Poll shows more people concerned about national debt than national default
posted at 10:40 am on May 25, 2011 by Ed Morrissey
Maybe if media organizations do enough polls on this subject, they might actually believe the consistent results they produce. This time, the Washington Post teams up with Pew to determine that the White House’s scare tactics on default haven’t budged the needle on raising the debt limit. In fact, they can’t even get a majority of their own party to worry more about a default than adding to the national debt:
The debate over whether to raise the legal limit on government borrowing has riveted Americans, with a large majority worried about the potential consequences regardless of whether Congress votes to allow the national debt to keep increasing.
But when pressed to name their biggest concern, nearly half of respondents say they are alarmed by the prospect that the debt could grow beyond its current limit of $14.3 trillion, according to a new Washington Post-Pew Research Center poll. Only 35 percent say they are more worried about the risk of default and economic destabilization if Congress does not raise the debt limit.
Pew breaks down the numbers:
The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press and The Washington Post, conducted May 19-22 among 1,004 adults, finds that by more than two-to-one (60% to 25%), Republicans say their greater concern is that raising the debt limit would lead to higher government spending and make the national debt bigger.
Independents, by 49% to 34%, also say their bigger concern is that raising the debt limit would lead to more spending and more debt. Nearly half of Democrats (48%) say their greater concern is that not raising the debt limit would lead to a government default, but 38% say they are more concerned that raising the debt limit would lead to higher spending.
Only 25% of the respondents say that they have “heard a lot” about the issue, but even that’s bad news for the White House. Among those most engaged, a majority worry more about adding to the national debt (52%), while 37% worry more about a default. The attempt to panic people into hiking the limit on borrowing has failed, even among Democrats.
This puts the White House on the outside of the mainstream on fiscal policy. The consistent poll numbers strengthen the Republican bargaining position for restructuring federal spending in significant ways as a tradeoff for what will be a very unpopular policy choice. As Democrats in the Senate start to approach the 2012 elections, more and more of them will start to demand the same changes as Republicans in order to protect their own seats in what looks like the next GOP wave. If the President keeps demanding debt-ceiling hikes while offering relative pittances for cuts, that wave will turn into a tsunami — again.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Sanford should tell Busch to go back to wherever the hell she came from.
Happy Nomad on May 6, 2013 at 10:46 AM
Good God, could this woman be any more obvious that she’s lying her ass off in order to get elected? Any right-leaning voter who pulls the lever for Sister of Colbert and then acts surprised when she becomes a lapdog for Pelosi once in office deserves to have the crap kicked out of them.
Doughboy on May 6, 2013 at 10:46 AM
She was asked about repealing ObamaCare, not passing new stuff. But then, I doubt she’s read ObamaCare either.
Fenris on May 6, 2013 at 10:48 AM
What a choice! If I lived in S.C., I would vote for Sanford. Every two years you get a chance to find a better Republican.
Cindy Munford on May 6, 2013 at 10:51 AM
Lesser of two evils, I suppose.
Let’s not forget, he was a pretty reliable budget hawk. We don’t need more Al Frankens.
BuckeyeSam on May 6, 2013 at 10:52 AM
And she doesn’t want to talk about anything but winning on May 7th. You’d think a woman who wants to become a member of Congress would be able to speak intelligently about something so invasive as Obamacare. Just calling it problematic doesn’t answer the mail.
Happy Nomad on May 6, 2013 at 10:52 AM
I thought that also, but I think she is talking about repeal legislation. Of course as far as I’m concern Obamacare, with all the fill in the blank stuff, was hypothetical.
Cindy Munford on May 6, 2013 at 10:55 AM
You gotta pass bills to see what’s in it, and you have to wait till she’s elected to see if she’ll vote for any of them. Just mind-boggling. She’d be a reliable vote for Obama and company, and shame on any Republican in that distrcit who’s folled into thinking otherwise. I know Sanford’s no prize, but really.
changer1701 on May 6, 2013 at 10:56 AM
Been burned too many times with polls last time….. President Romney anyone?
sandee on May 6, 2013 at 10:56 AM
If I were charged with First Degree Murder and Mark Sanford a criminal defense lawyer with a 100% acquittal rate, I might not like him but I’d definitely hire him.
Just saying…
Drained Brain on May 6, 2013 at 10:57 AM
Yeah but the Republican establishment finds Sanford so horrible that they pulled their support from him! I guess they like Pelosi and her minions.
Purity!
Vince on May 6, 2013 at 10:59 AM
I wasn’t rooting for Sanford, but I sure as hell am now. This woman can’t win.
Marcus on May 6, 2013 at 10:59 AM
Seems like that’s how all legislation is these days, and likely there will be no legislation that just says “Repealed”. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t call them out on their dereliction of duty.
Fenris on May 6, 2013 at 11:00 AM
I don’t buy that big of a swing in 2 weeks. I think PPP either cooked the earlier poll, cooked the recent one, or both.
I think they are just attempting to tighten the race so they can make sure the D’s are inspired to GOTV.
weaselyone on May 6, 2013 at 11:07 AM
Here’s the problem.
