Gingrich spokesman: The Beltway “literati” elite are trying to destroy him; Update: Spokesman’s statement going viral; Update: Rush Limbaugh responds

posted at 4:38 pm on May 18, 2011 by Allahpundit

No foolin’. After two and a half days of withering criticism from every corner of conservative media, from talk radio to print publications to right-wing blogs various and sundry, Team Newt’s strategy now is to shrug off the attacks as … typical D.C. insider ruling-class folly.

We’re all RINOs now, my friends.

When asked by The Huffington Post about media coverage this past week, Gingrich press secretary Rick Tyler fired off a response blasting the political and media elite.

“The literati sent out their minions to do their bidding,” Tyler wrote. “Washington cannot tolerate threats from outsiders who might disrupt their comfortable world. The firefight started when the cowardly sensed weakness. They fired timidly at first, then the sheep not wanting to be dropped from the establishment’s cocktail party invite list unloaded their entire clip, firing without taking aim their distortions and falsehoods. Now they are left exposed by their bylines and handles. But surely they had killed him off. This is the way it always worked. A lesser person could not have survived the first few minutes of the onslaught. But out of the billowing smoke and dust of tweets and trivia emerged Gingrich, once again ready to lead those who won’t be intimated by the political elite and are ready to take on the challenges America faces.”

This reads like some sort of generic statement his team prepared months ago to be rolled out as necessary if/when the media zeroed in on him but which they forgot to update for the present circumstances. For starters, there’s no one in the race, Barack Obama included, who’s more of a D.C. insider than Newt. In an alternate reality, in fact, that would be one of his selling points — that he knows how things work in Washington so there’ll be no learning curve if we elect him. Two: The whole reason he’s under fire is because, unlike Ryan, it seems he’s not “ready to take on the challenges America faces.” At a moment when conservatives are desperate to repair the country’s fiscal damage, his big contributions thus far are (a) sneering at Ryan on national TV for engaging in social engineering, much to the delight of Democratic ad-makers, and (b) allegedly telling Republicans on the Hill that they shouldn’t “be messing with entitlements.” When I think “disrupting a comfortable world,” I … don’t think Gingrich. Three: The bit about establishment cocktail parties is so trite — and so guaranteed to offend his conservatives critics who love to toss it at liberals and RINOs like yours truly — that it now almost seems like he’s trying to antagonize conservative media. Who does he think is attacking him because they’re secretly fretting about their inclusion in the Georgetown social scene? Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin? Good lord. (See you at the next Frum shindig, fellas!)

Old theory: Gingrich tweaked Ryan to pander to seniors but misjudged the ferocity of the backlash and then frantically tried to undo his critique. New theory, per his spokesman’s statement: Gingrich actually wants to lose, for reasons unfathomable to me. Anyone care to hazard an explanation? While you ponder, via Mediaite, here he is on Greta last night insisting that he’s now walked his initial criticism back to the point that Democrats would be engaged in falsehood if they merely quoted it. Huh?

Update: The spokesman’s bizarre, tone-deaf rant is now officially the meme du jour among D.C. politicos. The guy’s reduced himself to a laughingstock.

Update: Tomorrow’s show should be good:

Talk show host Rush Limbaugh responded sarcastically this afternoon to a suggestion from Newt Gingrich spokesman Rick Tyler that Gingrich’s critics — Limbaugh prominent among them — are simply members of an elite Beltway cocktail party circuit.

“Actually, I am part of the constitutional, free market, individual liberty circuit,” Limbaugh said in an email to POLITICO.

A good point from Ace: The spokesman’s statement really is a perfect illustration of Rich Lowry’s point that Newt seems incapable of polite disagreement, even with his own side. If you’re against him, only a lambasting will do. Even if it’s ruinous to his electoral prospects.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

snatourm going down in flames on hannity. Says McCain doesn’t understand torture

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 5:12 PM

Wrong! That is not what Santorum said at all, left-wing lap dog.

ladyingray on May 18, 2011 at 7:30 PM

This is simply piling on at this point. It was a few minutes of his life… a life devoted to small government and the Republican party. I wasn’t going to vote for him but this is sick. I don’t know if I want to vote for any of them.

What a bunch of cannibals.

petunia on May 18, 2011 at 7:22 PM

He has done a lot of damage in those few minutes,intentionally, to look like the “in the middle reasonable candidate”.

