Rand Paul at congressional hearing: Let me drop an Ayn Rand truth bomb on you
posted at 9:00 pm on April 12, 2011 by Allahpundit
Not as colorful as last month’s soliloquy on toilets, but still guaranteed to inspire high fives among libertarian C-SPAN junkies everywhere. Enjoy this, because his next big speech in the Senate is likely to be more controversial: He told Sean Hannity this afternoon that he might filibuster Boehner’s budget bill on Thursday when it comes up for a vote, and by “filibuster” I think he’s referring to the old-fashioned talk-til-you-drop version. He surely won’t have 41 votes to block the deal, assuming it even reaches the Senate, so the goal would simply be to register tea party protest of the package by dragging the proceedings out for several hours as the shutdown clock ticks down before relenting. Good retail politics, especially given growing grassroots dissatisfaction with the deal, but the real action will be in the House.
Exit question: Why don’t the RINOs in Congress ever use lessons from their own favorite books? Coming soon, perhaps: Scott Brown reads from “The Giving Tree.”
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
He gets it.
SouthernGent on April 12, 2011 at 9:03 PM
Do it! Old fashioned filibuster for the win.
knob on April 12, 2011 at 9:04 PM
Are we sure Scott Brown can even read?
“Me Scott Brown, me drive truck…”
tetriskid on April 12, 2011 at 9:04 PM
If he ran for President, young males would vote for him in droves.
MayBee on April 12, 2011 at 9:06 PM
I like Rand Paul. He has girded his loins.
BigWyo on April 12, 2011 at 9:06 PM
I’m with Rand unless he cuts support for Israel, then I’m not with Rand.
NickDeringer on April 12, 2011 at 9:06 PM
Excellent!
mizflame98 on April 12, 2011 at 9:07 PM
Let’s wait till he carries out his promise. Hope he won’t turn out inot another Jim Demint. Always promising to filibuster, never doing it.
promachus on April 12, 2011 at 9:08 PM
Rand Paul J-DAM!!
canopfor on April 12, 2011 at 9:08 PM
DIS-Topian…love it!!
canopfor on April 12, 2011 at 9:09 PM
I like Rand. Not a big fan of his father. Rand is smart, intelligent, seems to have a real grasp of the problems our country faces, and comes across genuine and sincere.
I could vote for Rand, if he ran. It would be harder to pull the lever for his father though.
BruthaMan on April 12, 2011 at 9:09 PM
Thank you for Senator Rand Paul, Kentucky.
Anthem is a great book. Ayn wanted it to be made into an animated film by Walt Disney. Disney should do it now, and kick it old school in hand-drawn animation.
Rae on April 12, 2011 at 9:09 PM
As long as we get some R. Paul, will “that” make Spathi happy?
hawkdriver on April 12, 2011 at 9:10 PM
$40 Billion cuts means $40 Billion of cuts.
Shut it down.
pedestrian on April 12, 2011 at 9:10 PM
It would be impossible to.
I’d love it if Rand was part of a part of a ticket though.
hawkdriver on April 12, 2011 at 9:12 PM
I guess he is john galt.
cpaulus on April 12, 2011 at 9:13 PM
It is a shame that what Rand Paul said is considered out of the norm. 20 years ago people would have thought what Rand Paul said was simple common sense. Now people are floored about it. How far our “free” society has fallen.
I hunger for the freedom I had in my youth.
unseen on April 12, 2011 at 9:13 PM
Meh. I’ll get excited when he starts quoting 2112 lyrics.
Mark1971 on April 12, 2011 at 9:13 PM
This guy just keeps getting better and better — and he’s got the x-factor that makes him a media darling.
John the Libertarian on April 12, 2011 at 9:14 PM
And I’m thinking back to not very long ago when all of the Tea Party and Palin Fans were so IN NEED of Scott Brown to win. Just had to have the guy.
I’m only trying to again point out the absurdity if not self-defeating perspective of creating and following these “idol candidates” who are soon discovered to be flounders out of water.
Take a look at how much some people swooned, witnessed about and demanded Barack Obama in the Presidency. And look how that turned out.
It’s just wrong to push single candidates with blind faith and some sort of infatuation that borders on lust.
