Canadian Oil Sands and America: Part 1
posted at 1:25 pm on August 10, 2011 by Jazz Shaw
Fans of the “all of the above” theory of American energy policy are well aware that we need to be exploring every possible avenue of resources to meet demand in the 21st century. When it comes to oil, most of us think of sweet crude, with gushers coming up out of the ground. Unfortunately, while we have some here in North America, a lot of it sits under countries which don’t exactly have America’s best interests at heart, and it’s not going to last forever. But there are vast deposits of other types in the world, including huge reserves of oil sands in Canada. Unfortunately, there were logistical barriers to accessing these resources in the early days of oil exploration, but modern technological innovations are unlocking the vast potential awaiting us there. And if we’re going to be exploring it, we might as well learn a bit more about it.
I was recently invited to tour a couple of oil sand operations in northern Alberta, Canada, to find out what these advances mean for both Canada and the United States. In a brief series of articles we’re going to take a look at some of the science behind these activities, as well as the effect it’s having on energy supplies, society and the environment. Today we’ll focus on some surface mining operations, moving on to some newer methods later in the week.
What the heck are oil sands?
Oil sands – also called tar sands – are a type of crude oil in the form of bitumen, an extremely viscous, black tar-like substance which is embedded in a mixture of sand, clay and water. The formation being explored in Alberta is part of the Athabasca oil sands deposits. They cover a huge swath of that part of Canada. Roughly 20% of the deposits are close enough to the surface – within a couple hundred feet – to reach by conventional mining techniques, and that’s the portion we’ll cover today. The rest runs much deeper, requiring different technologies which we’ll go into in a later article.
As you might imagine, this stuff can’t just be pumped out of the ground like sweet crude. So in the case of the reserves near the surface, you’ve got to dig it out.
The Mine
The first site we visited was the currently running mine operated by Suncor. And I won’t lie to you… it can be a bit shocking when you first see it. When we pulled up to the edge of the pit my first thought was, “Oh my God. It’s a strip mine.” And this is a massive operation. The picture below is of a few members of our press tour posing in front of the mine. To give you a feel for the full scale, the trucks you see in the distance are capable of carrying up to 400 tons of material and are the size of a small house.

To get to the oil sands, as previously mentioned, they have to cut down through a couple hundred feet of material. This involves removing the topsoil, then layers of earth and then clay (collectively known as “the overburden” in the mining industry) to finally reach the good stuff sitting just above the bedrock. This next shot is the current front of the excavation, showing the various layers which are being removed. The lowest layer – the rich oil sands – has a distinctly shiny appearance as you will see. Again, to get a sense of the scale of the operation, that shovel cutting into the earth has a bucket on it which can pull out nearly 100 tons of material in a single scoop. (I had to take this shot from a great distance on max zoom, but the quality is still fairly good for our purposes.)

After extraction, the bitumen goes through an extensive, highly technical process which we don’t have room to detail here, but the the sands are crushed and processed to remove all of the clay, water and other sediments. The material is then processed into diesel and synthetic crude in preparation for shipment. This is not just experimental technology. The company is already producing 300,000 barrels of fuel per day, with production slated to increase exponentially in the coming decades. You can see detailed videos and papers on the production process at the Suncor site, but I can tell you from first hand experience, it’s an extremely impressive operation.
Production and environmental concerns
As mentioned above, there are obvious environmental questions surrounding such a process. My initial view of the mine was reminiscent of the “bad old days” of mining in the last century when companies searching for copper and other resources would engage in strip mining, laying waste to huge tracts of land and leaving behind total devastation.
There is an additional area of concern in this process given how they have to deal with what are known as “tailings.” This is the residual clay and other material, suspended in water, which must be handled after the bitumen has been extracted. The industry has used “tailing ponds” for this purpose, allowing the material to slowly settle out of the water to the bottom for later reclamation. (And “ponds” is a bit of a euphemism, since they are the size of lakes.) This process can take decades to occur naturally since the particles remain suspended in the fluid for a very long time.
Suncor – along with other companies working in the area – have made impressive strides in dealing with all of these issues. I put the question to Anne Marie Toutant, a mining executive giving us a tour of the mine, asking, “Where does the overburden go? You always mention ‘elsewhere’ but you must have taken out enough to build your own mountain by now.”
