Pelosi: The GOP’s getting ready to starve six million seniors or something
posted at 5:48 pm on April 5, 2011 by Allahpundit
Via Breitbart. I don’t know which budget bill she’s talking about, the 2011 one or Ryan’s new one, but if it’s the former than she’s actually complaining here about a GOP budget that she could have prevented by passing a budget herself last year when she was Speaker. (Of course, with Democrats in control in the Senate and White House, any Mass Senior Starvation Program would require bipartisan support to pass now anyway.) Anyway, get used to this: Warnings about grandma being forced to eat styrofoam peanuts and Fancy Feast because of heartless Republicans and their insane crusade for solvency will be a staple of Democratic talking points by next November, especially with the White House desperate to win back seniors alienated by ObamaCare. Last week it was the GOP wanting kids abroad to die of malaria, this week it’s our nation’s elderly being made to eat out of garbage cans or else waste away, next week it’ll be something to do with puppies. So let me repeat the question posed last week: If they’re this worried about important programs falling through the cracks, shouldn’t they want to come to the table and make some sort of deal on a long-term sustainable budget that protects welfare programs to some extent? How does letting the country collapse fiscally, which would prompt truly draconian cuts under an austerity plan to rebalance the books, put more food on seniors’ tables? In fact, that’s one of my core complaints with the GOP’s “messaging” thus far, as bold as it’s otherwise been. Thanks to Obama’s appalling, irresponsible budget, the public is still under the illusion that we’re debating whether to reform entitlements. We aren’t. We’re debating when to reform them — now, when we have the luxury of lengthy debate, or later under extreme duress. I know how Nancy would solve this problem, but her answer is no more realistic politically than wanting to abolish Social Security and Medicare. So what’s the magic Pelosi plan for keeping those seniors — and everyone else — fed and insured and averting a fiscal catastrophe, the part of the equation that somehow always gets lost in these heartbreaking tales of woe? She’s the House majority leader for the Party Of Ideas™, right? Let’s hear some ideas.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Pelosi’s incontinence diapers and her muzzle have been seen…somewhere…looking desperately for their mastress.
Schadenfreude on April 5, 2011 at 5:50 PM
Ewww. We went so long without her picture on HA. Now the winning streak is ruined.
txmomof6 on April 5, 2011 at 5:51 PM
The witch had NO budget when she was scrooming the hammer. Why would anyone take her seriously now?
Schadenfreude on April 5, 2011 at 5:51 PM
That pathetic woman is absolutely nuts.
rplat on April 5, 2011 at 5:52 PM
I thought she was the ringleader for the Circle “D” Gang…?
they changed it already….sheesh**
ted c on April 5, 2011 at 5:52 PM
She’s rich enough to feed all the elderly. Why not?
Schadenfreude on April 5, 2011 at 5:53 PM
If only food was cheaper…
clement on April 5, 2011 at 5:53 PM
It would have been nice if the Democrats had compromised with each other back in September and actually passed the 13 separate appropriations bills for FY2011.
I guess Nancy Pelosi was too busy fly around on Air Nancy, while Harry Reid was scheduling funerals.
J_Crater on April 5, 2011 at 5:53 PM
I’m still astounded that someone that ignorant was able to become Speaker.
myrenovations on April 5, 2011 at 5:53 PM
This why I would or could never be in politics.
/smartass on
I thought you said earlier that Obesity was a critical problem in this country
/smartass off
Oil Can on April 5, 2011 at 5:53 PM
Maybe we could take those 90,000 kids and grind them up into protein cakes for the seniors and that way everybody wins? /
How does the Onion parody network compete with Pelosi and her crew?
sharrukin on April 5, 2011 at 5:54 PM
Why is Nancy Pelosi persecuting Jesus? Her views are a threat to Christians, therefore to Jesus.
http://www.bluecollarphilosophy.com/2011/04/jesus-asks-nancy-pelosi-why-she-is-persecuting-him.html
The Religious Left does not know how to understand Matthew 25.
Blue Collar Todd on April 5, 2011 at 5:54 PM
This woman (San Fran Nan) is a loon!..Total Loon!..:)
Dire Straits on April 5, 2011 at 5:56 PM
The Democrats are trying to starve children yet unborn.
