New jobless claims spike upward …
posted at 9:30 am on April 14, 2011 by Ed Morrissey
It’s been a while since we’ve taken a look at the weekly jobless claims report. Throughout 2010, the figure stayed in a narrow range centered on 450,000 new claims per week, but the last few months, the range dropped down to about the 380,000 level. The burst of hiring at the end of the year seemed to have move the needle a little, although the level of claims still stayed significantly above the consensus break-even range of 300K-325K.
This week, though, new jobless claims rose sharply back into the 400K range (via Steve Eggleston):
In the week ending April 9, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 412,000, an increase of 27,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 385,000. The 4-week moving average was 395,750, an increase of 5,500 from the previous week’s revised average of 390,250.
The advance seasonally adjusted insured unemployment rate was 2.9 percent for the week ending April 2, a decrease of 0.1 percentage point from the prior week’s unrevised rate of 3.0 percent.
The advance number for seasonally adjusted insured unemployment during the week ending April 2 was 3,680,000, a decrease of 58,000 from the preceding week’s revised level of 3,738,000. The 4-week moving average was 3,728,750, a decrease of 20,750 from the preceding week’s revised average of 3,749,500.
Reuters has ample reason to break out its favorite economic-indicator word, and they use it in both the lead and the headline:
New U.S. claims for unemployment benefits unexpectedly rose last week, bouncing back above the key 400,000 level, a government report showed on Thursday.
Initial claims for state unemployment benefits rose 27,000 to a seasonally adjusted 412,000, the Labor Department said.
Economists polled by Reuters had forecast claims slipping to 380,000. The prior week’s figure was revised up to 385,000 from the previously reported 382,000.
Frankly, I’d call this “unexpected” too. There hasn’t been any obvious indicators of sudden weakening in the job market, although the increased costs of energy might dampen job creation in the long run. Consumer spending increased in March, up 0.6% when gas prices and auto sales are discarded. There is little reason to believe that the annualized GDP number for 2011Q1 will have dropped in comparison to 2010Q4′s 3.1%.
So where did the jump come? I’m tempted to call this a statistical anomaly, at least until we take a look at a few more weeks’ data. We saw temporary spikes in last year’s otherwise-predictable level of weekly jobless claims, too On a few occasions, the number spiked above 500,000, but it didn’t stay at that level. The spike here is mainly notable for crossing the 400K line as opposed to the value of the increase itself (27K).
If this does signal a trend, though, and we return to the 400K range for weekly claims, expect both sides to hammer the Keynesian lines. Democrats will blame it on curtailing government “investment” and Republicans will blame it on a lack of confidence in current economic policy. Those attack lines will be anything but “unexpected.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
***************Shovel Ready*************************(sarc).
canopfor on April 14, 2011 at 9:34 AM
I sure didn’t see this coming. / / / /
Paul-Cincy on April 14, 2011 at 9:34 AM
Unexpected e1evnty!1! Count it
AH_C on April 14, 2011 at 9:35 AM
The poor redhead has been in and out of work so often she’s starting to resemble a revolving door.
Bishop on April 14, 2011 at 9:36 AM
It’s been a while since we’ve seen that redhead. Did she get laid off again?
Doughboy on April 14, 2011 at 9:38 AM
RECOVERY!
catmman on April 14, 2011 at 9:39 AM
Reuters uses “unexpectedly”? I didn’t expect that.
rbj on April 14, 2011 at 9:39 AM
She looks as thrilled as the rest of us about Scooter’s Economic Mess.
kingsjester on April 14, 2011 at 9:41 AM
Count it!
/crr6
mankai on April 14, 2011 at 9:41 AM
I thought that was Debbie Wasserman-Schultz’s twin sister.
mizflame98 on April 14, 2011 at 9:42 AM
Spin away lsm…
cmsinaz on April 14, 2011 at 9:42 AM
I think the redhead is a 99 weeker. She might be applying for her upteenth extension of benefits.