The answer was a pleasant surprise. They’re putting it all back where they found it, layering the clay, dirt and topsoil back to their original structure. The company then brings in forestry experts to supervise the planting of ground cover and seedlings native to the area. The process takes years, but they are actually rebuilding the native forests behind them as they go. To date the number of new trees they have planted on reclaimed land is quite literally in the millions.
As for all the water they use, Suncor has managed a fairly amazing feat of containment. They don’t draw off the pristine surface waters of the area, but tap into deep reservoirs of non-potable water. The system is very nearly a closed loop, with pretty much all of the water being recovered from the mining process, recycled and put back into the system. No discharge into the local rivers and streams is allowed and the government – along with citizen groups – monitor water quality on a continuous basis.
As for those tailing ponds, Suncor has pioneered new science which allows them to reclaim all of the water from the clay at a vastly enhanced rate. (We were invited to watch a demonstration of the science first hand, and it’s remarkable.) The clay is then returned to its natural situation as noted above. Instead of dozens of these stagnant ponds, the company is on its way to reducing their need to a single body of water. The old ponds are being reclaimed to their original state, just like the mine itself. Go here for some before and after pictures of their first tailings pond and see what it looks like today. (They also have a live, 24/7 web cam on the site so everyone can keep an eye on them.) What was once a deep reservoir of suspended clay, debris and fouled water is now a vast, sprawling meadow with new trees springing up. During the short tour I had of the former pond, we saw a black bear, a fox, flocks of grouse and raptors moving in to nesting sites the company installed.
VIDEO: Short video tour of the reclaimed tailings pond.
The Bottom Line
The exploration and development of oils sands in Canada is producing tens of thousands of jobs even as we speak. (The industry is currently staffing more than 21,000 high paying jobs just in the Fort McMurray area where I was staying. Suncor employs over 5,000 direct workers, with another 5,000 as contractors or indirect employees.) And they’re not all in Canada. The benefits reach out to us here in the United States. Among other things, the companies purchase some of those giant pieces of earth moving equipment I showed you from Caterpillar, right here in the USA. Also, a lot of the synthetic crude is refined here at home.
VIDEO: The following video was shot on site at the mine where Anne Marie Toutant explains some of the mining process along with how the land reclamation works. The video and audio are a bit rough, but I think it gives a good sense of the sights and sounds at a working mine.
Of course, expansion like that doesn’t come without some growing pains, but we’ll cover more of that in an article to follow, as well as other aspects of the employment opportunities and economic development associated with this work. Next time we will also take a look at some of the cutting edge technology being used by another company to access the deeper reserves of oil sands and how they do it with an even smaller footprint on the land.
DISCLOSURE: Costs for travel and accommodations for this tour were provided by the American Petroleum Institute. No other financial remuneration was offered or accepted. The author was under no obligation to publish any content relating to the tour and neither API nor any of the companies mentioned in this series had any editorial control or input regarding published material beyond fact checking for accuracy.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
If interested in even more info I’d recommend reading “Ethical Oil” by Ezra Levant, link on his website:
Paradox Drive on August 10, 2011 at 1:31 PM
Let’s fill up the tank and go for a ride
teke184 on August 10, 2011 at 1:33 PM
Look for the greenies to soon find some endangered fish, snail or cute little mammal to file a lawsuit on behalf of in front of a favorable liberal judge. They’ve just about stopped the mega loads from crossing into MT on their way to CA because they wanted to use scenic hwy 12. They are now looking for a different route.
Kissmygrits on August 10, 2011 at 1:34 PM
OT: New London Olympics logo
faraway on August 10, 2011 at 1:37 PM
Jazz how cool for you. It is an eye opening experience isn’t it!
Sometimes it is more like hard rock.
Did you notice any environmentalists? And the crap they leave behind? Environmentalists are usually the reason why the AK North Slope gets a bad name for trash…. because the tree hugging bunny humpers leave it there on purpose.
upinak on August 10, 2011 at 1:38 PM
And to think that one woman, namely one Lisa Jackson will come out and say, “Nope”.
/And that’s the end of it.
Abolish the Carter Era EPA
Key West Reader on August 10, 2011 at 1:38 PM
But how hot is it making the planet?
(I kid)
shick on August 10, 2011 at 1:38 PM
Canada isn’t as constrictive concerning Greenie’s. They let them have their say but when it comes to jobs, they will ignore tree hugging bunny humpers.
upinak on August 10, 2011 at 1:39 PM
This. LOLOLOL~!