FloatingRock on April 5, 2011 at 5:56 PM
Richest looter in Congress, Pelosi(D) spews that millions of Seniors will die because of a bill she didn’t read that stops her bill that she didn’t read.
Because stopping the tax-payer subsidization of (D)emocrats is “evil!”
DANEgerus on April 5, 2011 at 5:56 PM
If Paul Ryan’s budget proposals succeed, I wish I could be a senior. I really enjoy the taste of canned dog and cat food. Too bad I wouldn’t be able to afford a can opener. Nancy should have passed a non-repealable, 100% refundable tax credit for can openers in the lame duck session of the 111th Congress. Curse her short-sightedness.
steebo77 on April 5, 2011 at 5:56 PM
myrenovations: Two words: Safe Seat.
How do you think segregationists controlled the Senate for eighty years?
Seth Halpern on April 5, 2011 at 5:56 PM
See, it’s like this – they’re not ‘worried about important programs falling through the cracks’.
They’re not worried about kids dying of malaria.
They’re not worried about Grandma eating Fancy Feast.
They *love* that they get to *pretend* to be worried about it, so they can *lie* and demagogue and beat their chests and rend their garments over how evil the Republicans are.
They don’t want to come to the table to avoid this, AP – they want to stay away from the table for no other reason than and precisely *because* it gives them this cudgel that the MSM will help them use against the Republicans.
Midas on April 5, 2011 at 5:57 PM
They’ve eaten enough..
TexasJew on April 5, 2011 at 5:58 PM
C’mon Nancy, try coming up with something a little more original. For those of you a bit young, when the Republicans took power in 1995, Pelosi and the “dem leaders” all cried about starving the children and seniors when ever balancing a budget was brought to the house floor.
And when ever a built in increase on a certain program was reduced by a few percentages they all cried “it’s a cut”.
Boo frikken hoo Nancy…..you’re spending days are over.
Rovin on April 5, 2011 at 5:58 PM
Cardinal Pelosi once again shows her heretical exegesis by trying to claim that the Democrats and not your Heavenly Father will make sure that you are cared for.
Hening on April 5, 2011 at 5:58 PM
We can feed them all the fish from Japan that China and India are turning away at the ports.
pedestrian on April 5, 2011 at 5:58 PM
The Merchant of Venice, Act I, Scene III.
INC on April 5, 2011 at 5:58 PM
The seniors will have to eat the puppies?
DAMN YOU BOEHNER AND RYAN!
catmman on April 5, 2011 at 5:59 PM
Nanny Pelosi is a senior. Is she going to starve?
Nanny Pelosi is a congress critter. Is she going to starve?
Nanny Pelosi is wealthy beyond most peoples grasp. Is she going to give aid to Michael Moore who suffers so, especially in this time of war? Or cough up “her fair share” to the IRS in order to make things right for the unwashed masses?
Robert17 on April 5, 2011 at 6:01 PM
Well maybe she should ask GE to give a donation to feed grandma and grandpa. If she really cares about them.
Brat4life on April 5, 2011 at 6:02 PM
This doesn’t make any sense.
Everyone knows Republicans drink the blood of children. Why would they want them dead from malaria?
catmman on April 5, 2011 at 6:03 PM
Liberals don’t see it this way. They see 2 options:
1. Cut spending
or
2. Raise taxes on the rich
In either case the budget get balanced. With #1 puppies and kids die. With #2 puppies and kids are happy and only the evil rich are hurt (and they’re evil and rich so they deserve to die so it’s a net-net).
Of course you could impose a 100% tax on the rich and it wouldn’t make a dent in the deficit. But facts never got in the way of a good story for a liberal.
angryed on April 5, 2011 at 6:03 PM
No shame, these people.
BKeyser on April 5, 2011 at 6:04 PM
Cunning Stunt as usual Nancy
400lb Gorilla on April 5, 2011 at 6:04 PM
LIAR!
ultracon on April 5, 2011 at 6:06 PM
The Democrats are spending the futures of children yet unborn to buy the votes of seniors today.
FloatingRock on April 5, 2011 at 6:07 PM
Imagine if Sarah Palin said something so manifestly stupid.
