Romney edging Obama, Perry ties in latest Gallup poll
posted at 6:05 pm on August 22, 2011 by Ed Morrissey
If the presidential race was held today, according to the latest Gallup poll, Barack Obama would be … in a lot of trouble. In head-to-head battles with the top four Republican candidates in the race at the moment, Obama can’t score 50% against any of them — and is in virtual ties with all:
President Barack Obama is closely matched against each of four possible Republican opponents when registered voters are asked whom they would support if the 2012 presidential election were held today. Mitt Romney leads Obama by two percentage points, 48% to 46%, Rick Perry and Obama are tied at 47%, and Obama edges out Ron Paul and Michele Bachmann by two and four points, respectively.
These prospective election ballots — measured Aug. 17-18, well over a year before the Nov. 6, 2012, election — indicate that the race for president at this point is generally competitive, with voters fairly evenly divided in their preference for giving Obama a second term or electing a Republican candidate. Even though the four Republican candidates tested have varying degrees of name recognition, they all fare roughly the same.
Gallup’s analysis focuses on Obama’s low approval ratings and their impact on his numbers:
President Obama’s job approval rating is hovering around the 40% mark. This is below the rating that any of the six incumbent presidents re-elected since Eisenhower has had at the time of the presidential election. However, in August of the year before they were re-elected, Ronald Reagan (43%) and Bill Clinton (46%) were both below 50%. Obama’s position of rough parity against leading GOP candidates shows that more Americans at the moment say they would vote for Obama than approve of the job he is doing — perhaps a reflection of the continuing lack of a strong front-runner on the Republican side.
It’s more a reflection of an early stage in the process of choosing a challenger. The numbers for each are remarkably similar, which indicates that this poll reflects Obama more than the individual Republican candidates. All of Obama’s figures fall into a three-number range (46-48), while his challengers fall within a five-number range (44-48), all within the margin of error for the poll.
Given that, the breakdown of party affiliation is perhaps even more interesting. Obama draws between 84-86% of Democrats and loses between 10-12% regardless of opponent. He narrowly loses independents against all challengers except Bachmann, where he wins 48/42. Ron Paul has the least grip on Republican voters, holding 82% with 11% going to Obama, followed by Bachmann at 86/9. Perry actually edges Romney 92/6 to 91/6 respectively, which is really just a statistical tie.
Republicans appear ready to rally around Romney or Perry, and independents appear equally comfortable with either. Voters know Romney well, so his numbers probably won’t change much except in relation to Obama’s, while Perry still has to introduce himself to a large number of voters. That gives him more potential upside and downside, but he’s clearly off to a strong start, and the attacks over the last week don’t seem to have done much damage at all.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Taking election polls months before the first primary campaign begins.
Yeah, that’s not totally screwed-in-the-head stupid.
logis on August 22, 2011 at 8:53 PM
The real story here is that Paul beats Bachmann — a Hot Air “frontrunner” — head to haad against Obama. Paul also raked in over 1.8 million in 24 hours over the weekend all from small donations. Sure, Mitt can get 10 million in a day from wealthy bundlers, lobbyists and special interests. People are tired of corruptocrats from both parties. Despite her unfavorables, I think Palin would do well for the same reason.
Firefly_76 on August 22, 2011 at 9:01 PM
Oh, no doubt. You just wait and see. When what’s her name wins, people will compare Reagan to her instead of the other way around.
xblade on August 22, 2011 at 9:22 PM
A ‘bot the other day claimed “Palin suckered Perry into the race too early by making him think she was going to endorse him out of the box.” Even as ardent an “anti-Palin” that I am, I would never accuse her suckering her “friends” (Perry is supposedly her bff) so that she could rip the rug out from under him!
This is a (mostly) lovely thread. Hopefully as what’s-her-name bows out, threads like this become more and more common.
-Aslan’s Girl
Aslans Girl on August 22, 2011 at 9:25 PM
She definitely has a better rack. She still can’t win though.
xblade on August 22, 2011 at 9:31 PM
Have you read Demonic yet? That’s one of my vacation books here in a couple of weeks. I can’t wait.
gophergirl on August 22, 2011 at 10:04 PM
I’m not a Palinista, but I did think that C. Krauthammer was unreasonably and rudely dismissive of her.
On the other hand — and this is not meant to be a smack on Palin, but — I really think she’s been Quayled and is unelectable. Period. I do think she would be way, way better than the One, but I can’t see that she has the slightest chance.
Electablility-wise,even Romney is just another McCain.
No one can stand up to the withering irrational monologuing of Obama. As you see on these blogs, reason doesn’t stand up to emotion.
It will take a shrewd and smart campaigner who can get caustic one second and have you accepting his dinner invitation the next — guy who won’t look Putin in he eye and say “this is a man I can trust”. I don’t see this in Romney, or Santorum, or even Bachmann (though she’s close).
I’m hoping Perry can do it.
flicker on August 22, 2011 at 10:17 PM
Yes, I’ve read it. I don’t know how to sum it up except to mention Coulter’ own words: she didn’t understand why liberals acted the way they did until she read the works on mob psychology by Gustave Le Bon — written 125 years ago. And his works ring like they were written last week; particularly about what was happening in Wisconsin at the time I was reading it; and then again with the rioting in the UK.
It’s easy reading but not light reading; the chapters on the French Revolution were partiularly painful.
I recommend it to anyone who knows he will have to choose sides.
flicker on August 22, 2011 at 10:31 PM
Everyone knows the only polls that matter are on-line ones at blog sites!
ps. The primary campaigning has begun.
