Fox News poll: 74% think Palin shouldn’t run
posted at 8:25 pm on September 1, 2011 by Allahpundit
A data point from today’s new national numbers showing Perry leading with 26 percent, Romney with 18, and Palin with eight.
Et tu, tea partiers?
A separate survey conducted by Mark Blumenthal of 151 GOP “power outsiders” (i.e. influential Republicans in Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina) found that 81 percent of them also thought she shouldn’t run. Of that group, 76 percent said they agree with her on the issues but just 37 percent thought she could beat Obama if nominated. I’m much less certain of that than they are under the current economic circumstances, but there you go.
All along I’ve assumed that she’d jump in this month but lately I feel less certain. On the one hand, if she wasn’t planning to announce on Saturday, why would her team care whether O’Donnell precedes her onstage or not? That’s a sign that she’s in and wants the optics to be perfect for the big moment. On the other hand, would a new candidate leave the trail next month to fly to South Korea for a speech to the World Knowledge Forum? And what about this, via ABC:
A source close to SarahPAC said Palin’s team was upset by how Tea Party of America organizers hyped the event; Tea Party of America, they believed, was trying to promote the event based on the chance Palin would announce her campaign intentions at the Saturday rally.
Why object to hype suggesting that she’s planning to announce if she really is planning to announce? If she’s worried about the other speakers feeling overshadowed or the tea party’s message being overlooked in the media frenzy over whether she’s jumping in, the obvious solution was to say forthrightly that she won’t be announcing at the event. The fact that she won’t only makes the hype more intense, regardless of what the organizers say or do.
ABC has a preview, in broad terms, of what she’s planning to say Saturday. This could go either way:
A source close to Palin told ABC News that she’ll offer a “full throated defense of the tea party.”
“Regardless of what she decides to do, this rally is for the tea party to kick off this campaign,” the source said, “this” being the 2012 presidential campaign.
ABC News has also learned that Palin’s speech will reference themes from an Aug. 8 Facebook post called “Conquering the Storm.” It discusses the Standard & Poor’s downgrade of the nation’s credit rating and her solutions to the country’s financial woes.
A source close to Palin told ABC News last week that her speech at Saturday’s “Restoring America” event will be a substantive, big-picture vision of America.
That sort of speech could easily end with her saying, “And because the tea party’s vision is so important, I feel duty-bound to try to bring it to the White House next year.” Or it could end with her saying, “The tea party’s vision is bigger than all of us, which is why my supporters should take heart and continue to fight the good fight even though I’ve decided not to run.” Or, I guess, it could end with her saying nothing at all about her candidacy and leaving people to keep wondering, which will be exasperating to everyone but the most devout Palin fan. Exit question: How does this end?
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 8 9 10
This is a new troll who’s ignoring the tenor of the thread and went back straight to allah’s garbage talking points. I guess they take turns.
promachus on September 2, 2011 at 2:25 AM
promachus on September 2, 2011 at 2:23 AM
But you corrected me. You said 60% of democRats don’t want her to run, and the Hot Air says 74% of Republicans don’t want her to run.
Get it? This is the only issue this nation faces where left and right agree: Sarah should not run!
Really Right on September 2, 2011 at 2:26 AM
It would be much easier to quantify the above claim if we were to know who it is that stays home and then with those people, to subset them with Party affiliation. We have a much better idea and therefore a more precise number of registered Party members than the above.
anuts on September 2, 2011 at 2:27 AM
Well I’m glad the night wasn’t a total waste then:)
You are coming in just as I’m going out. Have a good night.
unseen on September 2, 2011 at 2:27 AM
AP doesn’t like to be reminded of his candyassness…
Gohawgs on September 2, 2011 at 2:29 AM
I got to this thread late and just spent an hour or so reading through all the comments. If anyone is just showing up, let me save you some time. Here is the gist:
Kataklysmic on September 2, 2011 at 2:29 AM
You too, brother.
Kataklysmic on September 2, 2011 at 2:30 AM
Once again, Reagan was a communicator unequaled in his era. Palin eats marbles.
However, if you want to continue to equate a Rolls Royce with a Yugo…knock yaself out.
rickyricardo on September 2, 2011 at 2:30 AM
No, it only means they have a higher number of votes who change Party affiliation than those already registered with a Party. It’s definitionally consistent.
anuts on September 2, 2011 at 2:30 AM
It’s simple isn’t it? The Democrats don’t want her to run because they don’t want to face her and they don’t want a woman on GOP ticket.