I saw a chart that layered the gubmint spending over a histogram chart of employment rats since 2000. We have 8 million FEWER people working now than in 2008, according to that chart. I have done a lot of website browsing over the past few hours so I don’t remember where I saw that chart.
So if they counted all 8 million fewer working people against the unemployment number, I wonder what the real rate is. They have stopped officially counting those who fall off that 99th week of benefits and who still are not working.
karenhasfreedom on April 14, 2011 at 9:44 AM
This is not fooling anybody. The redhead can’t hold down a job; she keeps getting fired for talking on the phone all the time.
apostic on April 14, 2011 at 9:45 AM
WTF, one unemployment claim at a time.
GrannyDee on April 14, 2011 at 9:46 AM
Obama has done nothing to add jobs. So, this will seem like good times in a few years.
faraway on April 14, 2011 at 9:46 AM
It is silly to take a few weeks as a trend. Two or three months is more appropriate.
burt on April 14, 2011 at 9:46 AM
In other news, Spanish Reformers didn’t expect the Inquisition.
Seriously, those of us who are seeing the double-dip recession pattern develop did expect this to happen sooner rather than later.
steveegg on April 14, 2011 at 9:49 AM
Sergeant Schultz would have given her a government job, like counting paper clips for $175,000 a year.
Bishop on April 14, 2011 at 9:51 AM
Hey, Ed, do you actually believe the 380k number after all the other numeric gymnastics Failbama’s team have employed?
You do realize that it isn’t an actual hard count? It’s done by survey. Some time later they claim to correct and adjust the survey value with actual data supplied by the states.
Please think that through a moment. What could go wrong with a system like that?
dogsoldier on April 14, 2011 at 9:52 AM
I can’t believe that anyone would use the word “unexpected” when describing this economy and what Obama and the Dems have done to exacerbate an already tenuous situation. Why, Obama told us yesterday that, if he’s left in charge, taxes WILL go up for some of us (never mind the fact that it will have no real effect on the deficit – all in the interest of furthering his “fairness doctrine). Wow, nothing makes me want to expand into a new market, replace outdated equipment or generally, you know, grow my business than a promise from the POTUS that he’ll be taking a larger chunk of my AGI in 2013.
The fact is that Obama and his cronies have made it more expensive to operate our businesses, they continue to kill demand for our services by allowing Benny to print in perpetuity thereby imposing an implicit tax (and hence reducing disposable income) on anyone that buys pretty much anything. It simply doesn’t pay to succeed in an environment like we have right now – which is why you still see so many businesses unwilling to hire. They’ve (me included) have cut back to a point just above what it takes to service our current client load and that’s it – we assume (best case) like many others that sales will remain flat, so you only hire when someone quits.
What I’d say is unexpected is that these claims aren’t higher in light of everything that they’ve done. But then again, the year is still young….
volnation on April 14, 2011 at 9:54 AM
Sing it!
Rovin on April 14, 2011 at 9:56 AM
All by design…all by design.
NJ Red on April 14, 2011 at 9:57 AM
I don’t know anyone who is/was/now hiring (except for extra xmas help)….haven’t since obama won the election. Did everyone go ‘galt’?
I witnessed all the lay-offs though and funny thing..those who voted for obama went first.
tinkerthinker on April 14, 2011 at 10:00 AM
Ed,
What part of $4.00/gal gas do you not understand.
The $4.00/gal gas was the cuase of the Grea recession in 2008. With the economy in worse shape we didn’t need to hit $4.00/gal again. $3.50/gal was the tipping point. While economists are saying $5.00/gal will be the tipping point they are missing the forest for the trees.
Right now the economy is rushing into another recession all due to the price of gasoline. Of course the dems will blame it on the GOp cuts in the budget.
