Union activity by federal employees on the job increased almost 7% in 2009

posted at 2:27 pm on June 2, 2011 by Ed Morrissey

Barack Obama has brought his community-organizing skills to Washington in one important — and expensive — way, according to a new report from the Office of Personnel Management.  The amount of time on the job spent on official union activities by federal employees increased almost 7% in 2009, costing taxpayers $129 million.  Interestingly, the amount of time spent on “union matters” declined slightly at the same time:

The cost of official time used by federal employees participating in union activities increased nearly 7 percent between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009, according to a new report from the Office of Personnel Management.

The report, the subject of a Wednesday hearing on Capitol Hill, found that federal employees spent nearly 3 million hours of official time on union activities in 2009 at a cost of $129 million to taxpayers, an increase of $8 million from fiscal 2008. The number of official time hours used per bargaining unit employee on union matters during fiscal 2009, however, decreased slightly from fiscal 2008. “Official time costs represented less than two-tenths of 1 percent of the civilian personnel budget for federal civil service bargaining unit employees,” Timothy Curry, deputy associate director of partnership and labor relations at OPM, testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on the Federal Workforce, Postal Service and Labor Policy.

“The dollars spent on official time are minuscule compared to the money saved by having a mechanism in place to resolve disputes in a nonadversarial way and promote cooperative labor-management efforts to increase productivity, improve customer service and reduce the costs of doing business,” National Treasury Employees Union President Colleen Kelley said in submitted testimony.

Miniscule?  One hundred and twenty-nine million dollars doesn’t exactly sound miniscule. Nor does the report indicate that government efficiency improved 7%.  Most taxpayers would scoff at the notion that customer service improved 7%, and as far as reducing the costs of business, did the federal budget decrease or increase from 2008 to 2009, from 2009 to 2010, and from 2010 to 2011?  Which federal departments got reductions in allocations in FY2010 to support Kelley’s contention?

National Journal reports that the largest amount of time was allocated to “general labor management,” a catch-all category that could include just about anything.  The second-largest amount of time was dedicated to dispute resolution, which one would normally assume should be what union officials should be doing on taxpayer time.  “General labor management” sounds an awful lot like “lobbying on government policy,” although thanks to the lax reporting standards at OPM, we will never get much of an accounting for this time use.

That, however, may change.  Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-GA) has a new bill that would limit union activities during work hours.  It should also require more stringent reporting of the types of activities being funded with taxpayer dollars, at least in terms of personnel costs.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Our tax dollars at work…..

UltimateBob on June 2, 2011 at 2:30 PM

It’s easier walking than busing in the liberal demonstrators to the National Mall.

Roy Rogers on June 2, 2011 at 2:32 PM

What do the union trash care, it’s not as if they’re going to be so much as reprimanded over this. The looters get more brazen every day as they assist in the collapse our the nation, soon enough they’ll be doing side jobs by acting as informers against their fellow citizens.

Bishop on June 2, 2011 at 2:32 PM

Go Phil!

Unions to protest at his house/office in 5….4….3…

cmsinaz on June 2, 2011 at 2:33 PM

I’d like to see the GOP produce a bill that forbade government/public employers from withholding union dues automatically from their employee’s paychecks.

Iblis on June 2, 2011 at 2:35 PM

I wonder how many people browse this site (and/or comment) on their boss’s time?

tgharris on June 2, 2011 at 2:35 PM

I wonder how many people browse this site (and/or comment) on their boss’s time?

tgharris on June 2, 2011 at 2:35 PM

Oooh. Conviction is a threadkiller.

samuelrylander on June 2, 2011 at 2:47 PM

No need to thank me…

Seven Percent Solution on June 2, 2011 at 2:55 PM

The fleecing and destruction of America continue. The question is, “Will we survive until November 2012?”

adamsmith on June 2, 2011 at 3:01 PM

The other 93% of the time was spent goofing off

Bevan on June 2, 2011 at 3:33 PM

Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-GA) has a new bill that…

…will be fought against, tooth and nail, by the unions. Can’t have any actual accountability when it comes to unions…

karl9000 on June 2, 2011 at 3:38 PM

The fleecing and destruction of America continue. The question is, “Will we survive until November 2012?”

adamsmith on June 2, 2011 at 3:01 PM

If we’re lucky, and probably not much longer than that, so we’d better be damned sure that we get the Community-Organizer-in-Chief-Liar-Hypocrite-Thug-Marxist out of 1600 Penn Ave at that time, or we’ll really be screwed.

Dopenstrange on June 2, 2011 at 3:39 PM

They are not spending more time on union matters. Issues is the # of employees increased, as did some wage rates. So the $s increased, of course. Kind of a non-story. That being said, it’s a nice pile of dough being wasted.

RW Wacko on June 2, 2011 at 3:56 PM

I wonder how many people browse this site (and/or comment) on their boss’s time?

tgharris on June 2, 2011 at 2:35 PM

Naw, that’s OK…they’re doing all they can to save America and their boss’s ability to make money through Free Enterprise, so it’s justified.

Now, any union members doing that on their boss’s time are thugs to be sure and ought to be fired.

Dr. ZhivBlago on June 2, 2011 at 5:23 PM

I wonder how many people browse this site (and/or comment) on their boss’s time?

tgharris on June 2, 2011 at 2:35 PM

I wonder how many trolls are greedy union thugs, here to put a positive spin on union activities, while being paid by private employers or a government entity?

slickwillie2001 on June 2, 2011 at 6:20 PM

“greedy union thugs”

True. Greed is a hallmark of Marxism.

Dr. ZhivBlago on June 2, 2011 at 7:11 PM

I wonder how many people browse this site (and/or comment) on their boss’s time?

tgharris on June 2, 2011 at 2:35 PM
I wonder how many trolls are greedy union thugs, here to put a positive spin on union activities, while being paid by private employers or a government entity?

slickwillie2001 on June 2, 2011 at 6:20 PM

Well, I don’t know. But if you’ve read my comments, you know I’m a pretty conservative guy politically. And BTW, its my day off.

tgharris on June 2, 2011 at 8:07 PM

tgharris on June 2, 2011 at 2:35 PM

I’m at work right now, as if it’s any of your business. But let’s pretend it is. I am paid as an at-will employee because I produce results for my employer, and my pay/bonuses/incentives are all dependent upon results, upon performance. Something union members wouldn’t understand.

In four years I’ve earned top-tier merit-based pay increases, two promotions and two awards for that performance. And almost daily, I keep an eye on this and two other blogs, including the occasional comment. My superiors are well aware of this, and couldn’t care less, because the job for which they hired me is getting done, and done well. Even so, non-work-related activities in which I engage while on “work” time never approach 7% of my day, that would be stupid. I’d much rather find something else to accomplish or improve for which my employer will happily continue to pay me.

I guarantee you that similar statements to the above can be made by almost all non-union commentors here.

Freelancer on June 2, 2011 at 9:41 PM

tgharris on June 2, 2011 at 2:35 PM
I’m at work right now, as if it’s any of your business. But let’s pretend it is. I am paid as an at-will employee because I produce results for my employer, and my pay/bonuses/incentives are all dependent upon results, upon performance. Something union members wouldn’t understand.

In four years I’ve earned top-tier merit-based pay increases, two promotions and two awards for that performance. And almost daily, I keep an eye on this and two other blogs, including the occasional comment. My superiors are well aware of this, and couldn’t care less, because the job for which they hired me is getting done, and done well. Even so, non-work-related activities in which I engage while on “work” time never approach 7% of my day, that would be stupid. I’d much rather find something else to accomplish or improve for which my employer will happily continue to pay me.

I guarantee you that similar statements to the above can be made by almost all non-union commentors here.

Freelancer on June 2, 2011 at 9:41 PM

And you guarantee this….how? You must know a lot of these people personally. Unless, of course, a non-union member is automatically good, and a union member is automatically bad.

Not that its any of your business…I am a locomotive engineer, and work for a hugely profitable Class One railroad. I have a job that entails tremendous responsibility and requires great skill. I make good money. I’ve got very good benefits. And I’m worth every nickle. And you know what? That good money and great benefit package is the result of my union representation, not any good will on the part of my multi-billion dollar a year employer.

Oh yeah….We’ve voluntarily tied part of our annual compensation to the carrier’s officer bonus program. If the railroad makes more money, so do we. Up to 15% of my annual salary is tied to the bonus program. It gives us a greater interest in our employer’s success. And initially, we had to drag them kicking and screaming into the deal. Go figure.

tgharris on June 2, 2011 at 10:18 PM