Y-not on August 22, 2011 at 10:34 PM
You think the primary campaign hasn’t begun? Huh? The first primary might be as early as January. We’ve had two debates. We’ve had the IA straw poll. We’ve already seen one contender (T-Paw) drop out. Every stop one of the declared candidates makes is called a “campaign stop”. The campaign has been underway since June.
-Aslan’s Girl
Aslans Girl on August 22, 2011 at 10:41 PM
flicker on August 22, 2011 at 10:31 PM
I bought my copy the other day at Borders “going out of business” sale. I can’t get over how precient Ann was in writing this. With flash-mobs and riots, I can’t wait to read it (after I finish Fed Up!).
-Aslan’s Girl
Aslans Girl on August 22, 2011 at 10:43 PM
Doing my best ultimate sarcastic Homer Simpson: “Yes! FI—-nally! Thank You!”
Marcus on August 22, 2011 at 10:44 PM
So a Romney / Perry or Perry / Romney ticket would beat an Obama / Sheriff Senile ticket handily.
profitsbeard on August 22, 2011 at 10:46 PM
I had to google it. Fed-up is by Rick Perry? Ooof. Now I’ve got to get it, if just to see who he is. Thanks.
flicker on August 22, 2011 at 10:48 PM
President Obama can’t get 50% against any Republican, and barely beats Ron Paul and Michele Bachmann.
The White House is officially freaking out, and hoping harder than ever that Palin will get in the race and kill the Republican’s chances.
Again.
Moesart on August 22, 2011 at 10:52 PM
flicker on August 22, 2011 at 10:48 PM
Yes, it’s one of Perry’s books (he’s written two). I bought it the day he announced. He dedicated it to the Founders and to the military. So far, it’s all about states’ rights. Very good.
-Aslan’s Girl
Aslans Girl on August 22, 2011 at 10:55 PM
Well now I have to get that too. I’m going to be doing a lot of reading on vacation. Good thing I have long layovers.
gophergirl on August 22, 2011 at 11:01 PM
Thanks!
gophergirl on August 22, 2011 at 11:02 PM
When Ronald Reagan was nominated by the Republican party in 1980, the polls showed him running behind President Carter by 20-some percentage points, as I recall.
We are a year or so away from nominating anybody at this time.
To say that “polls are meaningless at this point” doesn’t even begin to adequately describe the situation . . .
RedPepper on August 22, 2011 at 11:09 PM
De nada. Happy Vacation. Martha’s Vineyard?
Thanks for the tip. Now I have to order it, too.
I think nowadays the conventions only rubber-stamp the winner of the primary elections. Yes?
I hope Palin doesn’t run. She’ll suck the conserative air out of the room, diluting votes for the true conservative candidates, leaving only Romney and Huntsman to duke it out. Which means Romney is the nominee, and Obama wins.
flicker on August 22, 2011 at 11:50 PM
It is Perry’s to lose…don’t care one way or the other, but it is his to lose.
right2bright on August 23, 2011 at 12:14 AM
Fickle public…but I can’t remember a more “damaged” candidate than Palin and getting the nomination.
The key is the independents and all indication is they will not vote for her.
right2bright on August 23, 2011 at 12:16 AM
Polls that don’t reflect the electoral system are worth what exactly?
SuperBunny on August 23, 2011 at 8:11 AM
You said it.
Cylor on August 23, 2011 at 8:36 AM
I don’t remember there ever being a potential candidate anything like Palin. I don’t know what independents will ultimately do, but I can’t see Obama winning another term regardless of who runs against him. I think even Ron Paul could beat him if given the nomination!
littleguy on August 23, 2011 at 9:49 AM
This was taken of “registered voters”, not “likely voters”. “Likely voters” is more reliable. I would like to know the split between Dems and GOP.
Voter from WA State on August 23, 2011 at 10:01 AM
Do these people who like Gov. Perry know that he favors open borders! That he is soft on border control, opposed the border fence and bashed Arizona’s efforts at illegal immigration control? He will buy votes by encouraging illegal immigration with dream acts (as in Texas) and probably other forms of amnesty. He’ll, of course, spew all sorts of noble sounding reasons like they all do but he’s another sellout.
Chessplayer on August 23, 2011 at 10:08 AM
Polls are a liberal created propaganda tool
National opinion polls continue to show Carter leading Reagan by an apparently comfortable margin of about 25%. They also show that more moderate Republicans like Ford would run better against the President. This suggests that Reagan is not the strongest G.O.P. choice for the November election and that he clearly faces an uphill battle
Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,921912,00.html#ixzz1VrVLjZOO
This article was written at the end of May 1980. Not long before the primary election
Yes, Gallup had Reagan losing to Carter by 25 points , 6 months before the general election.
Btw, Reagan entered the primarty race in Nov 1979, not when the incumbant President did.
Again, Polls are not at all accurate, nor does any pollster offer their raw data, prior to their adjustments, up for inspection and analysis. Until they do, polls are not a valid source of anything.
Sure the pollsters CLAIM that the race “tightens” closer to the election date. But that isn’t true, thats’ their excuse for having faked numbers early on,that only exist to direct people to what they should do rather than gauge what the people want
LeeSeneca on August 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM
Wrong thread friend. The group-think sheep pen, where the idealogue’s hang out, is over in what’s her name country.
Haldol on August 23, 2011 at 11:16 AM
What would happen with a Romney-Perry Ticket?
Lawrence on August 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM
Depends on who is on top.
Interestingly, for the first time in history, the last campaign was one party’s nominee for president against the other party’s nominee for vice president. I still don’t understand that one.
Monkeytoe on August 23, 2011 at 1:23 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2