Report: Bachmann ordered Ed Rollins to apologize to Palin’s team
posted at 4:50 pm on June 20, 2011 by Allahpundit
When you’ve got a puppy with a habit of crapping on the carpet, you may need to rub his face in it to set him right.
Serious candidates require serious message discipline, and as of last Monday’s debate, she’s most definitely a serious candidate:
“We need Mrs. Bachmann out front and we need the campaign to be a real campaign with one spokesperson and a disciplined message,” said one Bachmann adviser granted anonymity to speak candidly about strategy…
Bachmann’s newly installed political team has had its own battles with message discipline — typified by campaign manager Ed Rollins’ recent comments alleging that former Alaska governor Sarah Palin hasn’t been “serious” over the last few years.
After the incident, Bachmann was “very firm” with Rollins, according to an adviser to the congresswoman, telling him this should not happen again and that there should be “no more press”. Bachmann also demanded that Rollins call the Palin people and apologize. “She is definitely not tone deaf,” the source added.
Bachmann’s move to limit her exposure in the wake of her debate performance is a smart strategy designed to avoid accidentally trampling on the momentum she built with that performance.
Such is Palin’s conservative cachet among the base, I think, that not even Michele Bachmann would feel completely safe from charges of RINO-ism if she had let Rollins’s attack slide. Already I’ve seen her dismissed by a few people in the comments here and elsewhere as some sort of stalking horse for Romney whose mission is to clear his way to the nomination by siphoning off votes from Pawlenty and Palin. What she’d be hoping to gain from doing that, I’m not sure; James Taranto imagined a Romney/Bachmann ticket a few days ago, but I’ve always figured Mitt would want a southerner as VP to shore up his support regionally. She hit him over the weekend for failing to sign the Susan B. Anthony List’s pro-life pledge (note the bit at the end of her statement drily alluding to his previous flip-flop on abortion), so whatever her ultimate strategy is, it doesn’t involve treating Romney with kid gloves.
If she’s looking to stay in the good graces of Palin fans, whose votes she’ll potentially need down the line, why didn’t she demand that Rollins apologize publicly? The passage in the WaPo piece quoted above, buried several paragraphs down, is the first I’ve heard of it.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3
Do you have anything besides ‘your feelings’ to back up your outrageous predictions?
zoyclem on June 21, 2011 at 12:11 PM
The ways for the institutional right to attack Palin -even for a woman -are extremely limited. Riddling her with degrading terms like “Unserious” is not the political equivelant of using the “N” word or the”L” word, but it is all they can do without causing a inter-party firestorm.
Like the mosquito-driven carabou in Alaska – they hope to drive her away with a million soft bites. What they don’t understand is that she’ll swat them back fatally, in her own good time.
Sarah has done America a large favor by exposing the devious right for being the power-freak hypocrites that they are – and anything but the conservatives that they would have us all believe.
Don L on June 21, 2011 at 12:16 PM
Sarah is a big girl. If this “scandal” is elevated, then the press will have their cat fight, even if it isn’t. The last thing SP needs is to get into a perceived whining session, especially with a friend. A person doesn’t prove that she’s serious by complaining, she proves it by kicking the cr*p out of her opponents with legitimate arguments and leadership.
Aardvark on June 21, 2011 at 12:33 PM
Bachmann felt the heat from Palin fans. Period.
pseudoforce on June 21, 2011 at 12:38 PM
Yeah, a private apology to a very public display of stupidity doesn’t cut it, Michelle.
holygoat on June 21, 2011 at 12:40 PM
It may not be her mission but she is becoming one by default
Here is Bachmann’s problem, she let it slide.
Bachmann did not control her own message. It would have been easy to make an immediate public statement. If she wanted to keep Rollins, she should have appeared with him, in public, in a happy, relaxed venue where she talked up Palin as a decent human being, talked up Rollins as a decent human being, and smoothed over the waves
This would have made it apparent she was running her own campaign, not running from her own campaign.