2)The 70% doesn’t want her to run because they back some other candidate. The 30% is her share of primary vote. Very simple.
promachus on September 2, 2011 at 2:35 AM
But Reagan wasn’t a one trick pony and although his communications skills were important, the ideals and beliefs behind them meant more. How many times have you heard that The Won is an oratory genius? And how many public servants like Reagan do you expect to see in your life time?
Cindy Munford on September 2, 2011 at 2:41 AM
The name of that Yugo is Perry. Perry talks like a dyslexic, no insult to dyslexics.
promachus on September 2, 2011 at 2:41 AM
promachus on September 2, 2011 at 2:35 AM
The democRats don’t want her to run because she is Satan to them.
Republicans don’t want her to run because she will never get the votes of independents, and will lose to Obama.
Really Right on September 2, 2011 at 2:45 AM
You are wrong. She has the highest favorables of any Republican candidate among independents. Why she loses to Obama is because apparently “true conservatives ” will vote for Obama if she’s on the ticket. If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you.
promachus on September 2, 2011 at 2:48 AM
I am a Palinista. Is AP over-generalizing? accusing me of denying the existence of a good-faith disagreement about Palin?
I believe that good-faith disagreements about Palin exist.
Further the good-faith disagreements do not have a nefarious purpose driving them. If they did then they would not be good-faith disagreements in the first place.
If what I have said is true then this refutes the statement “For Palinistas, there’s really no such thing [non-existence of] as good-faith disagreement about Palin.”
I also believe that there are bad-faith disagreements about Palin. I believe that Obama has bad-faith disagreements with Palin and it follows, for me, that bad-faith disagreements exist as well.
PS: (Superfluous to the argument but not entirely irrelevant)
On August 17 I debated a professional liberal atheist activist for one hour. The discussion was civil, polite and illuminating. This particular individual has debated Dinesh D’Souza and is a paid representative of a movement to remove military crosses from war memorials. I am not an active church goer but I believe in religious freedom and that symbols of sacrifice are legitimate forms of expression in War memorials and should not be torn down.
Geochelone on September 2, 2011 at 2:50 AM
promachus on September 2, 2011 at 2:48 AM
I cannot imagine any conservative not voting for Sarah if she is the nominee.
Really Right on September 2, 2011 at 2:52 AM
Well, the Rasmussen poll other day achieved it’s low numbers by declaring 20% of true conservatives won’t vote for Sarah. If you declare that idea is ludicrous, the poll becomes ludicrous. IN other words, Sarah is quite electable.
promachus on September 2, 2011 at 2:59 AM
Wait and watch…It happened in ’08. That is, if you believe baby Buckley, Frum, Brooks, Noonan and Colin Powell were/are conservatives…
Gohawgs on September 2, 2011 at 3:01 AM
Thanks for typing this so I didn’t have to. I was a little suprirsed by this as well. I am a died in the wool Palinista and feel that I have had many good faith disagreements. I have even defended AP against charges of anti-Palin bias a few times. And despite his comments tonight, I still feel he goes to exceedingly great lengths to be fair to candidates that he might not necessarily like. I have called on other Palin supporters not to bash MB (because I knew it would be unnecessary) and my praise-to-criticism ratio for Perry is about 10:1. Hell, despite claims upthread to the contrary, I have even tried outreach to Ace’s anti-’nista brigade that descends like the plague on most Palin threads. To no avail, of course.
Oh well, what can you do? The funny thing about it is everyone on HA would probably be best friends if they were next door neighbors. Even the ones who are at each other’s throats the most.
Kataklysmic on September 2, 2011 at 3:10 AM
Well I am oftimes amazed at your level of decency and level headedness in the face of these circular firing squads. You certainly set a high standard for discourse.
The way I look at it is that we have advocates positioned along a spectrum. Each playing a vital role, like soldiers trained as combatants to counter the multi-variate forms of opposition.
There needs be be those who are more direct, firm and not afraid to reply proportionally to insults. There needs to be the more diplomatic representatives. There is a need for the fact finders, link providers and debunkers. There is a need for those to bring passion into the debate. Accounting and numbers must be added for quantitative comparisons. There has to be troll killers and the more vocal sorts to keep the equally vocal antagonists from overwhelming a thread.