DaveS on April 5, 2011 at 6:07 PM
Well ya know,this reminds me of the 1994
ClusterFark,where the Evil and Dirty Rotten
Republicans,forced old folks to eat cans of dog
food!!(sarc).
canopfor on April 5, 2011 at 6:10 PM
Just let the elderly eat the aborted fetuses from Planned Parenthood…
… Problem solved!
/
Seven Percent Solution on April 5, 2011 at 6:10 PM
That’s pretty much my question – how does pushing the country over the edge help anybody? (Besides the Socialists, that is)
Too bad we don’t have media that will present the facts in an unbiased manner.
The people would know this instead of the Leftist-Oppressive talking points ad nauseam
Chip on April 5, 2011 at 6:10 PM
While compromise is part of politics, do you really want to compromise with the likes of Pelosi? The lady is off her rocker and should be treated so.
MeatHeadinCA on April 5, 2011 at 6:10 PM
Let’s elect us the first woman as Speaker of the House! Nevermind that she’s a complete idiot, it’s the gesture!
Sounds familiar to Bammie’s base.
slickwillie2001 on April 5, 2011 at 6:11 PM
The seniors can have any cat they like from around here. Please.
Bishop on April 5, 2011 at 6:12 PM
A record number of high school dropouts voted for the Democrat ticket in 2008. O’bama led the way, getting an alltime record 70% of their votes.
No one else had come to within nearly 10 points of that before. The closest was Algore with 61% in the year Bush stole the election.
Del Dolemonte on April 5, 2011 at 6:13 PM
Brood of vipers.
Eren on April 5, 2011 at 6:16 PM
It’s a good thing my grandma had passed on…I would hate to sit and watch her starve to death…Pelosi, she’s a grandmother right? She’s a millionaire, right? I think I have a solution…
right2bright on April 5, 2011 at 6:17 PM
The only problem with option 2 is that it destroys the economy – who would invest in a place where property can be simply stolen like this?
As someone else pointed out already, the destruction of the economy with increasing higher taxation will exacerbate the short falls in any retirement programs. Those funds are usually invested somewhere – a crashing economy would mean crashing investment portfolios.
It’s double the effect of a single Raise taxes on the rich policy – but maybe the Oppressive-left sees that as a feature instead of a bug.
Chip on April 5, 2011 at 6:19 PM
Ha. If you think Pelosi’s message is incoherent, wait until Debbie Wasserman Schulz steps in as the voice of the DNC!
DrStock on April 5, 2011 at 6:20 PM
Kudos to Pelosi`s trainers for coming up with the Bible reference.
But Nancy will need help with it again because the short-term memory needs constant grooming.
Her trainer most likely gets paid in vodka, by the way, and we paid for it! Although CA elected her . . . .Hmmmmm . . ..
Sherman1864 on April 5, 2011 at 6:21 PM
This is not a serious person.
Mason on April 5, 2011 at 6:22 PM
Loaves and fishes, baby! The Obamessiah will supply the miracle while the Botox Magdalen recites appropriate Biblical verses from memory.
Cicero43 on April 5, 2011 at 6:23 PM
Pelosi, glad you wanted to follow the examples of Matthew.
So Nancy, would you give me one million dollars? Since you are so sincere about the teachings of Jesus…
right2bright on April 5, 2011 at 6:23 PM
Not today, Nanzi. See You Next Tuesday, maybe.
Naturally Curly on April 5, 2011 at 6:23 PM
As long as she’s one of them, I can live with this.
BigWyo on April 5, 2011 at 6:23 PM
Ryan was right. These nutcases will demagogue the republicans efforts to put sanity back into government spending.
Kini on April 5, 2011 at 6:24 PM
Allah you SCARED me!
She’s the House Minority leader, haha.
apollyonbob on April 5, 2011 at 6:24 PM
FF is over 50 cents a can – it won’t be serious until Grammy is eating house brand.
katiejane on April 5, 2011 at 6:25 PM
I just don’t think it’s going to work this time…people are ready for real change. Not that hopey changey kind.
d1carter on April 5, 2011 at 6:25 PM
Isn’t there one, just one ‘journalist’ in the world that would ask that question…
… instead of just letting her lie on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on?
