Gallup: Huckabee leading a broad GOP pack

posted at 1:36 pm on March 25, 2011 by Ed Morrissey

Gallup’s new poll of Republican and Republican-leading independents offers a few mild surprises, but one of them isn’t the lack of a breakaway frontrunner.  Unlike most cycles, Republican voters haven’t set their hearts on an early favorite, a result that every pollster has found.  Also unsurprising is the presence of 2008 runner-up Mike Huckabee narrowly in the lead, ahead of Mitt Romney and Sarah Palin:

Mike Huckabee tops a large list of potential GOP presidential candidates in current support for the party’s 2012 nomination, with 19% of Republicans saying they are most likely to back him. This gives Huckabee a slight edge over Mitt Romney (15%). Sarah Palin is now at 12% after receiving 16% support in three prior Gallup polls. Newt Gingrich is the only other potential candidate who registers double-digit support. Sixteen percent of Republicans currently have no preference.

What might be surprising is that Huckabee has gained strength over the last seven months.  In September of last year, Huckabee came in third behind Romney and Palin.  Both have lost four points in subsequent polling, Palin’s all in the last month, while Huckabee picked up seven points in steady steps.  Everyone else has remained more or less in position, although Newt Gingrich’s brief bump to 13% in November dissipated almost immediately.

Even more interesting is what happens when various potential candidates are removed from consideration.  Without Huckabee, four other candidates all rise, including Ron Paul slightly from 6% to 8%; Gingrich picks up three points, Palin picks up five, and Romney four.  Without Huckabee and Palin, Romney adds seven points to go to 22%, and Gingrich picks up six to 16%, while almost all other candidates get a slight bump upward with none getting to double digits.

When Palin is taken out of the picture, though, almost all of the benefit is felt by Huckabee, who gets four more points to 23%.  Romney only gets a single point, Gingrich gets two, and both Paul and Michele Bachmann add one.  That’s an unexpected result; one might expect Palin supporters to break a little more seriously towards Bachmann, who shares her Tea Party credibility, or maybe Mitch Daniels, who doesn’t benefit at all.

Huckabee has not decided whether he’ll run at all, and currently doesn’t have a formal organization in the field.  His perch at Fox gives him a wide reach, though, and it might be paying off for Huckabee as he contemplates his options.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Let us remember that Mike Huckebee did not do a very good job as governor. Nothing personal against him but his performance was just not up the standards of other governors we know.

Also YouTube will not be good to Huckabee as he was for cap & trade and later said he never supported it etc.

Chuck Norton on March 25, 2011 at 4:46 PM

What’s wrong with creating an $800 million dollar surplus out of a $200 million dollar budget deficit?

cschande on March 25, 2011 at 4:49 PM

Also YouTube will not be good to Huckabee as he was for cap & trade and later said he never supported it etc.

Chuck Norton on March 25, 2011 at 4:46 PM

And don’t forget his “Obama grew up in Kenya” / “I never said Obama grew up in Kenya” backtracking (a.k.a. lying).

steebo77 on March 25, 2011 at 4:50 PM

Nope, I don’t support handouts for the violators, unless you want to include the 3 year-old kid whose parents brought him here in that category. True, if the government allows these kids to be eligible for scholarships, their parents won’t have to pick up the tab, but their parents weren’t going to pick up the tab in the first place. For most of these kids, their options are going to college on scholarship money or not going at all.

cschande on March 25, 2011 at 4:47 PM

What about being deported?

steebo77 on March 25, 2011 at 4:52 PM

If they want to do a meaning full poll, have those questioned rank order their candidates, giving at least their first,second and third choices.

Then they can do the instant ballot runoff thing and determine who has the most broad based support, and that would be meaningful.

The Rock on March 25, 2011 at 4:52 PM

Your profile shot over at Huck’s Army makes me assume your a youngster – maybe still in college. When you have kids of your own and realize that they are a part of you and you are more concerned with securing their future than your own – come back then and tell me how you feel about the hard-working illegal kid competing with your kid for the benefits you paid for but their parents did not… unless you’ve gone whole hog liberal by then, you’ll have a different point of view on this issue.

miConsevative on March 25, 2011 at 4:48 PM

Yep, I’m still a youngster, and you pegged the profile shot perfectly, as it was taken while I was still in college. I’ve moved on to law school now, but still no kids. Sure, maybe my views will change then, but that kind of an argument doesn’t hold a lot of water with me. It’s basically the argument people trot out when they’ve got nothing else to stand on. For example, how many times have you heard something along the lines of:

You’re wrong about abortion because you’re not a woman and therefore you just can’t understand!

That’s usually not the argument they start with, but a lot of pro-choicers end up there eventually. “You just can’t understand,” may be a difficult argument to respond to, but it doesn’t really say anything either.

cschande on March 25, 2011 at 4:54 PM

For most of these kids, their options are going to college on scholarship money or not going at all.

cschande on March 25, 2011 at 4:47 PM

Or working hard for a few years to save up money and then go to college. Or joining the armed forces to fund their education. Or working while getting required courses out of the way at a community college then getting loans to pay for college. Or, like millions of other people, being successful without a college degree. Or…

Being allowed to compete for a scholarship is not a right, it’s a privilege provided for citizen by other tax-paying citizens. For them to even think of complaining at not being eligible for these things they’ve not contributed to shows they already have an entitlement mindset, which I would say is a greater harm than benefit to a state.

miConsevative on March 25, 2011 at 4:55 PM

If they want to do a meaning full poll, have those questioned rank order their candidates, giving at least their first,second and third choices.

