POTUS who “opposes regulatory burden” about to create emergency condition in Texas
posted at 8:30 am on September 3, 2011 by Jazz Shaw
We have the quote locked in on the White House web site, veritably written in stone.
At the same time, I have continued to underscore the importance of reducing regulatory burdens and regulatory uncertainty, particularly as our economy continues to recover.
The Electric Reliability Council of Texas will certainly be glad to hear that. You see, they’ve been getting worried lately that if certain federal regulations go into effect, they could be in some serious trouble. Somebody should drop them a line and let them know they have nothing to fear, because they still seem to think the president is about to send them up the river without a paddle.
The Electric Reliability Council of Texas, operator of the state’s power grid, said in a report today that a new federal environmental regulation would reduce generating capacity and put the grid “at increasing risk of emergency events,” including rotating power outages.
The Jan. 1 implementation date for the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, designed to curb air pollution from power plants, leaves ERCOT with “an extremely truncated period” in which to assess the impact of the rule and “no realistic opportunity to take steps that could even partially offset the substantial losses of available operating capacity,” it said.
The report outlined three scenarios, with even the “best-case scenario” expected to result in the loss of an estimated 1,200 to 1,400 megawatts of generating capacity during peak consumption periods, ERCOT said.
“Had this incremental reduction been in place in 2011, ERCOT would have experienced rotating outages during days in August,” the report said.
Pshaw. After the president’s announcement this week about ozone level regulations, clearly Texas has no cloud on their horizon. The president will doubtless roll back those regulations any day now. Or at least right after he finishes his speech next Thursday night.
Unfortunately, nobody has clued in the Environmental Protection Agency on the latest presidential guidelines. When asked about the distress call, they were almost dismissive, saying that Texas “has an ample range of cost-effective emission reductions options” for complying with the rule “without threatening electricity reliability or the continued operation of coal-burning units.”
I hope President Obama finds out about this. These EPA guys are positively going rogue.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
That’s not what I was getting at. All of the new EPA regulations are targeted. I have been following it and even I got snookered. The only way this ends is the one’s that are going to effect the plant closings come this January go away.
cozmo on September 3, 2011 at 1:01 PM
Obama will attempt to destroy Texas, but he will come up with a “waiver” system to protect his constituencies.
GaltBlvnAtty on September 3, 2011 at 1:43 PM
Government is increasingly making it hard to do business. This is another prime example ………… and the rogue NLRB board is another. Our economy is in the tank because of a bloated government bureaucracy full of people who say you can’t do squat. And, then when they really want to do something dumb they create messes like the mortgage mess with the help of [semi]governmental agencies…………… With great ideas that everyone should own a home whether or not they can afford it.
SC.Charlie on September 3, 2011 at 2:04 PM
Meh…Mexico failed, along with the Regulators and carpetbaggers.
Texas is Texas. Not bragging, just saying.
Limerick on September 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM
I live in Lubbock, Texas and the 110 degree heat (throughout almost all of June and July – it actually cooled down in August) would have killed us without air conditioning.
My parents live in Houston and they had a few rolling brown/black outs this summer.
If these regulations go into effect, people will die due to lack of A.C.. My parents are 76 and 67 and I would be worried about my dad’s life.
This is all insanity.
Theophile on September 3, 2011 at 2:56 PM
Ted C, remember about a decade ago when Europe had their big August Hat Wave and 14,000 died as the power grid had problems and A/C was scarce.
JIMV on September 3, 2011 at 2:59 PM
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/09/03/blue-angels-to-fly-on-biofuels/?hpt=hp_t2
Tell me this is necessary and why.
Limerick on September 3, 2011 at 3:02 PM
Have you tried One Guy From Italy’s calzones? They are awesome. You are in Lubbock (as I am), so I can’t believe that you haven’t tried it. They have a location on University and one on 50th St..
Theophile on September 3, 2011 at 3:09 PM
The problem is with the idea of regulation. If government passes a law, the regulatory agencies should get one shot at the apple and produce the most minimal amount of regulations within a specific time frame. They do not get to keep fiddling with the process ans writing new ones forever. In government little ever goes away and eventually the industry is regulated to the point it no longer can function, and still the regulation continues…What we need is a well funded agency to review existing regulations with the goal of killing as many as possible.
