Obama’s speech: Evidence of just how little the debt deal accomplishes
posted at 2:35 pm on August 2, 2011 by Tina Korbe
As Yogi Berra would say, “It’s deja vu all over again.” The president today took to the podium in the White House Rose Garden to purportedly praise the debt ceiling deal that just passed the Senate. Instead, he used the opportunity to call for — yep, you guessed it — “a balanced approach” to deficit reduction in the future.
“The compromise requires that both parties work together on a plan to cut the deficit, and, since you can’t close the deficit with just spending cuts, we’ll need a balanced approach,” Obama said. “Yes, that means making some adjustments to programs like Medicare [to ensure they'll be around in the future.] It also means reforming our tax code to ensure the wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations pay their fair share. I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: We can’t balance the budget on the backs of the very people who’ve born the biggest brunt of this recession.”
He’s also said this before (or something sure like it), but he said it again anyway:
“Voters may have chosen divided government, but they sure didn’t vote for dysfunctional government. They want us to get the economy growing. Deficit reduction is part of that agenda, but it is not the whole agenda. Growing the economy isn’t just about cutting spending and rolling back regulations that protect our air and water and keep people safe. We’re going to have to do more than that.”
He then launched into calls for a payroll tax cut, a boost to unemployment insurance benefits, an infrastructure bank and the passage of important trade agreements, among other things. It sounded just like the speech he delivered in the same location about a month ago — and I was calling that a repeat speech of an earlier speech. Gotta say this for the guy: He stays on message. The president’s unchanged remarks reveal just how little the debt deal accomplished. All that was missing from the speech were the dire threats of a default. That only, it seems, is different today than yesterday. (For that matter, the unchanged remarks of Republicans also reveal just how irrelevant the deal actually is. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, for example, just took to the floor to highlight the need for deeper spending cuts.)
Listening to the president’s speech, though, I understood for the first time why so many are calling the compromise a victory for Republicans. Completely absent from the president’s remarks were any of the truly self-congratulatory statements that would have characterized such a speech if he had definitively won tax increases. He didn’t even rub it in that he’s free and clear to campaign from now until the election, thanks to the timeline of the debt ceiling increase. But, then again, the fact that he essentially just delivered a stump speech might be his ever-so-clever way of gloating about that — because that’s definitely what this was, evidence of an insubstantial deal and proof that Obama is still the consummate campaigner.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Infrastructure bank?
Whuh?
I thought that vaunted savior of the American Way, Porkulus, was supposed to be all about investing in our infrastructure with all of those “shovel-ready” projects that were going to cure all of our ills and push unemployment down to 8.5% a long time ago.
Well, I guess you can see a mile away what is coming next. (If you can’t, you most likely never, ever will.)
hillbillyjim on August 2, 2011 at 3:59 PM
Just once ask what does “fair share” mean.
Does that mean he wants a fair tax of 15% across the board. So if you make 25K in payroll you pay 3700 and if you make 1 million in payroll you send 15K with no way to reduce that tax bill other than working less. Which is what happens when you get more taxes. And please someone tell that, If you tax more they work less if you tax less you get more in taxes as more are working.
Class warfare must have had high marks in the center for American progress focus group but you can’t expect anything less when they are trapped in the room for weeks at a time with nothing but two books: rules for radicals and Communist manifesto.
tjexcite on August 2, 2011 at 4:08 PM
I’m in the same boat. I worked my butt off to survive the first recession. My company is as lean as possible. The situation is so demoralizing. You get beat down and you fight back to get back into the game and then they hammer you again.
I cut my pay 5 years ago and skipped some checks during 2009 to keep everything afloat and all my employees in a job. My standard of living has been going down and I’m starting to get to the point where keeping things going is not that attractive. The sad thing is that my attitude is not entirely because of the recession. I’ve survived several of them. The problem is that I don’t see a future where my company can thrive. So what’s the point?
ReaganWasRight on August 2, 2011 at 4:08 PM
You know, I’m sick of this statement, and it’s going to be a constant refrain for the next 15 freaking months.
I wish for once someone would ask him exactly what he means by “fair share”. Is it 50%? 60%? 70%? How much, exactly, should the “wealthy” and corporations pay Mr. President?
BacaDog on August 2, 2011 at 4:08 PM
Heh. Great minds, TJ.
BacaDog on August 2, 2011 at 4:09 PM
Infrastructure Bank = FDR’s WPA? Will we have a Civilian Conservation Corps Program (CCCP) next? A labor camp for unhappy unemployed Teapartiers perhaps?
Can we retread anymore failed old ideas?
KW64 on August 2, 2011 at 4:19 PM
Tina, I love you like a sister but you’ve really gotta figure out the formatting for your posts.
catmman on August 2, 2011 at 4:19 PM
looks like Europe is heading in the same direction too(down that is), though for different reasons….we are getting competition from the other side of the pond, are the Chinese going to buy their debt too :-)…darn, I’m a bit jittery that they will pick the EU :-)…they should buy just our debt :-)…
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Italy-under-fire-in-widening-rb-3187145634.html?x=0&.v=12
jimver on August 2, 2011 at 4:23 PM
Broken Record 2012!
Aronne on August 2, 2011 at 4:24 PM
..THIS x1,000,000,000,000,000!
The War Planner on August 2, 2011 at 4:26 PM
if this helps, actually I think a lot of Dems want the taxes for the ‘rich’ at the same levels that they were during Clinton administration…And pretty sure that’s what Barry has in mind too…I mean for now :-)…
jimver on August 2, 2011 at 4:26 PM
..c’mon, Teeeeeen! You can do it!
The War Planner on August 2, 2011 at 4:27 PM
Thanks, Tina!
:)
catmman on August 2, 2011 at 4:31 PM
Looks like the stock market really “hearts” this stinker of a deal.
All gains for 2011 erased. What should we expect from this do nothing deal? Just more of the same from the “Ruling Class”. Both sides of the aisle make me want to vomit. They care not for our country, only for themselves.
djtnt on August 2, 2011 at 4:40 PM
No, voters didn’t vote for dysfunctional government in 2010. But the majority of voters certainly did in 2008, when they voted to put an incompetent, inexperienced, hyper-partisan “community organizer” in the White House.
AZCoyote on August 2, 2011 at 4:44 PM
Yeah for the ObamaEconomy. I am making a bit over minimum wage cooking with a Masters in Architecture.
Yet, I am very, very proud to have a job.
carbon_footprint on August 2, 2011 at 4:44 PM
…and paying back the student loans from said minimum wage…well not really, I mean until the govt (aka taxpayers) picks up the tabs…little ‘nothing’ our govt does for our ‘brightest’ :-)..a token of appreciation :-)
jimver on August 2, 2011 at 4:58 PM
No,luckily, my student loans were paid off over ten years ago.
This past month, with my new job, has been surprisingly refreshing. I forgot how great it feels to go home after work exhausted. Don’t think I will get back into architecture ever again. The boredom of the office does not compare well with the excitement of the kitchen.
carbon_footprint on August 2, 2011 at 5:06 PM
Hahaha. Zuckerberg is bayam’s idea of an entrepreneur who should be emulated? Figures.
Nothing defines liberal “success” better than lying, cheating, stealing, and double-dealing.
AZCoyote on August 2, 2011 at 5:06 PM
Obama is still the
consummate campaignerloser.petefrt on August 2, 2011 at 5:07 PM
Ah, memories.
There’s nothing like a Friday night rush to let you know that your brain is still functioning, (after you clean the fryers,scrub the grill, then help the guys in the dishroom catch up, of course.)
I’ve worked in kitchens more than once in my life; there is something about the pace, the urgency, and the camaraderie in that environment that is compelling and appealing, no matter the crappy wages usually involved. Enjoy it.
hillbillyjim on August 2, 2011 at 5:17 PM
Hey! The Empty Suit has got to be good for something. Besides, The Narcissist-in-Chief has priorities.
And the USA isn’t one of them. Right now the only job Barry is “focused laser-like on” is his own.
So all you unemployed can just move to the back of the bus. Or get under it.
GarandFan on August 2, 2011 at 6:37 PM
Obama’s not the sharpest tool in the shed, but even he knows that at the end of the deal, you always act like you won, even if you clearly lost.
So naturally he’ll act like nothing has changed. But in his soul, he’s bitter.
tom on August 2, 2011 at 7:58 PM
That was the worst retread speech I’ve ever heard. It’s also the most pathetic example of liberal philosophy I think I’ve ever heard. This is the best the Obamacrats can do?
stefano1 on August 2, 2011 at 8:41 PM
Good lord . . . this guy is so incompetent and so inept. For the sake of the nation he’s got to go in 2012.
rplat on August 3, 2011 at 8:46 AM
Why do these communists believe they have a right to other people’s money. And let’s stop beating around the bush they are communists.or at a minimum hard socialists.
rplat on August 3, 2011 at 8:48 AM
The debt-ceiling compromise did NOT include any tax increases! Obama is trying to sneak them in rhetorically, but he really admitted that he LOST here, because the same Congress that voted for this deal will not vote for new taxes–especially in the House!
Read John Boehner’s lips: NO NEW TAXES !!! Got it, Barry???
Steve Z on August 3, 2011 at 10:43 AM
Why should he change his message? He WON, after all — the GOP leadership blinked, as always, and GOP Establishment leaders steered comfortably away from REAL controversial decision making and back into more familiar spending waters.
EasyEight on August 3, 2011 at 10:59 AM
The entire nation teeters at the edge of a fiscal cliff with a crumbling shale edge and the Tea Party Republicans tried to pull us back from the brink to fiscal sanity…it was the Democrat Statist Big Spenders and GOP Establishment Spenders who kneed the Tea Party GOP in the groin, pulled our nation away from safety and are crying “Neener-neener, we won” as we plunge off the cliff and continue to borrow 40 cents of every Federal dollar spent and add trillions more to our national debt. This “deal” doesn’t prevent the rating downgrade (that was based on real cuts, not baseline budget gimmickry), doesn’t save Entitlements, and doesn’t solve our debt and deficit spending problems. We are likely now going to be faced with making horrible choices when our national body hits the base of the cliff in a spray of debased Green Backs
EasyEight on August 3, 2011 at 11:02 AM
There were a couple hundred winners in this deal and over 300,000,000 losers. Cutting about $200Billion for a year while borrowing over $2Trillian for that same year seems a bit lopsided don’t you think?
tgillian on August 3, 2011 at 11:16 AM
Isn’t that how we got into this deficit, by spending too much. And that’s how you get out of it, cut spending. He just wants higher taxes so he can spend some more.
sadatoni on August 3, 2011 at 11:22 AM
Yikes! Here’s a peek at the Super Congress Boehner and Reid just created…lets get rid of these execrable Statists!!
http://noisyroom.net/blog/2011/08/02/unconstitutional-super-congress-slipped-into-debt-ceiling-deal-judge-napolitano-explains/
EasyEight on August 3, 2011 at 11:32 AM
+1
He may have had his bluff called, and lost, but if no one has the authority to make him pay up, he just sticks his hands in his pockets and whistles his way out of the room. Yet he maintains his seat at the poker table until 2012, playing high-stakes with our future.
rwenger43 on August 3, 2011 at 12:31 PM
Back in 2004 little Barry Obama started using the mantra “the failed economic policies of George W Bush”. In 2004 the economy was booming, but the lowest 4% of households hadn’t benefitted as much as the top 96% (as though they ever will.) So Obama the Re-distributor claimed that Bush’s policies were failing. Today the 96% would want that 2004 economy back; in fact, since Black families’ net worth has dropped 83% since Obama took office, all 100% may prefer to go back to 2004.
rwenger43 on August 3, 2011 at 12:40 PM
It tells you how out of touch the GOP elite are when Daniel Markovits of the LA Times has to point out the obvious that the Democrats won everything they wanted and the GOP caved as usual.
flytier on August 3, 2011 at 1:11 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2