Egyptian army siding with protesters?

posted at 2:55 pm on January 31, 2011 by Ed Morrissey

Earlier today, McClatchy ran an article wondering why the Egyptian army had not taken action to quell street demonstrations.  They have their answer now:

Egypt’s military says it recognizes “the legitimacy of thepeople’s demands” and promised to guarantee “freedom of expression” ahead of a planned escalation of the country’s week-old anti-government protests.

A military spokesman, Ismail Etman, has appeared on state TV saying the military “has not and will not use force” against protesters, but he urged them not to commit acts harming security or damage property.

The statement was the strongest sign to date that the military will allow week-old protests to continue and even grow as long as they are peaceful. The statement did not specify what demands the military views as legitimate — but the main demand by protesters is the ouster of President Hosni Mubarak.

That statement sounds like a death knell for the Mubarak regime.  The military had propped him up for the entirety of his dictatorship, after the assassination of Anwar Sadat left Mubarak in charge.  The lack of intervention by the army to this point could have been interpreted as a way to keep all options open, but endorsing “the legitimacy of the people’s demands” goes much farther than that.  It is at least an implicit endorsement of the demand that Mubarak flee into exile, and very much a signal that short of violence, the army will no longer keep him in power.

The news may have been lost among those now stampeding towards airports and other means of exit today, but the overall message hasn’t been missed at all:

Cairo’s international airport was a scene of chaos and confusion Monday as thousands of foreigners sought to flee the unrest in Egypt and countries around the world scrambled to send in planes to fly their citizens out.

Nerves frayed and shouting and shoving matches erupted as thousands crammed into Cairo airport’s new Terminal 3 seeking a flight home. The airport’s departures board stopped announcing flight times in an attempt to reduce the tension — but the plan backfired, fueling passengers’ anger.

Making matters worse, check-in counters were poorly staffed because many EgyptAir employees had been unable to get to work due to a 3 p.m.-to-8 a.m. curfew and traffic breakdowns across the Egyptian capital.

Anyone with means to flee and a destination to reach wants out of Egypt.  Don’t be surprised if Mubarak doesn’t join them soon.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

the adults are in charge

rob verdi on April 3, 2013 at 5:22 PM

Smart power.

steebo77 on April 3, 2013 at 5:29 PM

glitches…

is that between not optimal and bumps in the road?

DanMan on April 3, 2013 at 5:30 PM

What? Muslim extremists don’t have a sense of humor?

News to me…

Nethicus on April 3, 2013 at 5:34 PM

Wasn’t it the US Embassy in Cairo, which began the “we’re so sorry about the anti-muslim film” excuse first? You know, the one that our dear leader and his cohorts used as an excuse to arrest Nakoula Basseley Nakoula?

Hill60 on April 3, 2013 at 5:39 PM

#Benghazi…

Seven Percent Solution on April 3, 2013 at 5:40 PM

The You Tube Benghazi videographer is unable to comment due to prison rules..

hillsoftx on April 3, 2013 at 5:48 PM

Because we wouldn’t want to be controversial in defending our human-rights values, would we?

Get with the progressive ideal no culture is better than another one so the entire idea of human rights is a sham.

chemman on April 3, 2013 at 5:57 PM

Blithering idiots.

They have no idea what they’re doing, and wind up doing the worst possible thing: Projecting both incompetence and weakness simultaneously.

novaculus on April 3, 2013 at 6:07 PM

The MoBro are the REB’s people, you can’t mess with them.

slickwillie2001 on April 3, 2013 at 6:25 PM

I realize the purpose of The Daily Show, but it’s pretty clear that even behind the jokes, they simply don’t get it. But, of course, they likely all voted for Barack, so intelligence isn’t something I’d highlight as a strong point among the TDS viewership.

Or the US Embassy.

BKeyser on April 3, 2013 at 9:09 PM

As gutless as Morsi. Obama’s grand Middle East strategy in action. What courage! What boldness! All this from that purported multi-dimensional chess player.

Pahhh, what a clueless, idiotic clown.

ss396 on April 3, 2013 at 9:49 PM

Seems to me that we have had an inordinate amount of “glitches” since, oh, around Jan 2009.

Difficultas_Est_Imperium on April 4, 2013 at 1:03 AM

I appreciate Jon Stewart because while a liberal, he is true to his convictions. I don’t appreciate the U.S. Embassay in Egypt because they are cowards.

Illinidiva on April 4, 2013 at 11:13 AM

I realize the purpose of The Daily Show, but it’s pretty clear that even behind the jokes, they simply don’t get it.

BKeyser on April 3, 2013 at 9:09 PM

Agree. Note how the audience cheers as Jon Stewart’s graphics put a jail around the Fox-News building because they insulted the president.

Also, Stewart doesn’t realize that the Egyptian government is Islamist and it likely is an offence to criticize Islam. Doesn’t he follow the news at all?

virgo on April 7, 2013 at 12:17 PM