Video: Syria imposes new censorship as protesters beg for “international protection”

posted at 2:05 pm on August 29, 2011 by Ed Morrissey

Two interesting developments have taken place in Syria over the last couple of days. First, the Bashar Assad regime has included strict media censorship laws as part of its so-called “reforms” in Syria. CNN can no longer report from Syria, and now has to report on the story from Istanbul. This has been greeted with alarm in the region — so much so that CNN’s Ivan Watson reports that Assad has been told that he needs to listen to his people and conduct real reform by … Iran and Hezbollah?

The tenor of the protests has changed as well.  People in the streets have begun calling for international intervention against the Assad regime, referring back to the principle of civilian protection and the precedent of UN Resolution 1973.  And on its face, it’s hard to distinguish between Libya in March and Syria almost ever since.  The regime has used military forces to massacre civilian protesters and to threaten entire towns.  NATO cited the threat of widespread massacres as the reason it intervened in Libya; they’re actually taking place in Syria, even to the point where Assad’s allies are disturbed at the spectacle.

Will the Syrian protesters get international intervention?  I’d call it unlikely in the extreme.  NATO could go after Qaddafi because he didn’t have strong ties to a military power in the region; he managed to alienate everyone around him.  Assad’s ties to Iran would almost guarantee that any Western or even Arab-only intervention would provoke Tehran into joining the fight.  They have no intention of allowing their most critical alliance to disappear, and with it their pipeline to Hezbollah and Lebanon.  They might even consider threatening a strike on Israel as a way to sideline the Arab nations and force NATO back to the sidelines.  If the Syrians are to be rescued from Assad, they’ll have to do the rescuing themselves.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Syria has a military that is fairly formidable by 3rd world standards. NATO couldn’t just bomb them with impunity as they did with Libya, without expecting causalities – and even one lost pilot would send the squeamish Europeans running for cover.

Rebar on August 29, 2011 at 2:13 PM

Maybe CNN International will start reporting some facts now that their access has been revoked.

Access Trumps Truth.

Ben Hur on August 29, 2011 at 2:16 PM

how about we not care?

Notorious GOP on August 29, 2011 at 2:20 PM

Syria is going to be Barry’s Rwanda, except that, unlike Clinton, he’ll never own up to his dithering and complacency, in spite of the fact he’d had months to alter the course of events there.

Dusty on August 29, 2011 at 2:23 PM

Don’t worry, Syrian protesters. The UN is nearly done with the strongly worded letter.

BobMbx on August 29, 2011 at 2:23 PM

Assad’s ties to Iran would almost guarantee that any Western or even Arab-only intervention would provoke Tehran into joining the fight.  They have no intention of allowing their most critical alliance to disappear, and with it their pipeline to Hezbollah and Lebanon. 

Well, that would be one way to get rid of Iran’s nukes.

Count to 10 on August 29, 2011 at 2:24 PM

Sickening. Like the Iran uprising, the world just looks away and moves on.

mythicknight on August 29, 2011 at 2:26 PM

Sorry CNN, but you turn right around, push your way in and ACT LIKE THE JOURNALISTS YOU CLAIM TO BE!

Now… right now… then send in Rachel Maddow or something…

Khun Joe on August 29, 2011 at 2:30 PM

Maybe CNN International will start reporting some facts now that their access has been revoked.

Access Trumps Truth.

Ben Hur on August 29, 2011 at 2:16 PM

It worked out well for them in Iraq.

“Exclusive” news network for broadcasting Hussein’s propaganda.

BobMbx on August 29, 2011 at 2:34 PM

I don’t think an overwhelming force of NATO assets (especially those with fresh experience in Libya) would suffer much from a Syrian military engagement. That doesn’t mean that NATO force should be used.

blink on August 29, 2011 at 2:25 PM

NATO was stretched to the limit in Libya, and used up most of their munitions and spare parts just keeping a very few strike aircraft operational. A Syrian adventure, unless the Americans or Israelis took the lead, would break NATO.

