Sessions bill to demand sufficient time to review any debt limit deal

posted at 6:50 pm on July 1, 2011 by Tina Korbe

As the week winds down and the 4th of July weekend revs up, the Senate forgoes its vacation only to ignore the budget some more.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid yesterday opted to keep the Senate in session through the holiday, supposedly to mark up a budget and strike a debt limit deal, but Reid and Senate Democratic leadership have not scheduled such a markup — or, indeed, any action on the debt ceiling at all. Yet, some Democrats warn the timeline to reach a deal is tighter than advertised.

So, what’s a senator who wants a solution to do? Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, plans to introduce a bill next week to require that a debt limit increase be made public seven days before a vote occurs.

“There’s no doubt that the nation is facing its most severe systemic debt crisis in history, and the attempt to raise the debt ceiling has become the fulcrum for change,” Sessions said this afternoon in a phone interview. “So, I feel very strongly all senators and Congressmen and the American people need to have full opportunity to examine any proposal to deal with the trillions of dollars at stake. We think seven days for a bill of this importance is minimum. Really, we should have more. We should have been talking about our debt crisis all year, writing legislation and proposals up to fix it in public, not in secret meetings.”

Sessions said he expects his bill — as straightforward and transparent as it is — to still meet resistance from Democratic leadership in the Senate.

“Everything we’ve seen indicates that there’s a conscious, crafted strategy to produce a monumental deal on the eve of the August recess,” the senator said. “I’m worried most of all that somewhere towards the end of this process, at the 11th hour, a bad bill will be dropped on us, leaving the Congress with the choice of rejecting it and being attacked for not raising the debt limit … or voting for something irresponsible. It does appear the plan is to bring it up late so it will be very difficult to actually debate and offer amendments or to even fully understand what’s in it. … Congress shouldn’t be put in a position where they can’t read the fine print and get a truthful analysis of what’s in the legislation.”

As for the solutions he favors, Sessions said he likes all the components of the House Republican Study Committee’s “Cut, Cap and Balance” plan and especially emphasized spending cuts. That’s the essence of the debt limit debate, really. If Congress does nothing in the face of the debt limit deadline (and the nation can no longer borrow), the country could face steep and immediate cuts of up to 40 percent. The better bet, Sessions said, would be to “establish a solid, long-term, sustained path to fiscal responsibility by reducing spending carefully and steadily and focusing on efficiency and productivity rather than having it happen so dramatically.”

“That’s why we really need to have a good plan and get it done,” he said.

Unfortunately for Congress, Sessions said, the president isn’t helping, all harsh exhortations and false pretenses of leadership aside.

“We need to see something from the leader,” he said. “He’s the one person elected to speak to the whole nation. Implicitly, he’s saying that reductions in spending are not necessary. Not only is he not leading, but really he’s making things worse by implying real change isn’t necessary.”

Instead, Sessions pointed out, the only plan the president has put forward so far called for increased taxes and increased spending — and actually increased the debt.

“I think it’s plain he wants to collect more money from the private sector and spread it around,” Sessions said. “He believes that will help him politically, and he believes, as big spenders do, that you can extract money from the people and let the government spend it instead and that will make the nation better. I don’t think that’s accurate, so we’ve got a real, serious disagreement about the nature of the American republic. It’s a limited government. It’s a lean government. We believe in allowing the private sector to flourish with minimum burdens — and that’s the way to create jobs, productivity, innovation and creativity.”

But it’s really no wonder why the president won’t come forward to tout tax hikes. As Sessions said, few of those who swept the 2010 elections campaigned on promises of higher taxes. They advocated reduced spending.

“The president won’t come forward with his taxes, will he?” Sessions said. “If he’s so confident that raising taxes is a good thing, why doesn’t he produce how many billions he’s going to raise and how he’s going to raise it?”

Sessions has sounded this drumbeat for a very long time — but, ultimately, no matter how the upcoming vote goes, he knows power to change the nation’s trajectory resides in the hands of the American people (a fact that lends the upcoming 2012 elections even greater importance).

“The key to it is the American people,” he said. “Getting good information out to people so they really know the facts and the importance of it is what will determine ultimately the makeup of the Congress and how these votes will go. There definitely is a substantial group that wants to either overtly or covertly raise taxes and the American people needs to stand up to that.”


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

But what about the Casey Anthony trial?

