Americas get off light in tsunami impact
posted at 9:35 am on March 12, 2011 by Ed Morrissey
After the massive quake in Japan yesterday, Pacific Ocean nations braced for the impact of potentially catastrophic tsunamis created by the 8.9-level initial shock and the large aftershocks that continue in the region. Countries began evacuating coastal areas and warned citizens not to venture near beaches. Fortunately, the damage and loss of life were limited, although tsunamis and flooding occurred as far south as Chile:
Despite the power of Japan’s biggest-ever quake that killed at least 1,300 people, the tsunami waves were relatively benign as they rolled into the Americas, causing only isolated flooding, and fears of a catastrophe proved unfounded.
The tsunami swept past Chile’s remote Easter Island in the South Pacific, generating swells but no major waves, and there was little impact when they made landfall on Chile’s coast.
But the sea later flooded as far as 330 feet inland in Dichato and Talcahuano, some 310 miles south of the capital Santiago and near the epicenter of the massive 8.8 magnitude quake that struck Chile in February 2010.
In the US, the damage was limited to the coast, as boats were smashed and docks damaged. One man is still missing:
About 35 boats and most of the harbor docks were damaged in Crescent City near the California border with Oregon, where waves were more than 6 feet. Santa Cruz south of San Francisco sustained about $2 million in damages to docks and vessels, emergency management officials said.
Rescue services were searching for a 25-year-old man who was swept out to sea while standing on a sandbar at the mouth of the Klamath River in California.
The port of Brookings-Harbor, the busiest recreation port on the Oregon coast, was largely destroyed, said operations manager Chris Cantwell. “Right now we are in the middle of a big mess,” he said. “The surge pulled some (boats) out to sea, about a dozen sank and we’ve got boats everywhere sitting on top of one another and all over the place.”
However, Japan faces much more dire consequences, and the tsunamis are secondary at the moment. Thanks to the explosion at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, authorities will now distribute iodine to people in the vicinity of nuclear power plants to counteract potential radiation poisoning:
Japanese authorities have told the U.N.’s atomic watchdog they are making preparations to distribute iodine to people living near nuclear power plants affected by Friday’s earthquake, the Vienna-based agency said.
Iodine can be used to help protect the body from radioactive exposure.
In Japan on Saturday, radiation leaked from a damaged nuclear reactor after an explosion blew the roof off in the wake of the massive earthquake, but the government insisted that radiation levels were low.
Fortunately, the explosion did not expose the core:
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said there had been no major change in the level of radiation after the explosion because it did not occur inside the reactor container.
“The nuclear reaction facility is surrounded by a steel storage machine, which is then surrounded by a concrete building. This concrete building collapsed. We learnt that the storage machine inside did not explode,” he told a news conference.
Edano initially said an evacuation radius of 10 km (6 miles) from the stricken 40-year-old Daiichi 1 reactor plant in Fukushima prefecture was adequate, but then an hour later the boundary was extended to 20 km (13 miles). TV footage showed vapor rising from the plant, 240 km (150 miles) north of Tokyo.
We were very fortunate, but we should remember those who weren’t. The Salvation Army has already begun operations in Japan to provide assistance to the displaced. Be generous.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Really? Never saw that coming…
sandee on May 2, 2013 at 11:24 AM
Little change in emergency room visits, so no cost saving there. Geez, wonder of wonders.
WordsMatter on May 2, 2013 at 11:29 AM
Giving them free beer would have the same effect.
BobMbx on May 2, 2013 at 11:34 AM
So Medicaid doesn’t actually improve the health of the people enrolled in it. We still have to do SOMETHING! If we don’t its because we hate sick people. Head Start doesn’t help pre-schoolers either but we have thrown billions at it. Because if we don’t we are h8ters who want children to be illiterate. We have to have background checks which won’t stop any crime because if we don’t we want children shot in the streets.
It almost seems that the metric is that you can’t really show how much you care unless your program is without merit but you do it anyway because you care so much.
Lily on May 2, 2013 at 11:34 AM
And that’s the long and short of it. Allahpundit’s assessment is insightful and, sadly, accurate.
thatsafactjack on May 2, 2013 at 11:35 AM
The Left would destroy the world to protect their ideology. It’s their God.
Charlemagne on May 2, 2013 at 11:37 AM
These are policies brought to you by the same folks who believe, to this day, that banning cigarette lighters on airplanes was a much needed policy. But matches are just fine.
Well, they did something.
BobMbx on May 2, 2013 at 11:37 AM
His shining achievement, is a failure?
Oh Noz.
hawkdriver on May 2, 2013 at 11:38 AM
Watching the Dems roll out Obamacare reminds me of a clip from the silent-film archives of transportation inventions in the early 1900s. In particular, I remember seeing a flying contraption with four levels of wings, one on top of the next. The contraption got about a yard off the ground before crashing in a heap.
