Report: Palin to keynote tea party rally in September — in Iowa

posted at 5:09 pm on July 27, 2011 by Allahpundit

Kinda surprised this leaked so early. For maximum impact it could have dropped, say, a week or so before the Ames straw poll, just to remind Bachmann and Cain voters who prefer Palin to keep their powder dry.

Maybe she has something else newsworthy planned shortly before Ames?

In the latest indication that her sights are still set on a presidential run, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has accepted an invitation to keynote a Tea Party rally in Waukee, Iowa, on Sept. 3, RealClearPolitics has learned.

The Labor Day weekend visit to the nation’s first voting state comes after Palin indicated during an appearance on Fox News earlier this month that she would make her decision about whether to launch a campaign in August or September.

All signs now point to September as the month when Palin would throw her hat into the ring, as logistical concerns ranging from fundraising to getting her name on the ballot in various states would likely preclude further delay…

“I can only surmise that she’s very, very popular here,” [Charlie] Gruschow [of the Tea Party of America] said of Palin’s level of support among Republican caucus-goers in Iowa. “And it didn’t hurt at all when she introduced her movie in Pella. The feedback I’ve gotten was it was an awesome movie, and there are more people becoming more endeared to her.”

Remember, Perry’s supposedly set to declare during the second half of August so his announcement buzz will be fading just as the tea party rally takes place. If Palin’s own announcement follows quickly thereafter, she could suck up lots of the early oxygen he needs among the base. Or maybe she’ll surprise everyone by turning around, announcing that she’s not running, and endorsing him instead, which would presumably make him the instant favorite on the right to challenge Romney for the nomination. Ironically, given the near-certainty that Perry’s in, Mitt probably needs Palin to run too now so that the tea-party vote gets divvied up among the two of them and Bachmann. Exit question: Is Palin better off announcing before or after the tea-party rally? If she waits until after, she gets to surf the media buzz from her keynote speech. But if she does it before — which would really bigfoot Perry’s launch — then she gets to appear at the rally as a real candidate and use it as an opportunity to be anointed the semi-official tea-party choice. Tough call.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 4 5 6

straw poll up at Ace’s if anyone cares:

http://minx.cc/?post=319340

unseen on July 28, 2011 at 9:16 AM

i wonder why no one mentions the price of gas anymore. IMO as long as it is above $3.5 the economy will never recover. Just too much disposable income going to energy and food to have a recovery. Palin seems to be the only one that understands the link between energy prices and economic activity. Maybe its a factor of her being middle class. The upper class don’t have to worry about f illing up their tanks they have a guy that does that and drives them around. Palin doesn’t she fills her own tank she pays the bill with every fill up. She gets it and the rest of the idiots don’t.

unseen on July 28, 2011 at 9:20 AM

unseen on July 28, 2011 at 9:20 AM

It’s actually more than that.

Energy is key to economic prosperity which also is critical to national security.

Now that we have such an enormous national debt, it is impacting our national security posture.

Broke nations do not ensure freedom of the seas while developing and deploying the most advanced aircraft in the world, which has been US policy for 60 years.

Take for example the premature cancellation of the F-22 program. Huge mistake, unless we as a nation want to encounter enemy Air Forces who are on par with us technologically when we risk our pilot’s lives to further a national security objective.

A thriving domestic energy industry helps the private and public sector generate revenue, and in turn provides the domestic defense industry with a paying customer who can afford the best they can produce for America, which in turn provides for more high paying stable employment building jets, ships, tanks, missiles and so forth.

It is all inter-connected, and Palin is the only person I recall talking about this in any specific way.

Brian1972 on July 28, 2011 at 9:32 AM

It is all inter-connected, and Palin is the only person I recall talking about this in any specific way.

Brian1972 on July 28, 2011 at 9:32 AM

Her India speech covered this very well.

unseen on July 28, 2011 at 9:37 AM

It’s simply something that got hip to say to describe someone as a “supporter of something” back in the early 80′s, when the Sandinistas were in the news a lot.

Dreadnought on July 28, 2011 at 12:30 AM

LOL, your second paragraph contradicts your first.

Thanks for playing!

Del Dolemonte on July 28, 2011 at 9:47 AM

Her India speech covered this very well.

unseen on July 28, 2011 at 9:37 AM

From what I recall, it did.

Maybe I’ll watch that one again after I run a couple of errands.

Brian1972 on July 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM

where’s the link to your WMUR poll?

nistas are sandinistas? calm down granpa, have a beer

windansea on July 28, 2011 at 12:28 AM

The WMUR poll is at RCP.