Key West Reader on August 10, 2011 at 1:43 PM
Of course it is a strip mine. It also contains more than twice the BOE of Saudi Arabia. A tiny fraction of the revenue produced will be used to reforest the area after the oil is extracted.
Vashta.Nerada on August 10, 2011 at 1:43 PM
So instead of saying “Drill, baby, drill”, we say “Dig, baby, Dig”?
Are there any deposits of significance in the U.S. ?
moc23 on August 10, 2011 at 1:43 PM
War for Sand!!11!!
portlandon on August 10, 2011 at 1:46 PM
Where’s Dave Drywall? Can’t comment on this without his impeccable analysis.
/
Del Dolemonte on August 10, 2011 at 1:48 PM
Very neat, it was a good question and she answered it well. Did anybody else ask questions? The video ended just after yours. Every time I hear somebody with a northern accent say “y’all”, I crack up.
I’m jealous, those are the kinds of trips I consider fun.
Now, if they just let you drive one of the dump trucks.
A very “conveyor belt” sort of operation.
cozmo on August 10, 2011 at 1:48 PM
If you look closely at the video of the reclaimed tailings pond land, you’ll see a black bear. :-)
Jazz Shaw on August 10, 2011 at 1:49 PM
Jazz,
Thank you for an informative article and upinak thanks for a new phrase “tree hugging bunny humpers”
Duncan Khuver on August 10, 2011 at 1:50 PM
“Pound Sand”?
US has oil sands in eastern Utah. But the Democrats who controlled the House and Senate rammed thru a bill in 2007 that prohibits us from getting them. It was one of the very first things they did in their infamous 100 Hour Plan, which sounds scarily reminiscent of Communist China’s 5 Year Plans.
Del Dolemonte on August 10, 2011 at 1:52 PM
Why do they leave it there on purpose?
blink on August 10, 2011 at 1:53 PM
The only people actively engaged in opposition while I was there were a few members of the First Nations aboriginal tribes who have broken with the tribal leadership and still want the land left alone. But most of the tribes are on board now. The land is being reclaimed, rebuilt and replanted and many of their tribal leaders actually send people out to supervise and help with the planting and inspections. Also, the tribe members have many local businesses and Sunco along with other companies working in the area make sure to send a TON of business their way, built them some schools, community centers, etc. and got them on board. I’ll be covering a lot more about that in part three of this series on Friday. Tomorrow we’ll be looking at how they extract the deep resources using nothing but steam.
Jazz Shaw on August 10, 2011 at 1:54 PM
Good stuff, Jazz. We’ve been getting a very bad rap about our so-called “dirty oil” (I’m looking in your direction, James Cameron) so it’s gratifying to have someone come up and give the industry a fair hearing.
The lefties sure like to whinge about the “environmental devastation” going on but they don’t seem to mind the revenue that the royalties provide to the public coffers.
landshark on August 10, 2011 at 1:54 PM
To the question about oil sands in America, there’ a little bit in Utah / Wyoming, but not enough to be a major reserve. However, we will be talking later this week about how the technologies these guys pioneered are helping us here in America with exploring shale oil and deep natural gas formations.
Jazz Shaw on August 10, 2011 at 1:56 PM
Opec is against this. it threatens their cartel.
seven on August 10, 2011 at 1:56 PM
Naah. Canadian law and legal processes on environmental issues are much more rational than in the USA. If Canada owned Alaska they’d be drilling the crap out of it, offshore and on land, and selling us that oil.
I call it the Peoples Republic of Canada at times, but this is one area where they are far more sensible than we are.
Re: And I won’t lie to you… it can be a bit shocking when you first see it. When we pulled up to the edge of the pit my first thought was, “Oh my God. It’s a strip mine.”
…if not for this industry, there would not be anything in that area. McMurray only exists because of it. It’s crappy land not much good for anything else.
slickwillie2001 on August 10, 2011 at 1:58 PM
I like how Canadians say “process”.
lowandslow on August 10, 2011 at 1:58 PM
Excellent piece, Jazz. My first reaction upon seeing the video was similar to yours. I grew up in coal country, and there are still some ugly strip mining pits left abandoned by coal companies decades ago in the area, where very little grows. It is an ugly strip mine, but if the oil companies really do successfully restore the land to initial conditions, and this kind of mining is worth it.