JIMV on September 3, 2011 at 3:20 PM
Yeah, that was darkly hilarious. They were dropping like flies and it was 5-10 degrees cooler in their “heat wave” than in my home office in SoCal. Those frenchies wouldn’t make it to noon on a typical summer day in west Texas.
rcl on September 3, 2011 at 3:25 PM
It’s high time to call in the Texas Rangers and the Texas National Guard to arrest ALL of these employees of the EPA and charge them with attempted murder. Let each one hire an attorney and spend tens of thousands of dollars in trying to defend themselves.
honsy on September 3, 2011 at 3:31 PM
It couldn’t possibly be the utility jumping on the anti-regulation bandwagon and whining just so they can evade environmental responsibility and maximize profits. The EPA makes its money by squeezing corporations into hardship.
Constantine on September 3, 2011 at 3:59 PM
Atlas Shrugged: you will do the impossible and when you fail, it will be your fault.
AshleyTKing on September 3, 2011 at 4:38 PM
It’s high time to call in the Texas Rangers and the Texas National Guard to arrest ALL of these employees of the EPA and charge them with attempted murder. Let each one hire an attorney and spend tens of thousands of dollars in trying to defend themselves.
honsy on September 3, 2011 at 3:31 PM
me like!
Commies need gallows
Sonosam on September 3, 2011 at 6:21 PM
The pic of Obama on this post makes my skin crawl.
bridgetown on September 3, 2011 at 7:24 PM
EPA was specifically forbidden by Congress several years ago to issue new regulations concerning fossil fuels, so Obama’s Regime has sought at every turn to skirt the law where it exists, and to invent new regulatory authority where none exists.
Rule of law requires statutory authority for regulatory action. Making your own law by fiat, decree, regulation, or waivers and selective enforcement is not the rule of law.
It is dictatorship.
Adjoran on September 4, 2011 at 3:10 AM
Yup. But praise Gaia they’re not fast and furious about it…
locomotivebreath1901 on September 4, 2011 at 5:57 PM
Isn’t it about time to tell the feds to get back behind the wall of separation the Tenth Amendment tells them to? You do know what that wall of separation is, don’t you? It’s the wall between the powers the feds are allowed, and all that remains that is reserved to the states or the people.
Woody
woodcdi on September 4, 2011 at 6:51 PM
Whoever is in responsible for the photos of Obama on this site deserves our highest praise. I particularly love Obama, The Fiendish Won.
Basilsbest on September 4, 2011 at 7:02 PM
“Obama will attempt…”?
“WILL attempt…”?
I’d say he’s already attempted and maintained the attempt. Texas has been suffering mightily with huge financial liabilty due to, particularly, the ongoing fires there, and Obama has continued to deny them a state-wide declaration of emergency to be eligible for federal emergency money.
Meanwhile, lesser losses occurred in other states after the tornadoes (lesser, even then!) compared to those by Texas, and Obama was quick to approve FEMA intervention. Not so with Texas.
It’s not even arguable as to how Obama has tried to justify not allowing FEMA to assist Texas, it’s just downright hideously cruel how he’s played politics with Americans’ lives and the entire state of Texas. Criminal, in fact.
Lourdes on September 5, 2011 at 10:20 AM
Yep. Ol’ ernie’s always good for a lol.
Solaratov on September 5, 2011 at 11:31 AM
it’s pretty simple. It’s time for Texas to start ignoring anything the feds try to do here. They’re willing to watch the state dry up and burn… fine. We’re willing to watch the feds do the same.
Nope, not going to bring up the s-word, wouldn’t be prudent… but it would feel sooo good.
“The eyes of Texas are upon you…”
creekspecter on September 6, 2011 at 5:33 PM
Never in the history of our nation has so many states and groups of people come under attack by the presidency. It is if we have been taken over by an foreign entity that has no interests in the American people other than to stay in power. Now is the time to send the academic elites back to their classrooms where they have captive audiences and leave the country in the hands of adults who actually have a clue how to address the needs of the people. The old saying that “Those that do…..do …..and those that can’t…..teach” has come to fruition.
volsense on September 7, 2011 at 12:59 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2