Lourdes on April 12, 2011 at 9:14 PM
Palin/Paul would win!
wheelgun on April 12, 2011 at 9:14 PM
Go Rand Go!!
kringeesmom on April 12, 2011 at 9:14 PM
If that was me speaking I’d turn around and tell everyone to sit down and shut-up…
equanimous on April 12, 2011 at 9:16 PM
Rand Paul for President, Ron Paul for Fed Chairman.
entropent on April 12, 2011 at 9:17 PM
most excellent. Rand Paul would most likely be very well suited for this task. After that toilet thing, I’ve surmised that this guy can rant, and rant eloquently.
ted c on April 12, 2011 at 9:17 PM
I like Rand Paul. He’s a level-headed guy and a heckuva eye surgeon as well. I don’t understand the following that his father has, though…
ted c on April 12, 2011 at 9:18 PM
He is a good man.
carbon_footprint on April 12, 2011 at 9:18 PM
I’m rather stunned he referred to Ayn Rand as “Ann” Rand.
The author pronounced her first name to rhyme with “swine.” In fact, I saw a quote from her somewhere where she said “It’s Ayn as in swine.”
I had assumed that Rand Paul was named after Ayn Rand, so his error is all the more unfathomable.
Aside from that, however, his speech was admirable. I’m going to enjoy having Rand Paul in the Senate (much more than having Ron Paul in the House).
SwampYankee on April 12, 2011 at 9:19 PM
I doubt that they actually read that much.
ted c on April 12, 2011 at 9:19 PM
/monocle
Jeddite on April 12, 2011 at 9:19 PM
Speaking of the Collective…..Behold the Progressive
Superior Non-Fireing Smart Power!!
===================================
House progressives offer budget plan: Tax the rich, end the wars, slash oil subsidies, invest in jobs
April 11, 2011
****************
Liberal Dems claim the plan eliminates deficit by 2021
=======================================================
WASHINGTON – As the focus on Capitol Hill shifts [1] to America’s long-run fiscal woes, Congressional progressives are one step ahead of the White House and Democratic leaders in offering a counter-proposal to the House GOP approach.
The broad sketch proposes to end the Bush-era tax cuts on high income earners, enact a surtax on millionaires and billionaires, increase the the estate tax and eliminate corporate tax loopholes and subsidies for oil and coal companies. It also aims to create a public health insurance option, end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and invest $1.45 trillion in “job creation,” energy, housing and education programs.
The revenue-heavy proposal [2] (PDF) stands in stark contrast to the spending cuts-oriented plan put forth by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) — and championed by GOP leaders [3] — that slashes $6 trillion in federal programs (including Medicare and Medicaid) while significantly reducing taxes for wealthy Americans and corporations.
************************************************************
“This budget is transparent, straightforward and realistic about where we are in America right now,” Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-AZ),
************************************************************
************************************************************
co-chair of the progressive caucus, told Raw Story. “The Ryan plan, for all the credit it gets for thinking big, doesn’t reflect the reality of the American economy. It destroys the successful programs that made this country strong,
************************************************************
especially Medicare and education, and doesn’t even try to explain how it creates jobs. It reflects a faith that making government disappear will somehow create prosperity.”
(More…………)
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/04/11/house-progressives-offer-budget-tax-the-rich-end-the-wars-slash-oil-subsidies-invest-in-jobs/print/
canopfor on April 12, 2011 at 9:20 PM
Not what happened at all. There was no illusion that Brown wasn’t a moderate. We were pumped for him because he was the one vote to stop Obamacare. Then Nanzi pulled her procedural shenanigans and crammed it through anyway.
John the Libertarian on April 12, 2011 at 9:22 PM
Really dislike his dad, so I’m incredibly leery of him. Great clip though.
nickj116 on April 12, 2011 at 9:23 PM
For five minutes, before he dismantled the whole evil enterprise.
Emperor Norton on April 12, 2011 at 9:23 PM
Or merely the photo shoot from college titled: “Let Me Show You My Root.”
titles.
ted c on April 12, 2011 at 9:25 PM
O/T-From Drudge,oh boy!
========================
Obama prepares to revive tax cut debate — for now and 2012
April 12 2011(USA Today)
**************************
As he puts together his Wednesday speech on the federal debt, President Obama is poised to revive the great tax cut debate of late 2010 — and launch what is likely to be a major campaign issue of 2012.
Namely, tax rates for wealthier Americans.
