Breaking: Judge issues restraining order blocking WI budget-repair bill
posted at 12:12 pm on March 18, 2011 by Ed Morrissey
Opponents of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker’s bill recasting negotiating rights for the state’s public-employee unions won a round in court today — and the judge hinted that they have a strong chance of winning overall. Judge Maryann Sumi issued a temporary restraining order blocking publication of the budget-repair bill, instructing the Secretary of State to hold off until Smith can rule on the merits:
Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi issued a temporary restraining order Friday, barring the publication of Gov. Scott Walker’s law that would sharply curtail collective bargaining for public employees.
Sumi’s order will prevent Secretary of State Doug La Follette from publishing the law – and allowing it to take effect – until she can rule on the merits of the case. Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne is seeking to block the law because he says a legislative committee violated the state’s open meetings law in passing the measure, which Walker signed on Friday.
Sumi said Ozanne was likely to succeed on the merits.
“It seems to me the public policy behind effective enforcement of the open meeting law is so strong that it does outweigh the interest, at least at this time, which may exist in favor of sustaining the validity of the (law),” she said.
There have been varying opinions on whether the committee meeting required more advance notice than a note on the bulletin board, but Sumi appears to believe it did. A TRO is not usually granted unless the plaintiff has a substantial chance of winning the overall case. However, that statement also acknowledges that the legislature likely followed the law — which an appellate court might use to overturn the TRO and tell Sumi to stick to the statutes.
However, this is strictly a ruling on the process used to enact the law. If it came down to it, the Wisconsin legislature could simply pass it again, and it could do so rather quickly. The TRO is not based on any defect in the legislation itself.
I’d expect the legislature to take that up very quickly. I’d also expect some of the protesters to return in anticipation of that effort, although most of them probably won’t get away with taking more sick time to do so. Walker and the GOP could render this issue moot by Monday or Tuesday of next week, if need be, although they’d be wise not to tip their hand until Monday.
Update: Why issue a TRO today? Because, er … Sumi was going on vacation, as reported last Tuesday (via GR contributor Patrick Ishmael):
Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi warned she likely won’t decide whether to stop implementation of Gov. Scott Walker’s law when she hears testimony on a preliminary injunction on Friday. And after that hearing, Sumi said, she will be out of state on a family vacation until March 28, three days after the expected publication date of the bill.
Also, I wrote “Smith” rather than Sumi. My apologies for the error.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
I’m torn between re-voting, but using it as an opportunity to finally get a vote on the original bill, and the possibility that it might create a precedent for judicial activism. If there is a path to avoid such a precedent without delaying implementation of the law, that may be the wiser course. But I’m not a lawyer so if a Wi Constitutional precedent isn’t a real concern then I think I’d like to see the original bill passed.
FloatingRock on March 18, 2011 at 1:29 PM
We have a bought political judge at a very low level issuing a political ruling…whoopy.
If the republicans had any sense, they would immediately announce a new vote tomorrow after 24 hours warning and pass it tomorrow bypassing the silly judge.
JIMV on March 18, 2011 at 1:30 PM
NO RULE WAS BROKEN, anyway…. Rush just explained that, but I forget which rule WAS followed to the “T”…
they were NOT required to give notice, but actually did anyway.
(forgive if this is old news.. You guys are fast. :-)
Revote, ignore, whatevs.
Proceed as if this bitty had no say in this, since she doesn’t.
pambi on March 18, 2011 at 1:31 PM
Listened to Rush a few minutes ago about this. He found the rules that the Senate adopted on before signing this bill. It stated that no notice was required.
Not sure what this means but if the judge’s ruling is about breaking rules, then the rules weren’t broken.
Electrongod on March 18, 2011 at 1:31 PM
Is it possible that she’s just buying time for counties to sign contracts before the law goes into effect?
Cindy Munford on March 18, 2011 at 1:33 PM
If a judge can tell the legislature what to do, then the legislature can tell the judge what to do. The two branches are equal.
Impeach this sorry excuse of a judge.
slickwillie2001 on March 18, 2011 at 1:34 PM
I’ll say!
Cindy Munford on March 18, 2011 at 1:34 PM
Good observation Cindy, they are doing that. Passing union contracts out past 2012 to the next election. They still have CB in them too I believe from what I was reading.
wi farmgirl on March 18, 2011 at 1:35 PM
crr6 = Can’t Reasonably Reason (by a magnitude of 6).
Special Forces Grunt on March 18, 2011 at 1:35 PM
This is the kind of stuff that worries me… elected representatives and non-elected bureaucrats ignoring the laws and courts. There again, the courts seem to be, for the most part, anything but impartial. We can’t pick and choose what laws we follow, and if we do the MAN comes down hard on us (ever notice that that revolves around $/fines? Hmm).
I think our political system and our society at large is too polarized to really expect impartiality anymore, nor can we expect folks to go along with what is legally decided if they don’t like it. Both sides run to the Constitution and offer up diametrically opposed interpretations to support their respective positions.
Dr. ZhivBlago on March 18, 2011 at 1:36 PM
There are two issues, a open meeting law and a rule of the senate. The rule was met BUT the Judge has decided the open meeting law trumps the rule, which does not require notice in a special session, which they were in, though nothing in the law says that.
Politics. So, instead of playing on the legal field of political judges the left wants, simply repass the thing with 24 hours notice and kill the issue.
JIMV on March 18, 2011 at 1:36 PM
This could be a good thing. In most jurisdictions one can file a direct appeal of a preliminary injunction/TRO. Thus, this gets the issue to the Court of Appeals much quicker. I imagine the defendants will get fairer shake there than with this cherry picked trial judge.
tommyboy on March 18, 2011 at 1:38 PM
This is Madison. The judge simply found the senators guilty of legislating while republican …
PackerBronco on March 18, 2011 at 1:39 PM
Nope.
I can understand the temptation, but nope.
Mary in LA on March 18, 2011 at 1:40 PM
Well duh. Haven’t you listened to your fellow libs, crr? This is about Adolph Walker crushing the working class and starving orphaned children. All while the eeeeeevil Koch Brothers tug on his puppet strings.
Good Solid B-Plus on March 18, 2011 at 1:43 PM
Liberals. They will use anything but the Democratic Process to get what they want out of the Democratic Process.
Judicial appointments are important.
hawkdriver on March 18, 2011 at 1:49 PM
Dry humor, I should have given it a sarcasm tag. Anyway, the only time you’ll ever see conservatives take to violence is if it’s a last resort. As we all know, violence is the first resort of the left, and last of the right.
darwin on March 18, 2011 at 1:49 PM
Tingles and the lsm jumping with joy?
cmsinaz on March 18, 2011 at 1:51 PM
If they haven’t, they really need to track down these people and bring them in for questioning and if the evidence is there charge them. Doesn’t matter what their ideology is, this BS simply can’t be ignored and allowed to become de rigueur. There were IRS agents and Dem reps threatened over Obamacare and that should not have been allowed to stand.
I don’t care who you are, these threats mess with people’s minds, especially if they have families.
Dr. ZhivBlago on March 18, 2011 at 1:52 PM
It’s incidents like these that make it hard to believe those guys when they say it’s all about democracy and the children’s futures.
BlueCollarAstronaut on March 18, 2011 at 1:52 PM
Don’t you just love how this cr@p comes out on Friday? Could this have been done to take the heat off bho for his brazil trip and get us all talking about something else?
L
letget on March 18, 2011 at 1:59 PM
There’s the old joke that a “good” lawyer knows the law but a “great” lawyer knows the judge. The mask our courts wear continues to slip.
viking01 on March 18, 2011 at 2:07 PM
Gov. Walker’s response on Monday should be “1500 pink slips are in the mail. I would have liked to keep you on the payroll, but Wisconsin’s financial situation requires action now. Unfortunately the Judge has no idea how bad the situation is, if I could furlough her too, I would.”
TulsAmerican on March 18, 2011 at 2:17 PM
I’m noticing a LOT of WI plates here in W ND.
Many have been fleeing here for the last several years.
We’re also getting CA, MO, MI, ID, CO, OR, WA & I saw a car with NY plates in my rural area driving the backroads.
IDK WTF it is in a place where everybody knows everybody.
The exodus has begun.
Badger40 on March 18, 2011 at 2:20 PM
Since the judicial branches of states’ govts as well as the fed levels, they are only protecting themselves & their ilk.
This is why I’ve always harped on the fact that legislatures, states & Congress itself, has the right & duty to also weigh in on legal & Const issues.
You do not just let the judicial branch rule as gospel without ever questioning their judgment or challenging it.
They are covering their a$$e$ & the friends a$$e$.
Badger40 on March 18, 2011 at 2:24 PM
The judge in this case did not have legal jurisdiction in this action so the Gov should ignore the ruling
georgealbert on March 18, 2011 at 2:27 PM
William Jacobson at Legal Insurrection has a great take on this:
“It is hard to see how there is a likelihood of success on the merits, particularly if the Judge found no clear violation of any law or Senate Rule, but merely some vague conception of “public policy.” The Senate clerk already has stated that the procedures used complied with the Senate Rules, and Courts normally to not interfere in a legislative branch’s interpretation of its own rules. And let’s keep in mind, that no amount of notice would have made a difference, because every single Democratic Senator had fled to Illinois and was refusing to attend any votes.”
