Oil CEO: “We can create jobs”

posted at 9:45 am on June 17, 2011 by Jazz Shaw

A recent conference on jobs and competitiveness in Washington, DC brought together business leaders who attempted to address some of the business challenges facing the nation today. As part of this, Chevron CEO John Watson spoke to reporters at CNBC, casting a harsh light on one of the disturbing ironies in federal government policy. At a time when the White House is supposed to be focusing on job creation and economic growth they are not only leaving major opportunities on the table, but actively working to avoid huge potential gains in those areas. (View the video and transcript here.)

“I was very concerned about the tax proposals in the Menendez bill that came forward that day because i never thought I would see the day when an administration and more than half the U.S. senate would propose a tax bill that actually would disadvantage 132-year-old company like Chevron relative to Russian, Chinese, French, Italian and other companies, not just outside the united states, but inside the united states of America. So we did push back on bills that were being critical trying to impose punitive taxes on our business. We can create jobs, we can play a positive role and that’s my message.”

The interviewers did a good job of bringing up other concerns being heard around the country, such as the image of “Big Oil” raking in huge profits and doing well while so many Americans are out of work and unable to share in that prosperity. Watson points out that, first, while Chevron reported profits of $19B last year, they are actively investing more than $26B this year in exploration and other industry costs in the race to stay ahead of field depletion. Further, he seemed to express some frustration with the fact that energy companies are ready – today – to provide jobs and allow more Americans to share in prosperity, but it is our own government that’s slowing down the process.

CNBC: So do you think… we’re in D.C., this is the red tape capital, are the policies or lack of policies that we’re seeing here hurting job creation at Chevron?

Watson: They are. In fact, we told a group of senators this morning, that there’s a long list of regulations that have been enacted and been in place for a long time and new ones that keep coming that are restricting our ability to create jobs. We’ve provided that list to the senators. but for our industry in particular, you know, deep water drill ship employs about 200 people directly and 1,000 indirectly. It raises revenue for the government, puts people back to work, reduces imported oil. We just want to be put in the game. We can create jobs if we’re given the opportunity.

The list of “demands” that the oil companies have in order to make this happen don’t appear to be particularly onerous.

  • Opening up acreage to development
  • Issuing permits in a timely fashion
  • Keeping in place a tax structure that allows the investment to create those jobs

This isn’t rocket science and, as Watson points out, industry leaders have now placed the list of requirements directly into the hands of the senators. The jobs and investment capital are there waiting, as he puts it, to just be put into the game. If Congress wants to improve their not particularly impressive approval ratings, this might be a pretty good place to start.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Silly man, oil jobs are for Brazilians, not Americans.

Rebar on June 17, 2011 at 9:52 AM

Drill here. Drill now.

petefrt on June 17, 2011 at 9:54 AM

Its about time that Big Oil gets smart, grows a spine and starts boasting about the # of high paying, private sector jobs they create. Bravo. DD

Darvin Dowdy on June 17, 2011 at 9:56 AM

It’s almost like Obama is afraid of reducing the economic power of the Middle Eastern (and other) oil barons. God forbid that they lose their power over the West.

RBMN on June 17, 2011 at 9:56 AM

The last thing we want is to go after our on oil. That would mean that we wouldn’t be importing all that oil from our friends around the world. And it would create jobs. And lower the cost of gasoline.

All things we don’t need or want in BHO’s America!!!!

Cinematicfilm on June 17, 2011 at 9:57 AM

Oil CEO: We can create jobs.
US CEO: Oh no you can’t.

abilities.

ted c on June 17, 2011 at 9:57 AM

What he fails to understand is that the current economic environment exists by design.

CurtZHP on June 17, 2011 at 9:57 AM

It strikes me as pathetically sad that he has to point any of this out in the first place.

golfmann on June 17, 2011 at 9:59 AM

Countries around the world are laughing in our faces because of this administrations absolute disregard for the American economy. The policies we are getting out of the Senate can only be an intentional attempt to weaken the US. Actively fighting job creation, over regulation, pandering to the unions and the liberal left. What is going to be left after these gangsters are gone?

