Video: Democrats not terribly impressed with presidential leadership on budget
posted at 11:20 am on April 8, 2011 by Ed Morrissey
Finally — a bipartisan consensus emerges! Last night, CNN’s Dana Bash reported that Democrats on Capitol Hill have begun grumbling about the last-minute leadership of President Obama on the budget, having been less than impressed with his involvement until the moment of greatest media interest. Bash says that the strategy of keeping Obama “above the fray” leaves them holding the bag for failure — or worse, having a compromise forced down their throats. Anderson Cooper pronounces himself less than impressed:
BASH: I can tell you that talking to Democratic sources here in Congress over the past weeks, weeks and weeks, actually really months as this has been going on, this short-term spending bill after short-term spending bill to try to keep the government running, there’s been a lot of frustration with the President, with the White House, that they have not gotten more involved. You certainly saw the President out tonight and you saw him out last night. You’re seeing him involved at the eleventh hour. But many of his fellow Democrats are saying, where were you before? We needed you before.
And the reason, they think, is because it’s just not a politically a good thing for him to be doing to be getting involved in this kind of fight when he’s positioning himself for reelection and doesn’t want to be mired in this back and forth over a few billion dollars in spending.
COOPER: That’s why people hate politics.
Politico takes the White House spin to a conclusion that gets to the risk involved in the 30,000-foot strategy:
Obama staged several eleventh-hour interventions on health care reform. He repeated the tactic with far greater success during last year’s tax-cut debate, and he did it again Tuesday — popping into the White House briefing room when the drumbeat over his lack of public involvement was loudest, and the talks were disintegrating behind closed doors.
But it’s a strategy that chafes against his negotiating partners on both sides of the aisle — and there’s no guarantee it will work this time. There are many outstanding issues, from defense dollars to abortion, and the unpredictability of Speaker John Boehner’s tea party caucus may defy an Obama-style perils-of-Pauline rescue to prevent a shutdown by midnight Friday.
So the question for Obama is simple — Can the closer close the deal? — and the risks are big. If a shutdown happens and Obama can paint the Republicans as letting the lights go out over, say, Planned Parenthood funding, he could come off as the more serious leader.
But if talks fall apart and the GOP succeeds in portraying Obama as weak on fiscal issues, it could undermine his rationale for 2012 — that he’s the only responsible grownup capable of rising above the Washington squabbling to get things done.
There are a couple of problems for Obama in selling this. First, he’s been AWOL on the budget for months. He could have pressed Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid to produce a budget in 2010 when Democrats had full control of Congress. Where was his outrage then? It’s not exactly leadership to wait seven months past a budget deadline to finally get personally involved. For that matter, as I mentioned in my last post, this sudden burst of leadership has done nothing to produce a budget in the Senate, where his own party has a majority.
Second, a failure here runs the real risk of his previous lack of leadership getting a lot more attention. Presidents don’t usually make grandstanding efforts unless (a) they already have a victory in hand, or (b) a failure will suit their political purposes. The latter was true for Bill Clinton in 1995-6 because it was the Republicans who had full responsibility for producing a budget. That’s not true now, when Obama has been an absentee executive on budgets for seven months and couldn’t even lead his own team to do their jobs.
Obama could have closed the deal in September. Instead, Democrats at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue ran away from their responsibilities out of fear of voter backlash if they revealed their true agenda, and in the Senate and the White House, they’re still running away. That may be many things, but leadership it is not.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air

Video: Dem Congressman rips IRS for abuses, threatens bringing in special prosecutor

Sebelius touts ObamaCare as a boon to graduates instead of the war on the young it actually is

