The Bottom of the Teachers’ Union Barrel?
posted at 2:00 pm on February 20, 2011 by Jazz Shaw
With state budgets collapsing around the nation, an increasingly bright spotlight has been focused on the activities of many public sector unions, perhaps none more so than the teachers unions. Since most of the news is rather alarming to say the least, here at Hot Air we feel obliged to bring you a true feel-good story of union activity to brighten your winter days. With that in mind, I invite you to look over this CNN video journal by reporter Steve Perry. (Video available at the end of this column.)
The story focuses on Central Falls school in Rhode Island, an educational institute in such a sorry state of affairs that their drop-out rates were staggering and many students didn’t even log enough classroom time to receive a grade. Last year, in an apparent sign of throwing up their hands in despair, the school board took the drastic measure of firing all 88 of Central Falls’ teachers.
UPDATE: I’ve been reminded that Ed covered the firing of the teachers last year with full details of just how badly the school was performing.
Now, I already know what you’re thinking here. “But Jazz, what about those poor, unemployed teachers? Couldn’t anyone do anything to help them?”
Fear not! In charged the Rhode Island Federation of Teachers, who not only got all of their jobs back… they landed them a raise. And all of this is taking place in a community which wouldn’t even qualify as “working class” by most standards. The average wages in the Central Falls region are very low. Steve Perry sat down with Supervisor of Schools Frances Gallo to ask her about it.
CNN: So did you wind up paying them more?
Gallo: Yes
CNN: Central Falls is a poor community. Where did you get the money?
Gallo: Through the School Improvement Grant dollars. We had promised that if we secured those dollars, there would be a $3,000 stipend per teacher.
He then questions union representative James Parisi, who also seems to be put off by the pay situation.
CNN: So in this town where the average income is $22,000 the average teacher is now making $76,000. What are the community members paying for?
James Parisi: The highest paid teachers are making about $76,000, which frankly I don’t think is enough for the committed professionals that are in that school district.
CNN: You had a 93% fail rate. That’s undeniable.
JP: And you think that’s caused by teacher’s actions?
CNN: Absolutely.
JP: I don’t think the teachers are responsible.
We should note that the teachers didn’t just walk away with more cash without making some concessions. They had to agree to a number changes including making each class a few minutes longer and being forced to eat lunch with the students.
And how did that work out? Not so well, apparently, as 93% of the students are still failing to meet minimum standards in math and reading, with large numbers once again not even receiving a grade of any sort.
The teacher’s aren’t taking all of this unwanted attention lying down, though. This fall they staged a “sick out” in protest of the increasing demands for improved performance. Also, American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten visited the area to demand that everyone “stop playing the blame game,” and focus on the real needs of the students. (These needs apparently don’t include new, better teachers in the opinion of Ms. Weingarten.)
So there you have it. The feel good story of the week. See? And you thought the unions weren’t out there doing anything productive. The video of CNN’s report follows. Enjoy.
Now you can yell at Jazz for being a stupid, wrong-headed RINO even faster than by leaving a comment. Follow him on Twitter! @JazzShaw
This post was promoted from GreenRoom to HotAir.com.
To see the comments on the original post, look here.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air

Video: Say, how about having only one pilot on commercial flights?

WaPo vs WaPo (vs WaPo!) on IRS targeting of conservative groups







Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
You get to be the first in line when it starts burning? L.I.B (Let it burn) Burn baby Burn…
SWalker on December 3, 2012 at 6:56 PM
These figures don’t seem outrageous, considering the NEA’s size (3 million members, per their web site). How do these wages/benefits compare with top executives in other similarly sized non-profit groups?
cam2 on December 3, 2012 at 7:04 PM
Unions are basically a business–the only one not taxable. Also, under and by certain Federal laws, union violence during a strike cannot be prosecuted as a criminal offense.
Liam on December 3, 2012 at 7:07 PM
You could also end up like Jimmy Hoffa Sr.
listens2glenn on December 3, 2012 at 7:09 PM
The Ultimate Parasite.
Government backed extortion…
BigWyo on December 3, 2012 at 7:18 PM
For comparison, here are the figures for a couple of business associations:
http://www.publicintegrity.org/2011/03/03/2097/scores-union-leaders-earn-six-figure-salaries
cam2 on December 3, 2012 at 7:18 PM
The number of members isn’t as relevant as the number of employees, which is about 550.
Mike Antonucci on December 3, 2012 at 7:19 PM
Additionally, the revenues of the Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable are generated by voluntary member businesses, not the dues money extracted from individual teachers.
Mike Antonucci on December 3, 2012 at 7:21 PM
Do you mean compared to privately held corporations that derive their income from actually producing something as opposed to operating a racket that leeches of the very people they represent?
BigWyo on December 3, 2012 at 7:24 PM
Parasites are parasite and Unions especially the NEA are host killing parasites.
SWalker on December 3, 2012 at 7:24 PM
There isn’t a parasite that doesn’t inevitably kill the host. All in between is simply theft.
Liam on December 3, 2012 at 7:29 PM
My father (may he rest in peace) wanted me to be a machinist and he offered one big tip should I do so — become the union steward for your work unit and you’ll be immune from discipline (writeups) or lay offs.
This is a variant on his theme.
unclesmrgol on December 3, 2012 at 7:46 PM
…C R O O K S…!!!
KOOLAID2 on December 3, 2012 at 8:15 PM
Those low-level peons (read suckers) are the ones bussed in to be nasty vile mobs dressed alike in brightly colored tees.
Happy Nomad on December 3, 2012 at 8:18 PM
A variant, yes. But let’s not forget that the NEA and AFT are bleeding members stemmed only by the pay-offs from the Department of Education so that states can keep more teachers on the union rolls. The fact of the matter is that the teachers’ union is the next Govt. Motors. The numbers are becoming unsustainable with fewer and fewer peons paying in to keep the lords of the realm living the lifestyle Michelle Obama can only dream of as she jets off on a $4M vacation.
Happy Nomad on December 3, 2012 at 8:22 PM
That’s the way Communism always works. All the pigs are equal, but some pigs are a LOT more equal all the rest.
logis on December 3, 2012 at 8:31 PM
Champions of the little guy, making more than the US President?
They cry, “Poor, under-paid teachers!,” while picking those teachers’ pockets to pay for Jaguars, diamonds, & furs.
itsnotaboutme on December 3, 2012 at 9:16 PM
Union members are essentially the customers of the union – not the employees of the union.
So in direct comparison, executives for major corporations should be (and essentially are) paid according to their customer base. In that case, try a comparison between the top union exec and the CEO of say Walmart, based on number of customers. Tell me how that math turns out for you.
But basically Mike Antonucci and SWalker hit the right answers. Union execs are paid with money confiscated from the workers, much of it involuntarily, while legitimate businesses sell a product to entirely voluntary customers.
dentarthurdent on December 3, 2012 at 9:28 PM
DITTO. That sums things up very well, BigWyo.
Unions ALSO, with government indifference, instruct if not require the practice of criminal behavior. The ethics involved are corrupt. Unions foster this.
Lourdes on December 3, 2012 at 10:09 PM
…Castro with his castle by the sea for residence and his swelling bank accounts of BILLIONS in Luxembourg (which he calls his “salary” after sucking it off the Cuban nation for decades — his “reappropriated” “redistributed” “salary”)…Michelle Obama and her disgusting wastefulness of other people’s money to accommodate her vanity and lusts, same with her husband…
Communists, Socialists, always produce this “elite” few who, somehow, baffle the many “peons” (“workers” or “the people”) by dazzling them with their elitist vanity and indulgences and selfishness, so it is both who are to blame: those “elite” who feed off the “peons” and the “peons” for being so attracted to the shiny-false-idol.
Lourdes on December 3, 2012 at 10:18 PM
My FAVORITE Movie Ending!!: “Hoffa”
I get a warm and squiglly inside just THINKING about it…..and my Jaw gets Loose!!
williamg on December 3, 2012 at 10:34 PM
We should do what Obamacare did to insurers by limiting their administrative costs to a small percentage of their budget. State laws which limit public sector union benefits for the head honchos will hit the government teat-sucking Hoffas of the world without the risk of demagoguing conservatives for “punishing teachers.”
blammm on December 4, 2012 at 8:18 AM
If the sheeple are weak and dumb enough to elect Obama twice, there’s no reason they shouldn’t pay a union executive $1million per year to send their union dues to the Democrats. Meanwhile, the sheeple continue to graze on pasture grass while Obama and the Union leaders are eating steak at their expense. It’s truly a cycle of stupidity on the part of the sheeple.
cajunpatriot on December 4, 2012 at 9:11 AM