This is why I maintain that generalizations fail to capture the spectral nature of those engaged in the debate. We each have strengths and weaknesses, differing styles of expressing our thoughts, and different levels of education, experience and expertise.
Geochelone on September 2, 2011 at 3:30 AM
AP let the lying liars lying Palin rant go on for 17 hours…
Gohawgs on September 2, 2011 at 3:37 AM
Geo,
Did you see that alt is going to have to find yet another ABP to support?
Gohawgs on September 2, 2011 at 3:40 AM
Well put. I agree.
I don’t think anyone is in the dark about how AP views Palin. But he has praised and defended her on occasion. And if you contrast his treatment of her with that of his idealogical compatriot Ace, there is a marked difference imo.
Kataklysmic on September 2, 2011 at 3:45 AM
Kat,
Yes he has, on occasion…But even a visually challenged procine finds an acorn every so often…
Gohawgs on September 2, 2011 at 3:53 AM
Ya know, honest to God, when I skimmed the first paragraph of that thread (but none of the comments until now) I thought the exact same thing as what I have just now seen of your link.
I swear it. Not only is it funny from the perspective of poetic justice (God has to be a Comedian) but its crazy that you keep divining my thoughts. It is freaky.
So the animal rights angle that was so passionately defended in the sternest possible way (like a total deal-breaker) will be either cast aside as utterly irrelevant or rationalized by some hand waving quitter argument…
Geochelone on September 2, 2011 at 3:55 AM
Yes K. Parker is not as bad as Garofalo. hehe
Geochelone on September 2, 2011 at 3:58 AM
Some animals are more equal than others. The two-legged female kind are expendable.
Geochelone on September 2, 2011 at 4:00 AM
Aside from my silly snarc your point is well taken. It must be frustrating indeed to dwell in a realm so subjective as politics and try to keep your feelings suppressed in the name of objectivity. And then to have you work debased with these food fights must add to the annoyance.
I participated in another blog in which the actual blog posts were often ignored because certain trolls would ruin threads. The individuals who did all the work in crafting the threads never got the recognition they deserved. On occasion the author would chime in and say “Well what did you think of my write up?”
Once the trolls were banned and the discussion was moderated only then did people have time to focus on the quality of the content; and the bloggers got much more signs of encouragement to keep on blogging.
Geochelone on September 2, 2011 at 4:27 AM
Green isn’t a good color for some…
Gohawgs on September 2, 2011 at 4:29 AM
There’s a difference between the working arrangements of Ace and AP…Ace has his own blog. AP works for Townhall…
Gohawgs on September 2, 2011 at 4:31 AM
Allah…is it true..you have your ACE friends come over here to insult people who support Palin? And, then is it fair for you to turn around and call your commenter’s deranged because they fight back? There is a word for that…a smell too.
tinkerthinker on September 2, 2011 at 7:19 AM
LMAO, exactly. I don’t know what these idiots think they’re going to accomplish with a bunch of bummed-out Palin fans.
ddrintn on September 2, 2011 at 7:47 AM
Thank you – since I got to the thread even later than you I appreciate the recap. You did forget to add the warning that if Palin supporters don’t fall in line they will be PERSONALLY responsible for the ruination of the country by Obama getting a second term
katiejane on September 2, 2011 at 8:16 AM
Oh, now now. Is there anybody who doesn’t expect a “Palin supporter” to of course want an Obama second term so they can start “Sarah 2016!” in 2011? Given Perry’s support with the Tea Party apparently in every poll, he’ll do just fine without you.
Marcus on September 2, 2011 at 8:24 AM
oh don’t worry about it. It’s just Allah trying to rationalize his non support for Palin. some people just can’t be honest. I really really loved the people like Tina that say “I love Palin but” then goes on for 3 paraghraphs describing why they can’t stand Palin. those people really give me a LOL moment. And the kicker? when they come back the next day acting all innocent and upset for people calling them out for their words.
unseen on September 2, 2011 at 8:29 AM
entire post is spot on.
unseen on September 2, 2011 at 8:31 AM
what the hell are you talking about? that is the one of the most stupid posts of yours I have read. Perry will win or lose on his merits. I’ll tell you one thing if he has many more interviews like Levin’s last night he will lose in a landslide.