Then they can do the instant ballot runoff thing and determine who has the most broad based support, and that would be meaningful.

The Rock on March 25, 2011 at 4:52 PM

Um, they’ve done that sort of thing, and Huck wins.

cschande on March 25, 2011 at 4:58 PM

“…therefore in summation, i submit that the only way to win in 2012 is to pick mitt.”

Isn’t that convenient for Romney Fans. Another bland NE Republican. Being reviled by your party’s base is no way to win a general election. Just ask McCain & Dole… and Bush 1 for that matter. If you want a conservative who can appeal to the middle, go w/ Pawlenty or Daniels.

SAMinVA on March 25, 2011 at 5:00 PM

It’s basically the argument people trot out when they’ve got nothing else to stand on.

cschande on March 25, 2011 at 4:54 PM

Well, Mr Lawyer, you may want to learn that ignoring the 2 pages of comments I’ve made supporting my view by claiming I have nothing else to stand on isn’t going to convince too many juries unless they have horrible memories.

Your claim is the one more likely to be rejected by most conservatives, therefore the burden of proof is yours.

Further, you’ve thrown out many more “I feel” arguments before I raised this one observation and I in no way used that to try ignore all other points you’ve tried to make.

miConsevative on March 25, 2011 at 5:01 PM

Mike Huckabee tops a large list of potential GOP presidential candidates in current support for the party’s 2012 nomination, with 19% of Republicans saying they are most likely to back him.

So under 20%? IOW, this poll is meaningless because no one has made up their minds since no one is running yet.

MrX on March 25, 2011 at 5:10 PM

I have a friend and former boss who is from Texas, and a former Democrat. He supports Huckabee because he claims that infrastructure in Arkansas really got bumped up while Huckabee was governor.

Are there any Arkansans here who can confirm or deny that?

JohnGalt23 on March 25, 2011 at 2:26 PM

He is going to vote for someone who built a road or two
with federal tax dollars? Sorry, Huckabee lost me for many reasons, primary one being that tax dollars were used to
give illegals children college funds. I had to pay
$100 grand and these kids get education free or at low cost?

Amjean on March 25, 2011 at 5:23 PM

Huckabee is the type of candidate will make states like New Hampshire, Michigans, New Jersey and Wisconsin become deep Blue again.

swamp_yankee on March 25, 2011 at 2:58 PM
And yet he’s got the highest favorable ratings and is tied for the lead among GOP candidates in New Jersey, has an 8-point lead in Wisconsin, is polling a close second in Michigan, and is doing no worse than the rest of the GOP field against Romney in New Hampshire.

Facts have a bad habit of getting in the way sometimes, don’t they?

cschande on March 25, 2011 at 3:11 PM

Yes, the facts are that this poll is either a joke or
voters are even dumber than what I thought. This country
is in great trouble and they are going to pick him to lead us out of the mess we are in? Perhaps he can sit on a chair at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue playing his guitary with
the case open for donations to pay down our debt.

He must be the media’s current ABP candidate. They keep
recycling them each week or so and I can’t keep track.

Amjean on March 25, 2011 at 5:34 PM

Holding your nose and voting for the candy tax man is not better than staying at home or voting for 3rd party.

I will not vote for the American born white half of Obama.

jdkchem on March 25, 2011 at 5:36 PM

I would rather see my house burn to the ground and my entire life’s work destroyed then vote for Mitt.

unseen on March 25, 2011 at 3:16 PM

Have the bashers beaten you down so much on these threads
that you would vote for a rino in conservative squirrel’s clothing?
Jesus, Mary and Joseph! I never thought I would see this
from you. Take “Mitt” and add Gingrich, Daniels, Pawlenty, Huckabee, Barbour and any other APB candidate to your list. If the RNC succeeds in getting a RINO in office,
do you realize nothing substantive is going to change and
this country is doomed. Please tell me I misunderstood
your posting.

Amjean on March 25, 2011 at 5:43 PM

If Huckabee’s the nominee, this Palin supporter is sitting out the election. So, no. He’s not a viable second choice to Palin.

As for Armey deciding who the TP should support: Auck Frmey.

SilentWatcher on March 25, 2011 at 6:32 PM

Huckabee has ZERO chance of beating Obama. He’s turned himself into the Oprah Winfrey of FOX News commentary and comes across as a nice, yet slightly metro talk show host rather than a leader. I’m sure the MSM and Democrats will push him as the front runner in the hopes of facing him in 2012.

EasyEight on March 25, 2011 at 6:41 PM

I’ve held my nose while voting for a lot of Republicans in my time, but I’ll draw the line at Huckleberry.

SukieTawdry on March 25, 2011 at 6:44 PM

Isn’t that convenient for Romney Fans. Another bland NE Republican. Being reviled by your party’s base is no way to win a general election. Just ask McCain & Dole… and Bush 1 for that matter. If you want a conservative who can appeal to the middle, go w/ Pawlenty or Daniels.

