Recalling Scott Walker
posted at 6:50 pm on August 11, 2011 by Tina Korbe
This post is not just a post about the presently-underway, expensive effort to recall Wisconsin Republican Gov. Scott Walker — but, for practical purposes, that’s where this commentary must start. Guy Benson just laid it all out at Townhall.com:
Let’s see. A coalition of leftists, government unions, and Democrats spent millions of dollars on an effort to unseat a conservative State Supreme Court justice in April. They failed, and the victorious David Prosser promptly joined a majority decision upholding Gov. Walker’s (successful) budget law. Then they spent approximately $20 million to win back the Senate by recalling up to six Republican State Senators who voted for Gov. Walker’s (successful) budget fix. They failed, and the GOP will maintain control over the upper chamber, even if both incumbent Democrats win next week. Having racked up an eight-figure, zero-results tab, Wisconsin liberals are hoping that the third time’s a charm. To prove to the world how how very resolute they are — even in the face of multiple humiliating defeats — they’re doubling down on the quixotic mission of recalling the architect of the state’s (successful) budget repair legislation himself, Gov. Scott Walker.
You can tell by the tone of that paragraph just how confident Guy is that the recall effort against Walker will prove futile. He only grows more confident by the end of the piece. In fact, he’s so confident that he’s keen to start a meme to the opposite effect — to the effect that conservatives are worried about what might happen if Wisconsin liberals put their hearts and souls into the attempt to oust the man who quietly withstood absurd comparisons to Adolph Hitler and Hosni Mubarak just to keep his campaign promise to balance the budget. (“By all means, Wisconsin liberals, please pursue this wildly expensive pipe dream,” Guy writes. “Come to think of it, if it’ll goad these clowns into squandering even more money and political capital, I’m willing to start an online meme that conservatives are very worried that Scott Walker is vulnerable to a well-funded recall push.”)
Well, I match Guy’s confidence. As a minority of special-interest-motivated folks mount this misguided effort to recall Walker, I’ve been recalling him myself. Based on my own recollections of the Wisconsin governor — one of the most steadfast and fortitudinous politicians I’ve ever had the privilege to interview — I can’t imagine the people of Wisconsin voting him out of the office he has assumed and served with such perseverance and poise. Not at this point in the game.
What sticks with me most from my long-ago interview with the governor — on a night when protesters still stomped and shouted outside the state capitol and Walker greeted us at the door wearing jeans and a weary smile — is how committed he was to serving the entire state of Wisconsin and not just some special interest group. He spoke of the silent majority of Wisconsinites who elected him to balance the budget and expected him to do just that. He reassured us that he cared more about fulfilling his campaign promises than ensuring his own reelection. He expressed confidence that the budget-balancing principles he espouses work.
And lo and behold, he was right. As Guy pointed out, Walker’s budget has already been a success. Stories have begun to trickle across the wire. A school district finds it might actually have money to hire more teachers. Teachers in another district who were preemptively fired because the district assumed Walker’s budget fix wouldn’t stand are able to return to work. Milwaukee public schools barely know what to do with the savings they’ve garnered thanks to Walker’s budget repair bill. And those are just the first news stories to come out. As more and more Wisconsinites recognize the worth of the work Walker undertook on their behalf, they’ll recoil from a recall — and begin to think about the reward of a reelect.
True, none of this was at all clear two days ago. I could barely bring myself to check the results of the recall election, so nervous was I that all that Walker and the Republican Senate had achieved was about to be uprooted. And it’s by no means guaranteed. But Walker stands to succeed where so many expected him to fail for a simple, old-fashioned reason: He’s a man of principle.
He’ll succeed for another reason, too. He’s been painted as heavy-handed and dictatorial, unwilling to listen. But I recall a man who looks people in the eye and clearly takes an interest even in what a junior reporter has to say. The Wall Street Journal depicts a man who even now seeks the input of those who vehemently disagree with him:
After months of polarizing political debate and unprecedented recall elections Tuesday, Wisconsin Republican Gov. Scott Walker said he wants to shift his agenda toward issues on which the GOP and Democrats can find common ground.
“I think what voters want is for us to work together,” Mr. Walker said in an interview Thursday.
The governor said he plans to collaborate with lawmakers from both parties this fall to attract venture capitalists by providing financial incentives such as tax credits and to design a plan to improve third-grade reading scores. …
Mr. Walker said he has met with more than 70 of the state’s 132 lawmakers this summer and he is compiling a list of their proposals that he thinks could find broad consensus in the legislature.
Someone who sits down one-on-one with lawmaker after lawmaker to brainstorm best practices and policies doesn’t sound like a dictator to me (but, then, libs do seem intent to redefine the meaning of words like “terrorist,” “tyrant” and “dictator”). To an extent, the demonization of Walker throughout the entire budget season worked, resulting in lower approval ratings and Politico praising governors with a “softer” touch in articles none-so-subtly implying that governors with a firmer approach won’t ultimately be successful. But the effort to portray him poorly hasn’t been completely effective. Americans might rarely encounter strength and conviction in their leaders these days, but that doesn’t mean they’re unable to recognize it when they do.
