OMB director: “We’re not saying there’s anything wrong with people earning a lot”
posted at 4:05 pm on September 19, 2011 by Tina Korbe
Jack Lew today couldn’t say how an additional tax on millionaires and billionaires will create jobs — and barely confirmed that he thinks such a tax will at least contribute to deficit reduction. The director of the Office of Management and Budget appeared this morning on Fox News’ “Happening Now” to defend the president’s just-announced proposals to trim the deficit — proposals that are a part of his overall jobs plan. Fox’s Jenna Lee asked Lew how the tax will reduce the nation’s high rate of unemployment.
“Today’s plan puts into place a balanced, fair approach to doing the $4 trillion of deficit reduction we need to get to a point where our deficit as a percentage of the economy is at a sustainable level,” Lew told her. “Whichever way you go is a hard choice. There’s a Republican budget in the House that would make severe changes in Medicare and turn it into a voucher program. It would reduce spending on things like education and research and development to the point where we couldn’t invest in what we need for the future.”
Better to tax the super rich, Lew suggested.
“We believe there’s a fundamental unfairness to have middle class people paying higher marginal tax rates than millionaires and billionaires,” Lew said. “We’re not saying we should have a confiscatory tax rate; we’re saying it’s just not fair to have a world where it’s so unbalanced.”
Lee conceded fairness in the tax code is a laudable goal, but again pressed Lew as to how the tax will grow jobs. She wondered: Which of the president’s proposals specifically will improve the jobs situation? Lew didn’t have an answer.
“If you look at the overall package, the things that will create jobs are, first of all, passing the Americans Jobs Act by doing the things that would create demand now and directly create jobs through public works like roads and bridges and keeping teachers and firemen and policemen on the rolls,” Lew said.
At that point, Lee stopped trying and took the tack of this question instead: The revenues from the tax will at least go straight to deficit reduction, right? Well, sure, Lew (sort of) said.
“Well, obviously, it’s a package that overall will reduce the deficit,” he said. “The overall revenue is connected to the overall spending and if you net are bringing down your deficit, yes, it’s very much contributing to bringing down the deficit.”
Seemingly sensing that he had rejected the only two reasonable justifications for the tax — that it will either create jobs or reduce the deficit — Lew fell back on the “it’s not fair” argument.
“We’re not saying that there’s anything wrong with people earning a lot and being very successful,” he concluded lamely. “What we’re saying is it’s not fair to say those people should pay lower taxes than people who are earning much less.”
But while the president says Warren Buffett is paying less in taxes than his secretary, it’s not exactly accurate to say all millionaires and billionaires pay lower taxes than people who are earning less.
In 2009, 236,883 people reported more than $1 million in income — and paid $177 billion in federal income taxes, according to an infograph on Fox. That represents 0.2 percent of all federal tax returns, but makes up more than 20 percent of all income tax payments.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Hmmm, funny, I could have sworn that Obama was the Forest Gump of the Obamanation Administration.
SWalker on February 22, 2013 at 2:43 PM
…THEY ARE ALL UNQUALIFIED!…every jack one of them!
KOOLAID2 on February 22, 2013 at 2:46 PM
Filthy, Commie hypocrites?
Check.
OhEssYouCowboys on February 22, 2013 at 2:46 PM
….boiled shrimp, shrimp gumbo…..thats about all the shrimp there is……
BobMbx on February 22, 2013 at 2:47 PM
You’re doing Forrest Gump a disservice.
He was after all, a war hero, a successful businessman and a ping pong champion .
EnglishRogue on February 22, 2013 at 2:47 PM
It might – if you could find one.
Midas on February 22, 2013 at 2:48 PM
No, Chuck Hagel will have that title wrapped up.
The Jewish lobby is honing the rays from their dumb machine on him right now.
mwbri on February 22, 2013 at 2:48 PM
Obama is surrounded by dummies, by necessity.
It makes Obama appear smart and sane.
It’s just a charlatanic ploy. The Punk is always this. See the symptoms, top/left, too.
Schadenfreude on February 22, 2013 at 2:49 PM
Jack Lew, Chuck Hagel, John Kerry…so many choices, so little time.
Clink on February 22, 2013 at 2:49 PM
And he knocked the dog-shit out of a long-haired, woman beating, Commie.
OhEssYouCowboys on February 22, 2013 at 2:49 PM
Forrest Gump went back to get Bubba and all his wounded platoon mates. He would have done a better job with Benghazi.
mwbri on February 22, 2013 at 2:50 PM
Barry is Jenny. Haven’t you heard about his awful childhood?
mchristian on February 22, 2013 at 2:50 PM
EnglishRogue on February 22, 2013 at 2:47 PM
…and such a good soul.