I now understand why he supported Gore. They both got the boring gene.
unseen on September 2, 2011 at 8:33 AM
I figured you wouldn’t understand any of it.
1. The Tea party in every poll overwhelmingly supports Rick Perry.
2. A Fox News Poll is staring you in the face saying over 70 percent of Republicans do not want her to run.
3. Both Michelle Bachmann and Mitt Romney’s numbers combined together from Tea Party support do not equal Perry’s.
4. Boring? Listen, 90 percent or more of the American female population can’t stand it when Palin opens her mouth. Scientific poll? No just my opinion like your’s about Perry’s boring gene.
Marcus on September 2, 2011 at 8:43 AM
Well Ace has women issues:
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/08/perry-mafia-punked.html
unseen on September 2, 2011 at 8:52 AM
and how does any of that convince you that we want Obama to win a second term?
unseen on September 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM
unseen on September 2, 2011 at 8:52 AM
Two sides to every story. Here’s Ace’s much more plausible version:
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/320657.php#320657
Geller doctored quotes, I wouldn’t take her word at face value anymore.
-Aslan’s Girl
Aslans Girl on September 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM
which is why they always said “I love Palin but before trashing her. they didn’t want to pis* off Palin’s base. Now with polls showing she doesn’t have the punch she used to the people feel it is safe to simple attack her. I still haven’t met a person that will debate Palin on the issues.
unseen on September 2, 2011 at 8:59 AM
“We do not want and do not need the support of ‘Palin supporters’!”
Well, OK, if you say so.
Aitch748 on September 2, 2011 at 8:59 AM
Repeated just because it’s funny — and it’s funny because it’s true:
Well, all true except for the “don’t forget to back Perry” part. Apparently Perry’s support is so strong that the support of those “Palin supporters” isn’t necessary. LOL. So I guess we can stay home and kick back in 2012 and let the Perry supporters carry the load and deliver this nation from Obama without us. LOL. Suit yourselves, Rickrollers….:)
Aitch748 on September 2, 2011 at 9:06 AM
wow talk about women issues. I liked this quote from him:
yeap no women issues there.
unseen on September 2, 2011 at 9:07 AM
Well the hare krishnas believe they can amke everyone at the airport worship their god too.
unseen on September 2, 2011 at 9:10 AM
How brilliant! Because of that comment, the polling for Palin just went to 100% favorability and the 100% choice for president!
You loons should have been leveling the personal attacks for the last three years!!!!
csdeven on September 2, 2011 at 9:35 AM
Ok Marcus you go vote, the rest of us will stay home.
tinkerthinker on September 2, 2011 at 9:47 AM
The very reason I don’t post over there.
tinkerthinker on September 2, 2011 at 9:48 AM
We have become a nation of losers. When in the hell should any American be told they should not run for POTUS? It’s their right and theirs alone and if Sarah wants to run I’m all for her. Damn the torpedoes and full steam ahead!
Herb on September 2, 2011 at 9:56 AM
Good grief, somebody hose all the blood off the walls!
Let me sum up my opinion as succinctly as I can:
Fox News Poll= So what run anyway.
That’s about it, as far as I am concerned.
Brian1972 on September 2, 2011 at 9:59 AM
These polls are the ultimate concern trolling.
the_nile on September 2, 2011 at 10:03 AM
Holy crap, if this is right, here we go folks!
Brian1972 on September 2, 2011 at 10:07 AM
Youw making me cwy, mistew seben.
Lanceman on September 2, 2011 at 10:08 AM
OH MY!! She is now at 105% favorability!!!
Hallelujah!!!
csdeven on September 2, 2011 at 10:25 AM
I don’t understand that first sentence, but if you think you are a loser that’s alright by me.
No one is saying she shouldn’t run for POTUS, except to save her power.
She shouldn’t run if she wants to maintain her power broker status.
She can run, but if (when) she loses, she will be reduced to a two-time loser…so I guess she would fit your “nation of losers”.
She waited too long to decide, we can’t choose a “nation of uncertain leaders”, she is not decisive, not bold enough, so I suspect she is not going to run.
She had her chance, and she blew it by being politically clever, and we don’t want clever, we want a leader.
