<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republicans discuss revenues, yet still insist on no tax hikes  Update: Kyl&#8217;s office responds </title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:24:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: xblade</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4717152</link>
		<dc:creator>xblade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 01:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4717152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Why does everyone keep acting like ending corporate welfare/loopholes is a tax increase?

therightwinger&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because it effectively is. If you have to pay $50 in taxes that you didn&#039;t have to pay before because of &quot;loopholes&quot;, your taxes have increased, even though the rate may still be the same.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why does everyone keep acting like ending corporate welfare/loopholes is a tax increase?</p>
<p>therightwinger</p></blockquote>
<p>Because it effectively is. If you have to pay $50 in taxes that you didn&#8217;t have to pay before because of &#8220;loopholes&#8221;, your taxes have increased, even though the rate may still be the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kissmygrits</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716542</link>
		<dc:creator>Kissmygrits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 21:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zero is still secretly funneling dough to a new version of ACORN and out of the other side of his mouth is telling us we have to share some sacrifice. We&#039;ll be lucky to have gruel to share over the next year &amp; a half.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zero is still secretly funneling dough to a new version of ACORN and out of the other side of his mouth is telling us we have to share some sacrifice. We&#8217;ll be lucky to have gruel to share over the next year &amp; a half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaltBlvnAtty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716507</link>
		<dc:creator>GaltBlvnAtty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 21:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to see an analysis of the loopholes GE used to avoid paying any taxes. Would Obama like to close those?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see an analysis of the loopholes GE used to avoid paying any taxes. Would Obama like to close those?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chewydog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716488</link>
		<dc:creator>chewydog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 21:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s a map showing federally owned land as a percentage by state. Notice the difference between east and west. Seems this would generate a lot of revenue besides the sale price. Click on the map for a larger view.

http://bigthink.com/ideas/21343]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a map showing federally owned land as a percentage by state. Notice the difference between east and west. Seems this would generate a lot of revenue besides the sale price. Click on the map for a larger view.</p>
<p><a href="http://bigthink.com/ideas/21343" rel="nofollow">http://bigthink.com/ideas/21343</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716477</link>
		<dc:creator>mojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 21:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Go ahead, tin-horn, skin that smoke-wagon. See what happens.&quot;
-- Tombstone]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Go ahead, tin-horn, skin that smoke-wagon. See what happens.&#8221;<br />
&#8211; Tombstone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulsur</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716472</link>
		<dc:creator>paulsur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 21:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We need to call our representatives and tell them we will not accept an increase in the deby celing. Given current debt levels we want a reduction in the debt ceiling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to call our representatives and tell them we will not accept an increase in the deby celing. Given current debt levels we want a reduction in the debt ceiling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slickwillie2001</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716393</link>
		<dc:creator>slickwillie2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s a tax increase &lt;em&gt;this&lt;/em&gt; Republican can sign onto: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/ending-tax-break-union-dues-could-save-25-billion_576351.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ending Tax Break for Union Dues Could Save $25 Billion&lt;/a&gt;

After all, they are so flush with cash that they can afford to indulge favorite political candidates with enormous sums of cash besides simply running the union.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a tax increase <em>this</em> Republican can sign onto: <a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/ending-tax-break-union-dues-could-save-25-billion_576351.html" rel="nofollow">Ending Tax Break for Union Dues Could Save $25 Billion</a></p>
<p>After all, they are so flush with cash that they can afford to indulge favorite political candidates with enormous sums of cash besides simply running the union.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MNHawk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716343</link>
		<dc:creator>MNHawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Prior to the meeting, Republicans sent seemingly mixed signals about whether they would be open to “revenue increases” — a term all too often used as a euphemism for tax hikes.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Do they really think their voting base is as stupid as your typical leftist?  Do they really think their voters are nothing but a bunch of Ernestos?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Prior to the meeting, Republicans sent seemingly mixed signals about whether they would be open to “revenue increases” — a term all too often used as a euphemism for tax hikes.</p></blockquote>
<p>Do they really think their voting base is as stupid as your typical leftist?  Do they really think their voters are nothing but a bunch of Ernestos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BadMojo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716326</link>
		<dc:creator>BadMojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey if we&#039;re going to sell off some government land...let&#039;s start with California and New York! Of course both of those together would likely only net about 50 bucks...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey if we&#8217;re going to sell off some government land&#8230;let&#8217;s start with California and New York! Of course both of those together would likely only net about 50 bucks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716322</link>
		<dc:creator>mojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taxed Enough Already

Cut expenditures. Pay the overdue bills, forget about that nifty new gizmo. Fire a few thousand unnecessary and grossly overpaid Federal employees, starting with the high-profile weasels like Eric &quot;Who, Me?&quot; Holder and moving rapidly to the entire Department of Education.