SAMinVA on March 25, 2011 at 5:00 PM

more convenient than getting our asses handed to us by fighting over no-names and chumps (pawlenty, daniels, etc.). quote it in context, brother. the ONLY way to win is by picking someONE and uniting. it would help if that someone had the campaign experience, name notoriety, and money that mittens already has.

TruthBeTold2 on March 25, 2011 at 6:46 PM

Getting really tired of Gallup and some other polls trying to pick our candidate this far out. Not bothering to go into details of why Huckabee wasn’t electable the last time because of his record in Arkansas, etc.

Still think no one who ran in 2008 who couldn’t beat McCain should even be considering running. As far as I am concerned that rules them OUT!

PhiKapMom on March 25, 2011 at 6:50 PM

Huck is the “liberals choice” for the Republicans.

royzer on March 25, 2011 at 7:40 PM

Still think no one who ran in 2008 who couldn’t beat McCain should even be considering running. As far as I am concerned that rules them OUT!

PhiKapMom on March 25, 2011 at 6:50 PM

Ronald Reagan lost the 1976 election. He ran again in 1980.

Would you have been opposed to Ronald Reagan if he was considering a second run for the White House in 1979?

I don’t care if they have run once or twice for President. Let ALL Republican candidates make their case to the American people during the primaries.

Conservative Samizdat on March 25, 2011 at 7:54 PM

I have always voted Republican for President since I could vote in 1980- and I have never missed voting in an election since I was 18- HOWEVER, I will never vote for the Huckster. EVER! even if running against Obama and I really dislike Obama. That should tell you how I feel about somebody I feel is a bigot!

WyoMike on March 25, 2011 at 7:59 PM

Huckabee is against contraception. I consider myself pro-life but that is a step too far. Huck will not get my vote.

alwaysfiredup on March 25, 2011 at 8:00 PM

Both have lost four points in subsequent polling, Palin’s all in the last month, while Huckabee picked up seven points in steady steps.

People with a clue know that Palin isn’t going to run. More people are coming around to the reality. That, and the reality that she would never beat Obama anyway.

Palin fans that say they won’t vote don’t really matter. Because there will be few of them by Nov 2012. At least few willing to pout that much.

Moesart on March 25, 2011 at 8:11 PM

If Huckabee is the best the GOP can come up with, the party is toast — and damned well deserves to be so.

Jim - PRS on March 25, 2011 at 8:13 PM

He’s certainly not the second choice of THIS Palin voter. It might be safe to say he’s at the absolute bottom of my list. And that’s assuming he’s even on it in the first place.

NoLeftTurn on March 25, 2011 at 8:13 PM

People with a clue know that Palin isn’t going to run.

Moesart on March 25, 2011 at 8:11 PM

Lol. Oooookay. Will you promise to vacate all future HA Palin threads after she announces an exploratory committee or campaign?

alwaysfiredup on March 25, 2011 at 8:17 PM

Huck should stick it o playingup his b ass….

idesign on March 25, 2011 at 3:44 PM

fixed!

cableguy615 on March 25, 2011 at 8:52 PM

Conservative Samizdat on March 25, 2011 at 7:54 PM

Reagan’s got nothing to do with PhiKapMom’s point. She’s speaking strictly about McCain, and what a lousy candidate he was, and still Mitt and Huck couldn’t even beat McCain. So they shouldn’t run this time because they couldn’t even beat HUGE LOSER McCain.

JimP on March 25, 2011 at 9:34 PM

I will take the bait also…I have been a Huckabee supporter since 2007 before he won the IA primary.

To answer some of your allegations against Huckabee:

Amnesty:
Huckabee believes that a fence should be built before we do anything else about the illegal immigrants. Businessess should be fined for hiring them. He does not go along with amnesty. (spoken in an interview in 2011).
Yes, Huckabee supported children of illegal immigrants being eligible for college scholarships with the following stipulations:

They must have been in America from a very young age. They shouldn’t be punished for their parents choices.
They must be at the top of their class in HS.
They must be in the process of getting their citizenship in America to qualify.

Huckabee believes that these students will be more productive citizens with a college education where they would get a job and pay taxes, rather than pick tomotoes in a field for the rest of their lives and pay no taxes.

Amnesty for prisoners:
He looked at every single file of the convicts in the Arkansas prisons for his whole term as Gov. (10 1/2 yrs.). During this period of time, he noticed that the judges in Arkansas were giving the Blacks a much longer sentence than they gave the white prisoner who had committed the same offenses.

The Judge and Parole Board asked Huckabee to give clemency to Clemmons,16 yrs. old at the time, who was given a sentence of 104 years for several felonies (no killing, rape or using a gun was involved in these offenses). Not even criminals who had murdered had been given that long of a sentence. He proceeded to fill out paperwork which was given to other official, including the prosecutor, to state whether they had objections to this clemency. Nobody sent back any objections to Clemmons having the sentence reduced. Huckabee signed the clemency which reduced the sentence to 46 years. The Parole Board made the decision to let Clemmons out. Within three weeks, Clemmons broke his parole and was back in prison. The prosecutor failed to do the paperwork to keep him there, so Clemmons was released. It had nothing to do with Huckabee.