Hopefully she won’t continue to play her games, and she finds her way into the next administration, but if she continues to play her games, she becomes toxic. I don’t know who is advising her, but whomever it is, blew it big time.
right2bright on September 2, 2011 at 10:31 AM
OH MY GOODNESS!!!!!!!!! The delusional wing of the St Palin the Victimized congregation have the uncanny ability to outdo their lunacy almost daily!
Here is a statement from the article you linked to:
ROTFLMMFAO!!!!
They make statements like this on a regular basis and don’t acknowledge that they have been moving her “announcement” date since July 3rd using the same idiotic rational!
Hahahahahaha!!!
Priceless!
csdeven on September 2, 2011 at 10:33 AM
Because she is on the sidelines, she isn’t a candidate, you don’t debate someone who is of no consequence.
She could have shown up and debated the other candidates, but she is the one who has chosen not to debate them, not the other way around.
All she had to do was to step up and declare, and they would have welcomed her at the debates, but she didn’t, she chose to sit it out and wait…a lot of people sit and wait…it’s called not making a decision, not being a leader.
right2bright on September 2, 2011 at 10:36 AM
Oh look, the maniac a$$hole just can’t help him/her/itself.
All you do is whine and moan about “personal attacks”, while constantly engaging in personal attacks, such as this ridiculous nonsense you just posted aimed at me.
The main point of that story is what I bolded. They say she has announced she is going to participate in that debate.
I haven’t seen their source for it, or any confirmation as of yet so it may not be true. We’ll see if it is.
If it is, it’s big freaking news, whether you of the PalinHater Poster Union Local 69 like it or not.
Now that I have set you straight yet again, please kindly go engage in self-intercourse and do not bother me with your incessant trivial nonsense anymore.
Thanks in advance.
Brian1972 on September 2, 2011 at 10:41 AM
Brian1972 on September 2, 2011 at 10:07 AM
But, but, but, we’ve all been assured that it’s too late for her to even become a candidate, that three-fourths of all conservatives don’t want her to even throw her hat into the ring, and that (per Rasmussen) between one-fifth and two-fifths of all conservatives will actually go out of their way to vote for Obama (and not just stay home or vote third-party) if Palin becomes the GOP’s nominee! We’ve even been told that she’s going to announce on September 3 that she’s NOT running and will endorse Perry! How can she even DO this debate after all the snark we’ve dumped on her!!!! What the hell is she DOING!!!!! Damned attention wh*re needs to go back to Alaska and bake cookies and let the man from Texas take over!
/sarc
The open thread on September 12 is going to be epic. I bet she’ll do extremely well and yet still not change the minds of any of the set-in-stone naysayers on these threads.
Aitch748 on September 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM
The strange thing about this is, the article simply states she has announced she will be in the debate, it does not say anything or link to anything about where this came from.
Did that reporter hear it from SarahPAC?
Where is the announcement in other sources?
CNN has nothing on it.
TPX has nothing on it.
Fox News has nothing on it.
C4P has nothing on it.
Palin’s own Twitter and Facebook have nothing on it.
The more time passes with no one else reporting it, the more I doubt it is accurate.
Brian1972 on September 2, 2011 at 11:03 AM
Brian1972 on September 2, 2011 at 11:03 AM
OK, gotcha. Sigh. Though it would be very cool if she does participate.
Aitch748 on September 2, 2011 at 11:21 AM
Yes, it would. After the Iowa speech tomorrow, Palin is flying to New Hampshire to appear at a TPX event.
TPX and CNN are doing that debate, Sept 12.
We’ll see what develops, but right now that one link is the only place with that story, and they don’t link to anyone else anywhere.
I would like for it to be true, certainly.
Brian1972 on September 2, 2011 at 11:28 AM
So are those phony laughs.
Knowutumsayin’, mr. seven?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!
eleventy.
Lanceman on September 2, 2011 at 11:57 AM
csdeven on September 2, 2011 at 9:35 AM
I just heard someone threaten you with violence because you are sooo effing irritating, like chalk Screaching on a chalkboard type irritating
it’s not obsession if you are bothered by construction noise in the middle of the night
you are worthless and take up space just to waste it
Sonosam on September 2, 2011 at 1:10 PM
That surely is the main part of the story to you, but for those of us whom are tired of her game playing, the unwillingness of the delusional supporter to admit that she is playing games is the real story.