This ain&#039;t rocket science.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taxed Enough Already</p>
<p>Cut expenditures. Pay the overdue bills, forget about that nifty new gizmo. Fire a few thousand unnecessary and grossly overpaid Federal employees, starting with the high-profile weasels like Eric &#8220;Who, Me?&#8221; Holder and moving rapidly to the entire Department of Education.</p>
<p>This ain&#8217;t rocket science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Count to 10</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716282</link>
		<dc:creator>Count to 10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s as simple as that.
mr.blacksheep on July 7, 2011 at 3:36 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Tax deductions and credits don&#039;t affect the marginal tax rate--they just redistribute wealth. 
Also, lowering marginal tax rates only increases revenues under certain conditions, and those conditions can vary over a lot of things. For instance, it is often the case that, not only do you increase tax revenue by increasing the tax revenue on the poor, but you increase their output as well, because they work just hard enough to meet set obligations. Clearly lowering a tax rate from a finite amount to nothing lowers revenue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s as simple as that.<br />
mr.blacksheep on July 7, 2011 at 3:36 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Tax deductions and credits don&#8217;t affect the marginal tax rate&#8211;they just redistribute wealth.<br />
Also, lowering marginal tax rates only increases revenues under certain conditions, and those conditions can vary over a lot of things. For instance, it is often the case that, not only do you increase tax revenue by increasing the tax revenue on the poor, but you increase their output as well, because they work just hard enough to meet set obligations. Clearly lowering a tax rate from a finite amount to nothing lowers revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doufree</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716276</link>
		<dc:creator>doufree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RINOs are not dead. Especially in the Senate. And the House. And the Romney campaign. And the ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The RINOs are not dead. Especially in the Senate. And the House. And the Romney campaign. And the &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr.blacksheep</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716250</link>
		<dc:creator>mr.blacksheep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do we keep falling into the trap of equating higher (effective) tax rates with higher government revenue? It has been empirically proven that, at a certain point, increasing tax rates &lt;em&gt;decreases&lt;/em&gt; government revenue by suppressing productive economic activity.

So, if we have a &lt;em&gt;revenue&lt;/em&gt; problem, not a &lt;em&gt;perceived fairness&lt;/em&gt; problem, we should look at actions that will increase government revenue.  Increasing the effective tax rate (e.g. by closing &quot;loopholes&quot;) will, at this current time, &lt;strong&gt;do no such thing&lt;/strong&gt;.  Get over the idea that it will.  &lt;strong&gt;It won&#039;t&lt;/strong&gt;.  The only way to increase government revenue is to reduce the cost of doing business in America, which means rolling back government intrusion in the form of regulations and taxes.

It&#039;s as simple as that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do we keep falling into the trap of equating higher (effective) tax rates with higher government revenue? It has been empirically proven that, at a certain point, increasing tax rates <em>decreases</em> government revenue by suppressing productive economic activity.</p>
<p>So, if we have a <em>revenue</em> problem, not a <em>perceived fairness</em> problem, we should look at actions that will increase government revenue.  Increasing the effective tax rate (e.g. by closing &#8220;loopholes&#8221;) will, at this current time, <strong>do no such thing</strong>.  Get over the idea that it will.  <strong>It won&#8217;t</strong>.  The only way to increase government revenue is to reduce the cost of doing business in America, which means rolling back government intrusion in the form of regulations and taxes.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s as simple as that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KW64</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716225</link>
		<dc:creator>KW64</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Drilling permits for the Gulf, ANWAR and California would also be helpful. Mining permits too.

rbj on July 7, 2011 at 2:49 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And ROYALTY payments for all the extracted mineral wealth on public lands including coal as well as natural gas, oil and hard rock metals. Royalties for timber in wilderness areas too. Not to mention tax revenues for the profits and wages coming from all this activity. Let&#039;s mine private sector free market enterprise! Now that&#039;s the ticket. (No Sarc here, this is what we should have done long ago.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Drilling permits for the Gulf, ANWAR and California would also be helpful. Mining permits too.</p>
<p>rbj on July 7, 2011 at 2:49 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>And ROYALTY payments for all the extracted mineral wealth on public lands including coal as well as natural gas, oil and hard rock metals. Royalties for timber in wilderness areas too. Not to mention tax revenues for the profits and wages coming from all this activity. Let&#8217;s mine private sector free market enterprise! Now that&#8217;s the ticket. (No Sarc here, this is what we should have done long ago.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716214</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Two can play the word games. Lowering taxes like income tax and capital gains taxes will spur the economy and result in higher revenues. We should be therefore be selling tax cuts as ‘investments’. 