My worry is not so much that Suncor is “raping the land”, because they obviously are restoring it, but that the environmental whackos will come up with some “endangered grasshopper” or some such and get the liberal politicians and courts deem it a “nature preserve” banning future mining.
simkeith on August 10, 2011 at 1:59 PM
Funny the country with the world’s largest fossil fuel reserves allow liberals to do this to them. When is people going to figure it all out.
Did you know the WWII NAZI war machine ran on coal? Yep liquified coal, over 70 years ago. Search on “Fischer–Tropsch process”.
tarpon on August 10, 2011 at 2:00 PM
Don’t fret too much about mine waste, folks. Nature can regenerate itself with just a little help from livestock.
OhioCoastie on August 10, 2011 at 2:02 PM
Does the EPA know about this….
PatriotRider on August 10, 2011 at 2:04 PM
Did they give you an idea of what the break-even cost of extraction was on this project?
In the western Permian Basin of West Texas, the new horizontal hyrdofracking methods of extracting oil from shale formations apparently have a break-even point somewhere around the $70 range — i.e. anything when the price of oil is above $70 is worth going after, anything below $70 makes extraction not cost-effective. I would think the tar sands would have the same sort of cutoff price level where extraction does or doesn’t make sense, though that price could be above or below the $70 range that the new development oil shale fields here have.
jon1979 on August 10, 2011 at 2:05 PM
This is a win win in my opinion. I really can’t see how those “bunny humpers” can complain. The soil is put back and new trees are planted. Which helps the environment more so than older trees. Younger sapplings absorb more C02.
milwife88 on August 10, 2011 at 2:05 PM
As a proud Albertan, all I can say is: “If the US wants it and is willing to pay the world market price for it, they can have all the tar sands oil they want.” Dig, baby, dig. It’s a lot better than asking the Arabs for it. The revenues derived from it go to the best of causes: health care, education, and jobs in other areas.
Alberta knows how to deal with the environmentalists. Last year, several Greenpeace activists suspended themselves and a sign reading “Separate State and Oil” from the Calgary Tower. The emergency services gave them 30 minutes to protest before they arrested them. Last week, a judge convicted them, fining each C$2,300 and saddling them with criminal records for life. They had the audacity to complain about their treatment in jail. Fortunately, no one in Alberta cares.
KillerKane on August 10, 2011 at 2:07 PM
Can they back-fill these mines with liberals and the plant trees over it? All that BS has to be good fertilizer. /sarc
Mangy Scot on August 10, 2011 at 2:08 PM
“The process takes years, but they are actually rebuilding the native forests behind them as they go.”—They do the same thing with strip mines in the US now. I toured the Black Thunder mine in Wyoming last year and one of the geologists told me they restore the terrain to within inches of the orginal. They then replant with native grass and trees. We hunted on some of the old mine land that had been restored and is now a cattle ranch. Turkeys, whitetails, mulies, and elk everywhere. In fact, I shot a nice 12-pt. bull elk there.
WarEagle01 on August 10, 2011 at 2:10 PM
I asked that question at a dinner we had with the Canadian minister of energy and a couple of Suncor execs. The break even point is lower than you would think, in the lower sixties. They’re not doing this as a science experiment. They’re shipping 300,000 barrels of synthetic crude a day on average from that one plant and making a respectable profit on it.
Jazz Shaw on August 10, 2011 at 2:14 PM
Ah-HAH! A bought-and-paid-for big oil industry HACK! You and Patrick Michaels and Roy Spencer, virtual employees of Exxon! /s
iurockhead on August 10, 2011 at 2:21 PM
can that be reversed, by, say a majority Rep in both senate and congress?
jimver on August 10, 2011 at 2:23 PM
The problem with all these inferior petro operations is OPEC can put them out of business any time they want. What is worse, they won’t be put out of business because once we establish lots of jobs through these inferior operations, then we need price controls to keep the price high to preserve the jobs. These things become green jobs in the economic sense.
We need to go get the easy oil.
Buddahpundit on August 10, 2011 at 2:25 PM
US law enforcement could learn a thing or two from the kanucks. Greenies want to do some civil disobedience? Fine and dandy, let ‘em. Then lock them up for their trouble.
iurockhead on August 10, 2011 at 2:26 PM
Preview? Learn about (California-based) Ivanhoe Energy’s HTL technology overview here.
Video here.
Made in the USA!
Terp Mole on August 10, 2011 at 2:28 PM
There are various processes used to extract the oil in the different oil sands plants. Each has a different break-even point. Also, the costs of production have been declining over the years (new technology), and are drastically lower than those from the earliest methods years ago.