Walker says he expects to face a recall election, but he doesn’t sound too worried. “How legitimate it is, I’ll leave up to the pundits,” he said. So, to any Wisconsin liberal who wants Walker outta there, I echo Guy: If you want to waste money while Walker saves it, be my guest.
Related Posts:










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
It is disappointing that Scott Walker supports amnesty.
bluegill on March 21, 2013 at 8:05 AM
Let’s take back the terminology. It isn’t “path to citizenship” or even amnesty. It is a plan for preferential treatment of illegal aliens. Seriously, I know people who waited years and had to spend thousands to become citizens. I have no support for those who would reward those with illegal alien status.
Happy Nomad on March 21, 2013 at 8:10 AM
Liberals will not long allow the states to be creative in meeting problems, most of which are caused by Washington and by liberals with their chosen sacraments of SSM, abortion, and entitlements. They will either join the idiots in DC (like with the CO gun and magazine ban) when they gain power, or do everything to undermine efforts when out of power (like the recall vote against Walker by the teacher unions). And, of course, the courts to declare unconstitutional an amendment to a state’s constitution (like with the SSM case before SCOTUS).
If liberals are to succeed, free thought and action independent of Washington and the Democrat machine cannot be tolerated.
Liam on March 21, 2013 at 8:11 AM
The owners of the gop (Big business) should be thrilled that the Union buster wants to run.
But he’s wasting his time because Texas is going blue if he gets AMNESTY.
Viva the leaders of the end-of-America Party!!!
PappyD61 on March 21, 2013 at 8:14 AM
Courageous — like Scott in FL and Brewer in AZ, agreeing to expand Medicaid so they could get more magical Obamabucks (at least in the short run)?
But Scott is right about the states being the answer. If we’re going to have any hope of saving this country, the states are going to need to take the lead. The states need to re-claim their constitutional authority; authority that they’ve foolishly ceded to the federal government too many times.
AZCoyote on March 21, 2013 at 8:15 AM
Walker? Ryan? Rubio? Paul? Cruz? Etc.
2016????……That’s not the real question if the gop allows 20 million more illegals to be voters…..the real question is do we change the country’s name to:
Meximerica?………or Americo?
Anyone in the BowDown Media have the fritos to ask THAT question of these Amnesty pushers?
PappyD61 on March 21, 2013 at 8:19 AM
It is disappointing that Scott Walker supports amnesty.
bluegill on March 21, 2013 at 8:05 AM
Let’s take back the terminology. It isn’t “path to citizenship” or even amnesty. It is a plan for preferential treatment of illegal aliens. Seriously, I know people who waited years and had to spend thousands to become citizens. I have no support for those who would reward those with illegal alien status.
Happy Nomad on March 21, 2013 at 8:10 AM
Walker’s stand on immigration is my biggest problem with him.
annoyinglittletwerp on March 21, 2013 at 8:29 AM
His state voted for Obama. Yeah, they did it, and will keep doing it. I doubt Walker could carry his own state.
rubberneck on March 21, 2013 at 8:32 AM
Now this is someone I can get behind, is he perfect No. He has done great work in his state and he has Exec experience unlike Paul.
KBird on March 21, 2013 at 8:41 AM
His state voted for Obama. Yeah, they did it, and will keep doing it. I doubt Walker could carry his own state.
rubberneck on March 21, 2013 at 8:32 AM
THIS x1,000,000
PappyD61 on March 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM
With the consensus that there will be an immigration bill passed some time this year, it is critical that there is a national policy that spells out the difference between immigrants who are on a path to citizenship, (working, paying taxes into the system, and collecting benefits), and an actual “right to vote” as an American citizen.
Every “immigrant” working here with a legal status, MUST also carry the proper ID that says in essence, “working status approved” “NOT A LEGAL VOTING AMERICAN CITIZEN”.
Let the Democrats chew on the fact that it will be over 10 years of continuous residency and passing the test of understanding the Constitution—in English—before voting status is granted.
Rovin on March 21, 2013 at 9:13 AM
I like the idea of identification that proclaims they are not legal voters. However, given the large number of stupid english-speaking people here who are citizens and don’t have a clue about the Constitution, I can’t support an understanding of the Constitution as a requirement to vote….. UNLESS WE EXTEND IT TO ALL VOTERS.
Happy Nomad on March 21, 2013 at 9:21 AM
My bad. I had assumed that our public, (federal), education system would cover the Constitution for every American student at some point before they graduated from HS. One would think that the founding document that completes the foundation of how our government IS supposed to operate, would be understood. Perhaps our liberal progressive “leaders” should be pinned down on what they believe is a priority for all Americans.
Rovin on March 21, 2013 at 9:32 AM
Although I agree that Texans need to be vigilant in keeping Texas conservative…Currently the Liberal Catholics are outnumbered by a combined denominational Protestants as a voting block. Baptists being the largest single block close to the Catholic demographic percentage
In Houston the percentage is Catholic – 18.44% Baptist – 16.29%
In Dallas the percentage is Catholic – 19.25% Baptist – 15.36%
In Austinistan……………Catholic – 17.45% Baptist – 10.56%
South of San Antonio is predominantly Catholic – 30.9%
Baptist – 7.89%
“Geographically, Texas tends to be heavily Protestant in the north and east and Catholic in the south and southwest. Leading Protestant denominations and their known adherents in 2000 were the Southern Baptist Convention, 3,519,459; the United Methodist Church, 1,022,342; Churches of Christ, 377,264; Assemblies of God, 228,098; the Presbyterian Church USA, 180,315; the Episcopal Church, 177,910; Independent Charismatic Churches, 159,449; the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 155,451; the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, 155,019; Independent Non-Charismatic Churches, 145,249; and the Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, 140,106. Roman Catholics numbered 4,368,969 in 2000. There were an estimated 128,000 Jews, 114,999 Muslims, and about 10,777 adherents to the Baha’i faith. There were about 9.2 million people (44.5% of the population) who were not counted as members of any religious organization.”
http://www.city-data.com/states/Texas-Religions.html
Graph on Denominational Percentages:
http://www.bestplaces.net/religion/state/texas
workingclass artist on March 21, 2013 at 9:33 AM
True or not liberals are convinced that since the civil war, state sovereignty belongs to the president.
Speakup on March 21, 2013 at 9:49 AM
My incredibly stupid state government is about to pass in state tuition for children of illegals.
The comments on the Portland TV stations FB page are overwhelmingly and vehemently against it. Surprising to me.
I do not think the majority of the little people, left or right support the politicians’ ideas on this this issue, but then again, the little people are paying for this mess and don’t need votes.
Maybe all the gop needs is someone who will actually do the right thing and put Americans first.
ORconservative on March 21, 2013 at 9:51 AM
This is really frustrating…Aside from a direct and concerted effort to round up illegals…including at their homes or work, or school…containing them in numerous “camps” across the US, and shipping them out to their home country, anything short of that would fall under the “amnesty” umbrella.
That ain’t gonna happen, just based on the logistics of such an operation, the costs, the effects on children and families, and the political ramifications. So it’s well past time get over the whole “amnesty” bs and throwing any GOPer who so much as mentions some “path to citizenship” under the bus.
The sooner we get over that, the better. Make no mistake, I’m all for sealing our borders, build a wall, heck…put armed guards in towers with Gatling guns. A sovereign nation cannot exist with open, porous borders. Of course, over half of illegals in the US didn’t slip through a hole in the fence or over a barrier…they came legally and overstayed their visas. That’s another thing we should do…to be much stricter on.
JetBoy on March 21, 2013 at 10:12 AM
All Politics is local…… so they say….
Unless you have a Big Media controlled by fascists, who create a propagandist lying reality for millions of Americans, that has no accountability for the lies they spread.
Yes, Kill the messenger. Do not feed the WaPo, LAT NYT beast anymore.
You want honesty to return to American Government ?
Fight the Pravda. The Russians finally did. And they won.
FlaMurph on March 21, 2013 at 12:16 PM
Yes because Mitt and McCain had exactly the same message as Walker.
- x1,000,000
It was the message that won the day for Walker. Small Government and he has delivered on that message. It could not have been more different than the bigger Government message of McCain and Romney.
Mitt was 15 points behind Walker and the message was the one and only reason for that. Mitts GOPe message stunk on ice and lost him the election. Well that and his core beliefs came out from time to time. You know pro Obama Care. Pro Abortion. Pro Gay Marriage. He tried hard to hide them but they did come out from time to time.
Steveangell on March 21, 2013 at 12:46 PM
And ANY of the Democrats are better??? This man had the cajones to stand up to the radical far left, the unions, the Obama admin. AND WON..
I would vote for Scott Walker in a presidential race in a HEARTBEAT..
reshas1 on March 21, 2013 at 12:51 PM
The “just look to the states” approach has some validity but it is truly too simplistic. Yes, the progress made by the Republican Party has been made on the state levels, but I can tell you that in many cases the state legislators are just as venal as those in Washington. Too many are looking at the wrong issues. (i.e. when Texas was suffering an ugly financial picture, the first piece of legislation considered was a fetal heart/anti-abortion bill). Progress is being made in the states, but in many cases it is in spite of many truly stupid legislators.
Legislators in Washington, D.C. have been there too long. They no longer hear the voices of their constituents. I have never favored term limits, but I no longer vote for incumbents. Maybe term limits is the answer.
georgeofthedesert on March 22, 2013 at 11:19 AM