slickwillie2001 on July 7, 2011 at 3:00 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yep! It&#039;s time for the government to invest in our future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Two can play the word games. Lowering taxes like income tax and capital gains taxes will spur the economy and result in higher revenues. We should be therefore be selling tax cuts as ‘investments’. </p>
<p>slickwillie2001 on July 7, 2011 at 3:00 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yep! It&#8217;s time for the government to invest in our future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karenhasfreedom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716211</link>
		<dc:creator>karenhasfreedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the republicans in Congress don&#039;t want to have a &quot;tea party on your a$$&quot;, they better NOT raise ANY taxes at all.  Otherwise, the tea party will definitely primary them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the republicans in Congress don&#8217;t want to have a &#8220;tea party on your a$$&#8221;, they better NOT raise ANY taxes at all.  Otherwise, the tea party will definitely primary them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: golfmann</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716206</link>
		<dc:creator>golfmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it should be Cap, Cut and Balance, myself...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it should be Cap, Cut and Balance, myself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Count to 10</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716205</link>
		<dc:creator>Count to 10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That reminds me--one of the reasons that it appears like the rich pay a lower tax rats than the middle class is because only half of the taxes they pay on there investments actually show up on their tax bill. The rest is the corporate profit tax that is taken out before they see any of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That reminds me&#8211;one of the reasons that it appears like the rich pay a lower tax rats than the middle class is because only half of the taxes they pay on there investments actually show up on their tax bill. The rest is the corporate profit tax that is taken out before they see any of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716199</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Two can play the word games. Lowering taxes like income tax and capital gains taxes will spur the economy and result in higher revenues. We should be therefore be selling tax cuts as ‘investments’.

slickwillie2001 on July 7, 2011 at 3:00 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ah yes, but in our case it would be the truth, and the Democratic National Socialist Progressives &lt;em&gt;can’t handle the truth!
&lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Two can play the word games. Lowering taxes like income tax and capital gains taxes will spur the economy and result in higher revenues. We should be therefore be selling tax cuts as ‘investments’.</p>
<p>slickwillie2001 on July 7, 2011 at 3:00 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Ah yes, but in our case it would be the truth, and the Democratic National Socialist Progressives <em>can’t handle the truth!<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slickwillie2001</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716197</link>
		<dc:creator>slickwillie2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Because “corporate welfare/loopholes” is mostly a leftist fantasy...

Count to 10 on July 7, 2011 at 2:55 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If you really want to see a panic on the left, let&#039;s discuss a tax on Family Trusts, which the ultra-wealthy use to evade taxes. Maybe also a tax on college endowment funds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Because “corporate welfare/loopholes” is mostly a leftist fantasy&#8230;</p>
<p>Count to 10 on July 7, 2011 at 2:55 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>If you really want to see a panic on the left, let&#8217;s discuss a tax on Family Trusts, which the ultra-wealthy use to evade taxes. Maybe also a tax on college endowment funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PastorJon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716196</link>
		<dc:creator>PastorJon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;
Why does everyone keep acting like ending corporate welfare/loopholes is a tax increase?
 therightwinger on July 7, 2011 at 2:43 PM 

Because “corporate welfare/loopholes” is mostly a leftist fantasy. We shouldn’t even have a corporate profit tax to begin with. Get rid of that tax, and poof, no more “corporate welfare”. The reason that there is a special tax rate for dividends is that they are effectively double taxed. Get rid of the profit tax, and we can make dividends part of regular income.
 

Count to 10 on July 7, 2011 at 2:55 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not to mention that when you have the 2nd highest corporate tax rate in the G20, are one of only a handful of countries to tax overseas profits, you create an environment where you have to give breaks to keep companies here. One of the symptoms of that is lobbying, special breaks for friends, etc. 

Just end corporate taxation, prices go down, people can get paid more, and corporations and their lobbies will stop spending billions to cajole lawmakers for special breaks. You get rid of a lot of corruption, increase the money in circulation and revive the economy in one fell swoop.

