Report: Palin to keynote tea party rally in September — in Iowa
posted at 5:09 pm on July 27, 2011 by Allahpundit
Kinda surprised this leaked so early. For maximum impact it could have dropped, say, a week or so before the Ames straw poll, just to remind Bachmann and Cain voters who prefer Palin to keep their powder dry.
Maybe she has something else newsworthy planned shortly before Ames?
In the latest indication that her sights are still set on a presidential run, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has accepted an invitation to keynote a Tea Party rally in Waukee, Iowa, on Sept. 3, RealClearPolitics has learned.
The Labor Day weekend visit to the nation’s first voting state comes after Palin indicated during an appearance on Fox News earlier this month that she would make her decision about whether to launch a campaign in August or September.
All signs now point to September as the month when Palin would throw her hat into the ring, as logistical concerns ranging from fundraising to getting her name on the ballot in various states would likely preclude further delay…
“I can only surmise that she’s very, very popular here,” [Charlie] Gruschow [of the Tea Party of America] said of Palin’s level of support among Republican caucus-goers in Iowa. “And it didn’t hurt at all when she introduced her movie in Pella. The feedback I’ve gotten was it was an awesome movie, and there are more people becoming more endeared to her.”
Remember, Perry’s supposedly set to declare during the second half of August so his announcement buzz will be fading just as the tea party rally takes place. If Palin’s own announcement follows quickly thereafter, she could suck up lots of the early oxygen he needs among the base. Or maybe she’ll surprise everyone by turning around, announcing that she’s not running, and endorsing him instead, which would presumably make him the instant favorite on the right to challenge Romney for the nomination. Ironically, given the near-certainty that Perry’s in, Mitt probably needs Palin to run too now so that the tea-party vote gets divvied up among the two of them and Bachmann. Exit question: Is Palin better off announcing before or after the tea-party rally? If she waits until after, she gets to surf the media buzz from her keynote speech. But if she does it before — which would really bigfoot Perry’s launch — then she gets to appear at the rally as a real candidate and use it as an opportunity to be anointed the semi-official tea-party choice. Tough call.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 4 5 6
straw poll up at Ace’s if anyone cares:
http://minx.cc/?post=319340
unseen on July 28, 2011 at 9:16 AM
i wonder why no one mentions the price of gas anymore. IMO as long as it is above $3.5 the economy will never recover. Just too much disposable income going to energy and food to have a recovery. Palin seems to be the only one that understands the link between energy prices and economic activity. Maybe its a factor of her being middle class. The upper class don’t have to worry about f illing up their tanks they have a guy that does that and drives them around. Palin doesn’t she fills her own tank she pays the bill with every fill up. She gets it and the rest of the idiots don’t.
unseen on July 28, 2011 at 9:20 AM
It’s actually more than that.
Energy is key to economic prosperity which also is critical to national security.
Now that we have such an enormous national debt, it is impacting our national security posture.
Broke nations do not ensure freedom of the seas while developing and deploying the most advanced aircraft in the world, which has been US policy for 60 years.
Take for example the premature cancellation of the F-22 program. Huge mistake, unless we as a nation want to encounter enemy Air Forces who are on par with us technologically when we risk our pilot’s lives to further a national security objective.
A thriving domestic energy industry helps the private and public sector generate revenue, and in turn provides the domestic defense industry with a paying customer who can afford the best they can produce for America, which in turn provides for more high paying stable employment building jets, ships, tanks, missiles and so forth.
It is all inter-connected, and Palin is the only person I recall talking about this in any specific way.
Brian1972 on July 28, 2011 at 9:32 AM
Her India speech covered this very well.
unseen on July 28, 2011 at 9:37 AM
LOL, your second paragraph contradicts your first.
Thanks for playing!
Del Dolemonte on July 28, 2011 at 9:47 AM
From what I recall, it did.
Maybe I’ll watch that one again after I run a couple of errands.
Brian1972 on July 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM
The WMUR poll is at RCP.
Etymology
From Latin -ista via Spanish -ista in “Sandinista” (1930s)
Del Dolemonte on July 28, 2011 at 9:52 AM
-gov Palin India speech
http://www.hrwf-ca.org/2011/03/sarah-palin-speech-in-india.html
unseen on July 28, 2011 at 9:52 AM
More from the india speech, even back then Palin understood the debt problem:
unseen on July 28, 2011 at 9:55 AM
All that stuff kinda makes some sense, but did you see that hairdo? Yuck!
Huntsman/Crist 2012
We can be whomever we need to be!/
Brian1972 on July 28, 2011 at 10:00 AM
She is like a breath of fresh air. SP actually does offer a view of our reality that we all agree with and some ways out of the troubles. Time will tell if she gets in and can convince enough voters that she can turn this train wreck around. I don’t see anyone else on the horizon that is capable of doing it.
Kissmygrits on July 28, 2011 at 10:00 AM
lol….well at least she wasn’t wearing pink that would be totally unpresidential. /
unseen on July 28, 2011 at 10:01 AM
on a serious note i thought her India speech was one of her best and it was a powerful diplomatic speech alos. she said she wrote in from her kitchen table and i think it is a good window into who Gov Palin is and what fundementally she believes.
unseen on July 28, 2011 at 10:03 AM
neither do I which explains more than anything my support for Gov Palin. Yes Perry is the new flavor of the month but while Perry is better than Mitt he would still not be able to turn the ship around IMO.
unseen on July 28, 2011 at 10:05 AM
Whenever anyone uses -ista it makes me think of the Peronistas before anything else.
steebo77 on July 28, 2011 at 10:39 AM
unseen
Brian1972
These folks are the reason any Palin thread goes to 800. I would almost wager their last name is Palin.
