Feingold hints at Senate run
posted at 3:42 pm on June 2, 2011 by Ed Morrissey
Will Russ Feingold try to get back into the Senate, now that his longtime colleague Herb Kohl has decided to retire? Or will he inadvertently bigfoot other Democrats and damage prospects for a Democratic hold on the seat? Feingold said that he’s considering all of these questions in the first indication that he has an interest in defending the open Wisconsin seat:
“I am looking at it, but I feel I should take some time to think this through,” said Feingold, the former senator who was defeated last fall for re-election after three terms. “For me the question right now is whether it’s a good idea for me to go back into this sort of life.”
After spending 28 years in the Wisconsin Legislature and U.S. Senate, Feingold called his break from politics “a healthy one for me to be doing something different at this point in my life.”
Feingold said he has been approached by Democrats in Wisconsin about running either for Senate or for governor. Republican Gov. Scott Walker isn’t up for re-election until 2014, though Democrats may try force a recall election next year. The Senate seat will be open because Kohl, a four-term Democrat, plans to retire after 2012. Feingold has had little to say until now about his potential interest in the seat. …
Feingold said Thursday he didn’t want to draw out his decision in a way that slows down other Democratic candidates.
“My goal here is to make sure a Democrat wins this seat” and make sure it’s “somebody who will be a good representative of the progressive tradition in Wisconsin.”
I’m not sure if Feingold noticed it, but the “progressive tradition” took a beating in Wisconsin last November. Feingold lost his own election by seven points to newcomer Ron Johnson, who explicitly ran against Feingold’s progressivism. Republicans took control of the state government by winning control of both chambers in the legislature and the gubernatorial race. The GOP-run government just announced a biennial budget that comes within $32 million of being in balance, the best proposal in over 15 years — and second place went to a Democrat proposal that came in at $1.5 billion in the red.
The Journal-Sentinel reports that Feingold polls well against other Republicans, referring to a PPP poll from last week. The poll has a D+5 sample advantage (37/32), but the exit polls from Wisconsin in the 2010 election showed a near tie, 37/36 Democrats. Feingold had a ten-point advantage in the poll which outstrips the sample advantage, but the more hard-Left Tammy Baldwin is shown as coming within a point of Thompson, which tends to give less confidence in the overall results. Furthermore, the other Republicans in the race have barely had a chance to become known yet.
Does anyone think that a state that narrowly rejected JoAnne Kloppenburg for the Supreme Court just weeks after the turmoil in Madison will hand the Senate seat to Tammy Baldwin or Russ Feingold? Neither do I, and as the dust settles from the PEU reform and the GOP budget gets implemented, the “progressive tradition” in Wisconsin will become even more of a liability.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Yo Feingold. There’s a reason why you lost in 2010. No one wanted you anymore.
mizflame98 on June 2, 2011 at 3:44 PM
“My goal here is to make sure a
DemocratCommunist wins this seat” and make sure it’s “somebody who will be a good representative of theprogressiveCommunist tradition in Wisconsin.”darwin on June 2, 2011 at 3:47 PM
Let. Him. Try.
Apparently the boy needs to learn that his turn is over.
MadisonConservative on June 2, 2011 at 3:47 PM
If Wisconsin’s 10 Electoral Votes don’t go to Obama, he’s going to be in for some trouble.
cpaulus on June 2, 2011 at 3:47 PM
Wants back at the trough.
davidk on June 2, 2011 at 3:49 PM
power beckons…….
search4truth on June 2, 2011 at 3:56 PM
Is there really a difference between Communist and Progressive or Socialist?
[or Parasites]
Chip on June 2, 2011 at 3:57 PM
And hopefully our new tradition of beating the “progressive tradition” continues!
WhoU4 on June 2, 2011 at 3:58 PM
He’s probably getting tired of paying for his own gas…
Seven Percent Solution on June 2, 2011 at 3:59 PM
Did he ever really leave it? It’s only been 5 months. Is he suffering withdrawal symptoms?
jwolf on June 2, 2011 at 3:59 PM
Body counts.
mizflame98 on June 2, 2011 at 4:07 PM
Surely you’re joking, Mr. Finegold!
Emperor Norton on June 2, 2011 at 4:19 PM
Term. Limits.
The man was removed from office less than 18 months ago and he feels entitled to come back?
Once Obama is escorted from the WH in 2011 we have got some serious cleaning up to do.
Seriously.
Key West Reader on June 2, 2011 at 4:21 PM
Bring it on, Feingold!
honsy on June 2, 2011 at 4:24 PM
I like Feingold. He’s an unapologetic communist. But he, along with the communist from Vermont, Bernie Sanders doesn’t pretend to be something other than a communist. I admire their honesty despite disagreeing 99.9% of what they believe.
angryed on June 2, 2011 at 4:42 PM
Liberalism has no place in American society, its collective, anti liberty nature has no foundation in this country, at all, and yet we’ve been forced to suffer its Marxist vagaries for more than a century now.
This country is designed to operate on the principles of individual responsibility, freedom and morality, we are the very anathema to oppression and control that progressive liberalism must use to exist.
Entitlements are some big scary topic but what business does government have in our personal lives? Retirement? That’s part of some government mandate?
Ridiculous. SS, medicare, these are corruption magnets too powerful for politicians to resist, the exact reason personal issues were left out of our Constitution.
The message is, government control of our finances and health is a criminal enterprise, the government has no business being involved, only those who can’t help themselves, who would be destitute and suffering are within the government mandate.
You have to be responsible for yourself, government is too corrupt, too controlling, too incompetent, to be trusted with our money.
Speakup on June 2, 2011 at 4:43 PM
Wisconsin is wide awake. No more elitists like Russell Bin Feingold.
psychocyber on June 2, 2011 at 5:25 PM
Soupy Sales.
slickwillie2001 on June 2, 2011 at 6:16 PM
Losing twice in as many years doesn’t look good on a resume…
Gohawgs on June 3, 2011 at 4:24 AM