Seven Percent Solution on April 5, 2011 at 6:26 PM
Quarterly sanity tests should be required of all members of Congress.
albill on April 5, 2011 at 6:27 PM
Dog Food!
============
==============
Liberals Twist Sarcastic Rush Riff Into a Call for Segregated Buses!
September 18, 2009
********************
====================
And at that time we were in the middle of the budget debate, the school lunch cuts and the
************************************************************
Democrats were calling around saying that Republicans were engaging in their usual stuff of cutting Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid and they run around saying that food stamps and senior citizens were soon going to have to make the choice of eating dog food and being able to buy medicine or eating real food and not buying medicine.
************************************************************
So all this is banging around Washington the whole week before I get there. So I open up the speech by thanking the GOPAC people for inviting me. “It’s really great to be here and, I’ll tell you what, I’m so happy the Democrats are doing what they’re doing because I have heard them and Iwant you people to know: I love my mother and I love old people.
========
************************************************************
“And since the Democrats have told me what’s going to happen, what I have done is I went out and I bought my mom a new can opener so that she can get the dog food easier when she has to eat it,” and the place busted up laughing.
************************************************************
Well, now, this was televised on C-SPAN. Pat Schroeder went to the floor of the House the next day and said, “This is what it’s come to! This is it! Rush Limbaugh actually said he’s going to buy his mother a can opener so she can have dog food. Wow!” I could not believe it. These people are humorless. This guy Potok, in addition to being ugly, has no humor whatsoever.
(More………..)
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_091809/content/01125112.guest.html
canopfor on April 5, 2011 at 6:29 PM
Maybe Nanny Pelosi can work something out with Choo-Choo Biden to peel away some of Obama’s $53Billion earmarked for high speed rail to pay for some of those meals.
in_awe on April 5, 2011 at 6:33 PM
Since Nancy is dedicated to the Gospel of Matthew, here’s part of Chapter 7 she might want to internalize and pray over.
21Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
22Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
23And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
flyfisher on April 5, 2011 at 6:34 PM
I’m going to reserve comment until Congressman Clyburn weighs in.
By the way, has anyone seen Jim?
Anyone? Anyone?
pain train on April 5, 2011 at 6:40 PM
Nazi should be quoting scripture give her position on abortion.
Kini on April 5, 2011 at 6:42 PM
I’d like to caption that photo of Nancy:
Talk to the hand, because the head is empty.
disa on April 5, 2011 at 6:42 PM
Hey, they make them out of corn nowadays. Just sprinkle a little cheese powder over them and they’re perfectly fine.
disa on April 5, 2011 at 6:46 PM
Neither of those are cheap. It would be cheaper to feed granny bread and potatoes. Even brand name mac and cheese is quite expensive. Get more out of a loaf of bread.
I wouldn’t be surprised that those items came from a liberal talking point somewhere. That’s how out of tune they are.
kim roy on April 5, 2011 at 6:48 PM
Bingo.
tetriskid on April 5, 2011 at 6:48 PM
So we must steal from future generations to feed the seniors… that’s the point she wants to try to make?
We must rob the children and force them to starve later, to hell with the future, the old people need their perks even if we can’t afford them.
Screw the children
Is that the new Democrat strategy? Or perhaps I’m missing how she’s going to avoid dumping debt onto the next generation until they can’t possibly have a functional economy?
gekkobear on April 5, 2011 at 6:49 PM
Seriously, she has gone over the “senile” event horizon. If you listen to the entire clip she makes absolutely no sense except to keep repeating that the GOP is going to somehow deprive seniors of 6 million meals.
Johnnyreb on April 5, 2011 at 6:51 PM
Fancy Feast is costly but doesn’t give you the bulk. Wellness Core for adult cats and kittens is only $38 for a 12 lb bag on Amazon. 50% protein, 18% fat, Omega-3 and -6, vitamin C, no grains, antioxidants. This stuff has completely turned my 9-year-old kitty around. She’s lost a lot of her belly fat, her coat is sleek, and she’s very playful. Grandma could do worse.
disa on April 5, 2011 at 6:53 PM
Grandma won’t starve, we will just put all the abandoned puppies, the ones with big brown eyes, on a skewer and bar-b-que them, unless there are any Harp seals around…or we could just feed the whale meat.
right2bright on April 5, 2011 at 7:00 PM
They need a new schtick. This one is worn out. They’ve been bleating about this for at least as long as I’ve been alive.
