Solyndra employee to Mark Levin: “Everyone knew that the plant wouldn’t work”

posted at 8:05 pm on September 14, 2011 by Allahpundit

Yes indeed. Everyone knew. That was the point of last night’s post. And in fact, what you’re about to hear isn’t the first case of a Solyndra employee insisting that the whole enterprise was widely known to be a bust inside HQ. Remember this snippet from a recent Mercury News story?

One former employee, Mohammed Walahi, who began working as a process technician for Solyndra in 2005, showed up at the company Thursday morning to file a workers’ compensation claim for a repetitive stress injury and was surprised to see FBI agents instead of security guards. Solyndra’s employees were laid off with no severance pay and an immediate end to health benefits, and Walahi, 41, has a wife and two young children to support.

He lashed out at his former employer, saying Solyndra manufactured solar panels that often contained imperfections that had to be thrown away.

“At least $100,000 a day was thrown away,” Walahi said. “If they are wasting $100,000 a day, how much is that a month or a year? Of course that’s going to lead to bankruptcy.”

The latest news is that the Treasury Department is launching its own probe into Solyndra, which, given that the FBI and the Energy Department are pursuing investigations too, tells me that we’re firmly in five-alarm ass-covering mode now. Here’s the scariest part of the new report from ABC:

The $535 million loan to Solyndra included a quarterly interest rate of 1.025 percent, the government bank reported in July. Of 18 Energy Department loans cited in the bank’s report, Solyndra’s rate was lowest. Eight other Energy Department projects, each also backed by the Federal Financing Bank, came with rates three or four times higher, the report shows…

Department of Energy officials said the rates for all of its green energy loans were set by the bank using a formula, and Solyndra’s favorable terms were not the result of special treatment.

“All borrowers under the [government loan guarantee] program receive the same treatment,” Energy Department spokesman Damien LaVera wrote to iWatch and ABC News in response to questions.

Given that we’re still handing out billion-dollar loans to green ventures, it’s actually more troubling to think the department’s interest-rate formula might be so skewed that it would consider Solyndra a safe investment when even low-level employees knew the business was set to crash than that this was the product of some backroom deal. How many more green boondoggles are we on the hook for thanks to that “formula”?

Here’s what I still can’t figure out: Why would a White House that staked so much political credibility on “green jobs” want a business as risky as this to be its showcase venture early on? You would think they would have gone out of their way to stick with very safe green investments at the beginning to build a track record of success. Then, as the public got comfortable, they could branch out into riskier/more cronyistic projects. As it is, by the time this is over, the term “green jobs” will practically qualify as profanity. Why would the White House blow it that badly? Who gained? Click the image to listen.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

BTW: I forgot to check where they were made.. not likely the US.

Dasher on September 15, 2011 at 8:53 AM

Department of Energy officials said the rates for all of its green energy loans were set by the bank using a formula, and Solyndra’s favorable terms were not the result of special treatment.

The white house shepherded this through the system, yet presidential level inquiries are not “influence” or “pressure.”

yeah, right.

dogsoldier on September 15, 2011 at 8:55 AM

He lashed out at his former employer, saying Solyndra manufactured solar panels that often contained imperfections that had to be thrown away.
“At least $100,000 a day was thrown away,” Walahi said. “If they are wasting $100,000 a day, how much is that a month or a year? Of course that’s going to lead to bankruptcy.”

$36.5 million a year?

And if a solar panel costs $100,000, wouldn’t it be cheaper to FIX the imperfections, then sell it, than throw it away?

No private venture capitalist would invest a dime in this company.

With all due respect to Mr. Walahi, when there was half a billion from the Gubmint on the line, he and the other employees were probably told to zip their lip.

Steve Z on September 15, 2011 at 9:38 AM

Speaking of “green energy” I was at Sam’s Club the other day and walked down the row where light bulbs are. GE has a new “incandescent” which is really just a halogen tube inside of a shell shaped like a standard incandescent; $5.96 / 4 pack, which is only 3 times more than standard ones. So there is another solution other than CFL’s, or LED’s. But of course your wallet can tell the real difference.

Dasher on September 15, 2011 at 8:52 AM

Well, if the halogen tube breaks inside of a shell, at least the shell will keep the mercury from escaping and poisoning the air in an entire room.

Steve Z on September 15, 2011 at 9:52 AM

Solyndra’s technology sucked… The keys to viable solar panel production going forward is price per kw, and long years of trouble free service.
-
These guys were selling a gimmick, and at a premium ta boot. They were never going to be competitive in a market that is currently in a constant push to remove a few more pennies from the cost the product.
-
Barry and the gang had to know what they were getting into with Solyndra… and I don’t believe it was about long term solar energy production… or a 1,000 worker’s jobs.
-
Robbing the taxpayer is what it looks like to me. I like when Rush asked ‘who’s going to pay US back? Barry? The DNC? The eco-wacko groups?’
-

RalphyBoy on September 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM

Comment pages: 1 2