Abbas laments the failure of Hope & Change
posted at 2:15 pm on April 25, 2011 by Ed Morrissey
The promise of Hope and Change has left a lot of Americans disillusioned, but they’re not alone. An angry Mahmoud Abbas tells Newsweek that Barack Obama led the Palestinian Authority president on, and then abandoned him on the issue of Israeli settlements in Jerusalem. In fact, Abbas says, it was Obama’s idea to push for a total ban on settlements in the first place (via Hot Air reader AR):
Abbas is about as affable as politicians come—even hawkish Israelis like Ariel Sharon have said so. But occasionally, he can deliver a shot of scathing criticism, usually followed by a grandfatherly smile. A week earlier, he told me bluntly that Obama had led him on, and then let him down by failing to keep pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for a moratorium on settlement building in the West Bank last year. “It was Obama who suggested a full settlement freeze,” Abbas explained. “I said OK, I accept. We both went up the tree. After that, he came down with a ladder and he removed the ladder and said to me, jump. Three times he did it.” Abbas also criticized the mediation efforts of Obama’s special envoy, George Mitchell, who has shuttled between Israelis and Palestinians for more than two years. “Every visit by Mitchell, we talked to him and gave him some ideas. At the end we discovered that he didn’t convey any of these ideas to the Israelis. What does it mean?”
What does it mean? It means that the Smart Power administration had no idea how to sell that idea to the Israelis after concocting it with Abbas. Mitchell, who has worked in the region for years, had to have known that the demand would be a total non-starter, especially with Netanyahu as Prime Minister, but realistically with any Israeli in the top spot. That may be why Abbas never tried playing that card himself until Obama played it for him.
This should raise some serious questions about the intentions of the Obama administration in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. The collusion between Obama and Abbas on a poison pill demand is either an incompetent attempt to impose Obama’s own views on the conflict or a serious attempt to derail Benjamin Netanyahu. The White House made its displeasure with Netanyahu well known over the last two years. This looks like an attempt to push Netanyahu out of office by pinning him with the failure of the latest iteration of peace talks.
I’d buy either explanation, actually. This administration has managed to damage one of our key relationships in the region while further alienating the Palestinians, which is no small feat. They’re either brilliantly inept or ineptly malicious. There doesn’t appear to be a third option.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Obama has proven that he is a multi-tasker…
right2bright on April 25, 2011 at 2:19 PM
YES, there is a 3rd option, they are both.
Schadenfreude on April 25, 2011 at 2:21 PM
How does it feel the get the bus abbas? You would ever trust bho for on second? If you do forget it, bho is all about bho, period. bho will use anyone anytime.
L
letget on April 25, 2011 at 2:23 PM
Obama’s foreign policy in the middle east is entirely anti-Israeli. Which is not surprising given that Progressives in general are anti-Israeli.
Even miniscule hope for peace in the region has been set back decades by this president.
BKeyser on April 25, 2011 at 2:24 PM
It also means that Abbas is an idiot for not thinking through it himself.
mankai on April 25, 2011 at 2:24 PM
You need to buy a telephone?
Yes it should but it isn’t just Obama’s intentions about Netanyahu, but his acceptance regarding the existence of the state of Israel that we should be wondering about.
sharrukin on April 25, 2011 at 2:26 PM
Of course the freeze was little Bammie’s initiative, there were stories at the time about how shocked the ‘palestinians’ were when Bammie threw it out there on his own.
Truly though, it was probably the loony Samantha Power or the nutball Susan Rice that fed little Bammie the idea. He’s not smart enough to understand what’s going on over there and come up with that on his own.
slickwillie2001 on April 25, 2011 at 2:28 PM
…”Mama always said stupid is as stupid does” – Gump
PatriotPete on April 25, 2011 at 2:29 PM
How many more months?
I hope Republicans can avoid a really rankous Primary.
I don’t care who gets the credit for beating Obama. Just do it.
petunia on April 25, 2011 at 2:29 PM
Could the fact that the Goldstone Report has been apologized for have any bearing on Obama? I doubt it myself but Mr. Goldstones public apology changes everything.
fourdeucer on April 25, 2011 at 2:30 PM
There’s a difference????? What would that be?
sicoit on April 25, 2011 at 2:31 PM
or the Fourth option is They’re just plain brilliant…
/
PatriotRider on April 25, 2011 at 2:33 PM
Well, when your boss thinks that the difference between past failures and today is that you’ve got him, sometime you just shut up and let the fool learn the hard way.
rbj on April 25, 2011 at 2:37 PM
This. And they should all use the same slogan….
Barack Obama is “either brilliantly inept or ineptly malicious.”
redwhiteblue on April 25, 2011 at 2:48 PM
They’re brilliantly inept. Ineptness is camouflage for their maliciousness. The probable overall results from Obama’s actions both at home and abroad isn’t something anyone would want to say was their intent, but in fact it is.
cartooner on April 25, 2011 at 2:52 PM
Maliciously inept seems to be a very good descriptor here.
hip shot on April 25, 2011 at 2:56 PM
Far beyond inept and malicious, with all the brilliance of finely polished mud-like substance.
NeighborhoodCatLady on April 25, 2011 at 2:57 PM
That’s what’s not understood about little Bammie. He’s both incompetent because of his stupidity, and malicious because of his political beliefs.
That’s actually a very common problem. In truth, how can a Marxist be intelligent?
Intelligence and a belief in Marxism have to be mutually exclusive.
slickwillie2001 on April 25, 2011 at 2:59 PM
At this point, if Donald Duck won the GOP primary, I’d vote for him in place of the O.
hachiban on April 25, 2011 at 3:01 PM
As bad as Obama has been, can you imagine what the Middle East would look like if Livni had become PM?
myrenovations on April 25, 2011 at 3:05 PM
That pretty much is what he’s done to the entire world. Anyone who follows this tool up a tree deserves to jump. And the harder the fall, the better.
Big John on April 25, 2011 at 3:05 PM
I could buy that. This does have the real of Powers, vile Jew-hating hosebag that she is.
Vyce on April 25, 2011 at 3:07 PM
Donald doesn’t wear pants. There’s the so-con vote right out the window.
Vyce on April 25, 2011 at 3:09 PM
It would appear that “The Smartest Man in the World” is brilliantly inept.
“Unprecedented” even “Historic”.
GarandFan on April 25, 2011 at 3:15 PM
So, what he’s saying, is that Obama is an empty suit?
Shiny_Tiara on April 25, 2011 at 3:18 PM
Out of heft
Schadenfreude on April 25, 2011 at 3:30 PM
The Armani is empty.
Schadenfreude on April 25, 2011 at 3:32 PM
I was thinking Elmer Fudd; but I can go with Donald Duck!
Mutnodjmet on April 25, 2011 at 4:02 PM
Huckabee: quack-quack.
slickwillie2001 on April 25, 2011 at 4:06 PM
It’s not like he has scammed anyone else./
docflash on April 25, 2011 at 4:38 PM
So what was the settlement freeze in Bush’s Road Map all about Ed? You know very well that this was not a new Obama policy but a continuation of an older US policy.
lexhamfox on April 25, 2011 at 7:27 PM
Hummmnnn-Waterloo–Abbas.
dragondrop on April 25, 2011 at 9:16 PM