(More………)
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/04/obama-prepares-to-revive-tax-cut-debate/1
canopfor on April 12, 2011 at 9:26 PM
Or merely the photo shoot from college titled: “Let Me Show You My Root.”
titles.
ted c on April 12, 2011 at 9:25 PM
ted c:Lol:)
canopfor on April 12, 2011 at 9:26 PM
Yay! I get to say firster!
Scherzophrenic on April 12, 2011 at 9:26 PM
Nothing wrong with that. Politics is like a well played game of chess. Sometimes you have to sacrifice a rook to get to the queen. Brown received national attention as the one who had a chance and the one who could break the senate vote.
Brown does his own thing. He ran on that platform and made it clear he would not be in lock-step with republicans. Still, he was a better candidate than his opponent.
Though many of us are not fond of it, politics really is about choosing the lesser of two evils.
Everyone here is going to have their “preferred” candidate in the primaries. In the end, only one will remain. If people become self-centered and claim “I won’t vote for him/her because they were not my candidate,” on election night, then we all lose. It’s not about us, it’s about our country.
BruthaMan on April 12, 2011 at 9:27 PM
Few people know “Ayn” Rand is but they might know ANN Rand -it’s a popular misspeak that has supplanted the proper pronunciation.. I think he just wanted to be understood by more people.
That was excellent, the more I see of this Dr. Paul the more I like him.
batterup on April 12, 2011 at 9:27 PM
And I heard him say on Hannity today that he would cut the military budget if he could. Seems that national defense isn’t high on his priority list.
Voter from WA State on April 12, 2011 at 9:27 PM
you may be right, but defense has room for some cutting. Once defense dollars are appropriated, they’re sunk. Not much economic power comes out of a tank, unless you sell it.
ted c on April 12, 2011 at 9:30 PM
I shall summarize Senator Paul’s message:
The difference between freedom and a dictatorship comes down to one thing: Who makes the decisions.
In a free society I decide what I pay my employees.
I decide if I buy health insurance.
I decide what light bulb I buy.
I decide what my children are taught.
In a free society, I decide.
In Obama’s Amerika
Obama dictates that I will have insurance.
Obama dictates what that insurance will cover.
Obama dictates who the CEO of GM will be.
Obama dictates what executive compensation on Wall Street will be.
Obama dictates and dictates and dictates.
For a guy that is not a dictator Obama certainly does a lot of dictating.
The Rock on April 12, 2011 at 9:30 PM
Actually, his name is short for Randall, if Im not mistaken. That it matched AR’s name was coincidence.
Good Lt on April 12, 2011 at 9:30 PM
The UN is catagorized as military/defense spending. There’s a whole lot of cuts one could make without hurting the military. The misnomer that military spending = strong military is on par with the notion that spending more on education = smarter kids with higher graduation rates.
RachDubya on April 12, 2011 at 9:32 PM
Neil Peart would be proud.
FlatFoot on April 12, 2011 at 9:32 PM
What was the response!
Oh my heck!
I have a friend who has a basement full of light bulbs…
I completely agree. You have said some very astute things of late. There is far too much emoting going on in this party and far too little rational thought.
Watching someone in action for a long period of time is very important. Anyone can say anything! People can think they will react a certain way under certain conditions, but until they have been tested they don’t even know themselves how they will react! Jumping on the bandwagon of every new “conservative” who speaks the right words is making me nuts!
I’m still okay with Brown’s win though… it was Ted’s seat and now it has an R after it… that is priceless!
petunia on April 12, 2011 at 9:32 PM
Frame 1, gentleman on far right: Worst Toupee ever.
motionview on April 12, 2011 at 9:32 PM
I like Rand Paul more and more. I do have concerns, or at least need to be better informed, about his positions on foreign policy, but the common sense coming through him is undeniable.
It is intriguing to imagine him with real power to smite bureaucracy.
ace tomato on April 12, 2011 at 9:35 PM
I thought the reaction of the guy over Sen Paul’s right shoulder was really interesting. At first, he was just passing papers back and forth and gossiping with his fellow (I assume) staffers. Then he really seems to get engrossed in what Paul is saying, and even looks around the room as if guaging others’ reactions.
JohnW on April 12, 2011 at 9:36 PM
Ditto. I never expected Scott Brown to be a true conservative. He was the lesser of two evils, not a messiah.