BuckeyeSam on May 2, 2013 at 11:40 AM
“This randomized, controlled study showed that Medicaid coverage generated no significant improvements in measured health outcomes in the first two years, but it did increase use of health services, raise rates of diabetes detection and management, lower rates of depression, and reduce financial strain.”
Sooo, “increase use of health services” Same number of doctors, more patient visits, no improvements in patient health, and this will somehow lower the cost of medical care. Welcome to bizarro world.
WitchDoctor on May 2, 2013 at 11:41 AM
Two words: Helium balloons
blammm on May 2, 2013 at 11:44 AM
Obviously they asked the wrong questions on the survey…
Should have asked….
Q1. Do you want a green card with your Medicaid?
Q2. Would you like to register to vote?
Q3. Do you want SNAP card along with Medicaid?
Q4. How was your late-term infanticide operation?
txdoc on May 2, 2013 at 11:44 AM
Yeppers. See the boondoggle failure that is Head Start.
Resist We Much on May 2, 2013 at 11:44 AM
‘Toon of the Day: Never Again
Resist We Much on May 2, 2013 at 11:45 AM
God forbid!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/04/26/rep-hank-johnson-on-helium-debate-imagine-a-world-without-balloons-video/
VegasRick on May 2, 2013 at 11:48 AM
People eat like crap, smoke, take drugs, never exercise and expect the healthcare system to make everything right….
It’s all an illusion – designed to take away the rest of your liberty…..
But I do feel safer when the FBI and the DHS team up. /sarc
redguy on May 2, 2013 at 11:50 AM
It serves its purpose well of being a method of wealth transfer.
tom daschle concerned on May 2, 2013 at 11:51 AM
Sign me up for Medicaid!!!
stvnscott on May 2, 2013 at 11:51 AM
I like the results of the study, but 2 years seems to be a very short period of time to see any gains in health for the average group of people.
astonerii on May 2, 2013 at 11:51 AM
It helps with some liberal statistics by killing people off, so they are no longer a “burden” on society.
kirkill on May 2, 2013 at 11:53 AM
I’m in Colorado, it’s free weed here.
kirkill on May 2, 2013 at 11:54 AM
Failure!? I dunno….maybe it actually achieved the objective sought.
hawkeye54 on May 2, 2013 at 11:54 AM
Results never matter to libs.
Only intentions.
Which must always be fixed by “more funding” (Reid, et al., Since Forever).
Difficultas_Est_Imperium on May 2, 2013 at 11:55 AM
Hmm…. beer, weed, and Doritos, forming the major food groups of slacker health.
hawkeye54 on May 2, 2013 at 12:00 PM
Water, wet. Film at 11.
CycloneCDB on May 2, 2013 at 12:01 PM
The issue here is the same as educational spending. Money does not equal outcome, because you can’t change the underlying fundamentals of personal accountability.
Government spending is no substitute for good parenting, nor is it substitute for making good life choices. Of course some people suffer health ailments which are not within their control, but many “poor outcomes” can be directly correlated to lifestyle. And there is a demographic which simply does.not.care, no matter how often Michelle Obama tells them to “move!”
And no surprise on the ER utilizations. Those are “free” to folks with Medicaid.
byepartisan on May 2, 2013 at 12:03 PM
News today shows that DC has the highest number of out-of-wedlock births in the nation at 50%. I guess they really do have bastards all over the place there.
Seriously though, I heard that statistic and the only thing I could think about is the number of those bastard babies that will start off life on the public dole and never EVER leave it.
Happy Nomad on May 2, 2013 at 12:08 PM
So, in a nutshell, Utopia is spending money that you don’t have, to achieve results that don’t happen.
OhEssYouCowboys on May 2, 2013 at 12:11 PM
Don’t worry everybody. Mika’s is hosting Food Nazi Week on Morning Joe all next week. She will scare and nag all the plebs into eating healthier.
Lance Murdock on May 2, 2013 at 12:18 PM
This result is a REPLICATION of the Rand Study from years ago.
Dr. Drew Foy: “[w]e know from the Rand Study that individuals with ‘low premium’ coverage consumed LESS care than those with comprehensive’ coverage but experienced no difference in outcomes. As this was a relatively short social experiment, the reduction in costs is not likely related to pricing mechanisms related to comprehensive coverage but rather, related to over-consumption of services. This is a critical point in my opinion that consumer-driven or low-premium high-deductible coverage would address.”
http://bit.ly/ziaEkz
goy on May 2, 2013 at 12:18 PM
Obviously more money, that we don’t have, needs to be spent in order to accomplish……nothing.