For those who say Huckabee released 1,044 prisoners, here is the whole truth. Huckabee had 768 people who requested that he give them a pardon because they were on welfare and couldn’t get a job. These people had already served their full sentences. Gov. Huckabee figured it was better for these people to get a pardon, get a job and get off of welfare and save the state the money for welfare. So, he only released, pardoned, or gave clemency to 276 prisoners during his term. As I said there was some racism in Arkansas and Huckabee felt like the Black community did not deserve to serve a much longer sentence than the white people did.

VFT on March 25, 2011 at 9:44 PM

Mike Huckabee has either won or come in a close second in almost all of the polls for the last year. He has won the most Republicans, Conseratives, Independents and sometimes even Moderates to win these polls. Sarah Palin used to have the highest scores with favorable/unfavorable for the Republicans, but now Huckabee gets the highest scores in almost every category, male, female, Independent, Republican, Conservative. When he was polled by Gallup, Mike Huckabee also scored highest with the 2nd choices.

The reason misinformation was out there about Huckabee is from half-truth ads placed by Romney and Club for Growth in the 2008 primary. Mike Huckabee saw that the pundits and Republican radio and TV pundits would not tell the public the truth about him, so, like Reagan, he took his information straight to the public on Fox News, “Huckabee” show and on the radio. Democrats have watched his show and seen how Huckabee treats everybody with respect. That’s why Mike Huckabee has the highest favorables and lowest unfavorables of all of the Republican candidates. If Obama is down in the polls during 2012, some of the Dems might vote Republican if they LIKE the candidate. Huckabee stuck to his principles in Arkansas as Gov, and would do so as President. He did not push his religion on the people of Arkansas and won’t do that as President either.

I would be happy to answer any questions you have about Huckabee, and if I don’t know, I can find out the answer. It’s better to find out the truth about Huckabee rather than lies that have been fed from one person to another.

VFT on March 25, 2011 at 9:53 PM

If Huck runs, he wins. At this rate, he might even win if he doesn’t!

cschande on March 25, 2011 at 9:54 PM

VFT on March 25, 2011 at 9:53 PM

And having a show on Fox called “Huckabee” is perfectly fine with you?

alwaysfiredup on March 25, 2011 at 9:56 PM

that infrastructure in Arkansas really got bumped up while Huckabee was governor.

Are there any Arkansans here who can confirm or deny that?

JohnGalt23 on March 25, 2011 at 2:26 PM

That’s correct, John…Huck floated the idea of a bond to improve highways, mainly I-40 and I-30. The citizens voted to let the bonds and roads were improved…

Gohawgs on March 25, 2011 at 9:58 PM

If Huck runs, he wins. At this rate, he might even win if he doesn’t!

cschande on March 25, 2011 at 9:54 PM

You should’ve been more careful when sledding backwards down that hill…

Gohawgs on March 25, 2011 at 9:59 PM

A bit more about Huck’s 1033 pardons…

Gohawgs on March 25, 2011 at 10:05 PM

Well, I’m glad those polls have this all settled for us.
One word…NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Kissmygrits on March 25, 2011 at 10:12 PM

Don’t look now but the New York Times is Orgasmic about a Bachmann run and who (The Wasilly Hillbilly) it might hurt.

Let them all run.

As long as we get a true Conservative that can beat Obama.

This country won’t survive another 4 years of the Wrecking Ball and his minions.

PappyD61 on March 25, 2011 at 10:16 PM

Oh puleeeze! (Nearly) anybody but the Huck!

GFW on March 25, 2011 at 10:16 PM

Mike Huckabee saw that the pundits and Republican radio and TV pundits would not tell the public the truth about him, so, like Reagan He’s no Reagan (not even close), he took his information straight to the public (the Conservatives that watch) on Fox News, “Huckabee” show and on the radio. Democrats have watched his show and seen how Huckabee treats everybody with respect.

He is a BIG FED GOV Nanny State Bush Republican (truthfully all of the GOP candidates might be).

Sorry, if we want Overreaching Nanny State Government to tell us next how to wipe our rear-ends (they already tell us how much water we can use in our toilets and shower heads) then I’d rather the Democrats just do it and get it over with and turn us all literally in FEMA Camp Americans (Lautenburg sounds like he’d like to put the Tea Party in them).

Huckabee is just a squish. No thanks.

PappyD61 on March 25, 2011 at 10:22 PM

I wish I didn’t know what I know about Huck. He is likable and he has run a state for more than one term… I just wish I didn’t know what I know.

But anyone is better than Obama. And if we can get Republicans to come together and not bicker over every little thing we can at least get the commie out of the Whitehouse… then we can work on the rest of the problems.

First things first.

petunia on March 25, 2011 at 10:40 PM

I would be happy to answer any questions you have about Huckabee, and if I don’t know, I can find out the answer. It’s better to find out the truth about Huckabee rather than lies that have been fed from one person to another.

VFT on March 25, 2011 at 9:53 PM

Do you consider yourself a conservative? and if so, do you have a problem with any of his “nanny state” views such as on banning smoking in all workplaces, or the statements he’s made on government getting involved in people’s nutrition/fitness/etc?

That’s my big hang up with Huck.

miConsevative on March 25, 2011 at 10:58 PM

AlwaysFiredUP,

Of course it’s okay for Huckabee to have a show on Fox News. He couldn’t get the truth out because the Republican pundits wanted Romney to win or be the VP. Of course, they just conveniently forgot that Romney was really a liberal and certainly not a Conservative in MA. I don’t call Romneycare Conservative in any way…mandates anyone?