Etymology

From Latin -ista via Spanish -ista in “Sandinista” (1930s)

Del Dolemonte on July 28, 2011 at 9:52 AM

Brian1972 on July 28, 2011 at 9:32 AM

Through my work in AK (as an oil & gas regulator, then as governor), I’ve seen firsthand how energy development, job creation & national security are inextricably linked. Access to affordable, reliable energy is the key to economic growth, which is the key to job growth. Securing that stable domestic supply of fuel will lead to a more peaceful & prosperous America – an America that’s not subject to the whims of foreign dictators who could cut off energy supplies & seek to control.

Of course, energy issues are critical to the whole world’s stability & economic opportunities! By 2030, the world’s energy consumption will increase by 50% & almost half of that will come from here in India & from China. We all face similar challenges in this arena & this makes America’s quest for energy security all the more crucial as we seek to stabilize our economy, secure our homeland & cooperate with our allies who would also seek peace on earth.

Energy is key! My vision for a free & prosperous America has much to do with energy.

Now, we hear a lot about “green energy” today. And I am a true believer in environmental conservation & responsible stewardship of our lands. (It’s why I live in AK! A pristine environment to be passed on to future generations – I don’t want to mess it up! I am a conservationist. I married into an Alaska native family, where Todd’s connection to the land through his Yupik Eskimo heritage, an indigenous people, reinforces my respect for God’s creation. And we’ve made our living off the land – as commercial fishermen & Todd working in North Slope oil fields – so we don’t want to mess it up!)

So, I’m in favour of “all-of-the-above” approach to energy security. But “all-of-the-above” means including “conventional” resources! That means, the kind we actually use to reliably fuel our economy. That means crude oil, for example. And our natural gas, our coal, nuclear power.

Unfortunately, some have stymied resource development – like responsible domestic oil drilling. As a result, hundreds of thousands of well-paying jobs won’t be created in the U.S. until we change course; it means Americans get hit with huge gas prices at the pump unless we change course; it means we’re continuing to transfer hundreds of billions of U.S. dollars to foreign regimes to purchase energy from them – regimes that don’t have our best interests at heart.

And I’m not just talking about gasoline here. Remember that ‘petroleum products’ are all around you! Look at your everyday surroundings – the foodstuffs; the agriculture products grown with fertilizer; the plastics all around you; medical supplies; the transportation of all these products. It’s not just gas that increases as the price of crude increases: Everything is affected. Basic commodities.

So as government locks up land & we lose good jobs in the ‘Conventional Resource’ arena, you may hear that “green jobs” will be the saviour! But look around the world & try telling that to the thousands of English & Scottish workers who’ve lost jobs as a result of government investments in “green energy” projects. A recent UK study shows that for every “green job” created, nearly four jobs were lost elsewhere in the economy due to lack of affordable energy! Same story in Spain – investment in “green jobs” brought massive debt, skyrocketing energy costs & 20% unemployment.

This push for ‘green’ at the expense of ‘conventional, reliable’ sources is not a credible energy policy or economic policy. It’s “Social Engineering” by Central Government Planners. And it leads to nothing but more debt & more job loss. And taxpayers will be stuck subsidizing the failure and paying more for energy.

The good news is there’s a choice/another option! Instead of funding non-viable special interest projects, Americans can capitalize on our own viable resources that are just waiting to be tapped – they’re right on our doorstep! Billions of barrels of oil warehoused underground in AK!

And so much natural gas – Clean, green, affordable! Easy to transport, abundant across the U.S. – Whether used conventionally, or to power natural gas cars, or run power plants that charge electric cars, natural gas is an ideal “bridge fuel” to the future. (A future when renewable gas can someday become more available, reliable & affordable.)

I warn Americans so often: it’s a ‘false, utopian fairytale’ told that would want you to believe we don’t need to drill for oil today. No, government manipulating energy supplies? Manipulating any aspect of an economy – it leads to more people becoming more dependent upon government to meet needs – it is social engineering, it’s immoral, & it’s a problem we-the-people must be brave enough to take on.

-gov Palin India speech

http://www.hrwf-ca.org/2011/03/sarah-palin-speech-in-india.html

unseen on July 28, 2011 at 9:52 AM

More from the india speech, even back then Palin understood the debt problem:

Our need for energy independence is only one of the strategic challenges we face today. The other is an unsustainable government debt which hampers economic growth.

