Keep on plucking that chicken.

That wasn’t the poll question, was it now? So, not only is that your opinion, you are also full of it.

littleguy on June 7, 2011 at 5:32 PM

You should have read him when Fred Thompson was running, he was worse…just very, very obsessed, really strange.
He obsessed over Obama BC also, claiming that the short form BC from Hawaii was even illegal for driving…he gets carried away, not quite “right” if you get my drift.

That is your opinion. 63% do not agree.

csdeven on June 7, 2011 at 3:16 PM

That wasn’t the poll question, was it now? So, not only is that your opinion, you are also full of it.

Amjean on June 7, 2011 at 2:32 PM

Palin is also trying to convey excitement by her choice of words and tone – we live in a great country with a brave beginning. It’s not chance that turned us into a super power, and world leader.

Her speeches are great, she commands a room like few others can.

Brian1972 on June 7, 2011 at 9:15 AM

That is your opinion. 63% do not agree.

“This sinking ship we are on will be drowning in debt”

This is a perfect example. There is no need to use the verb “drowning” when she used the word “sinking” in the context she used it in. It is redundant. Is it a fatal flaw in and of itself? No, but it sounds disjointed, and when you add that to her Paul Revere gaff (and other gaffs), it shows a real lack of communicating skills. This would be disastrous when trying to explain ones position to others.

And she isn’t going to have respected professors running around this country and the world explaining what Sarah REALLY meant.

csdeven on June 7, 2011 at 9:06 AM
She reaches more people if she uses different adjectives.
With the liberal dumbing down of America, many people may
not know the definition of the first word, so Palin adds
another to help the dumbasses out. You should get this.

She looked like she should be in a straight jacket.

Continuing to make excuses for her is not helping the country.

No other politician would be allowed to go on camera looking like a lunatick and have people line up to make excuses for her.

petunia on June 7, 2011 at 12:01 AM
Oh boy, petunia has the double D’s today – delusional and
dumbass

“Everything else changes, but mobs are always the same. A mob is an irrational, childlike, often violent organism that derives its energy from the group. Intoxicated by messianic goals, the promise of instant gratification, and adrenaline-pumping exhortations, mobs create mayhem, chaos, and destruction, leaving a smoldering heap of wreckage for their leaders to climb to power.”

James Carville is warning of imminent civil unrest if the economy doesn’t improve. The Democrat’s understand their base all too well. Viva La Revolution.

I think the attack on Sarah Palin over her answer about Paul Revere, proves Ann Coulter’s point. The Leftist Media appears to be ignorant of the facts of the American Revolution, except in poetry – that captures the sensational aspects of Paul Revere’s Ride.

Ann Coulter on the ‘Liberal Mob’ of the American Left

Video from her appearance on ABC discussing her new book Demonic. Which is fascinating, they added excerpts from her book in the article above. This one is going to be a best seller.

Taste: “Although the left in America is widely recognized as hysterical, unreasonable, and clueless, the “root cause” of these traits has generally been neglected. More than a century ago, Gustave Le Bon perfectly captured the liberal psychological profile in his 1896 book, “The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind.” Le Bon — a French physician, scientist, and social psychologist — was the first to identify the phenomenon of mass psychology. His groundbreaking book “The Crowd” paints a disturbing picture of the behavior of mobs. Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini used his book to learn how to incite a mob. Our liberals could have been Le Bon’s study subjects.”

This cripples the csdevens and confers power to the target. This effect accounts for the continuing rise in power of Sarah Palin and the inverse effect on her enemies.

My daughter got the lesson. Thanks, cs!

Cricket624 on June 7, 2011 at 10:30 AM

Well said!

Brian1972 on June 7, 2011 at 8:39 AM

It wants to be Andrew Sullivan in the worst way, and it is succeeding.

It would try to get away with Trig Trutherism and Letterman’s statutory rape jokes if it knew it could do so without being banned from HA.

csdeven on June 7, 2011 at 9:06 AM

Good grief, put the chew toy down and let your jaws rest a while.

Brian1972 on June 7, 2011 at 9:15 AM

My daughter an I were taking a hike before work this morning and she started doing the csdeven thing to someone whose very existence seems to bug her.

So I warned her about the dangers of obsessive hatred, how the very first thing you lose is the ability to see the landscape around you and to be aware and think critically. Kinda like a fighter pilot who becomes so focused on the target that he loses sense of what is going on around him. Some aviation historians theorize that this effect killed the Red Baron.

A healthy person will put the chew toy down – csdeven and associates cannot. They are beyond the point of no return where their hate fuels their mental being and nothing will cure them short of the destruction of their target.

This cripples the csdevens and confers power to the target. This effect accounts for the continuing rise in power of Sarah Palin and the inverse effect on her enemies.

My daughter got the lesson. Thanks, cs!

littleguy on June 7, 2011 at 1:12 AM

She got it right in the same context that Germany bombed Pearl Harbor. She had all the facts, but botched up the telling of the story.

csdeven on June 7, 2011 at 8:30 AM

So, she “all the facts”, but didn’t assemble them to your liking? That’s your only beef? This is the thing that’s going to devastate her career and ruin the party forever should she be nominated??? You know, it’s morning (again) — it might be time for you to stop and smell to coffee.

Brian1972 on June 7, 2011 at 9:04 AM

There are two tiers. The bomb throwers, they get their narrative, and run with it. They will saturate the 24/7 media cycle with what’s ever sensational. They don’t let facts get in their way – they are selling perception. SEE Obama’s brand won marketing product of the year when he won the Presidency. That’s all the media does “Marketing” I don’t call them news outlets, because they really aren’t reporting, they are selling a point of view. There is another tier the academics, they will usually back up the spin, but when faced with inconvertible facts – they won’t back up the mud slingers. The reason is their reputation. When you read what Dr Allison stated, he wishes that it wouldn’t take Sarah Palin, to get people interested in their country’s history. How can someone like Dr Allison come out and state she’s wrong when he is teaching the same thing Palin stated? He can’t, and he won’t. The LSM went to the academic “Well” hoping to get some support and validation, and their bucket came up empty :) Media puppets don’t care if they look stupid, but academia does, it’s how they make their sheckles. Their reputations are more important to them than scoring cheap political points.

csdeven on June 7, 2011 at 9:06 AM

Good grief, put the chew toy down and let your jaws rest a while.

I do not find a problem with this in any way.

She communicates very well most of the time, no one is perfect however.

Her speeches are great, she commands a room like few others can.
One on one she is fantastic with people, even people who are not predisposed to support her.

You seem to relish ignoring all this in order to dwell on things that are minor in comparison.