to be. We will not be told it’s “their” guy.

wi farmgirl on September 25, 2011 at 7:34 AM

Check out the wiki on Christie, as a US Attorney, he ONLY prosecuted “sure things”, so he ended up with a “perfect” record. He’s a protege of Rove, and was one of Bush’s biggest bundlers. Perry has been Governor in Texas so long he has appointed virtually every position in Texas possible, including 6 of 9 Texas Supreme Court Justices. Rick started out as a “bushie”, but he has been in office so long he has his own machine in Texas. Romney is a “data wonk”, he would have taken longer to decide about OBL than Obama. He has not been “hiding” so much as that is how long it takes him to actually make a decision. Mitt does NOT shoot from the hip, he has been building his machine for 5 years. He will spend lots of his own money and lose like Meg Whitman did in California.

bigmike on September 25, 2011 at 9:16 AM

There’s only one question we need to ask about Christie -”shorts or boxers”

There, that takes care of the necessary information of the teen -to thirty crowd of celebrity munchkins.

Don L on September 25, 2011 at 1:35 PM

Perry was my guy, but who would have thought he’d suck so badly in debates. Besides, his immigration stance can’t fly…

Who’s next?

stacman on September 25, 2011 at 3:20 PM

I’d like to support Christie, but the guy looks like he’s gaining 50 lbs. per week, and no one is going to vote for an obese candidate…

stacman on September 25, 2011 at 3:26 PM

Amjean on September 24, 2011 at 10:55 AM

Or, maybe it will be sometime right before the convention .. it will all look perfect then .. or heck, 3rd party .. or 2016, or or or or …

Keep hope alive etc.

preallocated on September 25, 2011 at 8:01 PM

Comment pages: 1 3 4 5