Knucklehead on July 1, 2011 at 6:55 PM

I’m beginning to wonder if we will reach the 2012 elections. It appears more and more as if the left wants an “r” to break out.

chemman on July 1, 2011 at 6:56 PM

Wait, Senator Sessions; the President says you’re supposed to wait til the last possible day to make a deal; therefore, you can’t ask for time to review it or you make him look bad; and that makes you a RAAAAA-cist!

Remember “we have to pass it in order to find out what’s in it”? May San Fran Nan rot in the Minority Leader’s So-close-but-yet-so-far-from-power chair for the rest of her career for her duplicitous, manipulative co-dependent-with-the-enabling-news-media destruction of the American family and economy.

rwenger43 on July 1, 2011 at 7:03 PM

Not like it will matter. President Dick will likely ignore Congress anyway.

jawkneemusic on July 1, 2011 at 7:03 PM

We have seen this time, and time, and time again.

Nothing will come of this. A last minute deal will be struck, and the Republican leadership will fold.

Nothing will come of this. Nothing. We are headed toward disaster.

I hope the Republicans in the House, have some real, real guts. Because as much as I like Sessions,this will fail.

God Help Him.

Scoreboard44 on July 1, 2011 at 7:05 PM

But what about the Casey Anthony trial?

Knucklehead on July 1, 2011 at 6:55 PM

Knucklhead:I’m glad that episode(Circus-Side-Show)is
almost over!:)

canopfor on July 1, 2011 at 7:06 PM

I wouldn’t be counting on many of the American people. There is a disturbing lack of knowledge of history and economics in this country.

Only 58% of Americans in this poll knew that we declared our independence in 1776. Only 76% knew that it was from Great Britain.

Marist Poll

It doesn’t give me the warm fuzzies.

Common Sense on July 1, 2011 at 7:09 PM

As the week winds down and the 4th of July weekend revs up, the Senate forgoes its vacation only to ignore the budget some more.
=============

Oh ya,Hopey was/is/still,playing OneUpManShip on git’n ‘er done!

canopfor on July 1, 2011 at 7:11 PM

If we could just trust the politicians in DC

Alas, most are Media Whores that are worried about what the Campaign cash bundlers need. If only…….

PappyD61 on July 1, 2011 at 7:12 PM

I wanna pass “it” so I can know if that 1099 rule gets put in…

Gohawgs on July 1, 2011 at 7:18 PM

Than you:

California
West Virginia
Colorado
Nevada
Washington

SouthernGent on July 1, 2011 at 8:10 PM

Never let a crisis go to waste.

I dread to think what terrible-for-America legislation the Democrats have dreamt up.

Jay Mac on July 1, 2011 at 8:21 PM

Jeff, you rock.

Ward Cleaver on July 1, 2011 at 8:29 PM

Rome burns. Harry Reid dithers. Yep. Got us some real ‘leadership’ in the Senate. Thanks Nevada! But remember, Karma can be a real bitch!

GarandFan on July 1, 2011 at 8:36 PM

he knows power to change the nation’s trajectory resides in the hands of the American people

Yup…that’s what happened in November! Message sent…landslide…heard….we’ll see.

winston on July 1, 2011 at 8:55 PM

Sessions is going to be disappointed.

Obama doesn’t compromise. Obama plays hardball. He will force the GOP to walk away, which means no debt ceiling increase for the moment. Of course, that doesn’t mean a default at all and never did, but it does mean if we pay to service the debt, we can’t spend the budgeted amounts on other things.

It also means Obama gets to choose what to cut. He plans to use this power to hurt Republicans as much as he can – naturally blaming them all the way. The only question is will he try to hurt us by public outrage over meat inspections ceased (which stops distribution of meat), or Social Security checks not delivered, or targets federal spending in the states and districts won by Republicans. But it will be one or the other.

The man is a traitor to America. If he is not stopped, he will end up dictator for life.

Adjoran on July 2, 2011 at 12:57 AM

Maybe ALL Republicans in the House & Senate… Right now, as this disaster unfolds, they had better start campaigning in their districts for conservative ideas & against Obama. Same for the RNC, HSRC, etc… No more 60+ sec TV ads… < 30 seconds and on the TV around the clock in all markets… starting yesterday… They need to understand that it's more than just their political skin on the line, but the country's…

Obama may be able to raise 5-10+ times in excess of a Republican challenger… But if he has to refute ads & campaigning of even 20 more people, he'll have to divide his $$$ to address each point with which he disagrees.

One piranha vs an alligator has no chance… But one-hundred? Alligator has no chance…

Danny on July 2, 2011 at 1:03 AM