Ogabe on August 10, 2011 at 2:30 PM
Yep; Saudis have West over a barrel -and they don’t want to hear about oilsands development
slickwillie2001 on August 10, 2011 at 2:31 PM
Ezra Levant’s “Ethical Oil” was just voted the Best Canadian Political Book in the Last 25 Years.
He’s a native Albertan and tackles all the myths about the “tar sands.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sd2pDZJCwo
Here’s the spinoff website:
http://www.ethicaloil.org/
ConservativeTalkRadio on August 10, 2011 at 2:32 PM
Saudi funded Greenpeace cried a bucket of tears over dirty oil and dirty duckey feet awhile back. The nation said …meh. The political leftards of Canada are an endangered species at the moment. The far left have morphed into the Socialist Quebec Separatist Party and the vanilla liberals are lost in the tundra after having two retarded academics run them into the toilet. I’m a happy Canadian camper at the moment.
I LOLed, thank you!
BL@KBIRD on August 10, 2011 at 2:37 PM
The Tar Sands (along with related shale oil and offshore deposits on the East Coast) have pretty much saved the Canadian economy. If Canada had to rely on the traditional Ontario and Quebec manufacturing sector, the economy would resemble that of Ohio, with some Michigan thrown in. Now if the US government will just get out of the way, the Tar Sands can help save the US economy too.
Please note that Canada has three AAA ratings – the Canadian Federal government, and BC, Alberta and Saskatchewan, all provinces that are serious about resource extraction and all currently with non-lefty governments.
holdfast on August 10, 2011 at 2:41 PM
Its the same way with how they say PROject. I am working in Calgary, Alberta flying thunderstorm hail supression missions this summer up here. You can travel all over the western US and the dialect changes little, but as soon as you get over the Canadian border, you get lots of Eh, Aboooot, PROject, PROcess, etc.
Before aviation, I was working as a geologist on wellsites in Texas. Amazingly enough in 1997, they were just hoping that oil would stay at least $25 a barrel, and that would be enough to support drilling. Actually it crashed back down to 9 or 10 a barrel, so everyone stopped exploring.
firepilot on August 10, 2011 at 2:45 PM
Why would they be more terrified of these oil sands than of the real oil fields that aren’t being drilled? The Saudi remarks are designed to make us go “hey, the saudis don’t like it so we should do it!”, but the Saudis would love for us to compete with them with an inferior product.
Buddahpundit on August 10, 2011 at 2:48 PM
Under the Canadian Constitution, provinces are less powerful than US states when it comes to things like criminal laws (all Federal law in Canada), but the provinces generally have control over natural resources (other than offshore and navigable rivers), and if land is not owned by anyone, then it is owned by the province. Combine that with a generous welfare state that is principally funded by the provinces (especially since the massive cuts in federal transfer payments in the late 1980s), and you have a rather urgent need for every dollar of royalties that can be raised from the exploitation of natural resources.
holdfast on August 10, 2011 at 2:52 PM
Because of this, I can almost forgive Canada for fostering Justin Bieber on us… almost.
Wolftech on August 10, 2011 at 2:57 PM
I’m with kissmygrits. Look for the enviro-wackos to put a stop to this somehow.
SuperManGreenLantern on August 10, 2011 at 3:10 PM
Just hope and pray that the Canadian federal government doesn’t embark on another “National Energy Policy” as in the early 1980s. Alberta went from boom to bust in a matter of months thanks to Trudeau *spit* and his leftist cronies from down east. Ask an Albertan what s/he thinks of Pierre the Terrible someday if you want to see blood boil. it nearly happened with the Kyoto/Cap and Trade scam in the 2000s. Forutnately, Mr. Harper’s (a Calgarian) conservatives had the enormous courage and sense to stop that dead in its tracks.
KillerKane on August 10, 2011 at 3:18 PM
Let’s be fair now: those wacky pronunciations are not native to Alberta. Calgary is mostly populated by imports and until Maritimers started coming out here for work, I went years not understanding why Americans think we say “aboot”. “Eh” is a bit more common out West but not as much as you’d think.
For the record, I say “praw-cess” but then my forebears are from Minnesocold.
landshark on August 10, 2011 at 3:19 PM
Alberta is well-practiced in dealing with the ‘environmental’ movement. Last year, Greenpeace hung a banner attacking the energy sector in Calgary. Last week, a judge fined them and gave them permanent criminal records (impairing international travel and employment). Anti-oil sands propaganda is also effectively countered. If the US needs the oil, Alberta is happy to provide it.
KillerKane on August 10, 2011 at 3:21 PM
I sense a redditor…
John_Locke on August 10, 2011 at 3:27 PM
Where’s Dave Drywall? Can’t comment on this without his impeccable analysis.
/
Del Dolemonte on August 10, 2011 at 1:48 PM
———
Oil sands are great.
They (predictably) have lots of environmental problems this article glosses over or completely ignores (like, say tailing pond bird deaths that number in the thousands), but they’re trying to fix shit and it takes time and nobody’s perfect.
Sorry to disappoint you.
Dave Rywall on August 10, 2011 at 3:52 PM
Great article Jazz.
I recall they were discussing this not too many years ago, but it was deemed to not be cost effective. What’s changed? Technology? Cost of oil high enuf?
Strip mine reclamation in Appalachia has evolved amazingly over the last 40 years or so. There are old pits from the 60s & 70s that remain, and they are ugly. But now, the reclamation will often make significant improvements to the land itself. Of course, not everyone likes that. Some would rather leave that land to the rattlesnakes. Gotta wonder about their ulterior motive.
humdinger on August 10, 2011 at 3:54 PM
Over what period of time? The tailing ponds remaining now have not only scarecrows but timed air burst guns and flares that scare the birds away. There are still some, but vastly reduced. These guys are literally bending over backwards to eliminate every environmental complaint. Plus, they’re getting rid of the the tailing ponds anyway.
Jazz Shaw on August 10, 2011 at 3:56 PM
Over what period of time? The tailing ponds remaining now have not only scarecrows but timed air burst guns and flares that scare the birds away. There are still some, but vastly reduced. These guys are literally bending over backwards to eliminate every environmental complaint. Plus, they’re getting rid of the the tailing ponds anyway.
Jazz Shaw on August 10, 2011 at 3:56 PM
——-
Syncrude has been fined millions for multiple incidents of failing to deploy scarecrows and/or air burst guns.
I said they were working on shit.
I just said nobody is perfect.
Whoopdee whoop.
Dave Rywall on August 10, 2011 at 4:17 PM
Dave Rywall, is that the best you got? Some bird deaths in earlier oil sands efforts? Are you attacking wind turbine fields, too?
blink on August 10, 2011 at 4:22 PM
…but don’t worry about all the birds that are killed by wind generators.
slickwillie2001 on August 10, 2011 at 4:26 PM
The greatest number of complaints I got in private, off site interviews on pretty much every topic were against Syncrude. I didn’t get to tour their site, but they seemed to have a worse rep than most of the other operators. Including emissions.
Jazz Shaw on August 10, 2011 at 4:32 PM
Dave Rywall, is that the best you got? Some bird deaths in earlier oil sands efforts? Are you attacking wind turbine fields, too?
blink on August 10, 2011 at 4:22 PM
—-
What the f*ck is wrong with you
Read my post, then pis* off.
Dave Rywall on August 10, 2011 at 4:34 PM
The greatest number of complaints I got in private, off site interviews on pretty much every topic were against Syncrude. I didn’t get to tour their site, but they seemed to have a worse rep than most of the other operators. Including emissions.
Jazz Shaw on August 10, 2011 at 4:32 PM
—–
They’ve been nailed fudging the numbers of bird deaths in the past and seem to be the least willing to comply with the standards everybody else makes honest efforts to live up to.
Dave Rywall on August 10, 2011 at 4:35 PM
Someone’s in a bad mood today. Wisconsin perhaps.
slickwillie2001 on August 10, 2011 at 4:41 PM
Someone’s in a bad mood today. Wisconsin perhaps.
slickwillie2001 on August 10, 2011 at 4:41 PM
——
Bad mood, yeah that’s why I made 99% positive comments about the oil sands.
Dave Rywall on August 10, 2011 at 4:49 PM
Minor correction, CTR: Ezra Levant did indeed win a contest for best Canadian political book, but it was not for Ethical Oil, it was for his other book, Shakedown: How Our Government is Undermining Democracy in the Name of Human Rights.
And Mr. Shaw, I’m not sure if you’ve mentioned that this industry is the largest employer of aboriginals in Canada. This means that while Greenpiece can always find some natives who will be against it, most Indians are totally for it.