On this: there are no “easy” solutions, but there are “simple” ones, if we just apply courage & political will to confront the problem squarely. Obviously, we need to stop digging the hole we’re in; cut spending; cut government back down to size; get rid of overly-burdensome regulations. And most of all, we need job growth! And that won’t come from ‘top-down government planning’! It’ll come from the ‘Free Market Ingenuity’ of ordinary American entrepreneurs!

To release creative energy, we need to do on a national level what President Ronald Reagan did in the 1980′s. It’s what I believed in as a ‘Reforming Mayor & Governor’ in my state, because I want the free economic choices of ordinary men & women to power the marketplace – rather than distant bureaucrats thinking they can plan & grow an economy by “government decree”. (That just doesn’t work!)

I know you understand this, because in the early 1990′s, due to clear, commonsense, pro free-market reforms, India’s economy took off!

You abolished import licenses; cut import duties; removed investment caps & broke the union’s grip on industry.

You unleashed the creativity & hard work of the Indian people; you turned away from a system where ‘Central Government’ sets targets for all sectors of the economy, to a system that lets the market set its own targets. That works.

People no longer speak of India as a “struggling economy” as they would have 30 years ago. Today we speak of India as a “dynamic & vibrant economy”. You empowered individuals & in doing so, you’ve reminded America of the free, entrepreneurial model that made our country great, prosperous & exceptional!

See, if we unshackle the creative energy of our workers, & entrepreneurs, there is no reason in the world why we can’t get back to rapid growth & prosperity!

Friends: some people want to claim that the geopolitical stage is ‘so changing’ & some actually claim ‘America is in decline’. “The United States,” they’d say, “will soon be a shadow of its former self.” I completely reject this! It represents wrong-headed thinking by some friends & wishful thinking by our enemies! America’s demise has been predicted before. It didn’t happen then. It won’t happen now.

No, America is not in decline! What is in decline? It is the idea of a ‘Tax-&-Spend, Centralized Bureaucracy’ that has brought America to the point of debt & deficits in the first place. These “Big Government” ideas are once again being consigned to the ash heap of history – though they won’t go quietly to the grave.

From the beginning: my faith has never been in Big Govt. My faith is in the American people, & we are turning things around!

All great nations face the challenges that come with a changing economy, demographics, & new technologies. The nations that succeed in the face of these challenges are the ones that show innovation & ingenuity – & will empower a free power! These qualities are the hallmarks of the “American Experience” & the unique strengths of the American people.

My vision for my country is a strong America that unleashes those strengths & confidently engages in leadership in the world & can welcome the healthy competition & partnership of rising economic powers in a democracy, like India.

unseen on July 28, 2011 at 9:55 AM

unseen on July 28, 2011 at 9:55 AM

All that stuff kinda makes some sense, but did you see that hairdo? Yuck!

Huntsman/Crist 2012

We can be whomever we need to be!/

Brian1972 on July 28, 2011 at 10:00 AM

She is like a breath of fresh air. SP actually does offer a view of our reality that we all agree with and some ways out of the troubles. Time will tell if she gets in and can convince enough voters that she can turn this train wreck around. I don’t see anyone else on the horizon that is capable of doing it.

Kissmygrits on July 28, 2011 at 10:00 AM

Brian1972 on July 28, 2011 at 10:00 AM

lol….well at least she wasn’t wearing pink that would be totally unpresidential. /

unseen on July 28, 2011 at 10:01 AM

Brian1972 on July 28, 2011 at 10:00 AM

on a serious note i thought her India speech was one of her best and it was a powerful diplomatic speech alos. she said she wrote in from her kitchen table and i think it is a good window into who Gov Palin is and what fundementally she believes.

unseen on July 28, 2011 at 10:03 AM

I don’t see anyone else on the horizon that is capable of doing it.

Kissmygrits on July 28, 2011 at 10:00 AM

neither do I which explains more than anything my support for Gov Palin. Yes Perry is the new flavor of the month but while Perry is better than Mitt he would still not be able to turn the ship around IMO.

unseen on July 28, 2011 at 10:05 AM

The WMUR poll is at RCP.

Etymology

From Latin -ista via Spanish -ista in “Sandinista” (1930s)

Del Dolemonte on July 28, 2011 at 9:52 AM

Whenever anyone uses -ista it makes me think of the Peronistas before anything else.

steebo77 on July 28, 2011 at 10:39 AM

unseen
Brian1972

These folks are the reason any Palin thread goes to 800. I would almost wager their last name is Palin.