Rothenberg: Forecast for Senate seats changing because of White House scandals






Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Have you read some of the people of who comment around here AP?
NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 6:45 PM
“the babies”
That, right there, is all you need to know.
UnderstandingisPower on May 22, 2013 at 6:46 PM
Good point.
KCB on May 22, 2013 at 6:46 PM
Not even Gosnell’s attorney could sit in that courtroom, and see those images, and not come away unaffected. I’ve said it before, but it bears repeating: No wonder the MSM ran from this trial like it was the plague.
NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 6:47 PM
This really is a disgusting and self serving comment, all living things are viable until they die, the only thing taking a babies viability away is the abortionist.
clearbluesky on May 22, 2013 at 6:53 PM
[NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 6:45 PM]
It’s Mary Katharine.
Dusty on May 22, 2013 at 6:54 PM
DITTO, what “clearbluesky” wrote ^^.
Lourdes on May 22, 2013 at 6:55 PM
Understanding and lenient? To defend a guy who brutally murdered babies? How about without conscience and evil?
Understanding and lenient implies empathy and mercy are possible emotions to have toward those who are willing to either kill a child or have the child they are carrying be killed. The choice is between death and life for a baby.
Sorrow, grief, and anger for the unborn child are appropriate emotions to have. Empathy and mercy are for those who have repented and turned from this evil.
INC on May 22, 2013 at 6:55 PM
Oops. Sorry MKH.
NotCoach on May 22, 2013 at 6:56 PM
Gosnell didn’t have to keep his place so filthy, inspections or not. He didn’t have to re-use single-use instruments, or keep the parts of murdered babies in jars. He is simply a vile piece of human trash.
A sixteen week window is never going to be tolerated by the violent baby-killing Left who will do anything to stop it from becoming law. As MKH notes above, they’re not supportive of a twenty-week limit. I bet many in NARAL (which should be spelled ‘gnarl’ like the acronym sounds — twisted) think there should be no limit at all, even killing the infant just as he’s being born if the mother changes her mind about keeping him.
I don’t blame the lawyer for doing his job, and agree with the sixteen week limit as a first step. But if I were a defense attorney, I’d never have taken the case.
Liam on May 22, 2013 at 6:57 PM
Well, I can see why they’d go along with this, because you can still kill a LOT of babies in 16 weeks, but I’m not quite ready to call this progressjust yet.
Kensington on May 22, 2013 at 7:08 PM
“A person’s a person, no matter how small.”
INC on May 22, 2013 at 7:15 PM
That’s the excuse of a 5 year old child. It doesn’t take regulators for you to keep your place clean. But butcher Gosnell was simply interested in making more money for himself.
rbj on May 22, 2013 at 7:16 PM
Going to sixteen or seventeen weeks is definitely a step in the right direction. Know what would be a better step? Zero weeks. Just saying.
Shump on May 22, 2013 at 7:17 PM
I thought McMahon was a sleaze when he used the race card during the trial. Now I know hes slime because of his vociforous defending of this monster after he was convicted of murder. Meagan is wrong and we can tar him with the same brush as his client. He is as vile as Gosnell
neyney on May 22, 2013 at 7:18 PM
Oh we can’t have that. Dear Reaper, I mean Dear Leader wants it to be 39 weeks.
VorDaj on May 22, 2013 at 7:20 PM
In that, he is incorrect. It was the willful abandonment of existing regulation enforcement by the state, due to a political climate created by groups such as NARAL and PP that led directly to the situation at Gosnell’s clinic. It’s blood on their hands as much as his.
A new law, enforced as well as the old, will do exactly as well; meaning not at all. In the Navy we have a saying – you can expect what you inspect.
Jeff Weimer on May 22, 2013 at 7:30 PM
I don’t really care what this legal streetwalker has to say, aside from from a bemused curiosity regarding self-debasement. There was never any real question as to what the demon butcher Gosnell had been doing; this mercenary apologist as much acknowledges that he was comfortable with the practice in theory if not -belatedly- in actual gruesome reality.
So lawyer McMahon took the money, and defended the indefensible. And now he tries reassert his humanity by musing depressively about the macabre procession that has just come to a meat-grinding halt. But he willingly marched a leg in that procession; at least he didn’t portray his steps, in tired fashion, as necessary measures in assuring that “the system works for all.”
I hope that for the rest of his life, his last thought before tortured sleep is of scissors.
M240H on May 22, 2013 at 7:36 PM
And that right there is one of the big horrors of the abortion industry. That 83.5% of abortions are performed for no greater reason than the mother doesn’t want the baby or the hassel of giving birth and putting the baby up for adoption.
It is if you are a liberal who can’t think for yourself and insist on regulating every aspect of life.
hopeful on May 22, 2013 at 7:46 PM
Exactly. “Unwanted puppies and unwanted babies are the same thing.”~thujackass
davidk on May 22, 2013 at 7:49 PM
Never forget that the Allies once having liberated the concentration camps / death camps had to force march the local citizens through those camps to shock them into realization of the holocaust their pretending what was happening wasn’t happening had enabled.
— counting the seconds until psycho thuja spams us with his collaborationist prattle.
viking01 on May 22, 2013 at 7:50 PM
Maybe you should call your congressman/woman and demand they sponsor legislation to lock up every woman who does an abortion.
HotAirLib on May 22, 2013 at 8:02 PM
Interesting comment by the lawyer.
Quickest would be choosing to avoid actions that tend toward becoming pregnant.
AesopFan on May 22, 2013 at 8:21 PM
Well said, and worth repeating:
ITguy on May 22, 2013 at 8:29 PM