Tornadoes Absolutely Caused by Global Warming. Or Cooling. Or Something.
posted at 12:40 pm on May 5, 2011 by Jazz Shaw
Earlier this week, buried in all of the hoopla over dead terrorist related news, Jeff Dunetz stumbled across one of the more amusing stories to be seen recently on a not very amusing subject. Both Time Magazine and Newsweek have apparently attributed the huge outbreak of tornadoes this Spring to global warming. That part isn’t a surprise. But the publications have something else in common. As Jeff explains, there was a time when they blamed similar outbreaks on something slightly different. (Original link from Thomas Nelson.)
Inevitably the devastating tornadoes that killed more than 300 people in the US prompted Newsweek to ask: “Is global warming responsible for wild weather?” The answer, it found, is “yes”.
Another Newsweek article cited “the most devastating outbreak of tornadoes ever recorded”, killing “more than 300 people”, as among “the ominous signs that the Earth’s weather patterns have begun to change dramatically”. But that article was published on April 28, 1975, when Newsweek listed the US tornado disaster of 1974 as one of the harbingers of disastrous global cooling, heralding the approach of a new ice age.
From there we move to the pages of the other well known periodical.
But on the other side of NY City, lives the dean of newsweeklies, Time who has has been owned by the same company since it began publishing almost 90 years ago.
In a story about the coming ice age on June 24, 1974 the magazine reported:
Scientists have found other indications of global cooling. For one thing there has been a noticeable expansion of the great belt of dry, high-altitude polar winds — the so-called circumpolar vortex—that sweep from west to east around the top and bottom of the world.
There’s plenty more after that. For those with a darker sense of humor, stop by and check out the rest of this remarkable scientific study.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Cow farts.
John the Libertarian on May 5, 2011 at 12:41 PM
cris-crossing chem trails
DrAllecon on May 5, 2011 at 12:43 PM
The goal of all governments (Ruling classers) over the last 6,000 years?
CONTROL THE MASSES
Once you start with that understanding everything else makes sense.
PappyD61 on May 5, 2011 at 12:44 PM
Bin Laden was killed by Global Warming. How about that one?
Daemonocracy on May 5, 2011 at 12:45 PM
Tornadoes are actually caused by the collision of warm and cold air masses, but why bother to print the truth when a crock of crap serves the narrative.
mchristian on May 5, 2011 at 12:46 PM
wow… I see weather on the horizon.
upinak on May 5, 2011 at 12:49 PM
Dorothy. Track her down and make her tell us how she controls them.
Limerick on May 5, 2011 at 12:50 PM
Tornadoes are absolutely caused by…weather.
single stack on May 5, 2011 at 12:51 PM
No, they are caused by evil witches trying to steal our little dogs.
Blake on May 5, 2011 at 12:51 PM
Can we please get a shot of Al Gore telling his Tennessee folks how Global Warming contributed to the staes disaster and lives lost???
Odie1941 on May 5, 2011 at 12:51 PM
Blah blah blah, raise taxes to save planet.
Why not just say what you mean?
ORconservative on May 5, 2011 at 12:51 PM
I thought they were caused by them pesky flying monkeys!
pilamaye on May 5, 2011 at 12:55 PM
THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING! Hey Mister! Want to buy a magazine?
GarandFan on May 5, 2011 at 12:57 PM
Brian Williams on NBC dutifully blamed mankind for the tornadoes in Alabama.
http://www.bluecollarphilosophy.com/2011/04/brian-williams-blames-man-for-alabama-tornadoes-video.html
Blue Collar Todd on May 5, 2011 at 12:57 PM
Hmmmm. Let me check my Weather Rock!
Is the rock white? No, mean no snow.
Is the rock wet? No, mean no rain.
Is the rock gone? Yes, mean tornado.
pilamaye on May 5, 2011 at 12:57 PM
Here is your clue as to know how Williams is full of it: NBC.
Need I say more?
pilamaye on May 5, 2011 at 12:59 PM
Is anyone actually listening to this Chicken Little nonsense anymore?
NotCoach on May 5, 2011 at 1:01 PM
The fact of the matter is that tornadoes are associated with Spring cold. Not warming. This has been known for decades and is established weather science. And is one reason we can predict them at least in general if not with specificity.
Sometimes I worry that these so-called climatologist are not even meteorologist. And if you don’t have even that degree of training, how can you speak of the inter-relationship between weather and climate?
pat on May 5, 2011 at 1:01 PM
Liberal Pagans are stuck on stupid.