They post 10 times to everybody else’s one post in any Palin thread. They are obsessed, or on a payroll.

If they really thought Palin was the best candidate for Obama to run against they would be writing puff pieces like they do with mitt and Bachmann.

they don’t want her to run.

unseen on July 28, 2011 at 12:24 AM

Newsweek cover wasn’t a puff piece? The media are on their knees praying for any Palin candidacy at all, let alone one against Obama. I swear some of you people were born yesterday.

Moesart on July 28, 2011 at 11:12 AM

Newsweek cover wasn’t a puff piece? The media are on their knees praying for any Palin candidacy at all, let alone one against Obama. I swear some of you people were born yesterday.

Moesart on July 28, 2011 at 11:12 AM

if you bothered to read the newsweek article you would see it wasn’t a puff piece in fact the only difference between the newsweek and the garbage you seem to believe in is that it didn’t have any snark in it.

it was considered “fair” by Palin hitpiece standards. Hardly a puff piece.

unseen on July 28, 2011 at 11:21 AM

Perry announces on August 27th, Palin endorses him a week later. Mark it down.

cpaulus on July 28, 2011 at 11:29 AM

Perry announces on August 27th, Palin endorses him a week later. Mark it down.

cpaulus on July 28, 2011 at 11:29 AM

Nope. Perry’s not running:

January 2010: Perry told a questioner at a January 2010 debate that he “absolutely” would serve his full new 4-year term.
Source: http://www.wfaa.com/news/politics/debate/The-Belo-Debate-Part-II-83068707.html

steebo77 on July 28, 2011 at 11:36 AM

March 2010: Perry told Politico that he had “no interest” in being the next president “in any form or fashion.”
Source: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/33821.html

steebo77 on July 28, 2011 at 11:37 AM

Moesart on July 28, 2011 at 11:12 AM

You contribute nothing.

Pop in, throw a stinky turd, and you’re gone.

At least we can be thankful for the last part.

Brian1972 on July 28, 2011 at 11:37 AM

April 2010: Perry had the following exchange with Evan Smith of Newsweek.

ES: Everybody wants to know about your plans for 2012. Are you considering running and would you consider it?
RP: No and no.
ES: You are not considering running for president. You will not run for president.
RP: That’s correct.
ES: Under any circumstances?
RP: That’s correct.
ES: Vice president? Would you be willing to consider that?
RP: No. I don’t care about going to Washington, D.C.

Source: http://www.newsweek.com/2010/04/15/the-perry-doctrine.html

steebo77 on July 28, 2011 at 11:37 AM

December 2010: Perry told Reuters “I don’t want to be president of the United States. I’m not going to run for the presidency of the United States.” He also insisted the he already had “the best job in America.”
Source: http://af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFN1517695420101215

steebo77 on July 28, 2011 at 11:37 AM

May 2011: Perry’s spokesman Mark Miner told National Journal “Nothing has changed. The governor has no intention of running for president.”
Source: http://nationaljournal.com/politics/perry-spokesman-the-governor-has-no-intention-of-running-for-president–20110527

steebo77 on July 28, 2011 at 11:38 AM

Perry announces on August 27th, Palin endorses him a week later. Mark it down.

cpaulus on July 28, 2011 at 11:29 AM

Haha, you just may have that backwards.

Brian1972 on July 28, 2011 at 11:38 AM

steebo77,

You realize that every presidential candidate says they aren’t running until they are, right? Also, 2010 is light years away from right now in terms of politics. They people Perry most likely expected to run have chosen not to, and he’s said he’s changed his position. Oh, and he said that a week or so ago, not a year ago, like the quotes you’re posting.

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2011/07/28/perry-for-president-annoncement-expected-by-end-of-august

Perry and Palin are on the same team. If Perry announces, Palin won’t. She’s given no indication that she plans to run, though I’m sure she loves the publicity every time she goes to a primary state.

cpaulus on July 28, 2011 at 12:14 PM

You realize that every presidential candidate says they aren’t running until they are, right?
cpaulus on July 28, 2011 at 12:14 PM

Palin has never once said she wasn’t running. Her reply has always been “its too early yet” I’m serously considering it. etc.

this belief that Perry and Palin are a team is a ROFLMAO talking point. Let me know when two NFL quaterbacks that are firends sit out the big game because their friend is playing on the other team.

unseen on July 28, 2011 at 12:26 PM

cpaulus on July 28, 2011 at 12:14 PM

He didn’t say any of those things. An unnamed adviser, speaking to US News, said those things.