MJZZZ on June 17, 2011 at 10:00 AM

DHDN…

golfmann on June 17, 2011 at 10:00 AM

Some jobs are more equal than others, dontcha know. If the job benefits Evil Big Oil in anyway, well it is not a job-job. If it helps out GE or other friend of Obama, well it is a much better job.

txmomof6 on June 17, 2011 at 10:01 AM

Spot on Ted.

cmsinaz on June 17, 2011 at 10:05 AM

DHDN…

golfmann on June 17, 2011 at 10:00 AM

DHDN SP2012

stenwin77 on June 17, 2011 at 10:05 AM

Good luck…with Obama’s poll numbers decreasing, his base becomes even more important, the irony is that his allegiance to his base is what is driving his numbers down.
To help the oil companies, he would have to back track from his policies, go against his base, upset his friends down south, don’t hold your breath.
Jobs and enriching America is not on Obama’s agenda…making sure his base is tucked in is the top of his list, and expanding the government is the overriding policy.
He would expand oil company jobs, if the government controlled all the aspects of the production.

right2bright on June 17, 2011 at 10:06 AM

The government will decide who creates jobs.

darwin-t on June 17, 2011 at 10:06 AM

America has become another nation – It now is a place where God and Profits are considered evil, while envy, sloth and perversion are the new goods.

Can you say; “old Soviet Union,” three times fast, without it sounding like Obama, Pelosi, and Reid?

Don L on June 17, 2011 at 10:06 AM

Doesn’t the govt get more tax revenue from each gallon of gas than the oil companies themselves profit?

Ris4victory on June 17, 2011 at 10:10 AM

“We can do it, we have the technology, but we have an insane government limiting what we can do.”

teke184 on June 17, 2011 at 10:10 AM

CEO: We can create jobs! Put people to work!
Obama: If they are not union jobs, we don’t want them.

search4truth on June 17, 2011 at 10:10 AM

“We can create jobs”

So? We don’t want jobs … we want collapse so we can rebuild in our image.

- Your friend in Communism,

Barack

darwin on June 17, 2011 at 10:11 AM

Maybe if those CEO’s got the message to the Marxist trash, that yes, the Marxist trash could go on TV, and claim credit for those particular jobs being created.

MNHawk on June 17, 2011 at 10:13 AM

When Obama does anything it is usually to the detriment of this country or our allies. I’ve seen nothing positive from him that would move this country forward.

I don’t believe it is total incompetence. I believe he has an agenda and is determined to carry it out. The Dems blew their chance when they had the majority in the WH, Senate and Congress. What they couldn’t get passed then, Obama is doing it by executive fiat in the way of regulations.

Four more years of this socialist who hates this country and what it stands for and we’re doomed unless we elect a large majority to both houses with people who have some backbone that can say enough is enough to counteract this path of destruction.

iamsaved on June 17, 2011 at 10:13 AM

“This obviously racist, bigoted, hateful, imperialist, corporatist, fear-mongering, hate-filled Oil Robber Baron needs to be punished. It’s because of people like him that the Middle Class is suffering. Obama is doing the right thing by punishing the evil oil industry!” – Libthink

visions on June 17, 2011 at 10:17 AM

THIS is why I am optimistic about next year. There’s (hopefully) going to be a point where it would take a dead hooker to change the election results. And I am hopeful this will be in favor of the Republican. At that point, business will finally see a light at the end of the tunnel, and start investing again.

Sekhmet on June 17, 2011 at 10:18 AM

BHO ” WHO THE HELL DOES THIS GUY THINK HE IS?”

maintenanceman on June 17, 2011 at 10:19 AM

I wonder if any of these oil execs supported BHO in 2008 like GE did.

DavidM on June 17, 2011 at 10:21 AM

Obama said he can’t crush the economy (country) if energy prices don’t necessarily skyrocket!

tim c on June 17, 2011 at 10:21 AM

“This obviously racist, bigoted, hateful, imperialist, corporatist, fear-mongering, hate-filled Oil Robber Baron needs to be punished. It’s because of people like him that the Middle Class is suffering. Obama is doing the right thing by punishing the evil oil industry!” – Libthink

visions on June 17, 2011 at 10:17 AM

Don’t worry, I’m sure this guy will get special attention from the IRS next year.

Special. Attention.

Rebar on June 17, 2011 at 10:23 AM

Who say’s Obama is “electable”?

Roy Rogers on June 17, 2011 at 10:24 AM

I bet that the epa is going to be all over this company more than they are now after his statement.
L

letget on June 17, 2011 at 10:24 AM

OT but it does relate to how our government works at cross-purposes in creating prosperity:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/17/opinion/17brooks.html?_r=2&hp

It’s hard to believe that David Brooks wrote this less-than-squishy analysis.

We have “public servants” enriching themselves through their maintaining the levers of power. They pick winners and losers and are guilty of insider trading that would land anyone else in jail.

onlineanalyst on June 17, 2011 at 10:25 AM

I recognize this. It’s the John Galt Plan for economic recovery: “Get the hell out of my way!”

DailyDanet on June 17, 2011 at 10:29 AM

I think he is extorting the oil company’s with the payoffs going to him and his crew.

docflash on June 17, 2011 at 10:30 AM

He’s already forgotten that The One has told the Brazilians that we will be their best customer for oil.

GarandFan on June 17, 2011 at 10:31 AM

There must be some scientific research that shows that people on Food Stamps most likely vote for a Democrat…so Obama wants to grow that population more before getting people back to work.

albill on June 17, 2011 at 10:32 AM

a girl can dream …
How’s about a GOP commercial … RIGHT NOW … Showing the unemployment numbers .. Even just from the oil industry !! .. Followed by this statement and the list given to the Dem- led Senate !
Rub this in, GOP, ENDLESSLY !!

pambi on June 17, 2011 at 10:32 AM

As someone who provides for my family by working in the oil industry, at a refinery, this topic gets me heated up. Oil industry jobs are great paying jobs for the middle class and yet the Democrats are singling them out and stopping them from being created, even driving them away with their polices. This provides a powerful rebuttal to the claim that the Democrats actually care about the middle class. They only care about the middle class if they are figuring out ways to make us more dependent on the government, and taking away good paying jobs seem to be the Democrats preferred method.

People in this industry, and others with similar types of shift rotation, make sacrifices to provide for their families, usually working 12 hour rotating shifts. Shifts that go from days to nights. We work every other weekend, throw overtime on that and we work around 80-90% of our weekends. Holidays included because refineries do not shut down on Christmas and Easter, it’s 24/7, 7 days a week. Factor in the overtime we make and the higher taxes a two week check gets taxed at and we take less home for more time worked.

As to the unions. I got out of the one at my refinery because I couldn’t deal with the fact that union leadership will endorse the Democrat every time, even though a lot of union members are Republican. I even see anti-Obama bumper stickers in the parking lot.

It is time for America to drill here and drill now. Energy independence starts with oil drilling and not subsidizing Brazilian oil companies while taking that money from American companies, nor does it start with so-called “green” jobs. Something else should be on your radar is that China might eventually look into buying an oil refinery in America. If this were to happen, do you think Obama would really stop it?

For more of my thoughts on how the Democrats are really anti-middle class go here.

Blue Collar Todd on June 17, 2011 at 10:34 AM

OH !! And don’t forget DWS’s “We own this economy”

They just write themselves, these ads !!
DO IT !!!

pambi on June 17, 2011 at 10:35 AM

… and expanding the government is the overriding policy.
[0bama] would expand oil company jobs, if the government controlled all the aspects of the production.

right2bright on June 17, 2011 at 10:06 AM

EXACTLY….

0bumble is a not-so-closeted Mar-xist. If he had a way to take over the oil industry the way he took over the banks and car companies, he would.

Back in 2008, few people seemed to understand that 0bowmao is a Chicago politician-m0bster (I’m a Chicagoan, so I know). It’s all about power, control and MONEY. He can’t get the oil money flowing into Dhimmicrat coffers, so that is why they keep throwing up obstacles.

FlatlanderByTheLake on June 17, 2011 at 10:40 AM

It’s almost like Obama is afraid of reducing the economic power of the Middle Eastern (and other) oil barons. God forbid that they lose their power over the West.

RBMN on June 17, 2011 at 9:56 AM

Yes, it does, doesn’t it.

At the very least BO should be thinking that those ME oil potentates “have enough money.”

Shouldn’t American citizens at least have jobs? We are a country rich in natural resources. Why shouldn’t we use them?

Cody1991 on June 17, 2011 at 10:42 AM

Surprisingly, companies want to make more money. Which generally means growing, which means hiring more workers.

But every policy we’ve put in place lately seems to discourage or prevent businesses from doing that.

Just one change to the tax law would allow billions of dollars in overseas profits to be brought back to the U.S. for investment by firms. Right now, they face a huge tax payment if they try to bring the money here, so they keep it overseas and create jobs there. How’s that going to help us?

hawksruleva on June 17, 2011 at 10:44 AM

Whats the matter with this guy…only the government can save or create a job!!!

PatriotRider on June 17, 2011 at 10:44 AM

“We can do it, we have the technology, but we have an insane government limiting what we can do.”

teke184 on June 17, 2011 at 10:10 AM

Without the red tape, the $6 Million Dollar Man would’ve only cost $2 Million.

hawksruleva on June 17, 2011 at 10:46 AM

The interviewers did a good job of bringing up other concerns being heard around the country, such as the image of “Big Oil” raking in huge profits and doing well while so many Americans are out of work and unable to share in that prosperity.

How many jobs has Nancy Pelosi created while raking in obscene 62% profits in the last year?

Chevron actually hires people and they provide a much needed product people want to buy. What does Pelosi produce?

Oh yeah, she produces millions of people looking for jobs.

Dusty on June 17, 2011 at 10:46 AM

… and expanding the government is the overriding policy.
[0bama] would expand oil company jobs, if the government controlled all the aspects of the production.

right2bright on June 17, 2011 at 10:06 AM

Exactly! Remember hoof-in-mouth-disease Maxine Waters blunder about wanting to nationalize the oil industry?

onlineanalyst on June 17, 2011 at 11:00 AM

2 things Obama says and what are the answers.

1. we have opened more than anytime since 2002

2. They have plenty of areas to explore that are open that they are leaving alone.

tomas on June 17, 2011 at 11:15 AM

A guest on Medved’s radio show yesterday — one of the founders of Home Depot — tore into O’Bonehead as a hater of Big Business, and then identified the single most expensive and worthless regulation affecting American businesses today: Sarbanes-Oxley.

He added that the Doddering-Frankfurter financial bill that is being worked over for specific new regulations is also a disaster.

Jaibones on June 17, 2011 at 11:26 AM

Silly man, oil jobs are for Brazilians, not so they can sell oil TO Americans.

Rebar on June 17, 2011 at 9:52 AM

FIFY

shick on June 17, 2011 at 11:35 AM

That stupid capitalist! Don’t he know that politicians and gub-ment spending is what creates jobs?

Of all the absurdities.

esnap on June 17, 2011 at 11:43 AM

“We can create jobs”

Through consistent degradation of our environment.

ernesto on June 17, 2011 at 11:48 AM

As I have said, and others too…this President, and his admin are actively destroying jobs, and preventing new ones from happening. It’s deliberate, and intentional.

As long as Obama remains President, don’t look for any new jobs in the private sector. Remember…thousands were laid off due to Obama’s policies, and those thousands, if it were to happen, would be called back. Leaving those still looking, in the dust. But I look for no serious recalls, or new jobs while his arse sits in the oval office.

capejasmine on June 17, 2011 at 11:51 AM

Chevron should move away, take their corporate headquarters and find greener pastures. Maybe Canada would like to be the home of Chevron? If for the stockholders that is financially the most advantageous home of Chevron, don’t they have a fiduciary duty to make the move?

slickwillie2001 on June 17, 2011 at 11:56 AM

It’s almost like Obama is afraid of reducing the economic power of the Middle Eastern (and other) oil barons. God forbid that they lose their power over the West.

RBMN on June 17, 2011 at 9:56 AM

Bingo.

disa on June 17, 2011 at 12:32 PM

This president is actively using the EPA and state regulating agencies to halt further oil production and drilling by preventing permits. These permits are required for any new oil well and water injection wells which are required to transfer trapped oil to an existing oil producing well and to prevent subsidence due to the removal of the oil. The agencies in Calif. have not allowed a new water injection permit in the past year, which has slowed down our present oil production, slowing stockholder and company profits, and to the loss in California state tax revenue. Talk about killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.

dthorny on June 17, 2011 at 12:40 PM

Maybe the oil companies should stop running those stupid “we care about alternative energy too” ads like we’re all a bunch of hippies and just start leveling with the people that they needs jobs, they need oil, they don’t need government interference. Why is oil acting like the tobacco companies? Embrace what you sell, stop it with these lame P.C. outreach ads.

Daemonocracy on June 17, 2011 at 12:41 PM

According to the economic genius in the White House, high tech is causing high unemployment. In his bizarro mind atms put bank tellers out of work.

Following that kind of “logic”, oil companies put horse trainers on the unemployment rolls, car companies put buggy whip makers out of business and power companies ruined candle manufacturing.

Obumbler thinks this is a bad thing for the economy.

walkingboss on June 17, 2011 at 12:54 PM

Silly man, oil jobs are for Brazilians, not Americans.

Rebar on June 17, 2011 at 9:52 AM

Oil CEO: We can create jobs.
US CEO: Oh no you can’t.

abilities.

ted c on June 17, 2011 at 9:57 AM

These sum up the situation pretty well. Destruction of our country piece by piece by executive order.

dogsoldier on June 17, 2011 at 1:17 PM

I get SO tired of the phrase ‘Big Oil’. I work for a ‘Big Oil’ company. Me and 80,000 other people. That faceless misnomer is just a way to attack companies without mentioning the thousands of employees affected by the attacks. Disgustng.

gitarfan on June 17, 2011 at 2:51 PM