His advice to Walker is also excellent.
http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2011/03/if-need-be-re-pass-law-and-include.html
rrpjr on March 18, 2011 at 2:37 PM
So, is Sumi in some kinda’ judge’s union, or sumthin? /s
Dopenstrange on March 18, 2011 at 2:38 PM
Yes, indeed. Always use a tag — practice safe sarcasm! :-)
Seriously, it’s always better to sarc-tag a comment if there’s even the remotest chance that some lib will come in here, read your comment, and tweet it to all his friends saying “See? See? Told ya they’re Nazis!”
Right again, and the videos out of Madison prove that abundantly.
Mary in LA on March 18, 2011 at 2:38 PM
Correct again, I mean.
Mary in LA on March 18, 2011 at 2:39 PM
As long as it is a stand alone bill they are not needed.
antisocial on March 18, 2011 at 2:42 PM
Oh, gaia! Big mooch in a … Oh, I cannot even say it. They do not make them that large. They don’t.
Key West Reader on March 18, 2011 at 2:53 PM
I just barfed a little in my mouth.
Iblis on March 18, 2011 at 3:12 PM
And that is the real reason behind this. I think the judge knows she’s on shakey ground but just wanted to give the unions an extra week or so.
Deanna on March 18, 2011 at 3:16 PM
Just do the vote again properly.
lexhamfox on March 18, 2011 at 3:29 PM
Wow. Just wow…
OmahaConservative on March 18, 2011 at 4:04 PM
Violent socialists using radical court insiders to push their agenda outside of the process…where’s a Hitler mustache when it’s relevant?
Hening on March 18, 2011 at 4:20 PM
This is not what democracy looks like.
munseym on March 18, 2011 at 5:36 PM
Judge Sumi was originally appointed by Tommy Thompson, a Republican.
Right, I think that’s obvious at this point. You’re attempting to use the force of law to destroy your political opposition.
Well I can’t speak for others, but I certainly don’t want to destroy your ideology.
crr6 on March 18, 2011 at 5:46 PM
It was filed in state court. This is a state court trial judge.
The two judges which declared the PPACA unconstitutional never issued an order enjoining the law, that’s why it continues to be implemented. Here, the state judge issued a TRO blocking the law.
Does that clear it up for you?
crr6 on March 18, 2011 at 5:51 PM
It’s now clear that Republicans should consider a two step process for laws passed by democrats. First, vote no. Second, seek a restraining order. This should become standard operating procedure.
If the above fails, riot, destroy property and threaten to kill people.
Hey, if it works for democrats, why not use it?
darwin on March 18, 2011 at 6:17 PM
Yesterday I heard from a client that came into the office I work in saying that most of the union electricians & plumbers are working in N & S Dakota and even down south, Tx. Maybe that is what your seeing. Who can just walk away from their biggest investment their house? I don’t think their moving there. Your getting many of our guys over there doing jobs because they aren’t building squat here. We are very, very depressed for active businesses and growth. If they recall all these guys and Walker we will be in deep $hite.
wi farmgirl on March 18, 2011 at 8:00 PM
Diary of leftist thuggery
http://biggovernment.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/17/20-days-of-left-wing-thuggery-in-wisconsin-when-will-obama-democrats-and-msm-call-for-civility/
CWforFreedom on March 18, 2011 at 8:23 PM
Jesh those Demrats sure take a lot of vacations judges, teachers Union hacks Presidents all vacay all the time while the little people work….if they still have a job!
Ain’t it great?
Greatest times evah or at least since Jiminey Carter!
s/
dhunter on March 18, 2011 at 8:25 PM
She is a criminal. a typical democrat. The judge knows she is evil. The dems know it. No one supports this judge whose has an ethical bone in his body.
proconstitution on March 18, 2011 at 8:47 PM
I have said that the passage of the bill would not mean much. The Dem snd the Unions will file multiple lawsuits in selected friendly courts and have the bill overturned. he lessons are:
1. It is extremely important to win and take the power from the Dems and get Barry out.
2. It may be very hard to win big battle or try to reverse everything with one stroke, The Rand Paul’s “let cut 500 billions out tomorrow” sounded good, but will draw such oppositions and law suits that it is impossible and impractical to be implemented. While its may feel unsatisfying, it is easier to win small battles and let the victories accumulate into a big one.
bayview on March 18, 2011 at 10:46 PM
It was done properly the first time.
Slowburn on March 18, 2011 at 10:47 PM
A serious mistake Governor Walker made, and it was simply an act of good faith to try to simmer down the tempers, was to rescind the layoff notices right after the bill was passed and signed. He should have waited until after the law had been published. That would have put the pressure on the Dems to allow it to be published as passed or face the wrath of the laid off government Union workers.
opaobie on March 19, 2011 at 12:47 AM
Don’t you just love activist judges?
Were I Walker I would draft a new version of the bill using different language, pre-publish it, then fast track the bill.
kregg on March 19, 2011 at 6:27 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2