NoLeftTurn on April 5, 2011 at 7:00 PM
I haven’t seen so much dishonesty, and ignorance in one place, since the time I crashed a teachers convention.
Slowburn on April 5, 2011 at 7:04 PM
Botox McStretch Pelosi could always convert her luxury hotel into an assisted living facility, and use her millions to help feed and treat seniors.
“From each according to their abilities…….”
Tim_CA on April 5, 2011 at 7:04 PM
Ok I am confused, was it 6 million seniors that would starve to death or just 3 million? She quoted both numbers in her botox induced rant. That could make a difference on how some people vote I would think.
AARP could sell life insurance to the other 3 million seniors and make a nice tidy profit if they starved to death.
Johnnyreb on April 5, 2011 at 7:06 PM
Do they even know what they are saying, nuch less what they are talking about?
tarpon on April 5, 2011 at 7:10 PM
Matt:5:42 Give to everyone who begs from you …
Silent Scream.
That is all.
pambi on April 5, 2011 at 7:22 PM
Pelosi-
”
Isn’t that where her minimum wage exempt tuna canneries are?
docflash on April 5, 2011 at 7:24 PM
Don’t know why she’s so worried about granny and grandpa starvin’ to death.
She already had them lined up for death panels thanks to the “We gotta pass it to see what’s in it” atrocity.
ZeeMI on April 5, 2011 at 7:27 PM
I vote that Pelosi should be forced to eat NOTHING BUT DELTA SMELT until she’s a senior- er… well… until the people of California wake up to what a train wreck this woman is for our state, our country, our CHILDREN, and our seniors. Enough. is. enough.
NTWR on April 5, 2011 at 7:39 PM
The only thing Pelosi knows less about than Scripture is economics. And her level of knowledge on both is well into the negatives.
englishqueen01 on April 5, 2011 at 7:47 PM
Read the fine print, Grandma – starvation is excluded.
disa on April 5, 2011 at 7:49 PM
I didn’t click over to Breitbart or NRO… did Pelosi use the code word extremist?
jaime on April 5, 2011 at 7:49 PM
Nancy, you are an idiot. The Bible doesn’t say ANYthing about the government supporting the poor and needy, it tells the Church to do so.
Big difference, you idiot.,,
ladyingray on April 5, 2011 at 7:56 PM
You know, if the government fails to act people suffer. They are just incapable of doing for themselves. This is the core belief of progressives. 6 million homebound seniors??? Look, if you cannot feed yourself then you shouldn’t be at home! It’s the responsibility of FAMILY MEMBERS to do something about the situation, not government! And a member of the clergy sitting beside Pelosi nodding his head in agreement?! Astounding and pathetic!
David2.0 on April 5, 2011 at 8:12 PM
Pelosi is still allowed to speak? Her fellow members of the House should ask her not to. As for her citing Scripture, even the Pope took exception to her “understanding” of Catholicism.
Or, Michele Bachmann should simply walk over and deck her. Michele Bachmann knows first hand what it means to act as a Christian, just ask the couple dozen foster kids Michelle has taken into her home, among others she has championed.
When the chips are down, and you are twenty points behind the opposing team, and time is running short….yep, works every time, just use the Fear Card, works better than the Race Card these days, it seems.
Not this time. Time has run out.
coldwarrior on April 5, 2011 at 8:40 PM
No non-evil person has ever supported the criminal, Pelosi
proconstitution on April 5, 2011 at 8:45 PM
I guess it’s ok to employ a Bible verse if you can rip a verse out of it and use it outside of its righteous context so it makes your dribbling point seem more sensible. Otherwise, what good could the Bible possibly offer us?
ericdijon on April 5, 2011 at 8:50 PM
Nancy, put down the Bible verses and walk back slowly so that no one gets hurt!
shick on April 5, 2011 at 9:24 PM
Don’t preach the gospel of the Kingdom to gentile dogs?
mankai on April 5, 2011 at 10:41 PM
Pelosi and the Democrats are mad that someone is challenging their desire to decide when we die. How dare we try and take that power away from the Democrats. ObamaCare is the prime example of the attempt to get control over who dies and when. They don’t care about people dying, they care about having the power to decide whose life is worthy of life.