In recent years, the DCCC has proven pretty good (better than the NRCC, anyway) at winning special Congressional elections. Sanford’s operating alone without any help from the nationals in terms of getting the GOP base vote to turnout. If African-American turnout is higher than expected tomorrow (which is the core of the DCCC’s strategy here) Colbert-Busch probably takes this race.
Robert_Paulson on May 6, 2013 at 11:20 AM
Nothing a truckload a “lost votes” from the military and conservative distiricts can’t solve.
Add in some felons, illegal aliens, dead and multiple voters and it’s a “referendum” on the liberalizing of SC.
acyl72 on May 6, 2013 at 11:21 AM
People of SC, please vote for Sanford and then in two years run someone who isnt a dirt bag and vote that person in.
Jack_Burton on May 6, 2013 at 11:27 AM
Elizabeth Colbert Busch is no sweetheart. She was involved in a messy divorce, one that landed her in jail on contempt of court charges in 1988. You can see her mugshot and more in this link.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/05/must-see-elizabeth-colbert-busch-arrested-mug-shot-video/
Commonsense13 on May 6, 2013 at 11:33 AM
What in heaven’s name is wrong with you people in SC? I am in Augusta, just across the river, and you are scaring me!
ultracon on May 6, 2013 at 11:33 AM
Use your brain. All polls are not the same. Still, polls are based on empirical data. If you can’t parse/interpret data sets and outcomes I recommend more schooling.
Capitalist Hog on May 6, 2013 at 11:33 AM
yeah, in this day and age, I can’t imagine not supporting Sanford just to send a message to the gop elite. We need that seat and he’s no worse than a lot of them up there with their personal lives.
The gop eats their own.
hawkdriver on May 6, 2013 at 11:36 AM
Do you walk this Earth with a perpetual stick up your ass? Take a break, you don’t have to be a prick every day of your life.
hawkdriver on May 6, 2013 at 11:37 AM
Do you walk this Earth with a perpetual stick up your ass? Take a break, you don’t have to be a pr!ck every day of your life.
hawkdriver on May 6, 2013 at 11:38 AM
Woo. Raising her voice in court because her ex-husband was trying to get custody of the kids.
stingray9813 on May 6, 2013 at 11:40 AM
PPP means Piss-Poor Polling. They can be accurate when they want to, but they often use push-polling and fake polls to advance their political positions, and you have no way of knowing which is which.
slickwillie2001 on May 6, 2013 at 11:42 AM
As much as the RNC (and many here) may crave an abortion supporting, global warming zealot to beat Sanford on ‘principal’, they lose again. Sanford wins in a walk and will owe them nothing. The RNC, meanwhile will have no such qualms about supporting countless DC lifers who are habitual adulterers, but DON’T marry their girlfriends. Sanford left his wife to marry a woman he fell in love with. That’s a Disney movie compared to what goes on every day in the DC cesspool most congressmen swim in.
AmeriCuda on May 6, 2013 at 11:46 AM
Everyone who thinks she’d be a place-holder for two years then get tossed needs to remember Claire McCaskill. You can’t let a snake in the house and guarantee you can sweep it out later no problem.
Marcus on May 6, 2013 at 11:46 AM
Something Gov. Sanford would probably never dream of bringing up.
Cindy Munford on May 6, 2013 at 11:48 AM
Going back to being his worst nightmare is not a valid option.
Myron Falwell on May 6, 2013 at 11:49 AM
“Can Sanford succeed in his improbable comeback?” is a question that has little or nothing to do with this race. Of course he will win election, as he should in this R+lots district.
But he will never get elected anywhere else though, and hopefully this race has made that fact clear; so his “improbable comeback” is an epithet that will never be written.
The real question is not about some dream of a comeback, it’s will he spend election night with his supporters or will he be out walking the Appalachian trail?
MTF on May 6, 2013 at 11:50 AM
LOL! Sometimes they need to eat their own. I would just suggest that they chew more slowly and consider carefully whether swallowing a less than tasty but harmless offering or embracing two years unfortunate side effects. I was under the impression that this was a conservative district and they nominated him, it doesn’t seem like it should even be a contest but here we are.
Cindy Munford on May 6, 2013 at 11:52 AM
You know that only liberals can get away with that crap. I’m sure the Dems think that Gov. Haley’s Indian heritage is far scarier than Ms. Busch’s Canadian roots. Democrats seem to imply that their own constituency is less that cosmopolitan. You would think that they would get tired of being insulted.
Cindy Munford on May 6, 2013 at 11:57 AM
Sod off Captain Danvers.
There are scenarios wherein I edit, abridge or soften my words out of concern for my audience. As a mentor and frequent guest at the homes of friends, family and employees I am around kids a lot. When kids are in the room their presence is a priority. Aside from that….get bent.
I am very plainly spoken. I don’t insult without acknowledging that I am doing so. I don’t mask my flaws to make my point. True, I go hard…most of the time. Why should I express my thoughts about others with any less scrutiny than I apply to myself?
