Sen. Sessions: Once again, Senate shouldn’t recess until it addresses the budget
posted at 6:13 pm on June 29, 2011 by Tina Korbe
Before the Memorial Day recess, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, requested the Senate not adjourn until it addressed the lack of a budget — so Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid cleverly shifted the Senate gears into a series of pro forma sessions.
But the Senate is again scheduled to recess in a week. So, today, while the president exhibited his unparalleled ability to deflect questions, Sessions took once more to the Senate floor to reiterate the importance of Senate action on the budget before a recess.
“In just five weeks, we’re told we’ll reach the firm deadline on our nation’s $14.3 trillion debt, which has doubled in the last few years,” Sessions said. “Then, major reductions occur unless action is taken. The Republican House has set forth their plan, but the Democratic Senate hasn’t done so. [The Senate] hasn’t passed a budget in 791 days … And now the Senate is scheduled to take next week off … Before the Memorial Day recess I presented to the Majority Leader a letter, signed by 46 Republican senators, stating that we should not recess but remain in session to work on a budget plan … I renew the request from our letter.”
Sessions has been beating this drum for a long time — but he’s right to persist. More than 22 million Americans are out of work. A majority of Americans now fear the next generation will be worse off than theirs has been. And in the time that the Democrat-controlled Senate has taken no action on the budget, the debt has grown by $3.2 trillion.
To mark up a budget is one of the Senate’s most basic responsibilities. Wasn’t it Obama himself who said just today that taking a vacation without paying for it is “not how responsible families act“? I assume that means he supports Sen. Sessions call …
Incidentally, some news sources have actually made it sound as though Sessions’ call to remain in session was a response to Obama’s exhortation to Congress to act immediately on the debt ceiling — which he made during his news conference this afternoon. In fact, it was probably the other way around. According to a Republican aide with knowledge of Senate leadership discussions, the president likely knew Sessions might object if Reid asked for unanimous consent to adjourn, which would have put the recess to a vote. After all, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell certainly knew and he met with Reid just this week. Reid probably tipped the president off, too. So Obama had nothing to lose by also demanding concentrated action from Congress.
As a side note, the recess at hand is the Independence Day recess. I can think of few things that smack of dependence more than debt. Certainly, nations have to be able to borrow money — but they should also be able to demonstrate the potential to pay it back or, at the very least, have some kind of plan in place.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


Bobby Jindal: Paternalistic, big-government liberalism is the biggest loser here

Super Nannies: EU bans olive oils, Germany ponders Autobahn speed limit






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
As I just posted HotairLib has their whole head up their six o clock.
hamradio on May 24, 2013 at 2:43 PM
Who wrote the speech? Or are you just praising the messenger?
mixplix on May 24, 2013 at 2:57 PM
Connect the dots: journolist meeting by invitation only at the White House on, what Tuesday?, “big”speech by Obama on Thursday, lame stream media fawning over speech on Friday. Who would have seen that coming, huh?
parke on May 24, 2013 at 2:58 PM
They need the “war on terror” in order to further erode our Constitutional freedoms and to deflect criticism from the administration’s and Federal government’s ongoing corruption.
They are just trying to massage it so that they don’t offend the Muslims, international Libtards and their own sensibilities anymore than necessary.
A few Muslim terrorists here and there are quite expendable to this Administration despite their sympathies for them. These drone attacks also do much deflect any potential criticism that the Administration is weak in dealing with such matters.
Dr. ZhivBlago on May 24, 2013 at 2:59 PM
MSNBC is nothing but a left wing propaganda machine serving their master, Obama.
rplat on May 24, 2013 at 3:07 PM
I believe that he was officially nominated 10 days after he was sworn in. Wow! The WON really worked long hours that week and a half to earn that POS medal. During those ten days he ordered NO DRONE STRIKES to keep his peaceful record clean.
fred5678 on May 24, 2013 at 3:22 PM
Obama: Don’t worry about that Ben Ghazi guy. I killed Bin Laden, and Bush didn’t!
And Obummer still wants to close Gitmo? Good luck with that–not even Upchuck Schumer was willing to hold trials in New York!
Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:24 PM
They just changed the definition of terrorist. They used to be jihadis from the Middle East–now they’re Minutemen in Arizona and Tea Partiers in Ohio.
Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:29 PM
Erika, sometimes your writing shows signs of rivaling even the Master of Snark himself, Allahpundit. Good work!
KS Rex on May 24, 2013 at 3:45 PM
I love how crazy Al invoked the Nobel Peace Prize in praise of a speech that spoke about dropping bombs on people’s head. Maybe it was the “fewer” bombs than before that raised this to historic levels.
Do they even know or care that they are morons.
marnes on May 24, 2013 at 3:46 PM
His speech made less sense than Bluto’s Animal House Speech and was far less entertaining. Nothing less than base rallying time. Never thought I would say this, but Code Pink was the best part.
DDay on May 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM
Sperling posted this at the Examiner on May 23 about this “historic speech of Obysmal’s:
You see, we are just not working hard enough to “work with the Muslim American community” who are a “fundamental part of the American family.” Watch out, too, because Obysmal is again trying to limit the impact of the Internet.
onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:22 PM
That Chris Hayes is a bit of a twink, isn’t he?
onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM
Obama apparently gave two speeches yesterday and I watched the other one.
myiq2xu on May 24, 2013 at 5:03 PM
Nah. I’d detest the little pissant s.o.b. if he was white…or Asian…or any one of the myriad of made-up racial divisions.
Solaratov on May 24, 2013 at 11:00 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2