Wolf Blitzer: I wonder if Obama’s Cairo speech had something to do with this
posted at 2:55 pm on February 11, 2011 by Allahpundit
A taste for you of what’s to come this afternoon after The One speaks and the media gets to work on transforming two weeks of embarrassment into a glorious foreign policy masterstroke. Here’s an easy prediction for you, though: While some of the dumber Democratic analysts may rush to credit Obama for Egypt’s democratic moment, the White House itself will be exceedingly modest about its role in this. Partly that’s because they have surrogates on the left and in the press to do the work for them, but chiefly it’s because they understand only too well how terribly this could turn out. If O steps up to the podium and rhetorically high-fives himself, and then the Egyptian military ends up rolling over protesters with tanks in a few weeks or the Muslim Brotherhood wins a majority in parliamentary elections, the GOP will hammer him endlessly with the soundbite next year during the campaign. He’d love to take credit, I’m sure, but he’d love a second term more. So, modesty for now.
I linked Jake Tapper’s demolition of the White House record on Egypt in the other thread — needless to say, the idea that they were pushing for democracy is a near-total fraud — but let me refresh your memory about the Cairo speech specifically since that’s what Blitzer’s on about here. Politico tackled this back on January 28:
The other sleight-of-hand in Axelrod’s comment is his suggestion that Obama’s visit to Cairo in June 2009 was intended or perceived as speaking hard truths to Mubarak. To the contrary, many in the region, in other Muslim countries and the U.S. (see here and here) saw the choice of Egypt for Obama’s first speech to the Muslim world as a huge laurel for Mubarak, not an albatross. Obama’s speech made no direct reference to political reform or human rights issues in Egypt, save for a passing reference to Christian Copts there. There were also reports that the U.S. eased up on democracy promotion there.
However confrontational the Obama administration’s approach to this issue may have been over the past two years, I certainly don’t remember Obama administration officials ever publicly suggesting, as White House press secretary Robert Gibbs did directly on Friday, that U.S. aid to Egypt was in jeopardy.
On Twitter, our favorite Democrat (who has family in Egypt) writes, “When I was in Egypt last summer many ppl said govt was instable & Mubarak cld fall anytime. No 1 ever mentioned Obama or Bush as a reason.” So there’s your framework for O’s statement, which is set to start any minute now. Something to watch for: How effusively he praises Mubarak as a way of reassuring jittery U.S. allies in the region. The Saudis are already feeling panicky; presumably there’ll be plenty of lip service in Obama’s comments about “stability” going forward to calm their nerves. Click the image to watch.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4
This was his tear down that wall moment and he muffed it. Kinda like not catching the winning pass in the super bowl. Not to worry tho, the msm is there to throw a yellow flag for a do over in ’12.
Kissmygrits on February 12, 2011 at 8:32 AM
The sun rose AGAIN this morning thanks to The Dear Leader!!! Praise to the Dear Leader!!!!!
WannabeAnglican on February 12, 2011 at 8:55 AM
1. Obama’s administration did not return to Congress the slashed US tax funds that Bush/Congress had appropriated to extend humanitarian Egyptian interests. Obama effectively looted those US tax funds for which there are no accounting. But then, Obama’s the man refusing to provide his own personal legal documentation of credentials.
maverick muse on February 12, 2011 at 9:13 AM
2. If O steps up to the podium and rhetorically high-fives himself, and then the Egyptian military ends up rolling over protesters with tanks in a few weeks or the Muslim Brotherhood wins a majority in parliamentary elections, the GOP will hammer him endlessly with the soundbite next year during the campaign.
The MSM Kowtows To the Brotherhood
Posted by Candace de Russy Feb 12th 2011
maverick muse on February 12, 2011 at 9:13 AM
Mubarak: door closed.
Pandora’s box: door open.
(I think I got that from Ed, but it’s worth repeating)
itsnotaboutme on February 12, 2011 at 9:18 AM
I linked the IMF Chief’s statement repeatedly here at HotAir when he announced the first week of the Egyptian public protests that the IMF is funding Egypt’s revolutionary government/society in order to enforce/provide “equal income”.
And today, Drudge links the IMF announcement to remove the US Dollar as the international trade monetary unit.
maverick muse on February 12, 2011 at 9:19 AM
all I have to say is, Don’t count your chickens…
elifino on February 12, 2011 at 9:19 AM
Not to worry. The new currency will be rainbow colored skittles shaped like little obama heads.
Key West Reader on February 12, 2011 at 9:47 AM
Does Obama, really?
Rather, the US Government pre-Obama considered Hezbollah to be a militant group, “which the United States formally designated as a terrorist organization in 1997.” And at this point, our federal officials are in conflict with each other on “what” the Obama administration considers to be terrorist.
maverick muse on February 12, 2011 at 9:55 AM
Linky
maverick muse on February 12, 2011 at 9:56 AM
Okay, so now what?
kingsjester on February 12, 2011 at 10:47 AM
“Mr. Mubarek, tear down those pyramids!”
Dr. ZhivBlago on February 12, 2011 at 11:13 AM
If I were Obama’s press secretary, I would be asking Tingles, Wolfy and the rest of the MSM to tone down the the Won’s responsibility for the Mid East uprisings. We have seen them before and they don’t end up like Western Governments.
We seem to be entering a Pan Islamist era. The competition to out Jihad the next imam will be fierce.
jpmn on February 12, 2011 at 5:30 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4