Huckabee didn’t have the millions of dollars to put out ads to correct the lies in the media. He was offered jobs from CNN and MSNBC, but accepted Fox News. Yes, lots of Democrats and Independents watch his show and have found out what Huckabee believes on the issues, not the lies in the papers and on the internet from his rivals. Reagan did the same thing by bypassing the Republican Establishment and went direct to the people on radio.

In addition to Palin, Huckabee is hated by the Republican Establishment too. They would not be able to control him and they know it.

VFT on March 25, 2011 at 11:01 PM

MiConservative,

Thanks for asking me that question. I live in Indiana and I thought all states ban smoking in businessess, don’t they? Then why would Huckabee’s ban on smoking in business be a nanny state issue? This regulation is to safeguard everybody’s health.

As far as the nutrition issue:

Mike Huckabee got diabetes from being overweight and did lose over 100 pounds. He was raised in the South and saw that by eating such unhealthy foods as a child it led to his choices to eat as an adult and to obesity. So when Michelle Obama wanted to have an initiative to put healthy foods in “schools” for children to have some opportunity to eat healthy, even if their parents didn’t feed them healthy food at home, Huckabee agreed with this. He was not in favor of mandating adults by the government on what they eat. Michelle’s program was for the children in schools only. Since the Government already gave money to schools, they wanted to help children avoid obesity which, of course, leads to many health problems.

Because of what Huckabee experienced as a child, he knew that children needed to have some experience as a child to eat healthy. As you know, if we parents feed our children healthy foods, they will probably continue to eat healthy as adults. The same goes for bad foods too..children will eat bad foods as adults. I don’t consider this a nanny state issue either because we are talking about the health and welfare of all children in the country. I read many comments from the Dems. about how Republicans don’t care about helping our children to be exposed to healthy food, they just want to oppose anything the Dems want. Sometimes,the Democrats do have a good idea too.

VFT on March 25, 2011 at 11:12 PM

Yes, I am a very strong Conservative.

VFT on March 25, 2011 at 11:13 PM

The Huckster was no more than a proxy for Newt’s American Solutions back in the 2008 campaign.

No Huckster no way for you will never see where he truly stands except behind some polling data, just like Newt.

Kermit on March 25, 2011 at 11:23 PM

JimP,

You think Romney and Huckabee shouldn’t run because they couldn’t even beat McCain,right?

Have you forgot that Reagan lost his first time running for President and then when he ran the second time, he won almost every state. So Mitt and Huckabee could win against Obama too. The polls show they both have the best chance to win. Just this week in NC, which we need to win in 2012, Huckabee tied with Obama and Romney lost to Obama by 2 points. Everybody else on the Republican side lost by lots more points. We need to support the candidate who has the best chance to beat Obama. It doesn’t do us any good to vote for a candidate for the Republican nomination if that candidate would get creamed in the general election. These polls, of course, aren’t going to be exactly what happens, but what they are showing are trends. Huckabee is winning all the southern states, PA, IL, tied in NJ, tied in Maine, tied in MI and wins most of the Midwest states. He is not just an Evangelical or regional candidate any longer. He has won polls across the U.S. (of course not all of them). I personally believe that the numbers you are seeing in the PPP, Gallup and other polls, are from lots of people who think Huckabee might not be running. From listening to everything he says and watching what he does, I personally am convinced that he is definitely running. He cannot step up any staff or outwardly set up any organization because if he does,he will lose his job at Fox News like Gingrich and Santorum did. That’s your explanation at why Huckabee isn’t showing by organization or hiring staff like other campaigns. He reaches over 1,000,000 people every day on the weekend and lots of people on the radio. He will probably announce sometime this summer, and when he does, the people on these polls who didn’t vote for him because they thought he wasn’t running will then vote for Huckabee, and his numbers will go up a lot. Everybody already knows Romney is running. The Republican Establishment has put out that Huckabee isn’t running to try and keep him from winning the polls and convincing people to support the candidate the Establishment wants. They do that to Sarah too as you know.

VFT on March 25, 2011 at 11:27 PM

Kermit,

In case you haven’t noticed Mike Huckabee does support some things that may not be as popular. He does that because he is a leader, not a follower. He doesn’t look to see what the polls say to make a decision.

Remember that Huckabee gave either pardons or clenencies to 276 convicts in prisons in Arkansas. Do you think that was a smart thing to do if he wanted to run for President? No, but he believed it was the right thing to do for the people in Arkansas. Believe me I would rather have a President who cares about all of the people in the U.S. than a President who cares more about what the “world” thinks.

Mike Huckabee wants the U.N out of America. He thinks that the other countries should be paying for them. He didn’t say America get out of the U.N. but they be stationed in another country so we can save all the money we spend on the U.N. that treats us horribly. That’s not a popular position, but Huckabee believes it’s the right thing to do.

Huckabee is not like Obama or Romney for that matter, he is a leader and makes the difficult decisions necessary.

When Huckabee governed Arkansas during the Katrina tornado, he told the people in his office, to forget about the red tape, and right away help all the people who needed somewhere to stay coming from Louisiana. He said Arkansas should give them a place to stay and food to eat. He made a decision quickly to help them…that’s a leader.