Rebar on August 29, 2011 at 2:34 PM

CNN can no longer report from Syria, and now has to report on the story from Istanbul.

Why so far away? Couldn’t CNN get their Syria news from closer in, such as Israel or northern Iraq? This is equivalent to reporting on news in Washington from Chicago, which would suit Barack Obama just fine.

Steve Z on August 29, 2011 at 2:40 PM

Libya has oil, Syria doesn’t. Therefore, Europe doesn’t care about Syria. And without Europe, there’s no so-called “international community”.

sandberg on August 29, 2011 at 2:44 PM

Remember, not a soul in Syria has the least reference point, concept or history of freedom and democracy. They will be Islamic. They will have a new strong man. And they will live happily ever after under Allah. Let them be about their business and risk the weakening of Islam.

BL@KBIRD on August 29, 2011 at 2:50 PM

Hey Syria, don’t expect help from the folks that let Rwanda become a pool of blood. Don’t expect those who would look the other way why Religious genocide is going on in Sudan. Remember Bill Clinton just fiddled while the descendents of Portuguese spice traders were being systematically wiped out because of their Catholic faith in East Timor.(it took Australia to stop that genocide)Don’t expect our left to come help you -they’re too busy engineering and exporting their very own culture of death with abortion and planning death panels for our inconvenient old folks.

They’ll fight to the death to protect a tree though.

Don L on August 29, 2011 at 3:42 PM

Will the Syrian protesters get international intervention?

If they topple Assad will they not replace him with merely another American hating muslim dictatorship? It’s hard for me to muster much sympathy for them. Look at the rebels in Libya. What separates them from their former leader?

They will probably end up being much worse.

dogsoldier on August 29, 2011 at 3:52 PM

Everyone hates America until they need our help or money.

search4truth on August 29, 2011 at 4:00 PM

A little Ot, but the National Geo channel in the buildup to the 9-11 anniversary has been showing a program about Saddam’s atrocities, I watched it last night. It’s hard hitting program and worth watching to remind ourselves of the evil of that regime.

People forget, and the left rarely acknowledged, that he was FAR worse than Gaddafi, Assad or most dictators in the way he tortured and genocided his citizens, even using WMD. The mass graves in Kurdistan make the the ones they’re finding in Libya look like nothing.

juliesa on August 29, 2011 at 4:04 PM

All those death-to-America-and-Israel Syrian Muslims begging the filthy kafir West to save their ass. After we do you know it will be back to cursing the filthy kafir again, as the Qur’an requires (read it if you don’t believe me). But with our Islam loving Muslim sympathizer in the White House they can always hope to play the infidel sucker like a sappy violin, much like the death-to-America-and-Israel Egyptians & Libyans are trying to do.

Chessplayer on August 29, 2011 at 4:34 PM

There’s no way to do syria on the cheap as we did Libya and afghanistan (in the beginning). It would quickly turn into a three front war with iran and lebanon joining syria against western imperialists and the commie chinese and sovietizing russia will not consent to UN resolutions to let more of their client states go belly up.

eaglewingz08 on August 29, 2011 at 5:41 PM

We ignore the protests in Iran and Syria, but get involved in Egypt and Libya? Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Rebels refuse to handover Lockerbie bomber in Libya; priorities.

Daemonocracy on August 29, 2011 at 6:47 PM

Really, you don’t think they could merely relocate everything currently in Sigonella to Souda Bay and continue at the same pace against Syria?

blink on August 29, 2011 at 4:13 PM

No.

Syria has hundreds of fighter jets, and an enormous air defense network. It would take a massive effort just to gain air superiority, and losses will be taken. Expensive in both blood and treasure – NATO has little stomach for the former, and nearly none of the latter.

They wouldn’t have any American help either, 0bama would never do anything this risky as the election closes in. Let one US pilot be lost over Syria – and that’s it for him. A full on effort by an American lead NATO would certainly defeat Syria, but the Syrians won’t roll over like the Libyans did, they’re going to fight back, and NATO will take losses – losses they’ll be sore pressed to explain to their constituency.

Rebar on August 29, 2011 at 7:28 PM