Obamanomics 101: Borrowing to pay debt isn’t debt-debt
posted at 8:48 am on February 17, 2011 by Ed Morrissey
When does borrowing not create debt? Only in two instances: when one has no intention of paying it back, and when Barack Obama does it. Jake Tapper asked new White House press secretary Jay Carney exactly how borrowing over six hundred billion dollars in the best year of Obama’s ten-year budget projections (using the rosiest of all possible economic assumptions) somehow qualifies as (a) balanced spending and (b) not adding to the national debt. Carney explains how that works:
TAPPER: If I borrow money from you — to pay — to pay off the interest for -
CARNEY: You may owe me.
TAPPER: Ten-year rule. If I borrow money from you to pay off the interest for the debt I owe to Geoff, am I not adding to my debt?
CARNEY: Well, without dealing with hypotheticals, why don’t you — why don’t you –
TAPPER: The president seems to think that that borrowing money to pay the interest on the debt is not adding to the debt. I don’t understand that math.
Neither does anyone else — not even Carney, who then launches into a soliloquy about families, credit cards, and “invest[ing] in the future.” Carney also states that “interest payments are a major portion of our long-term debt,” but that’s not entirely true of the deficits, at least. Net interest on the existing debt will cost us $205 billion in 2011, and $240 billion in 2012. If debt interest was our only problem, it would be very controllable, and we wouldn’t need to keep borrowing to cover it.
Bear in mind that this interest reflects all the debt we have incurred up until the White House proposed its FY2011 budget. However, thanks to the massive spending expansion of the Democratic Congress and White House, interest payments start escalating rather quickly. By 2017, the interest hits $661 billion in Obama’s original budget plans; by 2021, it’s $928 billion a year. That is more than four times what interest was in 2010.
But to Carney, the problem is all in the past, not the present or Obama’s vision of the future:
Well, the debt is — has been created over a number of years, as you know. And we came in here with an economic crisis, the likes of which, I daresay, I think nobody in this room has ever seen, and which threatened to head straight into a depression if we didn’t act.
But I also remind you that we inherited, when this administration came into office, this president came into office, an enormous debt that had been piled up in the previous eight years. And that is part of the problem. And the interest that you’re talking about is on that debt as well.
Had we stopped deficit spending in 2007 when Democrats took control of the budgeting process, we would have a flat interest problem and no real fiscal crisis, just a hangover from previous deficit spending. Instead, Democrats — first with Obama in their ranks, and then at the lead — exploded the budget and put us on the fast track to Greece.
To answer Tapper’s question, borrowing to pay interest does add to debt. It’s unsustainable, no matter how many cliches Jay Carney uses to distract from the obvious.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
That will never happen! Many of the attendees are actual zombies. The White House strategy is to find a way for the zombies to become comfortable, and stop waiving their arms. That will happen. Many of them will give up and just sit there.
No, the Obama folks do not want any walk-outs! That would make room for new zombies, some of whom might not yet be in the desirable post-gesticulation phase. That doesn’t make for good TV.
The reason Helen Thomas has such staying power was that she was apparently a zombie hybrid . . . she never stopped moving, but she could always be counted on to ask a really stupid question. She gave the impression of activity . . . so they all told her how great she looked in red, and propped her up in the front row, thus drawing attention away from the other zombies.
Trochilus on February 17, 2011 at 10:25 AM
Private Pyle, you have got to be sh**ting me!!
JohnGalt23 on February 17, 2011 at 10:26 AM
Obama did not inherit a debt. He bought it. And he used my child’s credit card.
Ok. It has been over two years since The Big 0 took office. When do his testicles drop and he becomes a real man? When does he assume responsibility for this office?
kurtzz3 on February 17, 2011 at 10:43 AM
Jugears Ojesus and Palomino Pelosi OWN this debt. This inherited bullspit is getting a bit tired.
hillbillyjim on February 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM
/perfect!
roy_batty on February 17, 2011 at 10:46 AM
What the over/under on this twink lasting an entire year? Although, Scott McClellan lasted quite awhile for being a major dipsh!t during the Bush Administration!
mossberg500 on February 17, 2011 at 10:50 AM
With a $1.6 trillion deficit, $205 billion in interest is less than 13% of the deficit. So blame Bush and all his predecessors for 13%, whose fault is the other 87% ?
Carney: I double-debt dare ya.
Somebody should ask Carney his opinion on the Weimar Republic.
Steve Z on February 17, 2011 at 10:59 AM
How frustrating it must be for the press to have to sit through this rigmarole
//
FRUSTRATING?! Sorry but they are in bed with the wh,they are just stenographers!
ohiobabe on February 17, 2011 at 11:01 AM
Under -1100
Over +900
This a$$hole is 2 years behind in his lies.
VegasRick on February 17, 2011 at 11:03 AM
… but is “debt debt” like “rape rape” ??
J_Crater on February 17, 2011 at 11:04 AM
How much an you cover on the Over? At 9-1, I like that bet!!
JohnGalt23 on February 17, 2011 at 11:07 AM
Mr. Morrissey:
I’m not sure where you’re getting your annual interest numbers from, but according to this official U.S. Treasury website, we (i.e. the federal government) paid $413,954,825,362.17 of interest for FY2010, and more than 4 trillion dollars of interest over the previous ten years.
Interest Expense on the Debt Outstanding
ELCore on February 17, 2011 at 11:27 AM
Lord what a dolt.
Tim_CA on February 17, 2011 at 11:38 AM
Watching Tapper question him is like watching Godzilla stomping on Bambi.
Carney must be thinking, what have I gotten myself into…
PattyJ on February 17, 2011 at 11:41 AM
I knew a guy in college who bought a Les Paul with one of those credit cards they were handing out in the 80′s like Halloween candy during the first week on campus.
When asked how he was going to pay for it, without any money or a form of income, his reply was something to the effect of, “Who cares? Look at it!”
There may or may not have been marijuana involved.
Bruce MacMahon on February 17, 2011 at 11:48 AM
‘We have like a lot of families, like some families might have The first important step… debt on their credit card with intrest rates that to be contended with. But the first important step to dealing with this issue…’ is cutting up the credit card. Dumb sh*t…
RalphyBoy on February 17, 2011 at 11:59 AM
President Obama – Harvard alum
Press Secretary Carney – Yale alum
I assume these institutions assume that students understand the words debt and responsibility prior to their arrival in their freshman year.
However, I believe I was wrong. Their intellectual progeny sure understand the meaning of Socialism, but apparently not the meaning either debt or responsibility.
Why should they? When universities keep jacking up their tuition fees annually (Yale, Carney’s alum ’87, 1986-1987 $11K+/yr, 2010-2011 $38K+/yr), requiring more students to go into debt to Financial Aid, why should they teach about debt and responsibility.
This will continue election after election after election. Like someone had said earlier, these politicians are betting that Americans will not have the fortitude to do anything about it… perhaps they are right.
But 20 years from now, when not much has changed, >50% of your wages taken for Federal Income Tax alone, seeing our kids working hard simply to put food on the table – while seeing retired politicians & their crony media buddies wearing nice suits, living in their fancy houses, eating at fancy restaurants & living very well – all on the corrupt & immoral decisions they made while in office… I wouldn’t be surprised if a few of them get picked off.
You’ll know that they know this too when they try to pass a law making it illegal to own firearms. But if you’re a criminal, well then, that’s okay.
Danny on February 17, 2011 at 12:17 PM
“Investing” means putting your money into something that will grow in value. It’s deferring present gratification in order to gain greater gratification later. Borrowing to pay off debts is exactly the opposite: it’s improving your situation now at the expense of your future finances. Debts are not an “investment”, and what Obama is calling “investing in the future” is actually stealing from it.
Socratease on February 17, 2011 at 12:33 PM
It seems pretty clear now that a prerequisite for being a Democrat is to have flunked Econ 101. How anyone who understands basic economics can be a Dem is one of life’s great mysteries.
That’s why I’d like to see Obumble’s college records made public. Forget about the birther nonsense. If we have a President who flunked economics, then everyone who voted for him should be featured on a new reality tv show, “America’s Dumbest Voters!”
JayVee on February 17, 2011 at 12:46 PM
Major DNC Personal destruction machine firing up for JAKE TAPPER in 5….4…..3…
PappyD61 on February 17, 2011 at 1:11 PM
At some point the laughter will drown out the loons.
Speakup on February 17, 2011 at 1:50 PM
Maybe that’s why Gibbs got out and into some other form of Obama worship. He saw the handwriting…
jeanie on February 17, 2011 at 1:52 PM
Its no wonder the White House has it’s own propoganda arm.
You would expect them to walk off the podium shaking their head in disgust.
Keith_Indy on February 17, 2011 at 1:58 PM
It’s double-secret-debt
olesparkie on February 17, 2011 at 2:12 PM
Well put!
Trochilus on February 17, 2011 at 2:54 PM
Ed,
Why are we talking about 2017? Are we really going to dellude ourselves into thinking that the dollar is going to be worth anything by then.
You said,
In approximately two years the dollar is going to fall flat. This is inevitable and it is EXACTLY what they are planning.
The fall of capitalism and the firm and permanent placement of
a government run health care systemsocialism will be fully in place.shick on February 17, 2011 at 3:29 PM
Heck, I was going to miss the moronic/idiotic Gibbs, a lot. I never thought that anyone else ould equal or surpass him in so aptly portraying this inept Obama administration.
Well, they don’t disappoint. They found his replacement dummy in Carney.
Schadenfreude on February 17, 2011 at 3:43 PM
Maybe he had a stroke.
stenwin77 on February 17, 2011 at 6:55 PM
I dunno . . . how long do you think this Carney fellow will last??
Anyway, it can be hard on a man to respout the lies of another liar. Sentences get dragged out as the liar gropes for the right neutral as possible terms. A lot of uhs and tas and mmms . . . .
Hard to be confident under these circumstances.
Then again may show the man has a conscience.
Not all have as much reservations about lying.
Like our President.
Sherman1864 on February 17, 2011 at 9:57 PM
After Gibbs disastrous start, we were wondering here if he could last that month. I suspect that the Press Corpse will get used to the incompetence of the new guy. What else can they do?
slickwillie2001 on February 17, 2011 at 11:12 PM
Simple. Follow up!
“In response to Jake Tapper, you suggested that the national debt was something you inherited from the previous administration.
But his question addressed a specific amount that YOUR administration is currently adding to the national debt because of YOUR current borrowing. Could you please address the question in regard to current borrowing being employed to pay interest?
How do you respond to those who say that such borrowing to pay interest is leveraging the debt, exacerbating it in a way that is simply not sustainable?”
Then quote his response in a story.
And, put the numbers in the story, side by side.
Trochilus on February 18, 2011 at 8:40 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2