They post 10 times to everybody else’s one post in any Palin thread. They are obsessed, or on a payroll.
Newsweek cover wasn’t a puff piece? The media are on their knees praying for any Palin candidacy at all, let alone one against Obama. I swear some of you people were born yesterday.
Moesart on July 28, 2011 at 11:12 AM
if you bothered to read the newsweek article you would see it wasn’t a puff piece in fact the only difference between the newsweek and the garbage you seem to believe in is that it didn’t have any snark in it.
it was considered “fair” by Palin hitpiece standards. Hardly a puff piece.
unseen on July 28, 2011 at 11:21 AM
Perry announces on August 27th, Palin endorses him a week later. Mark it down.
cpaulus on July 28, 2011 at 11:29 AM
Nope. Perry’s not running:
January 2010: Perry told a questioner at a January 2010 debate that he “absolutely” would serve his full new 4-year term.
Source: http://www.wfaa.com/news/politics/debate/The-Belo-Debate-Part-II-83068707.html
steebo77 on July 28, 2011 at 11:36 AM
March 2010: Perry told Politico that he had “no interest” in being the next president “in any form or fashion.”
Source: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/33821.html
steebo77 on July 28, 2011 at 11:37 AM
You contribute nothing.
Pop in, throw a stinky turd, and you’re gone.
At least we can be thankful for the last part.
Brian1972 on July 28, 2011 at 11:37 AM
April 2010: Perry had the following exchange with Evan Smith of Newsweek.
Source: http://www.newsweek.com/2010/04/15/the-perry-doctrine.html
steebo77 on July 28, 2011 at 11:37 AM
December 2010: Perry told Reuters “I don’t want to be president of the United States. I’m not going to run for the presidency of the United States.” He also insisted the he already had “the best job in America.”
Source: http://af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFN1517695420101215
steebo77 on July 28, 2011 at 11:37 AM
May 2011: Perry’s spokesman Mark Miner told National Journal “Nothing has changed. The governor has no intention of running for president.”
Source: http://nationaljournal.com/politics/perry-spokesman-the-governor-has-no-intention-of-running-for-president–20110527
steebo77 on July 28, 2011 at 11:38 AM
Haha, you just may have that backwards.
Brian1972 on July 28, 2011 at 11:38 AM
steebo77,
You realize that every presidential candidate says they aren’t running until they are, right? Also, 2010 is light years away from right now in terms of politics. They people Perry most likely expected to run have chosen not to, and he’s said he’s changed his position. Oh, and he said that a week or so ago, not a year ago, like the quotes you’re posting.
http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2011/07/28/perry-for-president-annoncement-expected-by-end-of-august
Perry and Palin are on the same team. If Perry announces, Palin won’t. She’s given no indication that she plans to run, though I’m sure she loves the publicity every time she goes to a primary state.
cpaulus on July 28, 2011 at 12:14 PM
Palin has never once said she wasn’t running. Her reply has always been “its too early yet” I’m serously considering it. etc.
this belief that Perry and Palin are a team is a ROFLMAO talking point. Let me know when two NFL quaterbacks that are firends sit out the big game because their friend is playing on the other team.
unseen on July 28, 2011 at 12:26 PM
He didn’t say any of those things. An unnamed adviser, speaking to US News, said those things.
steebo77 on July 28, 2011 at 12:29 PM
So Perry gave his WORD that he would not run for POTUS to the citizens of TX and a year later he is considering breaking that pledge. Doesn’t lend alot of faith in the man’s word does it.
unseen on July 28, 2011 at 12:34 PM
is just like maobama – a serial liar. you are a delsuional moron. i cant wait until palin is YOUR persident. your head will explode. but it wont be messy because there is nothing inside that dense skull of yours
sidewinder22 on July 28, 2011 at 12:54 PM
when palin gave that speech in liberal land wisconsin, there was 2 days notice. 10,000 showed up. in 25 degree weather and an ice storm. the iowa event is in 5 weeks. it will be massive. i hope iowa can handle it.
when palin announces its game on for maobama,….and game OVER for everyone else
sidewinder22 on July 28, 2011 at 12:58 PM
Well, the PDS’ers will claim that the “ista” term is “non-offensive”, and then toss out some lame example, primarily the word “fashionistas”.
Of course, that was also the title of an American porno film, as well as the name of a group of criminals in the animated series “Kim Possible”.
Del Dolemonte on July 28, 2011 at 1:27 PM
If SP is reading this, she should play this as her intro when she takes the stage to announce. It’d make csdeven’s head explode, plus chances of the the singer putting a “cease & desist” from playing it will be nil.
AH_C on July 28, 2011 at 8:37 PM
No it doesn’t contradict what I’m saying, at all.
What I was saying is that the “habit” for putting -ista on the end of words to describe goups of people as supporters of some person, thing or idea, began when the Sandinistas became prominent in the news back in the 80′s, but that it doesn’t mean they were actually compaing said people to the Sandinistas themselves.
I don’t see why this is a difficult concept for you to understand.
A similar thing happened to the Russian suffix -nik back in the 50′s after Sputnik was launched, people began to attach “nik:” onto a lot of words (peacenik, beatnik, neatnik), but it didn’t mean they were comparing those groups of people to a Soviet satellite.
But hey if thinking otherwise makes you feel better, please don’t let me or common sense stop you.
Dreadnought on July 28, 2011 at 10:10 PM
I think the point of this is that blanketing over diverse large groups of people with a stupid label so they can all be collectively insulted is bound to be interpreted as rather offensive by many.
Brian1972 on July 29, 2011 at 6:38 AM
Brian1972 on July 29, 2011 at 7:18 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 4 5 6