Btw, this is just a breeze compared to what Palin has endured.

the_nile on May 18, 2011 at 7:30 PM

Is the reference to “gabby” in the parenthetical clear? Either way, her own words indicate that she, like the others, chose to stay out of it, rather than come to Sarah’s defense, which is the point raised by tencole.

GaltBlvnAtty on May 18, 2011 at 6:49 PM

from the link it is clear she was talking about the Congresswoman giffords.

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 7:30 PM

Btw, this is just a breeze compared to what Palin has endured.

the_nile on May 18, 2011 at 7:30 PM

Say what you will about Sarah Palin; I know my criticism of Newton Leroy Gingrich is grounded in fact.

gryphon202 on May 18, 2011 at 7:31 PM

MadisonConservative on May 18, 2011 at 5:44 PM

That’ll teach you to jump the gun before all the weapons are revealed…

…piker…

ladyingray on May 18, 2011 at 7:32 PM

Newt’s the hotel maid….We’re the French dude?

SouthernGent on May 18, 2011 at 7:33 PM

UltimateBob on May 18, 2011 at 5:59 PM

‘Love Shack’!!!!!! :D

ladyingray on May 18, 2011 at 7:34 PM

mike_NC9 on May 18, 2011 at 5:55 PM

Bah humbug. When those of you who pride yourself on being centerists lose elections you don’t blame yourselves but you are quick to blame conservatives for their actions. It wasn’t conservatives that lost it for McCain even though we detested him. It was all the GOP moderates that voted Dem. It wasn’t conservatives that lost it in Nevada it was all those GOP moderates that voted for Reed. It wasn’t conservatives that lost it in Connecticut it was all those GOP moderates that voted for Coons. It wasn’t the conservatives that lost it for Goldwater in ’64 it was all those GOP moderates that voted for LBJ that lost that election and we are still suffering the consequences for that (MEDICARE). So take the log out of your eye before trying to take the splinter out of mine.

chemman on May 18, 2011 at 7:39 PM

Game over.

WisCon on May 18, 2011 at 7:41 PM

Wrong! That is not what Santorum said at all, left-wing lap dog.

ladyingray on May 18, 2011 at 7:30 PM

This idea that we didn’t ask that question while Khalid Shaikh Mohammed was being waterboarded, he doesn’t understand how enhanced interrogation works,” Mr. Santorum said of his former colleague, Mr. McCain. “I mean, you break somebody, and after they’re broken, they become cooperative. And that’s when we got this information.”

Mr. McCain doesn’t understand how “enhanced interrogation” works? Perhaps Mr. Santorum forgot part of Mr. McCain’s biography: He was the subject of nearly five years of captivity and torture at the hands of the North Vietnamese.

Asked about Mr. Santorum’s remarks, Brooke Buchanan, a spokeswoman for Mr. McCain, responded simply: “Who?”

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/17/santorum-challenges-mccain-on-enhanced-interrogation/

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 7:43 PM

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 7:30 PM

You are correct; I should have checked the link myself.
If it is true that Michele Bachmann was one of the people criticised along with Sarah Palin as the cause of the Giffords shooting, then it seems that the statement about her is not so much that she did not speak out in defense of Palin as that she let Palin speak first, which is not so bad?

GaltBlvnAtty on May 18, 2011 at 7:45 PM

That’s fact. Most of what you are hearing now is being driven by ‘hurt feelings’ and jealousy.

JimP on May 18, 2011 at 7:23 PM

i think you forgot the /s tag…

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 7:48 PM

Vouchers provide a way for a tax payer to have input on how to invest their own tax dollars. Vouchers, per say, introduce liberty. Giving a person liberty to choose what is best for themselves works every time it is tried.

Rndguy on May 18, 2011 at 6:34 PM

You made my point. Conservatives are in love with the word “voucher”.

Let’s give the poor a voucher for a house. Oh wait, we already kind of did that.

We give seniors a voucher for living expenses called social security and the lazy a voucher called welfare. It would probably be better to have strict government controlled poor towns where people could go to live if they can’t make it on their own. You could have a druggie town where they could drug themselves to their heart’s content…or until overdose. There would be no crime back in civilization.

Trying to mix government with the free market increases the pain exponentially. The only reason a lot of conservatives like school vouchers is because it’s been contained to areas where they don’t live. We like to imagine the motivated kid getting out of a bad situation but the reality is that the problem children are going to take those vouchers too, and they are going to dumb-down your kid’s school.

Buddahpundit on May 18, 2011 at 7:51 PM

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 7:43 PM

Nope.

ladyingray on May 18, 2011 at 7:56 PM


Team Newt’s strategy now is to shrug off the attacks as … typical D.C. insider ruling-class folly.

Ahem, could NOT have described you better, Newt. If the glitter sticks…

HornetSting on May 18, 2011 at 7:58 PM

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 7:43 PM

There is a difference between enhanced interrogation, and the torture that McCain endured. My husband was subjected to enhanced interrogation as part of his military training, including waterboarding. However, they didn’t break any of his bones or pull out any of his fingernails to get him to talk. It’s more psychological than physical.

I believe Mr. Santorum is right…McCain knows from his own experience what torture is, but he’s wrong to equate it with enhanced interrogation.

kakypat on May 18, 2011 at 8:10 PM

“i think you forgot the /s tag…
unseen on May 18, 2011 at 7:48 PM”

LOL Good wisecrack. Touche.

JimP on May 18, 2011 at 8:11 PM

Dick Morris says Gingrich is brilliant and Ryan’s plan is unpopular with older people. Um, Dick, did you look at the polls? Dummy.

andy85719 on May 18, 2011 at 8:17 PM

Michael Medved spent an entire hour today lambasting Newt and declaring his candidacy RIP, saying he might as well pull out of the race.

MikeknaJ on May 18, 2011 at 8:28 PM

Michael Medved spent an entire hour today lambasting Newt and declaring his candidacy RIP, saying he might as well pull out of the race.

MikeknaJ on May 18, 2011 at 8:28 PM

I think anyone who has endured Michael Medved’s show could declare his conservative bones RIP…I figured, since he licked McCain’s boots, Michael would LOVE Newt.

HornetSting on May 18, 2011 at 8:31 PM

Newt would have been better off launching a campaign in search for Obama’s birth cert. Instead, he attacked one of our leaders with his own brand of beltway elitism, putting a headstone on his already dug political grave. And there was a time when I really liked this man.

Rovin on May 18, 2011 at 8:43 PM

Anyone care to hazard an explanation?

He is not as smart as so many say he is. He is a technocrati who thinks the peasants need his management.

AshleyTKing on May 18, 2011 at 8:47 PM

Buddahpundit on May 18, 2011 at 7:51 PM

I think it is a stretch to call Social Security and welfare as ‘voucher’ programs.

Rndguy on May 18, 2011 at 8:48 PM

Dick Morris says Gingrich is brilliant and Ryan’s plan is unpopular with older people. Um, Dick, did you look at the polls? Dummy.

andy85719 on May 18, 2011 at 8:17 PM

I can’t remember the last time Morris was right about anything.

Rndguy on May 18, 2011 at 8:49 PM

I think anyone who has endured Michael Medved’s show could declare his conservative bones RIP…I figured, since he licked McCain’s boots, Michael would LOVE Newt.

HornetSting on May 18, 2011 at 8:31 PM

Really not true or a fair assessment of the man.

Social issues, can’t think of a thing he’s not conservative on. National security, the same. Fiscal, he’s more moderate on some things but still conservative on most.

And I like his show because he actually engages liberal callers on their viewpoints rather than just insulting them or cutting them off.

MikeknaJ on May 18, 2011 at 9:16 PM

I think anyone who has endured Michael Medved’s show could declare his conservative bones RIP…I figured, since he licked McCain’s boots, Michael would LOVE Newt.

HornetSting on May 18, 2011 at 8:31 PM

As for McCain, his philosophy is that you can criticize a candidate all you like in the primaries but once the nominee is settled it’s best to unite behind them. Which I think most would agree with, and what I did once McCain had it wrapped up (he wasn’t my choice).

MikeknaJ on May 18, 2011 at 9:18 PM

As good a place as any to park this one about the lack of power of the WH press:
http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2011/05/17/veteran-journalists-todays-white-house-reporters-are-too-timid

onlineanalyst on May 18, 2011 at 9:23 PM

kakypat on May 18, 2011 at 8:10 PM

Agreed

Koa on May 18, 2011 at 9:29 PM

There is a difference between enhanced interrogation, and the torture that McCain endured. My husband was subjected to enhanced interrogation as part of his military training, including waterboarding. However, they didn’t break any of his bones or pull out any of his fingernails to get him to talk. It’s more psychological than physical.

I believe Mr. Santorum is right…McCain knows from his own experience what torture is, but he’s wrong to equate it with enhanced interrogation.

kakypat on May 18, 2011 at 8:10 PM

you got a good point but McCain knows all about breaking someone. rick shouldn’t have said that. and believe me i’m not a fan of McCain but the comment was just stupid. I do understand what he is saying but that would be like someone telling Obama he doesn’t know what it means to be black…

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 9:33 PM

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 7:43 PM

Santorum’s point, like Andy McCarthy’s at NRO today, is that the intel does not come during the duress of enhanced interrogation. The questions that are posed then are questions to which the interrogators already know the answers. The point of the technique is to “soften” the prisoner into cooperation of providing real intel. Santorum held a very high-level committee position when he was in the Senate. I trust his answer more than I do McCain’s. McCain has mischaracterized the whole issue, and, as McCarthy points out, McCain selectively argues the issue by ignoring pertinent facts that contradict his point.

onlineanalyst on May 18, 2011 at 9:34 PM

then it seems that the statement about her is not so much that she did not speak out in defense of Palin as that she let Palin speak first, which is not so bad?

GaltBlvnAtty on May 18, 2011 at 7:45 PM

I suppose you could look at it that way or you could look at it as if MB was laying low hopeing it would blow over and did not think to respond unitl after Palin lead on the issue and MB knew she had to finally make a statement about it. We will never know since Palin did respond first and came out with a blistering defens eof conservatives, the Tea party and herself while laying into the blood libel MSM and DNc that tried to turn a a hooror into a political sideshow.

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 9:37 PM

He is not as smart as so many say he is. He is a technocrati who thinks the peasants need his management.

AshleyTKing on May 18, 2011 at 8:47 PM

+1

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 9:39 PM

McCain selectively argues the issue by ignoring pertinent facts that contradict his point.

onlineanalyst on May 18, 2011 at 9:34 PM

I get that. My point and the avg person’s POV is do you really want to tell a person that went through 5 years of torture, who was broken by the North Viet army, that he doesn’t understand interragetion methods?

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 9:41 PM

My point is that McCain continues to spout off on the issue of enhanced interrogation. His mischaracterization must be refuted, or his “truth” becomes the narrative.

onlineanalyst on May 18, 2011 at 9:43 PM

flail fail.

bloghooligan on May 18, 2011 at 9:46 PM

Maybe Sean Hannity will believe this… but no thinking person will.

tetriskid on May 18, 2011 at 4:45 PM

Mike Gallagher is providing cover as well. That is totally disappointing…

ladyingray on May 18, 2011 at 7:26 PM

Disappointing but not unsurprising. Newt did his show and his show needs listeners.

Marcus on May 18, 2011 at 9:47 PM

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 9:37 PM

Yes, and either way it is Palin who led and with strength.

GaltBlvnAtty on May 18, 2011 at 9:49 PM

O/T, NSFW!! Funny as heck!

The Navy Seal Who Killed Osama Bin Laden

ProudPalinFan on May 18, 2011 at 9:49 PM

unseen: We are really not at odds with one another. In fact, you and I tend to see issues with a similar vision.

Nevertheless, check out what Andy McCarthy says about McCain’s mischief on the issue. McCain has weakened elements in interrogators’ toolbox for extracting intel with his insistence on calling enhanced interrogation torture and blurring the issue.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/267506/maverick-malice-andrew-c-mccarthy

McCarthy clarified and expanded on some of his points in the piece at “The Corner” today, as well.

onlineanalyst on May 18, 2011 at 9:49 PM

My point is that McCain continues to spout off on the issue of enhanced interrogation. His mischaracterization must be refuted, or his “truth” becomes the narrative.

onlineanalyst on May 18, 2011 at 9:43 PM

i understand and even agree for the most part. But like Cindy sheehan you do not attack someone that has absolute moral authority on the subject. If fact the best think to do is just ignore them if you can if you can’t you try to use them in your argument to enhance your argument.

Like Sen McCain wouold be the first to tell you tha tAmerica does not even begin to treat their prisoners in any many like he was subjected too. I fully understand Sen McCain fear of a slippery slope on this issue and his belief that AMerica should have a zero tolarance of anything that remotely appears to be torture. However we require our soldiers to go thruough this training and if they can do it I don’t se eany reason why under proper supervisor our intelligence can not use the proceudre to get the information we need. with no physical harm to the prisioner.

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 9:49 PM

onlineanalyst on May 18, 2011 at 9:49 PM

i think we agree on the subject just think there was a better way for rick to bring it up.

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 9:51 PM

I guess Palin took Newt down a couple pegs in her hannity interview form what posters are saying

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 9:52 PM

Maybe Sean Hannity will believe this… but no thinking person will.

tetriskid on May 18, 2011 at 4:45 PM

Mike Gallagher is providing cover as well. That is totally disappointing…

ladyingray on May 18, 2011 at 7:26 PM

Disappointing but not unsurprising. Newt did his show and his show needs listeners.

Marcus on May 18, 2011 at 9:47 PM

I’d like to add here in Dallas we go from Bill Bennett to Mike Gallagher in the mornings, actually losing the last hour of Bennett’s show – and the quality of political discussion goes from blazing hot to tepid at best.

Marcus on May 18, 2011 at 10:00 PM

To me it’s not the MTP interview that is Newt’s biggest problem or should I say, the biggest problem that I have with Newt, it’s this total Cluster Frack of damage control that causes me to have the most concern.

Newt you had a major brain fart and this is how you deal with it? Do you really think that this makes you look presidential? People in leadership positions make mistakes. It’s the nature of the beast.
What you are exhibiting hear isn’t leadership. Picking up the pieces and rallying the tropes to a common cause is what leadership is all about. What this country needs now and more so in the future, is a true leader. Professor Gingrich let me reintroduce you Kipling: IF

P.S. Sarah Palin, fighting like a girl makes you look so NOT like a man.

P. Monk on May 18, 2011 at 10:23 PM

Newt needs no help in his destruction. He is doing a mighty fine job himself.

bayview on May 18, 2011 at 10:53 PM

Newt’s schtick has always been about self-promotion, and the process he forgets or never thinks about promoting true statesmenship, and thus ends up exposing himself for the fraud that he really is.

This couldn’t have happened to a nicer or more deserving person.

Let’s bbut stock in popcorn futures as we watch the whole train of elites wrecking their own caboose.

Mcguyver on May 18, 2011 at 11:04 PM

Are we sure Charlie Sheen didn’t write this?

strictnein on May 18, 2011 at 11:24 PM

We must all bow down to the superior intellect that is Newt. We are all just mental pygmies compared to the Newt. All ideas are worthless unless they originate with the Newt.

What he fails to realize we already have the same type of person in office and are desperately trying to vote the idiot out of office. The last person we want to replace him with is someone who has the same attitude. Go home Newt, you are just embarrassing yourself.

TQM38a on May 18, 2011 at 11:36 PM

This reads like some sort of generic statement his team the Iraqi information minister prepared months ago during the Gulf war to be rolled out as necessary if/when the media zeroed in on him but which they forgot to update for the present circumstances.

Really, the whole thing reads like one of those arabic propaganda statements.

AZfederalist on May 18, 2011 at 11:41 PM

I still remember Newt and the other GOPers back in the ’90s and their Contract With America—they saved this country (or at least bought us more time) from that post-Reagan Libtard surge under the Clintoons.

Not really my pick for prez, and in spite of his flaws, I am grateful for Mr. Gingrich’s ongoing work on behalf of Conservatism.

Dr. ZhivBlago on May 18, 2011 at 11:58 PM

Not really my pick for prez, and in spite of his flaws, I am grateful for Mr. Gingrich’s ongoing work on behalf of Conservatism.

Dr. ZhivBlago on May 18, 2011 at 11:58 PM

Thank you.

I feel so unhappy about the piling on at this point.

But you know most of the people here don’t even consider Gingrich conservative. He is not pure enough.

I don’t get what is happening to this party. There is litmus test after litmus test. And nobody is that pure!

Newt made a real mess of this. In the past he has still done so much good. But there is just no quarter given.

I watched on Hannity tonight and Hannity tried to explain a little but I can’t even remember who he was talking to but they were just not hearing it.

I really don’t think Newt meant it the way it came out. But he never did get it right. And that is the breaks but, still there is so much gloating.

I think he meant if we did the same thing as the Democrats shoving it down people’s throats…we would be social engineering not that Ryan was social engineering… but he never got it said that way.

It is just a shame to see him demonized this way.

And I don’t even like him that much.

petunia on May 19, 2011 at 12:28 AM

But out of the billowing smoke and dust of tweets and trivia emerged Gingrich, once again ready to lead those who won’t be intimated by the political elite and are ready to take on the challenges America faces.”

“intimated”?

Did he mean this word, or meant to use intimidated?

Schadenfreude on May 19, 2011 at 12:38 AM

FULL.

OF.

IT.

xax on May 19, 2011 at 12:46 AM

I don’t get what is happening to this party. There is litmus test after litmus test. And nobody is that pure!

petunia on May 19, 2011 at 12:28 AM

True, and I am no fan of RINOs, but to me that’s the likes of Olympia Snowe, Arlen Specter, Susan Collins and some others who are obvious political opportunists and allow the voters to make the assumption that they have Conservative values merely because they have an R after their names-and do nothing to actually work for Conservative legislation.

Yes, we see that here. In a way it could be a good thing, because that means that Republicans/Conservatives are indeed a “big tent” of ideas. For example, a free enterpriser could be pro-choice, or a Fair Taxer could be an atheist…but at their core, all Conservatives, all Patriots.

We’re letting a minority of grumpy loudmouths and witch hunting bullies alienate potential support in upcoming elections. They pounce on any dissent they run across and “troll” and “paid by Soros/DNC” accusations are flung with rabid vehemence. They’re just as bad as the Libtards spewing their particular band of self-righteousness and intolerance.

On the other hand, the Left is more cohesive these days…they grumble, but in the end they have the talking points down and they keep their eye on the prize-Socialism.

Dr. ZhivBlago on May 19, 2011 at 12:56 AM

that would be like someone telling Obama he doesn’t know what it means to be black…

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 9:33 PM

Uh….. well!?

Vince on May 19, 2011 at 12:58 AM

that would be like someone telling Obama he doesn’t know what it means to be black…

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 9:33 PM

He doesn’t.

Nor does he know what it means to be white.

Schadenfreude on May 19, 2011 at 1:09 AM

Give a hoot – boot the moot Newt!

that would be like someone telling Obama he doesn’t know what it means to be black…

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 9:33 PM

He doesn’t.

Nor does he know what it means to be white.

Schadenfreude on May 19, 2011 at 1:09 AM

True – but he knows what it means to be red.

Adjoran on May 19, 2011 at 1:21 AM

Newt’s will go down as the shortest presidential run in history. Unfortunately with his (current) family in the campaign he can’t use “spend more time with the family” as an out.

curved space on May 19, 2011 at 6:04 AM

Gingrich actually wants to lose, for reasons unfathomable to me. Anyone care to hazard an explanation?

For the third time I’ll posit the improbable, but possible, motive – since the usual experts admit having no rational answer.

He’s gonna make the big switch (probably already has) to the left where (an intelligensia professor) is quite at home. Add in his penchant for disloyalty and presto – Obama gets his unity -his mouthpiece – his hope and change have arrived: black and white, GOP and DEMs united at last.

It would make a devistating situation. I submit that the left, being of vacuous conscience (any means to an end) and so very close (one more election?)to finishing off Old America will love it. If, it means ending personal freedom,God,family,independence, responsibility, private ownership, gun ownership,and our soverignity.

The government will no longer be in the words of Obama “limited” by that constitution thing.

Crazy to believe? Maybe.

Don L on May 19, 2011 at 6:45 AM

I still think Newt sees himself as too smart for the rest of us and he can climb out of any hole…even the ones he digs for himself. Our problem is that we don’t appreciate his brilliance. Hmmm, who else has a similar attitude?

SKYFOX on May 19, 2011 at 6:52 AM

This idiot (Gingrich)just made it that much harder for the other Republican candidates to wage an effective campaign. The last thing the party needs right now is someone who provides ammunition to the oppostion.

zoyclem on May 19, 2011 at 6:53 AM

I don’t get what is happening to this party. There is litmus test after litmus test. And nobody is that pure!

petunia on May 19, 2011 at 12:28 AM

Supporting a healthcare mandate is a pretty benign litmus test.

fossten on May 19, 2011 at 7:30 AM

Pundits are pulling themselves through hoops to try to explain Newt’s bizarre statement about rightwing social engineering. I think it’s simple to explain.

Newt was wounded by the leftwing media attacks back when he was running the House and his wound has never healed. He bends over backwards at times to appear moderate. He mistakenly believes he can befriend the MSM. Forget it, Newt, you can’t They will always be out to get you.

Drop out of the race now. You never had much chance of winning anyway. You are an intelligent conservative voice when you aren’t trying to show that you’re no longer the “rightwing bomb-thrower” the leftwingnuts said you were. Forget them. We need all the “smart bombs” we can get. You are a valuable asset in our arsenal but it’s not your destiny to be the commander-in-chief.

RandyChandler on May 19, 2011 at 7:42 AM

According to Cornell West, Obama doesn’t know what it’s like to be black. But imagine if a white person said that? As for Santorum, I believe he is dead on and McCain gave aid and comfort to democrats who wanted to dismantle our entire counter terrorist program with his equating what he went through with enhanced interrogations. He was hoping that sucking up to the democrat liberal media axis would grease his way to the White House. Another misunderestimation of the liberal media on his part.
What can be said of Newt that hasn’t been said already?
Every time the Republicans now try to save the country’s fiscal policies from democrat ruin, the Newt quote will be trotted out, there go those radical republican social engineers again! This may be ruinous to republicans in 2012 elections, and Newt’s impression of Emily Litella, will be of little effect, the damage has been done and Newt can’t put a bandaid on an amputation and claim it’s all better.

eaglewingz08 on May 19, 2011 at 8:10 AM

It was/is smart of Newt to put distance between himself and the GOP Hiearchy/Estab (of which Limbaugh is part of whether he wants to admit it or not). “BUT!” Newt is going about this-poke-in-the-GOP-eye the wrong way, in my view. He poked them in the wrong eye. Wrong but at least its a good start. He should make no apologies. But he’s getting bad advice from disconnected, clueless advisers. DD

Darvin Dowdy on May 19, 2011 at 9:06 AM

You mean like this how Newt did that to Palin during the blood libel Ricky?

Newt Piles On: Palin Should ‘Be More Careful,’ ‘Think Through What She’s Saying’
http://www.breitbart.tv/newt-piles-on-palin-should-be-more-careful-think-through-what-shes-saying/

Maybe Newt should have been more careful and thought through what he wanted to say.

what comes around goes around ricky/Newt. Screw you all.

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 5:07 PM

Funny; she flipped him like a pancake last night, and deservedly so; and in the meantime while Sean played the kingmaker card with her, she told the whole class how to address the media and stop flippin’ around and backtrack what you say.

If you said it so in the beginning you better stick with it. THAT’s what you really think-no apologies needed.

ProudPalinFan on May 19, 2011 at 9:14 AM

kakypat on May 18, 2011 at 8:10 PM

Agreed

Koa on May 18, 2011 at 9:29 PM

Ditto. McCain lacks the intellectual will to understand enhanced interrogation, maybe understandably. He simply cuts everyone off on this subject and declares the U.S. military to be the descendants of the NorKo communists.

He’s damaged. Retirement is probably a good idea.

Jaibones on May 19, 2011 at 10:34 AM

Ohhhhh, literati – I thought it said illuminati – I had a much different response planned. Never mind.

Queen0fCups on May 19, 2011 at 11:51 AM

Really not true or a fair assessment of the man.

MikeknaJ on May 18, 2011 at 9:16 PM

Agreed. Very smart, very disciplined and thoughtful. Doesn’t just react to everything, but actually thinks about it (unlike me). And seems very carefully dedicated to moving the political discussion to the right and not providing ammunition to the Democrats to discredit conservatives.

Jaibones on May 19, 2011 at 11:57 AM

unseen on May 18, 2011 at 6:07 PM

Heh I can imagine a video montage…

petunia on May 19, 2011 at 12:28 AM

Have you forgotten all the liberal positions Newt adopted?

Here are two that illustrate that he is stupid and liberal:

1. Global Warming
2. Dede Scozzofava (or however it’s spelled)

And there are many more. Endorsing Obamunistcare’s personal mandate put him way over the top.

How the devil can you defend him?

dogsoldier on May 19, 2011 at 12:31 PM

OMG. Newt just keeps digging and digging. He’s on Rush right now with diahrrea of the mouth filibustering Rush from asking any questions. Sad. This is the first time I ever remember hitting the ‘mute’ button while listening to Rush’s show.

olesparkie on May 19, 2011 at 2:14 PM

Newt thinks that “free markets” means government designs choices for people and allows them to choose from among them.

“Senior citizens like to be allowed to choose, they hate to be forced to choose,” is a direct quote.

joe_doufu on May 19, 2011 at 2:26 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3