GarandFan on May 2, 2013 at 12:19 PM
The right just wants our guns left alone. The left keeps trying to get us onto the slope so they can gradually make us slip.
cptacek on May 2, 2013 at 12:24 PM
Well, yeah. How you gonna show you care if there’s no problem? If you fix the problem you can’t show you care.
So, people who actually get things done are heartless, unfeeling Fascists.
You know how you can tell they’re Fascists?
Fascists made the trains run on time.
If Fascists cared, trains would have been unrealiable, and then throwing more govt. money at the train operators- ala Amtrak-would have showed how much they care.
So, efficiency, frugality, and results in govt = Fascism.
questionmark on May 2, 2013 at 12:26 PM
Libs deal in feelings, not facts. Same thing with Head Start. Kids aren’t better off, but lefties want it to be true, so the facts of the matter don’t count. After all it’s our money being being squandered, not theirs.
erp on May 2, 2013 at 12:27 PM
Yaaaaayyyyyy! We’re There!
questionmark on May 2, 2013 at 12:28 PM
…that’s a really really Red State isn’t it?…who would believe them?
KOOLAID2 on May 2, 2013 at 12:29 PM
Detroit, the Utopian paradise.
Lily on May 2, 2013 at 12:34 PM
Meanwhile, check out this spin from former “conservative”, Josh Barro. He pretty much takes the opportunity to bash private insurance instead of Medicaid. Unreal.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-02/what-to-make-of-the-oregon-health-study.html
cdog0613 on May 2, 2013 at 12:34 PM
Depends on what the real definition of “results” is. Perhaps to some, the results achieved were the results desired.
hawkeye54 on May 2, 2013 at 12:36 PM
I’m not connecting the two. I posted this earlier today and it is interesting…
Eugenics And The Nazis — The California Connection
Resist We Much on May 2, 2013 at 12:36 PM
An person who has an unhealthy lifestyle will be still be unhealthy, even if they have health care.
How hard is this to understand ???
williampeck1958 on May 2, 2013 at 12:44 PM
For at least half of the population, unfathomable. And many don’t think about the ramifications nor care. And many will continue on with unhealthy lifestyles oblivious to the eventual physical deterioration of their bodies they will experience.
hawkeye54 on May 2, 2013 at 12:53 PM
Thanks for posting that, RWM.
Sounds like such a Progressive idea…
Now…connect Margaret Sanger to Eugenics.
An small educated unelected self-appointed elite making sure the great unwashed are well taken care of…
Progressivism = fascism.
Can be easily documented if one bothers to search.
Most won’t. Many, many refuse.
coldwarrior on May 2, 2013 at 12:59 PM
Billions? Sounds like a bargain! Here I figured we’d be talking about trillions!
Kensington on May 2, 2013 at 1:04 PM
Indeed. Next time folks tell you that “access” (a.k.a. ACA) is going to save tens of thousands of lives per year, you might have a talking point to refute that, but you won’t change their opinions.
calbear on May 2, 2013 at 1:06 PM
Getting free money and services lowers the rate of depression? I don’t think these authors know what depression really is. They might mean that it lowered the rate of self-reported dissatisfaction or sadness, but not clinical depression. After all, if their idea of depression is something that giving someone some freebies quickly alleviates then why would anyone ever have any drugs prescribed for that?
As usual, the MediCAID program is a total failure and even in these areas that they try to claim some sort of “WINNING!!” they only serve to undercut normal medicine (not that anyone with a brain ever trusted the psychiatrists, who just make stuff up in order to prescribe drugs and make their field seem more important and relevant than it is).
As to emergency room visits, there are people who like just going to the emergency room when they want to see a doctor and they will not be changed because someone tells them they can make an appointment like a normal person. They are into the whole emergency room thing and will not stop. Anyone with a brain understands this and could have easily predicted the results.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on May 2, 2013 at 1:15 PM
If it is free….
.
.
.
.
.
.
why waste it?
coldwarrior on May 2, 2013 at 1:45 PM
But, 70,000 more folks have ACCESS. Read the fine print.
Kissmygrits on May 2, 2013 at 1:52 PM
Eugenics And The Nazis — The California Connection
The Left’s Lie About Fascism Will Outlive Cockroaches In A Nuclear Winter
Resist We Much on May 2, 2013 at 1:59 PM
There are none so blind as those who actively refuse to see.
Chaz706 on May 2, 2013 at 2:11 PM
The patron saint of Planned Parenthood…a fascist? Oh, heaven’s how is that possible???
//
coldwarrior on May 2, 2013 at 2:11 PM
Didn’t mean to repost California. Here: Eugenics Links
Resist We Much on May 2, 2013 at 2:17 PM
Well I reckon any health care plan that includes arrest, coercion at the point of a gun isn’t really all that concerned about your health in the first place.
esnap on May 2, 2013 at 5:25 PM