Will never happen, because our corporate tax structure is designed purely to force corporations to buy favor so the critters can get campaign money and jobs after they are voted out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Why does everyone keep acting like ending corporate welfare/loopholes is a tax increase?<br />
 therightwinger on July 7, 2011 at 2:43 PM </p>
<p>Because “corporate welfare/loopholes” is mostly a leftist fantasy. We shouldn’t even have a corporate profit tax to begin with. Get rid of that tax, and poof, no more “corporate welfare”. The reason that there is a special tax rate for dividends is that they are effectively double taxed. Get rid of the profit tax, and we can make dividends part of regular income.</p>
<p>Count to 10 on July 7, 2011 at 2:55 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Not to mention that when you have the 2nd highest corporate tax rate in the G20, are one of only a handful of countries to tax overseas profits, you create an environment where you have to give breaks to keep companies here. One of the symptoms of that is lobbying, special breaks for friends, etc. </p>
<p>Just end corporate taxation, prices go down, people can get paid more, and corporations and their lobbies will stop spending billions to cajole lawmakers for special breaks. You get rid of a lot of corruption, increase the money in circulation and revive the economy in one fell swoop.</p>
<p>Will never happen, because our corporate tax structure is designed purely to force corporations to buy favor so the critters can get campaign money and jobs after they are voted out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midas</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716194</link>
		<dc:creator>Midas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Just what will inspire them to work for a living when the gubmint steals 90% of their income to pay for the slackers who infest our society?
fogw on July 7, 2011 at 2:53 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Watching other people who refuse to work being carted off to a reeducation camp?

Bishop on July 7, 2011 at 2:57 PM


&lt;/blockquote&gt;

LOL, in &#039;gallows humor&#039; sort of way.  ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Just what will inspire them to work for a living when the gubmint steals 90% of their income to pay for the slackers who infest our society?<br />
fogw on July 7, 2011 at 2:53 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Watching other people who refuse to work being carted off to a reeducation camp?</p>
<p>Bishop on July 7, 2011 at 2:57 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>LOL, in &#8216;gallows humor&#8217; sort of way.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716193</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Why does everyone keep acting like ending corporate welfare/loopholes is a tax increase?

    therightwinger on July 7, 2011 at 2:43 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Where do you think the money to pay the taxes will come from?

Wade on July 7, 2011 at 2:48 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Does everyone understand that the Democrats one and only &lt;em&gt;grand idea&lt;/em&gt; is to redistribute (the people’s) wealth?

They have a cottage industry coming up with different ways of expressing it, but it’s just the dumb warmed over idea.

We could start a list:

Ending corporate welfare/loopholes – Tax increases.

Raising Revenues - Tax increases.

Enhancing Revenues – Tax increases.

Spreading the Wealth around – Tax increases.

Make the rich pay their fair share – Tax increases.

Shared Sacrifice  (notice the Democrats seem strangely absent from the sacrifice part of the equation) – Tax increases.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Why does everyone keep acting like ending corporate welfare/loopholes is a tax increase?</p>
<p>    therightwinger on July 7, 2011 at 2:43 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Where do you think the money to pay the taxes will come from?</p>
<p>Wade on July 7, 2011 at 2:48 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Does everyone understand that the Democrats one and only <em>grand idea</em> is to redistribute (the people’s) wealth?</p>
<p>They have a cottage industry coming up with different ways of expressing it, but it’s just the dumb warmed over idea.</p>
<p>We could start a list:</p>
<p>Ending corporate welfare/loopholes – Tax increases.</p>
<p>Raising Revenues &#8211; Tax increases.</p>
<p>Enhancing Revenues – Tax increases.</p>
<p>Spreading the Wealth around – Tax increases.</p>
<p>Make the rich pay their fair share – Tax increases.</p>
<p>Shared Sacrifice  (notice the Democrats seem strangely absent from the sacrifice part of the equation) – Tax increases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slickwillie2001</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716192</link>
		<dc:creator>slickwillie2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Get ready for fancy words for Taxes like “Fees” or “raising Revenues”.

It’s verbal gymnastics time folks.

Read my lips. No New Raising of Revenue”.

portlandon on July 7, 2011 at 2:45 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Two can play the word games. Lowering taxes like income tax and capital gains taxes will spur the economy and result in higher revenues. We should be therefore be selling tax cuts as &lt;em&gt;&#039;investments&#039;. &lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Get ready for fancy words for Taxes like “Fees” or “raising Revenues”.</p>
<p>It’s verbal gymnastics time folks.</p>
<p>Read my lips. No New Raising of Revenue”.</p>
<p>portlandon on July 7, 2011 at 2:45 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Two can play the word games. Lowering taxes like income tax and capital gains taxes will spur the economy and result in higher revenues. We should be therefore be selling tax cuts as <em>&#8216;investments&#8217;. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bishop</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/07/republicans-discuss-revenues-yet-still-insist-on-no-tax-hikes/comment-page-1/#comment-4716190</link>
		<dc:creator>Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 18:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=147518#comment-4716190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Just what will inspire them to work for a living when the gubmint steals 90% of their income to pay for the slackers who infest our society?
fogw on July 7, 2011 at 2:53 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Watching other people who refuse to work being carted off to a reeducation camp?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Just what will inspire them to work for a living when the gubmint steals 90% of their income to pay for the slackers who infest our society?<br />
fogw on July 7, 2011 at 2:53 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Watching other people who refuse to work being carted off to a reeducation camp?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>