GOP rep swipes name of Obama’s new jobs bill before Democrats introduce it in Congress
posted at 5:30 pm on September 14, 2011 by Allahpundit
I know what you’re thinking, but let me save you some time. I’ve already reported him to Attack Watch.
“My bill is not the president’s bill, it’s a real job creator,” Gohmert told The Hill, shortly after filing his two-page alternative to the president’s plan, under the same title.
Gohmert said that he read the president’s 155-page jobs plan, when it was emailed to lawmakers on Monday afternoon.
Calling the president’s plan a “disaster,” Gohmert said that he checked to see “who filed the ‘American Jobs Act’ for the president, here in the House, since we had to do it ‘now, right away,” but discovered that the plan had not been officially introduced in the House.
So, at 1:20pm Gohmert filed his own version of a jobs bill, under the title included on the president’s legislation distributed to members of Congress two-days prior.
Heritage has a copy of the bill here. It’s basically one line long: Repeal the corporate income tax, just as Palin recommended in her Indianola speech a few weeks ago. Congress would never do it, of course, but it’s a nifty way to underline criticism of Obama’s growth-slowing policies. Which, of course, is the whole point of this name-borrowing PR stunt.
Gohmert surely realizes that House Democrats can still introduce Obama’s bill under the same name, but I’m not sure rank-and-file conservatives do, so yeah — The One’s bill will still be the “American Jobs Act” too. (In fact, Reid’s already introduced it with that title in the Senate.) That’s why this is merely a good stunt instead of a great one. Here’s Gohmert a few days ago after O’s speech sounding distinctly and unsurprisingly underwhelmed.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Man that is some weak sauce, chump.
fossten on September 14, 2011 at 6:18 PM
King: You! Old Woman!
Peasant: I’m 37!
King: What?
Peasant: I’m 37, I’m not old! And I’m not a woman!
(And guess what Ernie? Skin color doesn’t matter when you are an American. That being said, I marched on Washington with the tea party and saw all sorts of brown skinned people marching too.)
Kristamatic on September 14, 2011 at 6:18 PM
Stereotype much?
Del Dolemonte on September 14, 2011 at 6:19 PM
I’ve heard that guy on the radio a time or two over the last week.
He’s on a rip-snortin’ tear, man. lolol
Murf76 on September 14, 2011 at 6:19 PM
Ah, the super-mask slips. Incredibly sad, ernie.
You can’t be whining about racism while you reveal your own prejudices and still be credible — but then you never were…
hillbillyjim on September 14, 2011 at 6:21 PM
No He didn’t.
fossten on September 14, 2011 at 6:22 PM
Uncle Toms don’t count don’t cha know?
csdeven on September 14, 2011 at 6:26 PM
It is merely a stunt but it is a great stunt.
I want Congressmen to fight back at every level. One of our problems now is the current group often makes a premature decision that a situation cannot be won, and therefore they should not fight
It is the fight Americans remember, or lack thereof
How did we end up raising the debt ceiling? West fell for the ‘hopeless’ line and came out telling the Tea Party to grow up, but Bachmann held to conviction and voted against
Raising the debt ceiling guaranteed our credit downgrade, which some might say hurt Obama more, but he spent the trillion immediately and how long does it take to payback a trillion?
You can surrender and lose, or you can fight and lose. Fighting is better if you want people to follow you.
entagor on September 14, 2011 at 6:28 PM
Why’d you de-friend me on Facebook? Afraid of my conservative opinion?
ladyingray on September 14, 2011 at 6:28 PM
You have to forgive ernesto every once in a while…
… He swings both ways, and apparently last night was time to play catcher.
/
Seven Percent Solution on September 14, 2011 at 6:30 PM
Another short cut to promoting a better jobs and prosperity environment would be to pass a bill that would require the Pension Guarantee Trustees to send out a notice that after date certain (Dec 2012?), the Trust Fund will no longer guarantee any defined pension plans (public or private). Additionally, they would provide a timely, clear and reasonable path to convert existing defined pensions into prorated defined contribution plans, based upon the actual amounts that have been contributed to said plans in an employees name (not including any promissory notes, written or otherwise, owed by future taxpayers).