Palin, just like all politicians, is to be judged on her actions and not solely on her words. Especially since her words don’t fit her actions.
So spare the group your incessant attacks on those who see Palin for what she is and refuse to drink the koolaid like you have.
csdeven on September 2, 2011 at 1:13 PM
Hahahahahahaha!!!! Yeah, you’re right….you have no ability to ignore what I write. It jumps off the screen and forces you to be irritated.
Bwahahahahahahaha!!!!! That’s what happens when you make room in your head for me 24/7! It SEEMS like the noise is out of your control. In reality you LOVE it! You relish it! If you didn’t you wouldn’t insist on hearing it!
Excellent! With that idiotic personal attack, you just changed the country’s opinion on Palin and her approval rating just skyrocketed!! What a brilliant strategy! You should have been doing that for the last three years!!!
ROTFLMMFAO!!
csdeven on September 2, 2011 at 1:19 PM
Did your grammy make your warm milk and cookies yet?
hahahahahaha!!!
csdeven on September 2, 2011 at 1:19 PM
csdeven on September 2, 2011 at 1:19 PM
it was only idiotic if the subject wasn’t an idiot
additionally, I wasn’t trying to change the world about SP, I was just reminding you how inconsequential you are.
Taking up space and being a nuisance isn’t an asset
At best you are a litmus test for ideas, if you think it’s good it most definately be bad likewise if you think it is bad it has a good chance y succeed
try drano for the acne
Sonosam on September 2, 2011 at 1:34 PM
See this?
First, my mental capacity is called into question by asserting I am delusional. I consider that an unnecessary insulting personal attack, which it is.
Then, out comes the victim card because someone whom you just insulted as delusional had the temerity to tell you to go f^*k yourself.
Your game is stale, old and worn out.
It never, ever stops. You can’t help yourself.
If you would like to avoid otherwise courteous people telling you to f^*k off, then perhaps you should consider “sparing the group” these constant belittling insulting attacks from you.
Can you stop? I don’t think you can.
So, in short, f^*k off.
You’ve absolutely earned it.
Brian1972 on September 2, 2011 at 1:43 PM
I bet she doesn’t.
Pablo Snooze on September 2, 2011 at 1:53 PM
Ah….the references to violence. How utterly despicable of you.
csdeven on September 2, 2011 at 1:56 PM
Bwahahahahahahaha!!!!!!
Remember, 74% say Palin shouldn’t run. And your idiotic attacks on others hasn’t changed that.
lol
csdeven on September 2, 2011 at 1:58 PM
All of your relentless foolishness hasn’t changed anything, except what most people here think of you.
Congratulations, you have a consensus.
You’re a jerk.
Now you may go and self copulate.
lol
Brian1972 on September 2, 2011 at 2:01 PM
You remind me of any number of liberal dimwits that comment on Politico.
You scawy, mistew seb’m.
BWAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
eleventy
Lanceman on September 2, 2011 at 2:47 PM
Hahahahaha!!! Keep going!!! Palin’s numbers increase with every insult you level at others!!!!
csdeven on September 2, 2011 at 3:25 PM
Ooooooo yeah!!!! Watch those Palin poll numbers get better by the insult!!! How cleaver of you loons to figure it out!!!
csdeven on September 2, 2011 at 3:26 PM
“Are you still here? It’s over. Go home.”
Lanceman on September 2, 2011 at 4:08 PM
A loser is afraid to participate. We as a nation fear some other person participating. Winners have a contest and best man/woman wins. We are afraid (72%) of someone else taking part in the contest. Boogey Man will get you!
Herb on September 2, 2011 at 5:18 PM
Right, and 20% of conservatives would vote for Obama (rather than sitting out the election or vote third party), and another 19% would at least consider voting for Obama, if Palin is the nominee.
Might as well get ALL the silliness on the table. Hope nobody gets too put out if some of those conservatives then announce that they’ll vote for Obama if Perry is the nominee.
Aitch748 on September 2, 2011 at 7:17 PM
It isn’t over until you insult enough people that results in Palins poll numbers to approach 100% favorability! Keep going loon, you can do it!!!
csdeven on September 2, 2011 at 8:49 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 8 9 10