The Punk is a charlatanic diabolic monster.
Schadenfreude on February 22, 2013 at 2:50 PM
It’s Obama’s strategy. He does so many things wrong that the sheer volume of attack material overwhelms whatever strategists that work against him. No matter how much material they throw against him, they feel as if their work is only 10% done. As a result, they pass by the most important chunks…
Archivarix on February 22, 2013 at 2:52 PM
Come on. You KNOW rules don’t apply to Democrats.
Warner Todd Huston on February 22, 2013 at 2:53 PM
“sometimes there just aren’t enough rocks”
ToddPA on February 22, 2013 at 2:53 PM
Were there to be a real Forrest Gump, Obama is it. Without the charm of the movie character, obviously.
I’d take a bullet for Forrest, not a problem. He was a decent person as the character portrayed.
And that’s where I’ll leave it.
Liam on February 22, 2013 at 2:56 PM
I would imagine gump could have written his name so you could read/know who it was? lew signature is worse than any doctor I have ever seen. I don’t want his signature on any of the trillion dollar bills bho plans to make to fund all the krap he wants!
L
letget on February 22, 2013 at 2:56 PM
Also came up with the “smiley” face T-shirt and “shit happens”. I knew Forrest Gump. Forrest Gump was a friend a mine. Jack Lew, you are no Forrest Gump.
msupertas on February 22, 2013 at 2:56 PM
I’d say Obama was more Chance the Gardner.
Fenris on February 22, 2013 at 2:58 PM
Forrest Gump was an honorable, brave, kindhearted man with a strong work ethic and a sense of decency and his word was his bond. The Obama crew has none of those qualities
ldbgcoleman on February 22, 2013 at 3:02 PM
Are you trying to suggest that a horrible childhood isn’t every American citizens god given right?
SWalker on February 22, 2013 at 3:13 PM
Sounds perfect for the job. After all, isn’t INCOMPETENCE a hallmark for any candidate for a job in this administration?
GarandFan on February 22, 2013 at 3:16 PM
Not Forrest Gump. Keyser Sose.
Mr. D on February 22, 2013 at 3:17 PM
I don’t know who Jack Lew is, however, what’s up with his hair? Is that real?
NJ Red on February 22, 2013 at 3:20 PM
Jack Lew’s Signature Is Probably The Best Thing About Him…And, Even It Sucks.
Resist We Much on February 22, 2013 at 3:38 PM
Dumb and mean ass commie nut case Dumb.
APACHEWHOKNOWS on February 22, 2013 at 3:39 PM
How dumb and how mean as commie nut case dumb are they..
CO2/Climate Change, stop coal fired power plants dumb.
http://www.wattsupwiththat.com
Lie to themselves and belive the lies dumb.
APACHEWHOKNOWS on February 22, 2013 at 3:41 PM
Of course they do. Jack Lew did his job to help set up that straw man for Obama to tilt at. Lew was highly successful in creating the kind of atmosphere against which the democrat machine could run. Now, he can reap the rewards of his treachery by ascending to an honored position in the regime. The fact that he enriched himself during that treachery is just a fringe benefit and not a thing to for any of those sycophants in the public relations branch of the DNC (i.e, the MSM) to worry their pretty little heads about.
AZfederalist on February 22, 2013 at 3:43 PM
Hey, where’s Lester?
Thought so. I don’t want to hear another of his holier-than-though bull about how WE aid and abet all of this. His folks are the ones that DO everything he purports to decry. Soros, convicted of insider trading? Not a Republican. Bernie Madoff? Not a Republican. Jack Lew? Not only Not a Republican, he’s the Democratic Treasury Secretary. And Lester is silent – because he shares an ideology neither truly believes.
Jeff Weimer on February 22, 2013 at 3:50 PM
Hey…have you heard that Obama’s nominee for Secretary of Defense, Chuck Hagel, has now come out against Obama’s nominee for Treasury Secretary, Jack Lew?
Yeah, it turns out that Hagel is dyslexic and he thinks Jack Lew’s name is Lack Jew.
OxyCon on February 22, 2013 at 3:54 PM
I think you’re thinking of Woody Allen’s character Zelig,
narciso on February 22, 2013 at 3:59 PM
If nothing else, Lew knows his way around the back-alleys of financial malfeasance.
If Obama was going after financial fraud, Jack Lew could be a good nominee – in the same manner as engaging a thief as a security consultant: they know the shortcomings, pitfalls, and holes in the system and the tricks that are used to avoid the watchdogs.
ss396 on February 22, 2013 at 4:34 PM
Forrest Gump was a wholly moral man. There is no one is this administration fit to shine his shoes.
Slowburn on February 23, 2013 at 9:18 PM