A huge part of the ‘common’ support of the politics of over regulation and excessive business taxation comes from politicians (of both parties), unions and bureaucrats who have defined pension plans that are not sensitive to marketplace whims (including regulations and taxation) in any significant fashion. If the well being of their pensions (and future) were at stake with excessive taxation and regulation, many of these folks would quickly sing a different tune. Corporate taxation and excessive regulations is a huge drag on stock dividends and pension growth. Plus, it’s likely there would be a mass exodus from the halls of Congress of both parties from folks who are largely in office for their (defined) personal benefit, not the well being of our nation’s general economic prosperity.
drfredc on September 14, 2011 at 6:54 PM
ernesto apparently fell out of his nest again and hit his widdle head.
gordo on September 14, 2011 at 6:55 PM
It’s not petty. It’s stupid.
I don’t care what any of the legislation is called, it’s all garbage. No matter how much lipstick you put on that pig, it’s still a pig.
ButterflyDragon on September 14, 2011 at 6:59 PM
We are not going to eliminate corporate taxes despite the case that can be made for how this would improved the economy and generate jobs. However, there is no reasons we cannot move towards this goal a baby step at a time.
First step: redo how we treat dividends. The reason that dividend income get special tax treatment is to compensate for the fact that these moneys are also taxed at the corporate level. A first step to lowering the corporate taxes, which of course are paid by customers, is to allow corporations to deduct dividends as a business expense. Offset the tax revenue loss by treating dividend income as ordinary income.
Warren Buffet would feel better at paying higher taxes.
Laurence on September 14, 2011 at 7:01 PM
BAD NEWS: GOP rep swipes name of Obama’s new jobs bill before Democrats introduce it in Congress
GOOD NEWS: ‘American Labor and Public Union Rewards full of rehashed old ideas that have already been rejected, plus the ol’ Tax the Super Rich demand again Bill’ is still available.
Red State State of Mind on September 14, 2011 at 7:15 PM
Ernesto,do you need some lube after that bend over you just asked for?
docflash on September 14, 2011 at 7:33 PM
Yet another concept with which the progs are unfamiliar.
Freelancer on September 14, 2011 at 9:27 PM
Racist ass.
mankai on September 14, 2011 at 9:56 PM
Although I know it was a “stunt” bill, I was impressed by its length (or lack thereof) compared to what we normally see in Congress. I think most bills (if not all) should have about a 10 page uppermost limit. Keep all of the earmarks out, and make it “commonsense” language.
IrishEyes on September 14, 2011 at 10:09 PM
If this was not a legitimate bill then has a bill been introduced?
I heard that Speaker Boehner has one? Regardless, Mark Levin was livid tonight, saying Boehner, Cantor and McConnell are ready to compromise and meet Obama 1/2 way on his bill. So here we go again.
No leadership in the House or Senate. We really need to get rid of these wimps!!
bluefox on September 14, 2011 at 10:33 PM
Great bill by Gohmert. The Senate should next “deem” it passed.
virgo on September 15, 2011 at 2:09 AM
I think I understand the logic, though I don’t agree with it:
Boehner, Cantor, and McConnell are probably figuring that this bill won’t help the economy any more than anything else Obama has done. So if they agree to let it pass, that gets rid of the argument that “Obama could have saved the economy, but those mean old Rethuglicans wouldn’t work with him!”
I think it’s a valid argument, but I also think it misjudges the mood of the electorate, which is very much anti-the usual “insider baseball”. When even liberals are arguing that Obama is ineffective, they aren’t blaming the GOP as usual — they’re blaming their former Messiah.
When the Dems have turned on their own, it is not the time to play defense as Boehner et al. are doing. It’s time to join the attack.
Mary in LA on September 16, 2011 at 2:45 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2