Johnny 100 Pesos on August 10, 2011 at 4:58 PM
Oil Sands vs. Wind Turbines: which one kills more birds?
http://youtu.be/ofoxM-tqPew
Stick with it.
landshark on August 10, 2011 at 4:59 PM
And perhaps even more telling, which kills more birds per watt generated?
Johnny 100 Pesos on August 10, 2011 at 5:01 PM
My brothers live in Alta. The oil sands are the big reason that “Province” is booming. Although there are the usual environmental crazies, the government has “rational” checks and balances to ensure that the oil is extracted responsibly.
And in a nice way, because Canadians are nice people.
Randy
williars on August 10, 2011 at 5:09 PM
Well done Jazz, looking forward to more posts on this.
grouchymonk on August 10, 2011 at 5:11 PM
Exactly right; the bird carcasses per unit [of generated electricity] ratio is the only meaningful measure. I should have been clear so thanks for correcting me.
landshark on August 10, 2011 at 5:29 PM
Being from Canada, but from the East coast, I want to thank you for this article. I only hear a little from this on national news and only when the environmentalists put up a fit. Very informative article. I hear Canada is one of the largest supplier of oil to the US.
In Canada, gas price is ridiculous. Around $5 per gallon (4 litres). BTW, do you know if there’s any truth to Canada having more oil than Saudi Arabia? I heard that it’s tough to get at, but it’s there. And the US isn’t far behind. We just don’t drill for it.
MrX on August 10, 2011 at 5:32 PM
Excellent article and informative. Putting people in jobs doing real work that benefits society. If only we allowed our own resources to be utilized to re-invigorate our industrial base.
whbates on August 10, 2011 at 5:46 PM
Actually oil sands have a much lower extraction cost than shale. I remember reading 2 different figures about 5 years ago: $6 per barrel and $15 per barel. Shale oil comes in at somewhere between $35 and $50. Think economies of scale. That 300,000 barrels per day would come to $10 billion in revenue last year.
LakeLevel on August 10, 2011 at 5:52 PM
The reclaimation is part of any mining operation anywhere in Canada for decades now.
You cannot put shovel to dirt without the reclaimation plan fully spec’d out and funded within the business plan presented.
Jim708 on August 10, 2011 at 5:55 PM
And Jazz was not kidding about high paying jobs. Each of the men and women driving those Cat 797 haul trucks makes north of $100,000 a year.
The money is good enough, that my brother-inlaw commutes from Fort Mac to Halifax NS for the work. He does about 6 weeks in and 2 or 3 three out. Round trip, about 4400 miles.
Jim708 on August 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM
Johnny, I interviewed some folks from the First Nations and we’ll be covering that on Friday.
Jazz Shaw on August 10, 2011 at 6:11 PM
Blink the bunny humpers do it so they can show the “federal” and “state” DEC (Dept Enviro Conservation) that the oil companies are making a mess. Only problem is that they have been caught doing it lately.
Jazz, I know all about that Tribal Nations and Sunco working with them. We have the exact same problems up here. I wonder if I could get a hold of someone at BP up here for you. They use to do tours for media and individuals (in a group setting) where you would be flown up north, check out a pad and how they drill and they explain how they work around the tundra and such. I always enjoy going up there. Or, if you got it in with some friends at API, ask if they know of BP still doing that. It is very eye opening.. and freaking flat. I am looking forward to the next segment.
upinak on August 10, 2011 at 8:39 PM
Saudi Arabia has much more, but Canada is in second place, ahead of Iran.
Here’s a chart.
I would rather see all the cash Saudi Arabia makes come to my country, and I’m sure my American friends would rather do business with us Canucks than with the terrorist-funding Saudi’s.
Johnny 100 Pesos on August 11, 2011 at 12:14 AM
Louis Farrakhan and Cynthia McKinney have threatened to cut off blink’s Kaddafi-kuddling kampaign funds.
Terp Mole on August 11, 2011 at 11:49 AM
More evidence that they don’t really care about the environment. They’re just anti-business.
blink on August 11, 2011 at 12:52 PM
You own this war now. Gaddafi is currently powerless to hurt America. It’s incredibly strange that you want to empower the rebels despite the fact that they might be a much greater threat to national security than Gaddafi at this point.
Now is the time to pull out of the Libyan war. Keep these two sides pinned down in civil war.
How can you claim otherwise?
blink on August 11, 2011 at 12:57 PM