God knows we’re a little overstocked on messiahs.
ace tomato on April 12, 2011 at 9:37 PM
<blockquote>The UN is catagorized as military/defense spending. There’s a whole lot of cuts one could make without hurting the military. The misnomer that military spending = strong military is on par with the notion that spending more on education = smarter kids with higher graduation rates.
RachDubya on April 12, 2011 at 9:32 PM
Is it really? Well there is defense spending that could certainly be cut… and cut deep.
petunia on April 12, 2011 at 9:37 PM
Yay! I get to say firster!
Scherzophrenic on April 12, 2011 at 9:26 PM
Scherzophrenic:That was a hoot!
=======================================
Kill The Wabbit
******************
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyxO8Q8la8g&feature=related
canopfor on April 12, 2011 at 9:37 PM
Both Ron and Rand Paul are isolationist in their thinking. It’s an off-shoot of Libertarianism that says “It’s none of our business what people in other countries do, unless they directly threaten us.”
As a result, I believe both Paul’s think the military budget could be greatly reduced to support a primarily defensive posture.
Because a lot of Republicans are hawkish interventionists who are inclined to view our national interests broadly (even if they stop short of favoring open-ended nation building missions), Paul’s isolationism may not sit well with Republicans as a whole.
He’s a mixed bag. But a very interesting mix.
SwampYankee on April 12, 2011 at 9:39 PM
Obama will read from Noam Chomsky’s “Failed States (American Empire Project)” and apologize to Iran for ovethrowing Mohammad Mosaddegh in 1953.
profitsbeard on April 12, 2011 at 9:39 PM
Unlike alot of you on here, I am a huge fan Ron Paul but I think Rand is even better. After we nominate Romney, the entire Tea-Party becomes disenfranchised, Obama rolls back into the White House, the country will be so screwed in four years that Rand will basically be able to waltz on into the Oval Office.
Nelsen on April 12, 2011 at 9:42 PM
On the philibuster thing… I don’t think highlighting that Republicans didn’t really get that great of a deal is doing anyone any favors. Let it go and move on.
We need to pick the battles better. The real fight is over the next budget.
petunia on April 12, 2011 at 9:42 PM
Are you kidding Obama doesn’t read anything but Obama! I bet he’s read his own book a million times.
petunia on April 12, 2011 at 9:43 PM
That was great. I hope he carries through on his promise to filibuster. I really like this guy. He’s far less kooky than his father.
NoLeftTurn on April 12, 2011 at 9:44 PM
The best part for me…?
Those words he spoke have not been heard in the halls of the elite political class in a very long time…
… and they were forced to put them on the record.
Seven Percent Solution on April 12, 2011 at 9:44 PM
It’s a dog whistle to Obama’s progressive base and other ‘tards everywhere.
Wonder if he’ll also mention the climbing gasoline prices and how we should just inflate our tires, via Gateway Pundit:
Flashback: Obama’s Solution to High Gas Prices, “Inflate Your Tires”
GrannyDee on April 12, 2011 at 9:45 PM
Since Ayers wrote it, Obama had to, just to find out what was in it.
Like one of his Bills.
profitsbeard on April 12, 2011 at 9:45 PM
“The Cat In The Hat” isn’t all that riviting.
Chewy the Lab on April 12, 2011 at 9:45 PM
The giving tree did so at its own volition.
lorien1973 on April 12, 2011 at 9:49 PM
I’d pay good money to see Rand Paul debate Jerry Brown, who just signed the “Global Warming Final Solutions Act” in CA, mandating that we get 33% of our power from “renewable” sources by 2020, among other suicidal requirements. Governor Moonbeam is about to reach escape velocity and catapult himself and 35 million of the rest of us into hard vacuum.
There was a link here earlier today to some dolt reminding us that “Atlas Shrugged is fiction” – apparently he doesn’t live in California.
peski on April 12, 2011 at 9:50 PM
Enjoyed the sentiment, but Ayn rhymes with “mine,” not “man,” Rand.
/tackyiknow
elcapt on April 12, 2011 at 9:51 PM
I am very proud of Rand Paul, I got to vote for him, and still have my yard sign!
Bridgette on April 12, 2011 at 9:54 PM
Ionesco’s RHINOCEROS?