Blue Collar Todd on April 5, 2011 at 11:31 PM
Allah. I told you 36 hours was too long to give the Dhimm-wits before they starting demagoguing Ryan’s plan.
nukemhill on April 6, 2011 at 12:10 AM
Few things piss me off more than a lying, cheating, conniving, socialist, pro-choice, liberal like Nancy Pelosi, invoking the Bible.
Dopenstrange on April 6, 2011 at 1:54 AM
Hey Nancy, you’re getting excommunicated and burning in Hell for your support of abortion.
No I’m not making this up.
Local Bishops responding to direction of His Holiness Pope Benedict are cleansing the flock around the world. If you publicly support abortion (hint hint, John Kerry, Kennedy clan, international Lefties that claim to be Catholic) be ready to make a choice: your political future or your soul.
SgtSVJones on April 6, 2011 at 3:03 AM
I seriously cannot believe this shrew has the audacity to quote scripture at all, much less as often as she does. She represents the bowls of debauchery in San Francisco and should tread lightly as a charlatan mocking those of faith.
Renwaa on April 6, 2011 at 5:40 AM
SpeakerPelosi,Show me the word “Government”
In Matthew’s gospel…
The people are separated individually, one from another, as one would separate sheep and goats. One does not separate sheep from goats by driving half the flock one way and half the other. Rather, it is the characteristics of each that determines what they are.
So it is with charity. If one has provided food, clothing and shelter for the least on his own, that one receives the reward. One gains nothing if one’s neighbor has done the feeding, cloathing and sheltering. Rather that one is taken away as a goat, while his neighbor sheep goes the other way.
I do not pay taxes out of charity. I pay taxes because the law will punish me if I do not. But if I pay my taxes, the law will leave me alone. I have received my reward, and that money no longer belongs to me. So, if I direct the government to spend money on charitable things, I am not directing them to spend my own money. I am asking them to spend money that does not belong to me.
To bring it back to the neighbors. If I tell my neighbor to feed and cloathe and shelter the needy using his own money, but do none of these things with my own money, will I be judged a sheep or a goat when the time comes?
Haiku Guy on April 6, 2011 at 7:46 AM
** I posted this over on the other thread before I saw this one. I think my comment is more appropriate to this discussion so I’ll put it here too. Second and final copy I promise. But I am interested in feedback if offered. **
I often feel frustrated. Because our ideology of smaller government makes it hard for us to convey that we care as much about the elderly, the children, and the poor. We care, but our point of reference is different so that it doesn’t enter into the discussion of government spending. We believe that individuals should care for the elderly, the children, and the poor.
Jesus cared deeply about these people. And Jesus was a huge supporter of the concept of wealth redistribution. It disappointed me that the concept of wealth distribution itself, was what was seemly confronted by republicans during the 2008 election, referencing “Joe the Plumber”. But wealth redistribution was never the problem. It was the agent of that distribution that was the problem. Jesus never asked anyone to send their wallet to Rome so that Caeser could redistribute wealth. Jesus wants you, and me, and others personally to redistribute our wealth.
And that is what needs to be the message of republicans. Particularly in our economy when so many are hurting. It’s not that we care less, but rather we care differently. I want the elderly, the poor, the children and others in society who can not look after themselves to receive compassion and care. But that care, that compassion needs to come from the heart and the action of individuals and private sector organizations who are better able to respond to their needs. It’s more efficient and less wasteful.
But how do we convey that message… When we cut spending we just create a void, a vacuum, and that is what scares people. And that vacuum becomes the message for people looking to expand the size and power of government. But as you pointed out, though the vacuum may look scary, it can lead to a better outcome for the people themselves. How should the republican message address the fear of the vacuum or transition between government support and private sector support when the government support is the only defined entity and the private sector support has not yet been realized?
tartan on April 6, 2011 at 8:46 AM
Subsidizing big oil overseas? You mean Brazil?
rasqual on April 6, 2011 at 8:57 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »