Canadian Oil Sands and America: Part 2
posted at 11:25 am on August 11, 2011 by Jazz Shaw
Yesterday we covered surface mining extraction of oil sands as practiced by Suncor in Alberta. But as noted, only roughly 1/5 of the deposits are close enough to the surface to reach through conventional methods. Necessity being the mother of invention, the energy industry was forced to develop new technologies to reach the rest of it. Today we’ll look at one way this is being done, as well as a bit of the cultural and economic impact these operations have on the community.
What is SAGD?
I had the opportunity to tour the Surmont facility, operated by ConocoPhillips in partnership with Total, where they are producing oil using a cutting edge engineering procedure. The company has pioneered a process known as steam-assisted gravity drainage (or SAGD.) Because the bitumen is too thick to flow through a pipeline in its native state, a pair of horizontal pipelines are run through the reserve, one above the other. Super-heated steam is pumped into the upper pipe, melting the oil sands and creating a slowly expanding steam chamber. The liquified bitumen flows down into the lower pipe where it is pumped to the surface.

When the oil reaches the plant it is mixed with lighter, less viscous fuel (also extracted locally) to produce a form of synthetic crude suitable for sale and delivery in the pipeline. The mixing is required because, left in its original form, the bitumen solidifies into something with the consistency of a hockey puck. We were shown an example of the congealed bitumen during a presentation at the end of the tour.

Controlling water usage to minimize environmental impact is a key priority in the SAGD process, just as with surface mining. ConocoPhillips’ water reclamation rate is over 90%, with the returning steam being captured, cooled, cleansed of impurities and returned for continuous loops through the cycle.
VIDEO: In this short video, a ConocoPhillips lab technician provides a brief demonstration of how the water used in the system is recovered and purified for reuse.
This method of “in-situ” resource extraction also has the salutary effect of vastly reducing the plant’s footprint on the land. A rather compact processing plant generates the steam, sending it along pipelines to small drilling pads miles away where it is injected into the ground. A matching line brings the liquified fuel back to the plant for processing. Since the drilling is done horizontally after reaching the depth of the oil sand, multiple pairs of pipelines can spread out from a single pad covering a wide area without requiring multiple, individual insertion points. And just like the Suncor operation, any surface area which is disturbed during the construction process is replanted with indigenous trees and ground cover.
VIDEO: The following brief report from Energy Tomorrow provides an excellent overview of the entire SAGD process, as well as an aerial tour of the facility.
Growing Pains
Though these companies and others have been engaged in energy exploration in Alberta since the 1960s, the past decade has seen a serious expansion of operations along with a corresponding growth in population. No endeavor on this scale can take place without a few growing pains. I had the opportunity to conduct interviews with a number of employees and contractors from several of the companies operating here during my stay, providing a glimpse into what life is like in a modern day boom town.
There are jobs aplenty to be had, and the energy companies are pretty much always hiring. These are good paying jobs, too. I spoke with one young lady who worked in the “tool crib” handing out and collecting tools, who said, “Where else could I get a job paying thirty dollars an hour to do this?” Specialized workers in both construction and oil production can earn significantly higher wages than that.
That’s good news for the workers and the local economy, but it’s also resulted in something of a real estate explosion. Because of the complicated process for allocating lands – either for resource development or private ownership – space is a prime commodity. I was told of the in-laws of one worker who recently purchased what he described as a, “not very large four bedroom bungalow on a pretty small parcel of land” which sold for more than $700,000. (And given the current exchange rate, that works out to pretty much the same cost in US dollars.)
Many of the workers are not permanent residents of the area, traveling in and out on work cycles ranging from seven to twenty-eight days, most putting in twelve hour shifts. Some full time employees have housing provided for them on site at little to no cost, which is a very convenient arrangement. Some other contractors I spoke with found themselves staying in what are known as “open camps.” These are sets of temporary trailers set up by people fortunate enough to own some property, where they provide the workers with a small living space, meals whenever they are not on site, and bus transportation to and from the job. It can come at a price, though, with one welder telling me he paid $200 per night to stay in such a camp.
In fact, everything seems to be fairly expensive around there. Some of the employees noted with rather grim humor that the cost of gasoline is well above the national average for the United States – a fact one man found quite ironic, noting that the fuel, “comes out of the ground about a mile from here.”
Such is the price of success, I suppose. Tomorrow we will conclude our series with a look at relations between the oil companies and the local population, including the indigenous tribes. We’ll also discuss why these new technologies are important to us in the USA, even though we don’t have much in the way of oil sands in the lower forty-eight, and how employment opportunities stemming from this industry may be able to provide an even greater boost to America’s struggling economy.
DISCLOSURE: Costs for travel and accommodations for this tour were provided by the American Petroleum Institute. No other financial remuneration was offered or accepted. The author was under no obligation to publish any content relating to the tour and neither API nor any of the companies mentioned in this series had any editorial control or input regarding published material beyond fact checking for accuracy.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Obama to ban steam injection in 1..2….
cktheman on August 11, 2011 at 11:27 AM
Steam is responsible for global warming, the demise of the dinosaurs, the disappearance of the Spiny Sabretoothed Jackdaw, Pluto being reclassified as a non-planet, and the burning of my toast this morning.
Steam needs to be banned, BANNED I say! No more hot showers for you Gaia killers.
Bishop on August 11, 2011 at 11:38 AM
California-based Ivanhoe Energy’s patented HTL technology eliminates this expensive step.
Made in the USA!
Terp Mole on August 11, 2011 at 11:42 AM
Well, who wouldn’t accept a free trip to Fort McMurray, Alberta?
YYZ on August 11, 2011 at 11:46 AM
Just like Alaska!
IowaWoman on August 11, 2011 at 11:46 AM
In the freight transport business we’ve had Ft McMurray “on our radar” for several years now. But as with any remote destination the freight rates are highly “lopsided” as carrier & drivers know they’ll likely not get any return cargo within several hundred miles after a Ft. McMurray delivery – SO inbound rates TO Ft. McMurray are sky high and rates for any cargo leaving that area remain low…….which is the normal result of unbalanced supply & demand……..We are VERY hopeful this technology continues to grow!
Katfish on August 11, 2011 at 11:58 AM
How does one get signed up for these free trips, Jazz? I’ll travel anywhere to get out of my crappy neighborhood.
Knucklehead on August 11, 2011 at 12:01 PM
Steam is just the byproduct of warming Dihydrogen Monoxide. I say we ban it at the source. Eliminate Dihydrogen Monoxide today!
Wolftech on August 11, 2011 at 12:22 PM
Several members of the group were lost when mosquitoes dragged them away, over to where the big ones were waiting.
slickwillie2001 on August 11, 2011 at 12:24 PM
Holy crap!
Hurry, let’s establish bases in Canada so we can trade for their oil!
/Southernblogger
/bloghooligan
fossten on August 11, 2011 at 12:26 PM
Hey! Let’s invade Canada!
Bullets for oil!
sarc/
FOWG1 on August 11, 2011 at 12:38 PM
The mosquitoes were pretty big for sure, but I was actually more worried about the freaking bears and mountain lions. And they were not viewed at a great distance…
Jazz Shaw on August 11, 2011 at 12:38 PM
Apparently just by publishing articles on energy topics for a few years.
Jazz Shaw on August 11, 2011 at 12:39 PM
Thanks for the tip. I’m an expert on sun tan products and cruise ships. I need to get busy.
Knucklehead on August 11, 2011 at 12:49 PM
Might be a bit nippy in January…
I wonder how much fuel they burn generating the steam, and how much “lighter, less viscous fuel” is needed to blend with the bitumen. Still, if they produce 20,000 barrels per day, that’s $2 million a day ($730 million per year) in revenue, and they could afford some operating expenses and salaries…
Steve Z on August 11, 2011 at 1:02 PM
You probably won’t get much of a suntan in Alberta…
Steve Z on August 11, 2011 at 1:03 PM
How are the mosquitoes and friends? Any blackflies?
gh on August 11, 2011 at 1:21 PM
? The site says their head office is in Calgary…
Shay on August 11, 2011 at 1:21 PM
Not true! Between June 15 and Sept. 15, you can turn toasty brown! The rest of the year – not so much.
honsy on August 11, 2011 at 1:23 PM
There’s no need to invade Alberta – all they ask is the world market price for their oil. Think of it this way: there’s enough there to allow the US to withdraw from the Middle East entirely.
Besides, despite leftist claims to the contrary, Canada is one of the staunchest US allies. There are no lengths to which they will not go to back the superpower to the south. The green berets worn by US Special Forces in the Vietnam War, and the Napalm used there, were both produced in Canada. In fact, the Cdn gov’t lied about not being involved in Iraq when they actually were. So relax, Canada not only has much to be taken, but they’ll give it to you as well.
KillerKane on August 11, 2011 at 1:45 PM
Dihydrogenous monoxide rears it’s ugly head again!
Count to 10 on August 11, 2011 at 1:57 PM
The HTL process was patented in the USA. Their Commercial Demonstration Facility was in California.
Doesn’t surprise me they moved HQ closer to the primary market.
Terp Mole on August 11, 2011 at 2:00 PM
Steve Z – I used to get a wicked tan every summer at a little vacation spot known as Wainright Alberta, a/k/a the PPCLI Battleschool a/k/a/ Hell on Earth. Of course it was really just a tan on my forearms and from my shirt to the bottom of my beret, but still.
holdfast on August 11, 2011 at 2:02 PM
Did you get any information on the newer technologies for processing the oil sands? I just read an article (linked from Insta-Glenn) about a process that reduces water usage significantly, and energy usage by ~85%. It uses solvents. My only concern with it is how they manage the left-overs. But your articles have me hopeful that they’re doing their best to minimize the impact on the environment.
nukemhill on August 11, 2011 at 2:09 PM
I’ll take the reports from a shill of the massive ultra-greedy energy conglomerates with a grain of oil sand. Thank you.
FlatFoot on August 11, 2011 at 2:41 PM
I’ll go further and say that an Alberta in Canada is a more reliable supplier of oil than an Alberta as 58th state would be. In Canada, our nutball EPA has a more difficult time shutting down the oil business.
slickwillie2001 on August 11, 2011 at 3:00 PM
slickwillie2001 – 58th state, heh. I almost forgot that gag.
I agree with you, but whenever Ottawa is controlled by an eastern-based party (Liberals or NDP) they threaten Alberta with their rhetoric. In recent years, they menaced the country with Kyoto. Fortunately, they undermined it by exempting Ontario’s vote rich auto sector from the plan, and by the sheer ridiculousness of the whole idea. In the past, however, they proved their maliciousness with the National Energy Policy – the memory of which will make any Albertans’ blood boil with anger. So, it is in everyone’s best interest to keep the Canadian federal government sane.
KillerKane on August 11, 2011 at 3:14 PM
Interesting, because this is how heavy oil is produced in the Bakersfield, CA area, near Iraan, TX, Venezuela and other places, FOR YEARS.
Kermit on August 11, 2011 at 10:32 PM