Did an FCC official do work for PBS simultaneously?

posted at 12:55 pm on February 18, 2011 by Ed Morrissey

There are two interesting stories centered on “FCC: Survivor” this morning, and we’ll roll them up into a single post.  First, the House has followed through on its threat to restrain the commission from enforcing authority in a jurisdiction Congress never granted it.  An amendment to the continuing resolution passed last night that bars funds from being used to enforce Julius Genachowski’s “Open Internet” rules:

The House passed an amendment Thursday that would bar the Federal Communications Commission from using any funding to implement the network-neutrality order it approved in December.

The amendment, approved on a 244-181 vote, was offered by Energy and Commerce Communications and Technology Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden, R-Ore., to legislation that would fund government agencies for the rest of fiscal year 2011.

They’re also working on Plan B in parallel.  On Wednesday, Walden introduced a Congressional Review Act measure that would allow Congress to strike the Open Internet regulations altogether.  The two efforts will work on separate tracks, although both would be subject to stalling or opposition in the Senate.  Either way, Congress has signaled its intent to pull the reins hard on regulatory adventurism in the Obama administration.

But that’s not the only adventurism one can find at the FCC, or at least that one could have found before January 7 of this year.  That was the last day of employment for Yul Kwon, the former deputy chief of consumer and government affairs at the FCC.  According to Cecilia Kang at the Washington Post, Kwon — who won a million dollars on the CBS show “Survivor” in 2006 and had been with CNN and Discovery in between — went back into show business with PBS, hosting its new show “America Revealed,” which PBS announced two days after Kwon left the FCC.  Prior to his departure, Kwon’s wife gave birth to their daughter Genevie in late September.

That’s where this gets interesting.  PBS, of course, is a regulated entity who has to answer to the FCC.  According to the law governing the FCC, no one employed by the FCC can work for or have any significant relation to an entity or person regulated by the commission, emphases mine:

(2)
(A) No member of the Commission or person employed by the Commission shall—
(i) be financially interested in any company or other entity engaged in the manufacture or sale of telecommunications equipment which is subject to regulation by the Commission;
(ii) be financially interested in any company or other entity engaged in the business of communication by wire or radio or in the use of the electromagnetic spectrum;
(iii) be financially interested in any company or other entity which controls any company or other entity specified in clause (i) or clause (ii), or which derives a significant portion of its total income from ownership of stocks, bonds, or other securities of any such company or other entity; or
(iv) be employed by, hold any official relation to, or own any stocks, bonds, or other securities of, any person significantly regulated by the Commission under this chapter;
except that the prohibitions established in this subparagraph shall apply only to financial interests in any company or other entity which has a significant interest in communications, manufacturing, or sales activities which are subject to regulation by the Commission.

When did Kwon actually start working for the PBS and filming the show?  That’s an interesting question.  Let’s take a look at the PBS release again, shall we, and the caption on the photo:

AMERICA REVEALED host Yul Kwon at La Tomatina en Reno, America’s biggest tomato fight

When exactly is “America’s biggest tomato fight”? If you’d guess it wouldn’t happen in the dead of winter, you’d be right. La Tomatina en Reno took place in August 2010 at the Club Cal-Neva in Reno.  If Kwon was there on vacation, then that would be fine — but the implication is that Kwon was there as part of his America Revealed duties, while still employed by the FCC.  The picture doesn’t look like an average family snapshot, either.  Photo credit goes to Jeff Ross, a photographer whose Google link describes him as “an advertising studio shooting commercial, industrial and editorial photo assignments in Reno, Las Vegas, Sacramento, Los Angeles, Phoenix and San Diego.”

Let’s take a look at December as well.  On December 11, photographer Jason Savage posted some work he was doing for PBS on a new show called … America Revealed.  And guess whose picture he took while out in Montana for the new show?  Yul Kwon, standing under an old airway beacon far away from Washington DC:

Last week I was freezing my #!$@ off photographing  an airway beacon on the continental divide in Montana and like usual, the wind was relentless. PBS is producing a new show, America Revealed that will be airing sometime next year. Part of the show features tranportation in America and for this portion they were featuring Montana’s old airway beacons that are still in operation. Back in the 30′s gas powered airway beacons were lined arcross the country to help pilots navigate their way, specifically the U.S. Mail planes. Year’s later most all of the country had abandoned these antique beacons,with Montana deciding to keep them in operation and maintain them across the state. Local pilots still use them for navigation in the mountains and they are an interesting remenant of aviation’s past.