Why do you think Obama gave that speech yesterday. And the GOp is stupid enough not to know what is going on.
unseen on April 14, 2011 at 10:00 AM
fixored….
apostic on April 14, 2011 at 10:01 AM
Is the 15% or so real unemployment rate also a statistical anomaly?
andycanuck on April 14, 2011 at 10:05 AM
Ed, 1st quarter GDP estimates have been coming in at below 2%.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/q1-gdp-estimates-slashed-post-trade-data-2011-04-12
Mark1971 on April 14, 2011 at 10:06 AM
What’s interesting about this is the time frame. Even though it’s seasonally adjusted, there is no traditional reason for a downward trend of employment right now. Seasonal retailers have already laid off temporary help from Christmas. But farm, construction, and summer jobs should be starting to hire now. So this statistic means that people are losing work that should be year round. It would be even more interesting to see the exact areas of current job loss.
Deanna on April 14, 2011 at 10:08 AM
..nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!!
The War Planner on April 14, 2011 at 10:20 AM
The jobless people acted stupidly…
Khun Joe on April 14, 2011 at 10:20 AM
It’s never “unexpected” when government spends more than it takes in. The private capital market is being drained by all the public sector borrowing. Real jobs that produce useful output are not being generated. Keynesian economics is like cutting an artery and calling it a surplus in blood.
scrubjay on April 14, 2011 at 10:24 AM
How do you solve a problem like Obama?
portlandon on April 14, 2011 at 10:34 AM
Maybe if Red would get off the dang cell phone, she’d get hired!
Dingbat63 on April 14, 2011 at 10:40 AM
Contrary to Deanna, I believe that the spike could be caused by seasonality. In ordinary Aprils, construction employment jumps. The seasonal adjustment removes the jump. This year construction employment is moribund both on the commercial and residential side. The failure to jump creates the downtrend.
I don’t think this is a statistical anomaly — it is a genuine bad signal. Presumably, winter months showed less unemployment than was real because of the seasonal adjustment. It is now being recognized.
levi from queens on April 14, 2011 at 10:46 AM
Oh, I don’t know…. but perhaps they were
LYING….
for the election, and have been trying to fudge it all back to reality before they get exposed? (I’m sorry, I mean “REVISE”)
50/50 I’d say…
jibe baby, jibe!
golfmann on April 14, 2011 at 10:59 AM
One week does not a trend make. However, I believe we are beginning to see the inevitable flow-through of inflationary pressure that began to build last summer. If I am right, we have Uncle Bernanke to thank for this report and the ones soon to follow.
flyfisher on April 14, 2011 at 11:03 AM
Can’t figure out where these job losses are coming from?
Let me show you.
Packaged Spaghetti Prices:
November 2008 – .32 cents per LB package.
May 2009 – .67 cents per LB package .
November 2009 – package reduced to 12 oz. .99 cents per package
May 2010 – 1.19 cents per package
November 2011 – package reduced to 10 oz. $1.49 per package
May 2011 – price will be 1.99 per 10 oz. package.
This is not the price of EVERY spaghetti pasta out there, but is the pricing for a product produced in the USA from a company who has been producing for 30 years and which focuses their business on the trade rather than consumer advertising. Name brands with heavy advertising budgets are rising higher.
Now food and energy is exempted from the government’s inflation figures, but the above is a clear example of what is happening out there.
Rising gas prices are a pain…one we all feel and can see.
Rising food prices we feel, but they are harder to see. Plus everyone with a microphone is ignoring the severity of our beginning food crisis.
Jason Coleman on April 14, 2011 at 11:04 AM
Interviewer: “We’re looking for a few good qualified people who can work as janitorial, custodial and maintenance assistants. Could you tell me a little about your prior job experience-if you have any.”
Job Applicant: “errrr, (cough, hem, haw) I used to be President of the United States. err. aahhh (stutter) a a actually I helped in the unemployment rate–when I became unemployed, 5 million Americans became employed…”
Interviewer: “I’m sorry to interrupt but positions for handling trash and garbage and pushing brooms is necessarily competitive and you may have noticed that I did emphasize QUALIFIED in the job description. In any event may you have a nice day and makes sure the swinging door doesn’t hit you on the way out.”