I.E.: “You invent excuses for yourself!”
profitsbeard on April 12, 2011 at 9:56 PM
“Me Scott Brown, me drive truck…”
tetriskid on April 12, 2011 at 9:04 PM
And I’m thinking back to not very long ago when all of the Tea Party and Palin Fans were so IN NEED of Scott Brown to win. Just had to have the guy.
I’m only trying to again point out the absurdity if not self-defeating perspective of creating and following these “idol candidates” who are soon discovered to be flounders out of water.
Take a look at how much some people swooned, witnessed about and demanded Barack Obama in the Presidency. And look how that turned out.
It’s just wrong to push single candidates with blind faith and some sort of infatuation that borders on lust.
Lourdes on April 12, 2011 at 9:14 PM
fyi – I know you didn’t state that Palin “swooned” over
Scott Brown – however, some might infer that she did by
your posting. – Palin did not endorse Scott Brown.
Amjean on April 12, 2011 at 9:58 PM
It’s also just wrong to push candidates over a single issue with blind fanaticism and obsession that borders on mania.
MadisonConservative on April 12, 2011 at 10:02 PM
Did he just call the USA dystopian? Oh, Yeah!!!!!!
Bring it!
(Another question: was he named for Ayn Rand?)
Pablo Snooze on April 12, 2011 at 10:06 PM
Try rereading those threads. It wasn’t the Palin fans saying “Scott Brown for President”.
alwaysfiredup on April 12, 2011 at 10:11 PM
canopfor on April 12, 2011 at 9:26 PM
It’s a dog whistle to Obama’s progressive base and other ‘tards everywhere.
Wonder if he’ll also mention the climbing gasoline prices and how we should just inflate our tires, via Gateway Pundit:
Flashback: Obama’s Solution to High Gas Prices, “Inflate Your Tires”
GrannyDee on April 12, 2011 at 9:45 PM
GrannyDee:Amen!:)
canopfor on April 12, 2011 at 10:13 PM
LOL
Norwegian on April 12, 2011 at 10:25 PM
Better yet….
The Trees – Rush
There is unrest in the forest,
There is trouble with the trees,
For the maples want more sunlight
And the oaks ignore their please.
The trouble with the maples,
(And they’re quite convinced they’re right)
They say the oaks are just too lofty
And they grab up all the light.
But the oaks can’t help their feelings
If they like the way they’re made.
And they wonder why the maples
Can’t be happy in their shade.
There is trouble in the forest,
And the creatures all have fled,
As the maples scream “Oppression!”
And the oaks just shake their heads
So the maples formed a union
And demanded equal rights.
“The oaks are just too greedy;
We will make them give us light.”
Now there’s no more oak oppression,
For they passed a noble law,
And the trees are all kept equal
By hatchet, axe, and saw.
Mo_mac on April 12, 2011 at 10:38 PM
Sigh, I like that guy! We’re stuck with Udall and Bennet, ugh. Udall is a good man, but still votes the Dem party line. Bennet is a carpetbagger from the Northeast who’s completely out of touch with Colorado issues. He should have lost, he only won by 800 votes over Ken Buck, but 4000 ineligible voters voted.
Common Sense on April 12, 2011 at 10:52 PM
It will be interesting to see who votes for this sham bill.
This is where we find out who the real tea partiers are in congress. If there are only a handful left it will not bode well for the future. If they vote for the Boehner’s sham bill they will be committing the same mistake that he is: renouncing the only leverage they have available to them. Who is going to believe the tea party has any teeth in future battles if they sign onto Beohners sham?
I think this is an essential point. If the tea party just goes along with the establishment on this then their influence is essentially dead.
Oh, but they’ll use the tea party to try to inspire turnout in November, of course. But otherwise they will be feckless.
I think this is where the rubber meets the road; where we find out who’s worth keeping and who get’s dropped.
FloatingRock on April 12, 2011 at 10:56 PM
Like chocolate and peanut butter.
jdkchem on April 12, 2011 at 11:00 PM
A Boulder liberal and a wanna-be Boulder liberal.
jdkchem on April 12, 2011 at 11:03 PM
I predict that Rand Paul will be president of the USA one of these days. I don’t think it will be in 2012, but it won’t be too long after that.
I’m getting that conservative tingle.