VFT on March 25, 2011 at 11:36 PM

Classic Hucakbee, no spin:

“I also support cap and trade of carbon emissions. And I was disappointed that the Senate rejected a carbon counting system to measure the sources of emissions, because that would have been the first and the most important step toward implementing true cap and trade.” – Mike Huckabee

“And one thing that I do know is his having grown up in Kenya, his view of the Brits, for example, very different than the average American.”

“I think that the rational approach is to give people a pathway to citzenship” – before his amnesty flip-flop

“If I were some of these guys, I’d have to be sitting in a warm tub of water with razor blades.” Huckabee was referring to other GOP candidates.

It goes on and on…

swamp_yankee on March 26, 2011 at 12:14 AM

Because of what Huckabee experienced as a child, he knew that children needed to have some experience as a child to eat healthy. As you know, if we parents feed our children healthy foods, they will probably continue to eat healthy as adults. The same goes for bad foods too..children will eat bad foods as adults. I don’t consider this a nanny state issue either because we are talking about the health and welfare of all children in the country. I read many comments from the Dems. about how Republicans don’t care about helping our children to be exposed to healthy food, they just want to oppose anything the Dems want. Sometimes,the Democrats do have a good idea too.

VFT on March 25, 2011 at 11:12 PM

But isn’t this the role of parents, not the state? Sure, some will fail, but freedom is freedom to fail as well as to succeed. Case in point is the place in Cali banning toys in Happy Meals. Sure, some parents fed their kids too much Micky D’s, but why then, am I punished when I want to give my kids, who usually eat a healthy diet, a special treat with a Happy Meal which now will have no toy because some other parents are irresponsible.

And I don’t think smoking in the workplace is banned everywhere. It just happened in Michigan and there are plenty who are against it. Businesses (especially bars) have lost customers to casinos (where, for some reason, you are allowed to smoke). I think it’s up to the business owner to decide whether to allow smoking or not, and then the customers to decide if they want to go to a place that allows it or not. But this freedom has been taken away.

As I said earlier, it’s better for me to get to bed early, stay fit and avoid any chili that’s part of a Texas chili cook off – but I don’t want the government to be in charge of my bedtime, my exercise habits or my food choice. Nanny staters always have good intentions – but it always ends up taking away our freedom. And ultimately, it leads people to believe that someone should be looking out for every aspect of their lives and if anything goes wrong, someone else must be to blame – hence the many frivolous lawsuits and insane disclaimers you see now days.

miConsevative on March 26, 2011 at 12:19 AM

VFT,

Sincerely, keep talking up your candidate.
As someone who has seen Huck up close I would disagree with some of what you say are his attributes. As swamp_yankee posted above, Huck has “changed course” on several important issues. The link I posted above showed his penchant for helping those sentenced to prison if they were able to interact with him (at the Govs Mansion) or if relatives were able to meet with Huck or if a fellow preacher vouched for them or if he knew them or of them. His desire and push to change what foods kids and others consumed came years before the FLOTUS proposed her similar idea. Huck did cut all the red tape he could in helping the Katrina refugees, including getting the many Baptist, and other, church camps to open their camps to the many people that Arkansas welcomed after the hurricane. There are many Katrina survivors still living in Arkansas due to the help and welcome that they received.

And, as someone that has seen him up close — Huck is not in my top 4 or 5 current “would vote for” POTUS candidates…

Gohawgs on March 26, 2011 at 1:38 AM

If Huck runs, he wins. At this rate, he might even win if he doesn’t!

cschande on March 25, 2011 at 9:54 PM

I think cschande is having a transient ischemic attack like those gibbering reporters.

BDavis on March 26, 2011 at 2:05 AM

VFT on March 25, 2011 at 11:27 PM

No, VFT. I was clarifying PhiKapMom’s point for Conservative Samizdat on March 25, 2011 at 7:54 PM

I realize you are zealous for your candidate and hence misread the comment.

JimP on March 26, 2011 at 5:50 AM

Huckabee is a RINO and he is not in Sarah Palin’s league. Let’s not forget that Huckabee supports us paying for Scholarships for illegal aliens.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbKA4HqjpeA

Huckabee is the last person we need to lead this country. He cannot be trusted.

sinsing on March 26, 2011 at 6:25 AM

If Huck runs, he wins. At this rate, he might even win if he doesn’t!

cschande on March 25, 2011 at 9:54 PM

I think cschande is having a transient ischemic attack like those gibbering reporters.

BDavis on March 26, 2011 at 2:05 AM

Haha. Nope! Just stating the obvious.

cschande on March 26, 2011 at 9:33 AM

Huckabee loses NV and AZ (ID?) against Obama and loses the election if he is the nominee. His not-to-subtle digs at Mormons will really hurt him there.

besser tot als rot on March 26, 2011 at 11:38 AM

Huck or Obama… Does anyone really have to ask?
Ham Sandwich or Obama… Does anyone really have to ask?

Big John on March 26, 2011 at 2:15 PM

Huckabee as a choice against Obama is merely picking which sewer this country spirals down.

{^_^}

herself on March 26, 2011 at 3:04 PM

We already had a southern Sunday school teacher as president and how did that work out? The fundies will sink Moroni’s candidate and crush Newton the unfaithful and then move on to check the sex and cult creds of the other candidates the process ending with a more religious McCain lite and four more years of BHO. Perhaps Trump will provide a few laughs before the final agony of defeat.

Annar on March 27, 2011 at 11:39 AM

Swamp_Yankee,

When Mike Huckabee made that comment it was about the Cap and Trade bill that Bush was trying to get through the Senate in 2007, not the Cap and Trade bill that the Democrats have been trying to push through recently. BTW, that Cap and Trade bill by Bush was for voluntary Cap and Trade, not mandatory like the Dems want.

If you would have listened to Huckabee’s show on Fox News you would have heard his clarification of this mistake about Kenya. Huckabee didn’t say this on his show, but the interview was during Huckabee’s book tour. This interview was about the 42nd interview he had that day, and he was exhausted. Huckabee is NOT a birther and has never been a birther. He stated that Obama spent part of his childhood in “Kenya”. On his show, Huckabee said he misspoke, he meant to say “Indonesia” which Huckabee had already wrote in his book that Obama spent some time growing up in “Indonesia”, so he knew what the right answer was. After Huckabee mentioned “Kenya” he went on with that train of thought because Obama’s father and grandfather were raised in “Kenya”. He has been very respectful of Pres. Obama and does not criticize him about personal issues, just his policies. Huckabee would have known that this interviewer would come out with the correct information about Obama, so he would not have deliberately said something that was so easily proven. He’s not stupid.

Huckabee does not back amnesty, he said he thinks that we ought to build a fence, and fine companies who hire illegals before we can talk about what to do with the illegals we have in our country.

I hope I have clarified some of the misinformation about these topics.

VFT on March 28, 2011 at 3:28 AM

Go Hawgs,

Thank you for your statement to continue to talk up my candidate.

As far as the prison issue, Mike Huckabee has stated emphatically that he did not use his religion in any way as a means to determine if a prisoner was given amnesty, etc. I know you have read this about him, but it isn’t true. That same prosecutor I mentioned in my statement above about Clemmons and Huckabee’s role, was a Democrat and he talked to some Conservatives when this killing of the 4 officers came out, and told lies about Huckabee (that he told Huckabee not to let Clemmons out of prison), because he knew he was the one guilty of letting Clemmons out of prison because he didn’t do his job by filling out the proper paperwork, so Clemmons got out of prison….he was trying to shift the blame to Huckabee.

After Huckabee was diagnosed with Diabetes, he realized that some of those obese children in schools in Arkansas might grow up and get Diabetes too because of the foods they ate in schools. So Gov. Huckabee had the schools give heathier foods for these children, and Arkansas was rated very high for the success they had with Huckabee’s program. Other Governors requested information so they could implement it in their schools too.

As far as Huckabee changing positions, I assume you mean about immigration and the students he wanted to have a chance to get a scholarship. There were stipulations that Huckabee wanted before the child of illegal immigrants would be eligible for that scholarship:

They must have been very young when their parents brought them to America…so they spent most of their lives in U.S.
They must be in the top percentile of their graduating class.
The must be going through the process to be a citizen.

Huckabee did not think it was fair that these very smart children would be punished for what their parents did. He thought it would be better if they graduated from college, got a good paying job and paid taxes rather than them having to pick tomatoes for the rest of their lives. As you know, this was voted down in Arkansas, so it never happened.

I hope you will come to Hucksarmy.com and get the other side of what has been reported in the MSM about Huckabee, and then make an informed decision on whether you would vote for him in the primary.

VFT on March 28, 2011 at 3:43 AM

miConservative,

Of course it is the role of parents to determine what foods their children eat, but, as you know there are lots of parents that don’t have the money or didn’t grow up eating healthy foods themselves, so they continue the cycle of giving bad food to their children. Because the government already gives funds to schools in America for food programs, I’m sure Michelle Obama figured they would give healthy foods so these children that don’t eat healty at home would at least get the opportunity at school.

Mike Huckabee does NOT agree with the government telling us adults what to eat, or when to go to bed. I don’t believe he is a Nanny Stater at all. I agree with the premise of people who don’t smoke not having to be around second hand smoke in the workplace…this can cause cancer even for non-smokers. As I stated above, we have had that law in Indiana for several years, so I assumed most states did the same. But you know even if all of the states don’t have that ban, they will in the near future. Mike Huckabee had Ann Coulter on his show and asked her why she spread this lie around. She, like you, believed Huckabee said this for all of our country, but he said he only wanted it for Arkansas.

VFT on March 28, 2011 at 3:53 AM

Besser,

Mike Huckabee apologized twice to the Mormons for the question he asked the reporter about Mormons. I hope they will forgive him because he has stated many times, he has nothing against other religions or even athiests. He did not like Romney, nothing about his religion, because Romney keeps changing positions, pandering to people, and has no principles and can’t be trusted.

Their has been a poll from AZ that showed Huckabee in second place, but I realize he might have a difficult time winning in AZ and NV. As you know, if Huckabee has won a lot of state primaries before it gets to NV or AZ, that would probably help him do well with the momentum he would have built up.

You know that he is at the top of every southern state and most of the midwest states. If he could get NC, which last week he polled even against Obama, get IN, OH, FL, and IA, and maybe PA which he won a poll there too, he could win the nomination without winning any western state.

VFT on March 28, 2011 at 4:02 AM

Mike Huckabee did not push his religion on the people of Arkansas when he was Governor and won’t do that as President either. That doesn’t mean he won’t work hard for pro-life and make sure our country is not giving the taxpayers money to pay for abortion.

VFT on March 28, 2011 at 4:04 AM

VFT on March 28, 2011 at 3:43 AM

Thanks for the reply…As a resident of Arkansas, I’ve seen Huckabee up close, literally and figuratively. As it stands now, he won’t be in my top 5 potential POTUS candidates for 2012…
You, backwards sledding boy and terrie (Daniels) are some of the few commenters that actually defend and promote their preferred POTUS candidate instead of throwing out a lot of “yeah, buts” about Palin while not talking up anyone else. (though terrie does throw in a Palin snark at the end of her comments).

Gohawgs on March 28, 2011 at 4:11 AM

This is NOT good news for GOP voters.

mountainaires on March 28, 2011 at 9:26 AM

Nothing about Huck excites me as a possible candidate.

MTinMN on March 28, 2011 at 11:15 AM

I always read the comments on Hot Air, but most of you are so mean and say terrible things (most are not true) against Huckabee, I just never responded. But someone asked that a Huckabee supporter respond, so I did.

It’s not an accident that in the polls, most of Palin’s supporters will vote for Huckabee if she doesn’t run. I have stated on here a long time ago, that Huckabee and Palin are very similar. I hope the people on Hot Air will take another look at Mike Huckabee because he is able to get the votes from the Republicans/Conservatives and the Independents which we have to have to win in the general election. Give Huckabee a chance…go on Hucksarmy and ask your questions about him and get answers that are true, not just half true from the MSM or what the Club for Growth put out in 2008.

VFT on March 28, 2011 at 2:35 PM

Who could question Huckabee? He’s always been on the right side… right?

In 2007, Huckabee supported a “cap and trade” emissions control program and also stated that confronting global warming is a moral issue.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aYDB2MPIf0EU&refer=politics

Who doesn’t like Cap & Trade to cut CO2 emissions?

And on Health Care; he’s for Preventative care and getting the government involved in your health, well being, preventative care, and lifestyle choices. Don’t you want the government making more choices for you?

Huckabee argued illegal immigrants pay more in taxes than they receive in benefits

http://web.archive.org/web/20070704122041/http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2005/01/28/News/316347.html

Right, illegal immigration is good, and we should work to make them legal. And it makes money for the State, which is why California is flush with cash… oh wait.

Huckabee has voiced his support of intelligent design and he has stated that he does not accept the validity of Darwin’s theory of evolution.

http://web.archive.org/web/20061115183113/http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/rncse_content/vol25/8118_is_evolution_arkansas39s_h_12_30_1899.asp

That’s going to be a popular position as well. Not to mention his rants on homosexuality.

Yeah, he’s a keeper; if you’re for a pro-illegal immigrant, anti-evolution anti-gay Presidential candidate. Or are we going to hope those topics don’t come up? Or that the general public hates Darwin and gays and love illegal immigration?

He’s dodgier than heck, he’s all for getting the government more involved and more control over your life; but he has different goals that the liberals working to get the government more involved and more control over your life… is that good enough?

Is the only problem that the government is getting too powerful with the wrong ideals; and we need less freedom and a more powerful government… but we need someone like Huckabee steering the government into more detailed control of our lives?

If I wanted larger, more intrusive, more powerful, and more controlling government in America; couldn’t I just vote for Obama again?

gekkobear on March 28, 2011 at 3:18 PM

Gekkobear,

In case you hadn’t noticed, Mike Huckabee is a social conservative which means he believes in the traditional belief of one man and one woman like we have had it for hundreds of years. Once you start down the path of gay marriage, what’s to stop the Mormons who do believe in multiple marriages from saying, “Hey we aren’t getting our civil rights either”? That could also start other groups from wanting their civil rights! You are obviously not a Christian who reads the Bible or you would know that God created the earth and all of the worlds. There have been lots of scientists in the last 20 years who are now doubting evolution too. If you watched the movie, “Expelled”, Ben Stein went around the world and interviewed scientists. One of the most well known scientist said that aliens probably came to earth and that’s where man came from. Ben Stein asked him, “Who made the aliens”? The scientist admitted, he didn’t know.

Would you rather have Obamacare which has the Government making all the decisions for you…especially at the end of your life in whether it’s worth you having surgery or not? Mike Huckabee knows that if more people would get doctors to stress preventative care, more illnesses would be caught early which would save lots of money and increase the chances for people to survive bad illnesses. For example, my spouse and I get Colon checks every five years as preventative medicine for cancer growing in the colon and catching it early and removing it.

If you would have looked at one of my posts above, I spoke in detail about Mike Huckabee’s comment on Cap and Trade. He was speaking about the bill that Bush wanted in 2007 which was for “voluntary” Cap and Trade, not what the Dems want now.

Mike Huckabee does not believe in amnesty for illegal immigrants. He wants a fence built and companies to pay a fine before any other decision is made about immigration.

VFT on March 30, 2011 at 1:12 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3