Thank you for your service. Now, why don’t you do what you’re always making a grand production to others about doing? Ignore me.
Capitalist Hog on May 6, 2013 at 12:04 PM
Wow, you are so cool.
Cindy Munford on May 6, 2013 at 12:10 PM
As one who lives in this district and didn’t vote for Sanford in the primary or the runoff, I will be pulling the lever for him tomorrow. My wife is ready to vote for him as well. It isn’t that we have come around to being pro Sanford so much as being sick of the negative campaign ads being purchased by the Dem/ liberal money pouring into the state. You can’t find a single reason to vote FOR Colbert-Busch…. only reasons NOT to vote for Sanford. We’re frackin’ sick of it!
Storybec on May 6, 2013 at 12:33 PM
I, thankfully, have no dog in that hunt; being in Colorado. Both candidates make a football bat look perfectly functional. And both are detestable. Still and all, a Sanford win, against all odds and with the RNC pulling out AND celebrity support for the Democrat; would have to cause more than a little concern on the Left. If they cannot pull that one out, or have to resort to the normal Democrat vote fraud tactics in a race they should walk away with; means that they are going to have to crank the fraud up to 11 or 12 as a starting point for any putative midterm elections.
Subotai Bahadur on May 6, 2013 at 12:36 PM
If Dems put a lot of money in your area and still lose, I think that’s my definition of a successful stimulus program. I’m praying for y’all.
Cindy Munford on May 6, 2013 at 12:38 PM
Show polls with Democrats up big amounts right up until a week before the election and then report accurate numbers right before the election to protect their professional reputation – Typical PPP manuever.
[That said I'm hoping for a Colbert-Busch win in this meaningless election just to dump all of Sanford's baggage that will just feed the "war on women" meme. Irrelevant stuff like that gets nationalized if Sanford sticks around.]
blammm on May 6, 2013 at 12:43 PM
Another black eye for the republican party.
rubberneck on May 6, 2013 at 12:44 PM
Why does that sound so much like “We need to pass it to see what’s in it?”
This shouldn’t even be close, much less this close. I guess there was no one else who could have gone for the position? That’s sadder than anything else involving this election.
DrAllecon on May 6, 2013 at 12:47 PM
Black eyes are temporary.
Cindy Munford on May 6, 2013 at 12:49 PM
After PPP was proven to be one of the most accurate pollsters in 2012 you are still going for this “the polls are lying” conspiracy crap. The only tomfoolery was the “unskewed” polling sites.
libfreeordie on May 6, 2013 at 2:09 PM
I set the “over/under” for the GOP nominee at 53% BEFORE the primaries and nothing has changed, despite the unions and national Democrats spending over $1 million in attack ads. SC-CD-1 isn’t going to send a union stooge to DC, no matter how much lipstick you put on the pig.
SC incumbents don’t get “primaried” out of office, so all you meddling outsiders shouldn’t get your hopes up. OTOH, in your pathetic ignorance and self-righteous posturing, you may not know about Mark Sanford:
1. Won congressional primary in 1994 vs several establishment Republicans including state party chairman
2. Pledged not to accept PAC $$ and didn’t
3. Pledged to serve no more than three terms and did it
4. Slept on office couch first year in office to save money
5. Shared apartment with other Republican congressmen, never bought house in DC
6. Came home to SC every weekend at own expense
7. Was only Member of Congress who returned office expense money to Treasury every year from 1995-2001 – including Ron Paul
8. Retired, but was talked into running for Governor by grassroots Republicans
9. Won primary vs former Governor, sitting AG & Secretary of State
10. Was mentor and encouraged reformers Haley and Scott to seek higher office
11. Brought pigs to legislature to protest pork
WHO in the GOP has a better record of proposed reform and spending cuts than Sanford? Other than nuts like Paul, no one.
But we thank you interlopers for your interference, we will persevere despite no help countering the unions and Pelosi PACs from outside. We invite you to visit, spend lots of money, and then go home.
We don’t care how you do it up north, mmmkay?
Adjoran on May 6, 2013 at 2:47 PM
I can’t speak for anyone else but I hope he wins. Don’t they get multiple votes up north?
Cindy Munford on May 6, 2013 at 2:56 PM
Dead heat goes to the dem. GOP voters aren’t going to be anxious to head to the polls to vote for this guy. They might say over the phone that they support him, but actually showing up? Nah. Not going to happen.
Rational Thought on May 6, 2013 at 3:32 PM
So Sanford had an affair and lied about it? And THAT is supposed to make him poison to women? As I recall, we had a President with that on his record and women love him. Perhaps Sanford is on to something here. The worse he treats women, the more they love him. This might be something for future Republican candidates to think about. Have an affair and then run for office.
duggersd on May 6, 2013 at 4:31 PM
Shortly after she clarified that she would NOT vote to repal Obama’care’, that she misspoke.
Schadenfreude on May 6, 2013 at 5:13 PM
Bill Clinton has two black eyes? Really?
Schadenfreude on May 6, 2013 at 5:15 PM
Sanford by 3+
SouthernGent on May 6, 2013 at 6:44 PM