When the s hits the fan, you have to face it head on.
Instead she let the story fester
This is where Palin scores and Bachmann loses. Bachmann has great ideas, and is an honest representative, but she is sometimes weak in the moment of truth, or doesn’t catch on to the significance of her inaction.
Her ideas are big league, Her skills are minor league
entagor on June 21, 2011 at 1:35 PM
pseudoforce on June 21, 2011 at 12:38 PM
Nonsense. Bachmann would never insult SP and would never tolerate any of her people doing so. She should have done better do diligence before hiring Rollins. I hope she fires him soon.
Really Right on June 21, 2011 at 2:22 PM
She asked him to apologize. Have I missed the news item indicating he actually did?
alwaysfiredup on June 21, 2011 at 2:26 PM
Right. Which is why Bachmann personally came out with an apology the very next day. Come on. Palin is Bachmann’s biggest obstacle, not Romney.
pseudoforce on June 21, 2011 at 2:33 PM
OT: Holy crap, AP, thanks for putting that QOTD to bed. My eyes are bleeding from all the carnage.
alwaysfiredup on June 21, 2011 at 4:34 PM
Stop the presses – A political campaign manager said something unflattering about a potential political rival, something that has never happened before in the history of politics.
You Palinistas really need to get a grip – You guys are bigger whiners than the Messiah currently sitting in the White House. If St Sarah of Wasilla can’t handle something as ridiculously trivial as this, than she doesn’t need to be running for president.
JFS61 on June 21, 2011 at 4:34 PM
This is about Bachmann’s judgment, not “St. Sarah”. If she doesn’t want my vote, that’s fine. There are lots of other candidates.
alwaysfiredup on June 21, 2011 at 4:36 PM
Classy and astute.
AshleyTKing on June 21, 2011 at 4:40 PM
Actually, it’s neither. There’s been no apology, just a trial balloon that one was ordered.
alwaysfiredup on June 21, 2011 at 4:46 PM
Oh no! She hired Rollins?! I thought Bachmann was trying to be a serious candidate!
scotash on June 21, 2011 at 5:28 PM
Bull shite, Bachmann is a Palin fan :P
IowaWoman on June 21, 2011 at 7:03 PM
Let’s see your reaction if in an interview a Palin staffer were to call Bachmann, oh, an unelectable far-right wingnut or Pat Buchanan in a skirt.
pseudoforce on June 21, 2011 at 11:29 PM
Exactly!
Bachmann has quickly become a typical politician who arrogantly believes that she can fool the people into believing that she will actually represent us when in fact all she wishes to accomplish is to raise her personal stature via the backs of the TEA Party people.
Even though her talking points remain most Palinesque her efforts are most like those of the
GOP elitists, thus Bachmann will not get my vote.
DannoJyd on June 22, 2011 at 10:35 AM
DEMOCRAT EMAIL SUPPORT OF PALIN: You have carved your name into AK history!
The above contains my analysis of Palin’s emails for Democrats who supported her efforts as Governor. There were many. The most heartening aspect of preparing this post was how kind my fellow Democrats could be, and how appreciative they were of solid leadership and honest governance — regardless of party. I would like this post to be a reference for counter-arguments to the false assertion “Democrats won’t vote for Palin”. Yes they will — here is the proof.
I also have a note about the Democratic CA State Controller, who docked our legislator’s pay for turning in a false and horrendous budget. I would like to encourage my fellow Californians to send him a few kind words, too.
(PS. Bachmann IS a stalking horse for Romney. The false “anti-abortion” bru-ha-has is a distraction and Kabuki Theater of the first order. The main item we all need to focus on: THE ECONOMY).
Mutnodjmet on June 22, 2011 at 11:48 AM
So, are you a Democrat today or counted amongst the many recovering Dem-o-holics as am I? ;o)
DannoJyd on June 22, 2011 at 6:04 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3