CHALLENGE TO GLOBAL WARMISTS: Try changing the course of a Tornado by attacking it with a huge can of hair spray!!!
(…thus allowing correction of the ‘global warmist’ genetic defect via natural selection…)
landlines on May 5, 2011 at 1:02 PM
My dear mother, God bless her, used to argue the rain showers we sometimes experienced on the Fourth of July were caused by the fire works set off at the local park.
She was ahead of her times-A Global Warmer before there was a Global Warming!
Herb on May 5, 2011 at 1:03 PM
Government controlled climate coming soon!
I’m curious. When the government is given the go ahead to control the climate, will we then stop referring to these events as “natural” disasters?
Saltysam on May 5, 2011 at 1:04 PM
Sooo-what are wildfires caused by…according to the left that is.
annoyinglittletwerp on May 5, 2011 at 1:04 PM
It’s 52 degrees in Chicago, I’m freezing.
Knucklehead on May 5, 2011 at 1:05 PM
Dont’ tell me, let me guess.
A mileage tax will eliminate tornados. Am I right?
Lily on May 5, 2011 at 1:10 PM
Ray Suarez, on PBS, did his damnest for twenty minutes trying to get some NOAA employee to say it was global warming. Every time the tornado was explained as hot/cold air masses colliding Ray would ask something like ‘is there another reason they were so strong’.
Limerick on May 5, 2011 at 1:12 PM
I used to have a dog-eared copy of that Newsweek from 1975. I would show it to members of the global warming religion for a good laugh. Sadly, it was lost in one of my moves.
Vashta.Nerada on May 5, 2011 at 1:14 PM
…and if tornadoes and deaths attributed to them increase, then, logically of course, we will need to increase the tax.
The liberal mind is a natural disaster.
Saltysam on May 5, 2011 at 1:16 PM
Did the NRLB approve your move?
Knucklehead on May 5, 2011 at 1:17 PM
Any weather outside of partly-cloudy, 75-degree days is eveidence of global warming. Nice “science” they got there.
CDeb on May 5, 2011 at 1:17 PM
Cooling. Warming. Doesn’t matter. I’m willing to give up all my freedoms and rights if the government will just save me from it. Oh, and give me a check.
/Dem voter.
John Deaux on May 5, 2011 at 1:21 PM
\
I neglected to ask their permission. Hmmmm, perhaps that helps explain how it went missing?
Vashta.Nerada on May 5, 2011 at 1:22 PM
No, they were caused by a butterfly flapping its’ wings in Japan.
And our all-knowing, all-seeing, all-powerful government scientists track every butterfly, every cow fart, and every cough and sneeze over the entire world, and every flutter of every leaf and the exact temperature and velocity of every cubic inch of air, and they have computer models so accurate and so detailed, and supercomputers so powerful and blindingly fast, that they can precisely determine the cause of all weather phenomenon for the next thousand years.
//liberal fantasy
ZenDraken on May 5, 2011 at 1:23 PM
One of our local meteorologists, James Spann, is an outspoken skeptic of the current climate change hoopla. If you ever want to see a mild mannered, Christian man get spitting mad, try telling him that global warming caused these tornados.
Tornadoes are WEATHER, not climate. We’ve had big outbreaks before (1974 comes to mind) and we’ll have them again. The conditions were just right for this particular outbreak, and none of those conditions by themselves is anything unusual. The unusual part is that they all came together at the same time–and that’s just a fluke of nature.
I wish instead of worrying about climate change, the news people would take a look at how fast and furious the locally-driven disaster relief has come together to meet people’s needs. Long before FEMA arrived, local agencies and individuals had already mobilized to help people affected by the tornadoes. Compare and contrast to Hurricane Katrina–why did one area get help to the afflicted more quickly and efficiently?
That’s worth an investigative news story or two.
bamaconservative on May 5, 2011 at 1:25 PM
More precisely, by the collision of a mass of warm, HUMID air with a mass of cold, DRY air, and the geography of North America makes the southeastern United States particularly vulnerable to tornadoes.
Upper-level winds in middle latitudes are normally out of the west, while storms rotate counterclockwise (seen from above), with winds out of the south to the east of the storm center, and out of the north to the west of the storm center.
Moisture from the Pacific is usually precipitated out during passage over the Rockies, so that air is usually very dry east of the Rockies. But a south wind east of a storm center brings warm, humid air from the Gulf of Mexico northward over fairly flat land, leading to a sharp contrast between warm, humid air and cold, dry air.
The Gulf of Mexico, west of the Florida and Yucatan peninsulas, is a fairly isolated tropical sea, with little water influx from cooler oceans, so it tends to remain very warm, and the air over it remains humid, regardless of climate changes elsewhere in the globe.
If the climate over the Great Plains became warmer, this would tend to REDUCE the temperature contrast with the Gulf of Mexico and thereby reduce the frequency and severity of tornadoes.
If the climate over the Great Plains became cooler, this would INCREASE the temperature contrast with the Gulf of Mexico and INCREASE the severity of tornadoes. Severe tornadoes are usually a sign of COOLING, not warming, of the climate over the Great Plains.
Steve Z on May 5, 2011 at 1:34 PM
How much is Exxon paying you, you Fascist!
NotCoach on May 5, 2011 at 1:42 PM
I believe Jazz Shaw’s joke from a few days ago is appropriate here. Memo to Time and Newsweek:
Weather is here. Wish you were nice.
jwolf on May 5, 2011 at 1:43 PM
Zero. Although if we had Drill, Baby, President Palin instead of Brazil, Baby, Barry ‘Bama, I might get a job with Exxon…
Steve Z on May 5, 2011 at 1:47 PM
There’s actually a lot more to it than that. Clashing airmasses are responsible for convection (lift). When cold air is aloft, and warm air is at the surface, instability is created, as the warm air wants to rise against the sinking colder air, etc…. That alone doesn’t necessarily create the local conditions necessary for tornado formation.
In this case, the key to the long lasting, long track tornados was the amount of sheer in the atmosphere. Winds were all over the place as you went up. The sheer actually extended all the way into Michigan, but there was insufficient instability further north to set off a lot of storms. In 1974, the system was positioned further to the North.
cktheman on May 5, 2011 at 1:51 PM
I’m old enough to remember the global cooling fanfare of the 70′s. I remember the Weekly Reader at school had a cover page stating that the next ice age was coming. Man I wish I could find that. Someone out there must have a stash of Weekly Readers from when they were in grade school, right?
vcferlita on May 5, 2011 at 2:18 PM
The world was a great place back in the Feudal bays when only the few people of noble blood were able to live the life of kings. The weren’t enough people living well enough to affect the planet so as to threaten the wonderful lives of the chosen few.
Now too many people of insufficient breeding are trying to live lives to which they were never intended to by the very nature of their birth status and they are threatening the lives of the truly worthy by their efforts to live comfortable lives instead of the abject slavery to which they were born.
This must be stopped and people forced back to their places in life – blue bloods to lives of ease and leisure and peasants to lives of service, suffering, poverty, and an early death.
Then the Earth will return to the paradise it once was – all will be as it should be.
babylonandon on May 5, 2011 at 2:53 PM
Here in the Northern Great Plains we are experiencing cooler, wetter weather, & so in turn we expect more violent storms.
See as a geologist/science teacher, I get this.
I guess I can see why John Q. Ignorant Public may be confused on some of the details, but it’s still frustrating when people cannot think one iota for themselves about anything.
Bcs my cowboy-ranching husband gets it, & I don’t even need to tell him that.
He’s used his brain & experience outside from his whole life on the Plains to figure it out all by his lonesome.
Badger40 on May 5, 2011 at 3:43 PM
LMAO!
Damned peasants! They must be oppressed!
Badger40 on May 5, 2011 at 3:44 PM
Put up or shut up. If GW is scientific fact and killing people–contribute to fighting it and stop chopping down Mother Earth’s forests to print your leftist rags with. Hypocrites!
chickasaw42 on May 5, 2011 at 4:29 PM
Man’s hubris runs amok while the world continues to regulate its temperature according to the way it was constructed, totally unnoticed by — or uninvolved with — mankind.
Tennman on May 5, 2011 at 5:08 PM
OK, OK, enough already. I cause global warming. There, satisfied?
Send in a SEAL team stat. I’ll even have my inheritors (mostly debt, but still) publish the photos. And BarryO can, then can’t give a speech at Ground Roberto(17).
Oh, and don’t forget the political fundraiser afterwards.
Robert17 on May 5, 2011 at 7:36 PM