steebo77 on July 28, 2011 at 12:29 PM

January 2010: Perry told a questioner at a January 2010 debate that he “absolutely” would serve his full new 4-year term.
Source: http://www.wfaa.com/news/politics/debate/The-Belo-Debate-Part-II-83068707.html

steebo77 on July 28, 2011 at 11:36 AM

So Perry gave his WORD that he would not run for POTUS to the citizens of TX and a year later he is considering breaking that pledge. Doesn’t lend alot of faith in the man’s word does it.

unseen on July 28, 2011 at 12:34 PM

timetraveler

is just like maobama – a serial liar. you are a delsuional moron. i cant wait until palin is YOUR persident. your head will explode. but it wont be messy because there is nothing inside that dense skull of yours

sidewinder22 on July 28, 2011 at 12:54 PM

when palin gave that speech in liberal land wisconsin, there was 2 days notice. 10,000 showed up. in 25 degree weather and an ice storm. the iowa event is in 5 weeks. it will be massive. i hope iowa can handle it.

when palin announces its game on for maobama,….and game OVER for everyone else

sidewinder22 on July 28, 2011 at 12:58 PM

From Latin -ista via Spanish -ista in “Sandinista” (1930s)

Del Dolemonte on July 28, 2011 at 9:52 AM

Whenever anyone uses -ista it makes me think of the Peronistas before anything else.

steebo77 on July 28, 2011 at 10:39 AM

Well, the PDS’ers will claim that the “ista” term is “non-offensive”, and then toss out some lame example, primarily the word “fashionistas”.

Of course, that was also the title of an American porno film, as well as the name of a group of criminals in the animated series “Kim Possible”.

Del Dolemonte on July 28, 2011 at 1:27 PM

Here’s a long-distance dedication…just for csd.

kingsjester on July 28, 2011 at 8:25 AM

If SP is reading this, she should play this as her intro when she takes the stage to announce. It’d make csdeven’s head explode, plus chances of the the singer putting a “cease & desist” from playing it will be nil.

AH_C on July 28, 2011 at 8:37 PM

It’s simply something that got hip to say to describe someone as a “supporter of something” back in the early 80′s, when the Sandinistas were in the news a lot.

Dreadnought on July 28, 2011 at 12:30 AM

LOL, your second paragraph contradicts your first.

Thanks for playing!

Del Dolemonte on July 28, 2011 at 9:47 AM

No it doesn’t contradict what I’m saying, at all.

What I was saying is that the “habit” for putting -ista on the end of words to describe goups of people as supporters of some person, thing or idea, began when the Sandinistas became prominent in the news back in the 80′s, but that it doesn’t mean they were actually compaing said people to the Sandinistas themselves.

I don’t see why this is a difficult concept for you to understand.

A similar thing happened to the Russian suffix -nik back in the 50′s after Sputnik was launched, people began to attach “nik:” onto a lot of words (peacenik, beatnik, neatnik), but it didn’t mean they were comparing those groups of people to a Soviet satellite.

But hey if thinking otherwise makes you feel better, please don’t let me or common sense stop you.

Dreadnought on July 28, 2011 at 10:10 PM

Dreadnought on July 28, 2011 at 10:10 PM

I think the point of this is that blanketing over diverse large groups of people with a stupid label so they can all be collectively insulted is bound to be interpreted as rather offensive by many.

Brian1972 on July 29, 2011 at 6:38 AM

Congressional Freshmen – For Such A Time As This
by Sarah Palin on Thursday, July 28, 2011 at 1:03pm

Out here in proverbial politico flyover country, we little folk are watching the debt ceiling debate with great interest and concern. Today I re-read the open letter I wrote to Republican Freshman Members of Congress in November 2010, just days after they were ushered into office in an historic landslide victory due in large part to the activism of commonsense patriots who are considered part of the Tea Party movement. I respectfully ask these GOP Freshman to re-read this letter and remember us “little people” who believed in them, donated to their campaigns, spent hours tirelessly volunteering for them, and trusted them with our votes. This new wave of public servants may recall that they were sent to D.C. for such a time as this.

The original letter is pasted below, with added emphasis to certain passages that I feel are especially relevant to the current discussion.

All my best to you, GOP Freshmen, from up here in the Last Frontier.

Sincerely,

Sarah Palin

P.S. Everyone I talk to still believes in contested primaries.

******

Brian1972 on July 29, 2011 at 7:18 AM

Comment pages: 1 4 5 6