Old Fritz on April 12, 2011 at 11:04 PM
Is Rand still best buds with Adam Kokesh? Will there be a “Muslims for Rand Paul” group or a “Stormfront for Rand Paul” group? Just askin’
Connie on April 12, 2011 at 11:06 PM
This vote is so important to me that for the first time I’m going to print out the roll call and tack it on my wall.
Pass or fail.
FloatingRock on April 12, 2011 at 11:06 PM
We aaare the Priests of the Teeeemples of Syyyyyrinx!
He could sing the whole album! That’s a fun way to filibuster!
I must say, I’m more impressed with him than I initially expected to be. He’s really doing some good work.
Dongemaharu on April 12, 2011 at 11:26 PM
Must read for tonight
Schadenfreude on April 12, 2011 at 11:28 PM
Reminder: Atlas Shrugged, the movie opens this weekend.
kurtzz3 on April 12, 2011 at 11:52 PM
Thanks Hot Air for posting some vids lately of Rand Paul. I have not had an opportunity to listen to him before he was elected. I am impressed and will seek out more on my own.
Mr_Magoo on April 12, 2011 at 11:54 PM
Rand was great and I really am glad he is a Senator. God knows we need about 90 more of him…But Lee from Utah is a jerk…he was so distracting and he really needed to pay more attention, he might learn a thing or two…
CCRWM on April 12, 2011 at 11:55 PM
Rand Paul is far too kind to his fellow Senators.
AshleyTKing on April 13, 2011 at 12:07 AM
The problem with isolationism is that you wait to fight aggression until you are fighting the war on your own soil.
The point on nation building is that you do not have to invade again in a few years. However I am not a fan of how we tried to do it in Iraq, and Afghanistan. In Iraq we should have built three nations, and made sure the Kurds got all the oil in the north. Afghanistan has been at war with its self ever since the introduction Islam; so the first thing to do is eliminate everyone that reacts violently to ‘insults to Islam’, fallowed quickly by the pedophiles.
The intervention in Libya should have been by assassination.
Slowburn on April 13, 2011 at 12:47 AM
Or just annoyed that you were heaping praise, I suppose.
What do you think Neil, the Canadian, is thinking knowing that we are not the only ones quoting his lyrics in reference to our current troubles?
I’ll toss in the obligatory:
A geeky Canadian hard rock drummer that wrote lyrics that were not intended to bed every pretty girl in the front row at the concert. What is wrong with this guy?
I’m not a betting man but I’ll give good odds that Rush is not on Obama’s iPod playlist.
turfmann on April 13, 2011 at 5:17 AM
Might you consider moving to Israel then? I mean, at this point we really need Americans who are interested in the future of America. If Rand Paul is the guy who gets it, then we really need to support him.
Not trying to be mean, but Israel doesn’t need our money. Israel doesn’t need our military muscle(they kicked hell out of 3 or 4 Arab countries all at one time). Come to think of it, Israel doesn’t need us for much of anything.
So it rankles me a bit to see an American parrot some brain dead mantra about support for Israel. Israel is never going to put American interests before its own. Isn’t it time we take the same view of our own country……….before it’s too late?
David2.0 on April 13, 2011 at 5:57 AM
I’m for the old-school filibuster idea. Like the musicians on the Titanic, we might as well have some fun while this ship goes down.
Bugler on April 13, 2011 at 6:14 AM
Yeah. His dad is honest and sincere also, but kinda comes off as the crazy uncle.
Mr. Grump on April 13, 2011 at 9:45 AM
I would vote for Rand Paul in a nano-second.
jjrakman on April 13, 2011 at 10:06 AM
Rand Paul has been just terrific so far. A+
james23 on April 13, 2011 at 10:12 AM
Yes, that’s right. Co-option complete; they will be gone and the butt of jokes, like Milli Vanilli. I’ve already written off Adam Kinzinger, a tea party guy who allowed himself to be used by the GOP and Faux News over the weekend as the spokesperson for Tea Partiers for the Win tm.
james23 on April 13, 2011 at 10:16 AM
Funny how that only seems to apply to RINOS. Didn’t see too many moderates supporting O’Donnell when she was running for senate.
jakabok_botch on April 13, 2011 at 11:14 AM
We have no need for ancient ways, our world is doing fine…
jcrue on April 13, 2011 at 12:33 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »