Irony of the Week

posted at 6:00 pm on March 20, 2011 by Ed Morrissey

Whenever people choose to name landmarks and buildings for people living or deceased, they want to associate themselves with that person to send a message or to teach a lesson.  Evidently, the lesson to be learned from Amtrak’s re-dedication of its Wilmington, Delaware train station for its most famous passenger is that if you want to get somewhere on time … don’t take Amtrak:

Amtrak President and CEO Joseph Boardman had an appointment to keep, and he wasn’t going to let the massive power outage that occurred Saturday on his rail line’s Northeast Corridor stop him.

And, neither were Federal Railroad Administration chief Joseph Szabo or Amtrak board member Jeff Moreland.

The three were expected at the gala unveiling of the newly re-named “Joe Biden” train station in Wilmington, Delaware Saturday afternoon but they found themselves among the thousands of other Amtrak passengers who were temporarily stranded on trains along the popular Washington, DC to New York route.

So, Boardman, Szabo and Moreland — who heard just hours before that Vice President Biden was slated to make an unscheduled appearance at Saturday’s event — abandoned a stranded Acela Express train at Baltimore’s Penn Station where an awaiting car ferried them to Wilmington.

Yes, in one of the most obvious suck-ups in federal bureaucratic history, the federally funded Amtrak chose to change the name on its building for the current Vice President.  Biden has spent the last two years talking about high-speed rail as the path to put Americans back to work and usher in another age of economic expansion — a push that benefits the perpetually-broke Amtrak by promising years or decades more of federal “investments” in trains that have trouble getting even the CEO to important appointments. In fact, the station got a face lift from Porkulus money managed by Sheriff Joe himself:

As a thank-you to its most famous customer, Amtrak is renaming the train station in Wilmington, Del., after stimulus “sheriff” Vice President Joseph R. Biden — after the project received $20 million in stimulus money and came in $5.7 million over the initial announced budget.

Spokesmen for Mr. Biden, who said he personally fought for stimulus money for Amtrak, didn’t respond to messages Wednesday or Thursday.

Citizens Against Government Waste says the suck-up is legal, if a bit unseemly, but also may be inadvertently appropriate:

Renaming the station is apparently legal — and is fitting in this case, saidLeslie Paige, spokeswoman for Citizens Against Government Waste.

“It’s an absolutely perfect monument to a guy whose entire history has been overspending and overpromising,” she said. “It would make sense [Mr. Biden‘s] name would be slapped on a bloated, over-budget train station in Wilmington.”

It’s as fitting as having Amtrak’s CEO and staff get rescued from its own stalled train and chauffeured to the Biden event.

Irony of the Week is an occasional feature.  If you have a suggestion for an Irony of the Week, please e-mail it to obamaisms@edmorrissey.com.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Either the FBI is stupid enough to believe Jahar that he was going there to party, or Jahar was stupid enough to believe Tamerlan that they were going there to party. You don’t head to NY with a pressure cooker, home made grenades, firearms, and undisclosed other explosives in a stolen car after killing a cop to party; especially after seeing yourself in FBI photos on national television.

Who knows what they could have done. They easily could have dropped pressure cookers on a subway, gotten off, and used their grenades and guns in a rampage elsewhere in NY. The idea that they were going to go clubbing is crazy.

eski502 on April 24, 2013 at 5:33 PM

Epic fail by this administration

cmsinaz on April 24, 2013 at 5:34 PM

While I understand that someone who is consider a threat to the U.S. should be on every list we have, I don’t understand why we wouldn’t put him on a list to give Russia (or whatever country) a heads up if he is on the move.

Cindy Munford on April 24, 2013 at 5:36 PM

“The CIA’s request came months after the FBI had closed a preliminary inquiry into Tsarnaev after getting a similar inquiry about him from Russian state security…”

9/11 was allowed to happen because the Clinton administration built a wall between the CIA and the FBI…

… President Bush took that wall down.

With ‘Fast and Furious’, Benghazi, and all the other shenanagins Obowma has been running pretty loose with the law, I have little doubt that the wall is back up…

… and as a result, another terror attack in the U.S. and Americans are dead.

Seven Percent Solution on April 24, 2013 at 5:40 PM

Which FBI manual do you get this from?

verbaluce on April 24, 2013 at 5:32 PM

Did you just ask a conservative to provide proof of their paranoid conspiracies?

lester on April 24, 2013 at 5:43 PM

Was the CIA simply being cautious by tossing his name into the pile because the Russians had flagged it or did something new come to light after the FBI stopped looking at him?

I demand a Congressional investigation into the matter.
WHO was that person in CIA who went against the unspoken fatwa of the sultan of DC and insisted on profiling a potential jihady ?
WHO ?
Oh BTW, the CIA lies
/Nazi Policei

burrata on April 24, 2013 at 5:45 PM

The FBI is not allowed to consider violent Islam in the context of any investigation it does regarding potential threats.

Jabberwock on April 24, 2013 at 4:58 PM

Which FBI manual do you get this from?

verbaloon on April 24, 2013 at 5:32 PM

Er, that was a memo sent out in October of 2011 ordering all FBI manuals to remove any references to the possibly of Islamists committing terrorism.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/04/20/Flashback-FBI-Training-Manual-Purged-References-To-Islamic-Terror

The FBI insists to CBS that they took all the required steps that were permissable under the law. However, around the same time the bureau interviewed Tsarnaev, changes in the FBI training manual took place as well. The FBI’s own departmental counter-terrorism analytic lexicon was purged of key words that could reference Islamic terrorism. Words like Muslim, Islam, Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, and sharia were not mentioned once in the FBI’s counter-terrorism lexicon afterwards.

The FBI initially denied the existence of the document in 2012 until PJ Media’s Patrick Poole posted the unclassified doc in May of that year. Congressman Louie Gohmert (R-TX) took the issue to the House floor and excoriated the administration for allowing the changing of the training manual to happen.

Del Dolemonte on April 24, 2013 at 5:48 PM

Gorelick…

Walls…

Some assembly required.

catmman on April 24, 2013 at 5:49 PM

Which FBI manual do you get this from?

verbaluce on April 24, 2013 at 5:32 PM

Did you just ask a conservative to provide proof of their paranoid conspiracies?

lester, it’s time for your violin lesson! on April 24, 2013 at 5:43 PM

Del Dolemonte on April 24, 2013 at 5:48 PM

You’re exceedingly stupid, Nessman.

F-

Del Dolemonte on April 24, 2013 at 5:50 PM

But he said investigators don’t believe the brothers were headed to New York to “continue what they were doing.”

Of course the NYC Marathon isn’t until next fall. They would have plenty of time to get ready. Let’s all party.

chemman on April 24, 2013 at 5:55 PM

And some more:

Fri, Oct 21, 2011

Deputy U.S. Attorney General James Cole confirmed on Wednesday that the Obama administration was pulling back all training materials used for the law enforcement and national security communities, in order to eliminate all references to Islam that some Muslim groups have claimed are offensive.

“I recently directed all components of the Department of Justice to re-evaluate their training efforts in a range of areas, from community outreach to national security,” Cole told a panel at the George Washington University law school.

-snip-

Dwight C. Holton, the U.S. Attorney in Oregon said he had spoken with Holder directly about the issue of the terror training materials. Holton is the federal prosecutor who announced the arrest of so-called “Christmas tree bomber” Mohamed Osman Mohamud in 2010. That announcement made no mention of Mohamud’s Muslim faith.

“I want to be perfectly clear about this: training materials that portray Islam as a religion of violence or with a tendency towards violence are wrong, they are offensive, and they are contrary to everything that this president, this attorney general and Department of Justice stands for,” Holton said Wednesday. “They will not be tolerated.”

I think we’re done with this subject…

Del Dolemonte on April 24, 2013 at 5:55 PM

And here is the entire 2011 FBI unclassified document, removing those Naughty Words like “Islamist”. Enjoy!

http://www.scribd.com/doc/93235898/FBI-Counterterrorism-Analytical-Lexicon

Del Dolemonte on April 24, 2013 at 5:59 PM

Nice work, Del. lester got schooled… again.

John the Libertarian on April 24, 2013 at 6:06 PM

Undo the damage the Church Committee has done to Intelligence Organizations. The DHS and the FBI flat out CAN’T DO THE JOB.

Repeal the ban on CIA activities in the U.S.

It doesn’t matter how many Databases, how many different Departments there is: Luck and MSNBC is no way to fight a war on terror.

BDU-33 on April 24, 2013 at 6:07 PM

He partied in Cambridge after he and his bro detonated a few bombs, so I don’t find this unbelievable.

Buy Danish on April 24, 2013 at 5:30 PM

JMO, but it seems to me he tried to act “normally” in the days right after the bombing, whatever that meant for him, trying to avoid detection. But when their pictures were released and they knew it was just a matter of time before they would be apprehended, they shot a cop, stole a car, loaded up the car with guns and explosives, and were headed for NYC. I just don’t think it’s believable they were going to party.

mbs on April 24, 2013 at 6:08 PM

The idea that they were going to go clubbing is crazy.

eski502 on April 24, 2013 at 5:33 PM

Given that they had a bomb, guns and grenades it does seem unlikely that they were going to go clubbing, but they could have been intending to buy clubs en route.

YiZhangZhe on April 24, 2013 at 6:10 PM

Okay, which troll just got a new job? Is it verbaldouche or non-parmesan or Hotlips? — San Francisco Restores Taxpayer Funding for 6-Foot Tall Healthy Penis Mascot

slickwillie2001 on April 24, 2013 at 6:18 PM

verbaluce on April 24, 2013 at 5:32 PM

lester on April 24, 2013 at 5:43 PM

C’mon fellas, pick up your report cards, take them home and have mommy and daddy sign them.

BobMbx on April 24, 2013 at 6:20 PM

Report: Tsarnaev admits that he and brother were headed to New York; Update: To … party?
…in other words, they had WAY MORE American taxpayer welfare money to fund their islamofascist jihad, so why not do like most of the rest of the freeloaders and also party on our tax money?

TeaPartyNation on April 24, 2013 at 6:33 PM

“Party in NYC” is probably just a euphemism for “safe house”. Or do we really think he’d give a lead on the group funding their little jihad? Better to to let them think you’re insane than compromise the cell.

somewhatconcerned on April 24, 2013 at 6:35 PM

I think we’re done with this subject…
Del Dolemonte on April 24, 2013 at 5:55 PM

You offer a Breitbart link and then a bunch of stuff that doesn’t say/prove at all what you think it does…
Sure, we can be done.

verbaluce on April 24, 2013 at 6:37 PM

I just don’t think it’s believable they were going to party.
mbs on April 24, 2013 at 6:08 PM

Blow things up first, then party? Obviously he’s going to have to tell us where and with whom they planned to party, and where they planned to stay.

Buy Danish on April 24, 2013 at 6:39 PM

I understand killing infidels is ok under Islamic Jihad codes but isn’t partying supposed to be shunned under Islamic Jihad codes.

SparkPlug on April 24, 2013 at 6:48 PM

Which FBI manual do you get this from?
 
verbaluce on April 24, 2013 at 5:32 PM

 
Did you just ask a conservative to provide proof of their paranoid conspiracies?
 
lester on April 24, 2013 at 5:43 PM

 
And here is the entire 2011 FBI unclassified document, removing those Naughty Words like “Islamist”. Enjoy!
 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/93235898/FBI-Counterterrorism-Analytical-Lexicon
 
Del Dolemonte on April 24, 2013 at 5:59 PM

 
What an insightful post. That lester sure is a bright guy, and he’s 100% right about that topic.

rogerb on April 24, 2013 at 6:57 PM

Which FBI manual do you get this from?

verbaluce on April 24, 2013 at 5:32 PM

Did you just ask a conservative to provide proof of their paranoid conspiracies?

lester on April 24, 2013 at 5:43 PM

It’s time to pass on the one brain cell already? Oh, how time flies.

kim roy on April 24, 2013 at 7:01 PM

You offer a Breitbart link and then a bunch of stuff that doesn’t say/prove at all what you think it does…
Sure, we can be done.

verbaluce on April 24, 2013 at 6:37 PM

Let me help you wipe the drool off your shirt:

Go to Breitbart link. Look at article. WOOOO! More links in article, which include:

Washington Times

and

Official looking stuff

and

wow! a third link

You’re welcome.

kim roy on April 24, 2013 at 7:06 PM

Mayor Doomberg wouldn’t let them by a large soda.

alanstern on April 24, 2013 at 7:09 PM

You offer a Breitbart link and then a bunch of stuff that doesn’t say/prove at all what you think it does…
Sure, we can be done.
 
verbaluce on April 24, 2013 at 6:37 PM

 
Let me help you wipe the drool off your shirt:
 
Go to Breitbart link. Look at article. WOOOO! More links in article, which include:
 
Washington Times
 
and
 
Official looking stuff
 
and
 
wow! a third link
 
You’re welcome.
 
kim roy on April 24, 2013 at 7:06 PM

 
Now now, be nice. He’s owned up to having problems with long sentences before:
 
http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/15/breaking-obama-to-announce-gun-control-proposals-tomorrow/comment-page-4/#comment-6649182
 
Who knows what to expect when you add in clickable links.

rogerb on April 24, 2013 at 7:15 PM

A cpl of radicalized murderous yahoos –
I don’t share your panic or your sweeping embellishments.
I see they had some successful explosions, but don’t grant them successful worldwide reverberations.

verbaluce on April 24, 2013 at 5:28 PM

Sweetie, a couple of terroristic acts, randomly done here and there and thus unpredictable, are purposely designed to panic the population and divert law enforcement.

Use your head for more than a hat rack.

onlineanalyst on April 24, 2013 at 7:15 PM

I understand killing infidels is ok under Islamic Jihad codes but isn’t partying supposed to be shunned under Islamic Jihad codes.

SparkPlug on April 24, 2013 at 6:48 PM

Yes, but you need to understand that all sins are forgiven to those who die in the cause of Islam. This is an important factor in understanding the Muslim mind.

Party and drugs = bad
Party and drugs + suicide bombing that kills kuffar = direct route to paradise.

Its a sacrificial offering by which Islamic sins can be forgotten, and the formula works for any sin, not just parties and drugs.

YiZhangZhe on April 24, 2013 at 7:19 PM

Was the CIA simply being cautious by tossing his name into the pile because the Russians had flagged it or did something new come to light after the FBI stopped looking at him?

Maybe the FBI and the CIA have different standards for assessing threats.

I’d need to see the chronology of events here, but did the Russian authorities hear back from the FBI with the neg dec on Tamerlan, so they appealed to the CIA to persuade the FBI to reverse their decision? It may not be something new that came to light. It may be that the Russians didn’t tell the FBI a reason which would clinch adding Tamerlan expecting that the FBI would find enough on theri own to add him to the list. How about a question here: Will Russian security tell the CIA things that they won’t tell the FBI?

Dusty on April 24, 2013 at 7:34 PM

I understand killing infidels is ok under Islamic Jihad codes but isn’t partying supposed to be shunned under Islamic Jihad codes.

SparkPlug on April 24, 2013 at 6:48 PM

Partying with women and drugs is allowed in islam as long as the moozie kills atleast onekafir.
If moozie doesn’t kill,he doesn’t get to party.
So if you ever see a moozie partying with women and drugs,know that the moozie is getting ready / planning a jihad against
kafir (s).
BTW, aren’t the Husseins partying in the WH tonite ?

burrata on April 24, 2013 at 7:38 PM

as the CIA simply being cautious by tossing his name into the pile because the Russians had flagged it or did something new come to light after the FBI stopped looking at him?

Allah

Tamerlan ran across either an informant or someone undercover.

And they didn’t tell the Feds, because they don’t tell them anything they don’t feel they shouldn’t be privy too.

budfox on April 24, 2013 at 8:03 PM

The FBI has got to get one of Big Sis’s pinging machines…

d1carter on April 24, 2013 at 8:40 PM

Tamerlan ran across either an informant or someone undercover.

And they didn’t tell the Feds, because they don’t tell them anything they don’t feel they shouldn’t be privy too.

budfox on April 24, 2013 at 8:03 PM

Given the REB administration’s slackass attitude about islamic terrorism, the Russians might be smart to develop their own network of informers in the Russian communities in the USA.

slickwillie2001 on April 24, 2013 at 8:42 PM

Given the REB administration’s slackass attitude about islamic terrorism, the Russians might be smart to develop their own network of informers in the Russian communities in the USA.

slickwillie2001 on April 24, 2013 at 8:42 PM

Funny you say that, because it does exist – to keep an eye on ex-pats who might want to finance “resistance” movements.

It does beg the question – how did the Russians know about Tamerlan’s extracurricular interests in 2011, before he went to Dagestan?

Lot of Russians in MA. Armenians, Jews, Georgians, etc…wouldn’t be hard to put a watcher in the community.

budfox on April 24, 2013 at 9:00 PM

David wood explains so much in this video about why such Islamic terror happens and how Obama and many other Muslims try to mislead.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SoXs-0_rHY&bpctr=1366853747

Chessplayer on April 24, 2013 at 9:24 PM

Probably wanted to visit the WTC site, to pay their respects to the fellow jihadists who died there. And then off to find something to bomb. If a jihadi can make it in New York he can make it anywhere.

farsighted on April 24, 2013 at 10:16 PM

farsighted on April 24, 2013 at 10:16 PM

Pretty certain they weren’t headed over to the Stonewall Inn over on Christopher Street to party.

coldwarrior on April 24, 2013 at 10:23 PM

What did the CIA know, or think they knew, about Tamerlan Tsarnaev in late 2011?

And how did they know it? The CIA does not operate within the US, where Tamerlan had been living the past 6-7 years.

And how did the Russians know enough about a guy who had been living in the US the past 6-7 years to consider him a threat to Russia?

So both the CIA and their Russian cuonterparts, agencies that do not theoretically concern themselves with what is going on within US borders, both thought in 2011 that Tamerlan was a potential threat.

And the FBI did not.

Sounds to me like Tamerlan must have had contact with foreign Islamist militants in 2011, and/or before that. The Russians say he met with some while in Dagestan/Chechnya in 2012.

Yet we are told by this admin there is no foreign connection or involvement in the Boston terrorist bombing.

This does not add up.

farsighted on April 24, 2013 at 10:32 PM

Russia or some other Muslim country,

HotAirLib on April 24, 2013 at 4:33 PM

Troll is even dumber than I thought.

farsighted on April 24, 2013 at 10:41 PM

How many billions do we spend on Intelligence?

Oil Can on April 25, 2013 at 12:05 AM

Troll is even dumber than I thought.

farsighted on April 24, 2013 at 10:41 PM

HAL could take tips from libfree on occasionally making sense.

MelonCollie on April 25, 2013 at 1:44 AM

Obama has always been an ardent apologist for imperialistic Islam.

Those who voted for him supported him in part because of this lickspittle, craven stance.

Whether out of cowardice in the face of a brutal, violent religious threat, or from a world-historical naivete about the murderous tenets of Mohammad, or possibly because they approve of Islam’s depredations against a West they hate for leaving them with case of post-colonial guilt.

A morbid, unhistorical form of self-loathing which gives the suicidal a kick by witnessing the big, bad “colonial” powers reap well-deserved “blowback” for their imperialistic “crimes”.

(Coyly overlooking all of the equal and worse imperialistic, misogynistic, incalculably cruel crimes committed by Islam during the past 1350 years, with its scorched earth policies which killed and enslaved millions from Mecca to Morocco, Spain to the Seychelles, Turkey to Timbuktu).

Obama has actively sought to geld America’s ability to fight militant, expansionistic, terroristic Islam.

Being a Quisling or a madman (there are no other choices) himself.

profitsbeard on April 25, 2013 at 1:52 AM

Is it my imagination, or, didn’t the MSM roll the Tsarnaev family out as non-muslim immigrants?

kregg on April 25, 2013 at 5:43 AM

As the smoke clears on this story it is beginning to look like Bill Clinton’s Jimmy Carter moment*.
Perhaps we should have left Melosovic alone?

*Carter deposed the Shaw of Iran for a “peaceful cleric” (a point of history missing from the movie Argo).

kregg on April 25, 2013 at 6:01 AM

Oh great, another ________ hearing. Didn’t we have one before Obama became a 2 term president?
 
HotAirLib on April 24, 2013 at 3:52 PM

 
Insert appropriate “Modern Voter” topic here. Suggestions include:
 
Benghazi
 
Fast and Furious
 
Budget
 
Employment
 
Annual nationwide gun death toll of urban black children vs. rare and isolated mass-shootings of whites
 
etc.

rogerb on April 25, 2013 at 2:10 PM

Comment pages: 1 2