MaiDee on April 14, 2011 at 11:16 AM
+1
But, it’s not all gloom and doom. Our #1 product, bullshit, is thriving.
flyfisher on April 14, 2011 at 11:16 AM
Not everyone. Beck and Palin have been calling a clear warnign signal about them.
unseen on April 14, 2011 at 11:25 AM
9.2% unemployment, plus “real” inflation around 10% puts us back into Carter-era misery indexes.
miseryindex.us
On a personal note, I just made the transition from volunteer work to paid work! I’m doing what I did before, just for pay.
Daisy_WI on April 14, 2011 at 11:42 AM
Full bumper multi-stickers for sale…
-
“Did you trade in your SUV… and your job… for
Hope andChange?”-
“0bama… No Hope… Lots of Change… All Bad”
-
“$??,000,000,000,000… and printing… Welcome to Socialism”
-
“Give Obama 4 More… Because the Dollar… Isn’t Worthless Yet”
-
And last but not least…
-
“Sure… Bush Made Mistakes… Obama’s Doing it On Purpose”
-
RalphyBoy on April 14, 2011 at 11:43 AM
If inflation becomes a problem, they’ll just change the way in which they measure it: Inflation Actually Near 10% Using Older Measure
Fear not, our undocumented president is on the job.
slickwillie2001 on April 14, 2011 at 11:47 AM
It will hasten job destruction. There’s no way things don’t go downhill with $4 gasoline prices.
Gird your loins.
forest on April 14, 2011 at 11:58 AM
Oh no! More bad news!
Redhead’s out of work again…
Unexpectedly!
Haiku Guy on April 14, 2011 at 12:02 PM
Why this is “unexpected.”
Bevan on April 14, 2011 at 12:09 PM
Okay… So the 5 people that I had to lay off rather than hire as regulars a while back… well it looks like we’ll be bringing back 2 or 3 of them soon… Most likely as temps again instead of regulars.
-
The seesaw goes up and down, sometimes not up so much as down… lately.
-
RalphyBoy on April 14, 2011 at 12:14 PM
I take ALL numbers published by this admin with mountains of salt.
ornery_independent on April 14, 2011 at 12:44 PM
WTF indeed.
crazy_legs on April 14, 2011 at 12:48 PM
Well, there you go. It can’t be anything to worry about, because Beck is a nutcase and Palin is just so stupid. /s
pannw on April 14, 2011 at 12:55 PM
pannw on April 14, 2011 at 12:55 PM
funny how that works out isn’t it….
unseen on April 14, 2011 at 1:02 PM
It really would be if it wasn’t so frustrating, dangerous and scary.
pannw on April 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM
It’s interesting reading Ed’s words lately. It’s as if he’s purposefully aiming down the middle and not writing for a conservative blog or something.
Too funny.
Um, $4 gas. Hello! I own a small business. it’s killing us on procurement, shipping, and energy.
kevinkristy on April 14, 2011 at 1:39 PM
Orrrr maybe some of us are jumping off the deep end and feel comforted that other people are doing it too.
What I have noticed is the more mild and sane voices at Hot Air have been shouted out and the only ones left get more and more shrill.
I think Ed is staying pretty even.
petunia on April 14, 2011 at 1:54 PM
True, but that’s getting old.
There are folks out there making more and more money all the time. They keep printing the stuff, and keep taxing us and it’s going somewhere.
But not into creating American jobs.
And as a country we’re at each other’s throats…making things any better?
Dr. ZhivBlago on April 14, 2011 at 4:31 PM
If he doesn’t get primaried, the ‘rats really are as stupid as I think.
Lanceman on April 14, 2011 at 4:39 PM
The democratics problem is that the narrative of racism that they have carefully built to protect little Bammie can and will be used against a democratic party challenger in an instant. It already happened to Hillary. They are stuck with him.
slickwillie2001 on April 14, 2011 at 5:28 PM
I considered that after I hit ‘submit comment’.
Lanceman on April 14, 2011 at 6:29 PM