It looks to be an interesting show and as always it’s a pleasure to be involved with anything PBS is doing. Yul Kwon is the host which some will remember from his victory on Survivor/Cook Islands.

Nor does that appear to be the only work Kwon was doing between August and December, as a look at his Twitter feed indicates:

  • Flying over Dallas in Cessna, taking pics of the roads to analyze congestion. They do everything big in Texas, including road construction. 11:10 AM Dec 10th, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from Addison, TX
  • Flying over Los Angeles with Commander Chuck, traffic reporter for Ryan Seacrest’s show. Wish I could avoid gridlock in a helicopter… 10:44 AM Dec 7th, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from here
  • At National Finals Rodeo in Vegas. 175K people. Felt out of place, didn’t see many Korean cowboys. Local govt awesome at managing traffic. 9:36 PM Dec 3rd, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from Paradise, NV
  • The biggest mass transporation system in America? School buses. 26 million trips a day. Here in Kingman, AZ, they drive 3 mil miles a year. 12:09 PM Dec 2nd, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from Kingman, AZ
  • Cold morning in Helena, MT (20 below freezing). Will learn why they need gas beacons to navigate planes here. Losing feeling in my thumbs. 5:39 AM Nov 30th, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from Helena Valley Northeast, MT
  • Just interviewed head of FAA, Randy Babbitt, about NextGen air system, which will reduce air traffic delays by 40%. Can’t wait to see it. 10:15 AM Nov 23rd, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from Washington Mall, Washington
  • Ok, bad hint. Better hint: I was on top of a skyscraper in NYC that’s named after a wealthy politician. http://plixi.com/p/57863857 9:07 AM Nov 19th, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from New York, NY
  • Guess where I’m shooting this at. Hint: I think I need dramamine. http://plixi.com/p/57862189 8:56 AM Nov 19th, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from New York, NY
  • At FAA’s command center which coordinates all air travel. Huge video screens tracking 5000 flights. If only they showed football games! 10:29 AM Nov 18th, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from Hunter Mill, VA
  • At giant rail yard in Chicago, learning why American trains are so good at moving freight, not so much at moving people. 12:03 PM Nov 10th, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from here
  • In NYC finishing first episode on how America produces food. Am delivering pizzas on bike for Dominos. Feel like a giant target for taxis. 2:48 PM Oct 21st, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from Tribeca, New York
  • In Detroit harvesting at urban farm. Farmer is helping inner city dwellers get fresh food and reduce blight. Amazing story of urban renewal. 2:31 PM Sep 18th, 2010 via Twitter for BlackBerry®
  • Just went flying in a Boeing Stearman biplane from the ’30s. Amazing! Felt like I was Snoopy’s WWI flying ace riding in his Sopwith Camel. 9:49 AM Sep 16th, 2010 via web from Garden City, KS
  • 2nd jump had probs. Guy strapped on my back got too excited and-in director’s words-dominated every scene. Not sure who was more humiliated. 12:33 PM Sep 14th, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from Garden City, KS
  • Just did my first jump. How embarassing. Hoped to give a manly roar, but ended up screaming like a baby. Here we go on the second try… 9:21 AM Sep 14th, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from Ivanhoe, KS
  • I’m about to jump out of a plane into a corn field in Kansas. I probably should’ve told someone I’m scared of heights. Oh boy. 6:24 AM Sep 14th, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from here
  • In Greeley, CO at cattle feedlot to learn about beef production. Surrounded by piles of manure big enough to deserve … http://tmi.me/1ffQH 10:49 AM Sep 10th, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from Greeley, CO
  • Woke up this morning to the smell of…100,000 cattle. Talk about a wake up call! I thought it smelled bad on Survivor. Skipping breakfast. 10:15 AM Sep 10th, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from Kersey-Gill, CO
  • Woke up today in Cut Bank, MT, coldest place in mainland USA. Kicking myself for wearing shorts. Learning how to harvest wheat today. Yeah! 10:58 AM Sep 9th, 2010 via ÜberTwitter from Cut Bank, MT
  • Little of this sounds like FCC business, does it?  It sure sounds like fun, but it also sounds as though Kwon was working for PBS at the same time he held a management position at the FCC — a rather blatant violation of the law and a conflict of interest to boot.  Some of this activity took place just after his daughter’s birth, which prompts the question as to whether Kwon conducted any of this activity while on paternity leave through the FMLA — which would also be a problem, since the FMLA doesn’t exist to allow people to work second jobs.

    Did Genachowski know of Kwon’s activities?  Did anyone wonder where Kwon was doing during what looks like copious time away from the office?  Perhaps someone in an Oversight Committee might like to ask Genachowski a few of these questions.  Given the propensity for PBS’ puppets to show up in Congress to testify for funding, it seems like perhaps we should find out what other puppets may still be working at the FCC.

    Update: Interesting points to ponder from a reader:

    I may be wrong about this, but I believe that the FCC doesn’t directly regulate “PBS” — what they regulate are the individual stations that make up the PBS network. Furthermore, PBS itself doesn’t produce programs — many of them, such as Yul Kwon’s “America Revealed,” are produced by outside production companies. I suspect that Yul or his supporters may point out that Yul was working for Lion Productions, an independent production company, not a directly FCC-regulated entity. Whether his “moonlighting” for them was proper is a separate matter.

    The first argument is the same as saying that the FCC doesn’t regulate ABC or CBS, which is true but meaningless.  Their only distribution channels are through their broadcast stations, which means that the FCC regulates them.  The “America Revealed” program may have been produced outside of PBS, but it was a PBS project — clearly identified as such in December when the photographer shot the picture of Kwon under the tower.  It amounts to doing work for PBS, which is a regulated entity.

    However, even if it wasn’t, how could Kwon spend weeks or months flying all over the US filming this show while supposedly drawing a taxpayer-funded salary?  The FCC either doesn’t keep very good track of its employees or someone high up endorsed this moonlighting.


    Related Posts:

    Breaking on Hot Air

    Blowback

    Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

    Trackbacks/Pings

    Trackback URL

    Comments

    Comment pages: 1 2

    Incompetency is just a liable as Malevolence…

    Doctors are held accountable for incompetence…so should those in Government.

    workingclass artist on May 17, 2013 at 2:29 PM

    “…and it’s important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives…”

    Here is the crux of the matter. The Obysmal administration was so intent on portraying Libya as a great success in the flourishing of democracy and that Al Qaeda was “on the run” that they hadn’t prepared for the jihadists’ attack. Sending in help or a rescue might have cost even more lives, and they didn’t want the body count to even go higher. The O-team was content to keep the “collateral damage” relatively small for their own cynically political purposes.

    onlineanalyst on May 17, 2013 at 2:31 PM

    I consider them both but if they are publicly saying this as their excuse, then you can bet they are worried that the actual info is about to come out. For all those not paying attention, that would be Fast and Furious 2; The benghazi edition.

    Boehner should step up and say, “ok, we are all in agreement that you are idiots, now we are going to find out just what the hell you were doing over there!”

    can_con on May 17, 2013 at 2:32 PM

    Regarding the Rush caller near the end of his program just now wondering why all the focus on the coverup of the Benghazi matter and not the cause of it: it’s because if you look at the factors that led to the attack you’ll find McCain, Rubio and Graham were promoters and the GOP establishment would prefer people only focus on the aftermath and Democrat coverup rather than the bi-partisan cause.

    FloatingRock on May 17, 2013 at 2:43 PM

    Their best defense: We’re horribly incompetent and shouldn’t be allowed to run a hamburger stand. But we still don’t think our incompetence caused anyone to die.”

    And even there, we can point to 4 people who died, and many more that would have died if 2 of those 4 hadn’t responded without waiting for orders and staged a rescue action.

    So it’s not really, “incompetence that didn’t cost any lives.” It’s “incompetence that cost 4 lives.

    And this is their best defense. Which almost certainly means they’re lying, and there really was deliberate malice and/or neglect behind it.

    There Goes the Neighborhood on May 17, 2013 at 3:01 PM

    Here’s a crazy thought. Earlier in the day, the Cairo embassy had been besieged. Why not put fast-response forces on standby THEN?

    Basically the U.S. response on 9/11/12 was the same as a rabbit when it notices a nearby wolf. Hold very still and hope the threat passes by.

    hawksruleva on May 17, 2013 at 3:01 PM

    Do a google map search of Sigonella and tell me what type of aircraft (and the number) that you see there.

    blink on May 17, 2013 at 2:41 PM

    That’s definitely a non-zero number of aircraft. For that matter, I hear there are aircraft all over the world. I’m thinking if the US REALLY wants to get somewhere, we can probably pay enough to charter a flight/commandeer a helicopter, etc.

    Too bad we don’t have any naval capabilities available in the Middle East. Or an air base in the Middle East. Or a friendly well-prepared regional ally who could send in some forces on our behalf.

    hawksruleva on May 17, 2013 at 3:07 PM

    Is that going to be Hillary’s campaign slogan?

    Hillary 2016: “I’m Not Corrupt, Just Incompetent!”

    AZCoyote on May 17, 2013 at 4:05 PM

    Is that going to be Hillary’s campaign slogan?

    Hillary 2016: “I’m Not Corrupt, Just Incompetent!”

    AZCoyote on May 17, 2013 at 4:05 PM

    “I can’t answer the god*!mn 3am phone call…cause I’m too drunk to find the f*#kin’ phone…@#$%&*$#@!!…” – Hillary Clinton

    workingclass artist on May 17, 2013 at 4:18 PM

    “We’re portrayed by Republicans as either being lying or idiots,” said one Obama administration official who was part of the Benghazi response. “It’s actually closer to us being idiots.”

    The GOP should use that quote in every political ad against Dems from here on out.

    Of course they won’t…they don’t want to “alienate moderates” or something limp-wristed akin to that.

    Dr. ZhivBlago on May 17, 2013 at 4:19 PM

    Weapons To Syria.

    Libyan weapons to Syria, Mali and Gaza Strip – US Security Council Report.

    We were in Benghazi for the weapons.

    oldroy on May 17, 2013 at 4:39 PM

    “US” – Should be UN Security Council

    oldroy on May 17, 2013 at 4:39 PM

    So it seems that the real clusterfark of idiocy is that no accounting was made for how to deal with Libyan weaponry and we have essentially armed a whole region of terrorists militias and rebels.

    oldroy on May 17, 2013 at 4:51 PM

    Stevens was probably in Benghazi to review weapons “applications” from different bidders. As long as you didn’t have anything like “Tea Party” in your militias name, you could buy sell or trade weapons.

    oldroy on May 17, 2013 at 4:55 PM

    OK let’s see

    An idiot would say here, “I was an idiot”

    A liar would say here … “I was an idiot”

    In other words, these remarks are devoid of any information content

    rightmind on May 17, 2013 at 1:11 PM

    If I remember the logic puzzle correctly, the right question to ask would be something like “If I asked you yesterday whether you were an idiot or a liar, which would you have answered?”. Idiot still says “idiot”, liar would have said “idiot” yesterday, but must now lie about that so must say “liar”.

    WTF, correct answer is “progressive”.

    bofh on May 17, 2013 at 4:59 PM

    WTF, correct answer is “progressive”.

    bofh on May 17, 2013 at 4:59 PM

    Correct answer is “Regime Changer without a plan to deal with 40 years of Quackadaffy weapons left behind.”

    oldroy on May 17, 2013 at 5:02 PM

    Oops.

    oldroy on May 17, 2013 at 5:02 PM

    When incompetence merges with complete corruption you have a perfect storm.

    MaiDee on May 17, 2013 at 6:09 PM

    Do a google map search of Sigonella and tell me what type of aircraft (and the number) that you see there.

    blink on May 17, 2013 at 2:41 PM

    Those maps are old, but ok, One sec…

    Ok I did that. There are a number of jets on the tarmac. I knew there would be.

    That’s definitely a non-zero number of aircraft. For that matter, I hear there are aircraft all over the world. I’m thinking if the US REALLY wants to get somewhere, we can probably pay enough to charter a flight/commandeer a helicopter, etc.

    Too bad we don’t have any naval capabilities available in the Middle East. Or an air base in the Middle East. Or a friendly well-prepared regional ally who could send in some forces on our behalf.

    hawksruleva on May 17, 2013 at 3:07 PM

    That was my point. Any adult would know this. There is no excuse for letting those men die.

    dogsoldier on May 17, 2013 at 6:27 PM

    hawksruleva on May 17, 2013 at 3:07 PM

    We can either charter one or if necessary we have people that can borrow one.

    dogsoldier on May 17, 2013 at 6:29 PM

    I think “lying idiots” pretty well covers it!

    Another Drew on May 17, 2013 at 6:35 PM

    I keep going back to Hillary’s 3:00 A.M. Phone Call ad. It seems that everybody in the administration failed that test. They’ve sunken below even my lowest expectations, and I don’t see anyone in the GOP bullpen likely to rise above ideological squabbles and lead us out of this.

    flataffect on May 17, 2013 at 7:06 PM

    The challenge was issued above by an obvious Obama apologist, to look at a Google map of Sigonella and report whether any aircraft were seen there.

    The question would be, “why not”. Actually, if there are no aircraft there now, there soon will be because the Italian government has just reported that 200 U.S. Marines plus two aircraft are being based at the joint U.S. Italian base at Sigonella, Sicily. (Just across a short stretch of water from Benghazi.) “Quick, the horse is galloping down the lane, close the barn door.”

    Oldflyer on May 17, 2013 at 7:48 PM

    Let’s just ponder that a moment. We took our quick-response team offline on the anniversary of 9/11? Who made that call?

    This is why I do not believe it was stupidity. I believe whoever left the ambassador isolated, wanted to make sure he was not covered

    I am a minority, but I believe there was to be an event to lead to a glorious hostage exchange – but it was foiled by the brave men who refused to stand down. Whoever started the evil chess game was left hanging and they had to run with the video fast, precisely because no one, no one, would be able to explain withholding cover from the victims. If I am right, I will never be vindicated, because the scandal will be too great so they have to fall back on stupidity

    IMHO stupidity in such a case implies a total contempt for the lives of the victims. This is why we need an IRS scandal.

    In any case, there is no way Obama can justify flying off the next day to a fund raiser. That in itself demands an IRS scandal. Since the Whistleblowers were coming, the guilty ones had to start a chicken dance, fast.

    AP scandal was the one and only way to get the MSM willing to beat up on Obama’s IRS

    entagor on May 17, 2013 at 10:11 PM

    My vote goes to: you are lying idiots.

    ghostwalker1 on May 17, 2013 at 11:18 PM

    One theory has it that the whole thing was a charade to set up a prisoner exchange – Stevens for the Blind Sheik. It would explain:

    1. Why there was reduced security.

    2. Why the platoon on the way within Libya was told to stand down.

    3. Why it was called a hostage situation.

    The men who fought back apparently weren’t in on the plan. This enraged the attackers, who thought they’d been lured into a trap or betrayed. So they went and got more friends and made a second attack.

    Akzed on May 17, 2013 at 12:58 PM


    This is a theory that makes all the pieces fit. It’s true they’re incompetent, but that doesn’t mean they weren’t also up to no good.

    Cara C on May 18, 2013 at 1:05 AM

    Wonderful article by Sharyl A. The administration appears to be conceding they have lost the debate and are plea bargaining for the lesser charge of idiocy over malice. This won’t do. In the entire piece, no explanation was given for the arrival of the video onto the scene.

    Don’t fall for that hangdog expression, Repubs. Those watery eyes are shifting about.

    MaxMBJ on May 18, 2013 at 3:30 AM

    The challenge was issued above by an obvious Obama apologist, to look at a Google map of Sigonella and report whether any aircraft were seen there.

    The question would be, “why not”. Actually, if there are no aircraft there now, there soon will be because the Italian government has just reported that 200 U.S. Marines plus two aircraft are being based at the joint U.S. Italian base at Sigonella, Sicily. (Just across a short stretch of water from Benghazi.) “Quick, the horse is galloping down the lane, close the barn door.”

    Oldflyer on May 17, 2013 at 7:48 PM

    There were people in Tripoli, who could have gotten to Benghazi. All of that came out in direct testimony from a variety of sources.

    dogsoldier on May 18, 2013 at 10:26 AM

    Wonderful article by Sharyl A. The administration appears to be conceding they have lost the debate and are plea bargaining for the lesser charge of idiocy over malice. This won’t do. In the entire piece, no explanation was given for the arrival of the video onto the scene.

    Don’t fall for that hangdog expression, Repubs. Those watery eyes are shifting about.

    MaxMBJ on May 18, 2013 at 3:30 AM

    You are correct, but it’s malice when you deliberately leave someone in a precarious position ( I mean 9/11 really? ) and ignore their pleas for help<<<<< And then HE.WENT.TO.BED.

    That is the most malicious thing ever. Oh wait! Then HE.LIED.ABOUT.IT

    Then he got everyone around him to lie about it. And go on five shows to lie about it and he made a lying ass commercial about it and had some poor slob who made a youtube video locked up and lied about it.

    Geez he's STILL lying about it.

    dogsoldier on May 18, 2013 at 10:31 AM

    I’m surprised that the Regime is claiming the “idiot defense”. I thought Team Obama were the smartest guys in the room. The MSM has told us Obama is the best thing since sliced white bread. What happened to his 2008 campaign slogan “Judgement To Lead”? But I guess in their minds, claiming to be idiots is better that self identifying as marxist enemies of America.

    SpiderMike on May 18, 2013 at 11:23 AM

    Comment pages: 1 2