Michael Moore: Americans love guns because we’re racist, right?

posted at 4:53 pm on January 19, 2011 by Allahpundit

Via Eyeblast. On a busy news day, no way does Michael Moore doing his Michael Moore shtick make the cut for the blog. On a slow news day like today, when I’m scrambling for content? You betcha. In fact, watching this gives me a new appreciation for The One’s own brand of insultingly reductionist explanations for why Americans dig firearms. To Obama, the yokels cling bitterly to guns and religion and xenophobia as a way to ease their economic jitters. I suppose Moore would sign onto that — every leftist is a historical materialist at heart, no? — but Obama’s statement, while insufferably condescending, doesn’t impugn the character of Americans nearly enough to make it good, hearty, progressive rhetorical fare. Moore, an old pro, knows how it’s done. Enjoy, bitter-clingers.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Nice screen shot. LOL.

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

portlandon on January 19, 2011 at 4:54 PM

Speak for yourself, Jabba the Hut.

Ward Cleaver on January 19, 2011 at 4:55 PM

I love donuts… but not nearly as much as Michael Moore does.

myrenovations on January 19, 2011 at 4:56 PM

According to the left:

we loguns cuz we’re racist

we don’t want socialism cuz we’re racist

we breathe in oxygen and exhale c02 because we’re racist

we have 10 fingers and ten toes because we’re racist

the sun comes up in the east cuz we’re racist

angryed on January 19, 2011 at 4:57 PM

Hmmmm….a huge abortion post, then a Michael Moore post.

Are you guys trying to ruin my day?

BobMbx on January 19, 2011 at 4:57 PM

Americans love guns because we’re racist

Oh, thank God. I was afraid it was because we’re in love with the phallic imagery of guns.

But, knowing clowns like Moore, it won’t be long before that theory too is advanced.

FlameWarrior on January 19, 2011 at 4:57 PM

Michael, dude the faded baseball cap is soooooo 1998. Come on man.

angryed on January 19, 2011 at 4:58 PM

Oh, so this is the Biggest Loser. I’ve been wondering what all the fuss was about. Now I definitely won’t watch./

pugwriter on January 19, 2011 at 4:58 PM

And he’s grossly overweight because he loves giant pans of lasagna…oh, wait, that’s likely true.

Asher on January 19, 2011 at 5:00 PM

Strange logic. The places that have more guns have less crime.

That’s a bad thing?

princetrumpet on January 19, 2011 at 5:01 PM

I realized this is superficial, shallow, and irrelevant …

But man, that strange little guy has been packing away the cheeseburgers lately.

Probably trying to self-medicate the pain from the epic failure of the Sicko movie.

He still makes me smile, though. I sent him a Hallmark thank you card after the 2004 election for helping relect W … and I always chuckle wondering which one of his staffers opened it.

Keep talking, Mike. I love this guy. He’s the greatest recruitment tool the Republican Party has ever had.

Emphasis on <strong>tool.

Professor Blather on January 19, 2011 at 5:02 PM

Strange logic. The places that have more guns have less crime.
That’s a bad thing?

princetrumpet on January 19, 2011 at 5:01 PM

A natural progression?

BobMbx on January 19, 2011 at 5:02 PM

How does MM explain all the racist gun control laws in the past?

modnar on January 19, 2011 at 5:02 PM

princetrumpet on January 19, 2011 at 5:01 PM

It’s about equality–the places with less crime need to have the same amount of crime.

theperfecteconomist on January 19, 2011 at 5:03 PM

Martin Luther King: Racist.

Bishop on January 19, 2011 at 5:03 PM

On a not-so-related note, I was watching TV the other day and saw that “The Fast and the Furious” was on, but I misread it as “The Fat and the Furious” and my first thought was, “huh, must be the new Michael Moore movie.” Bazinga!

Meric1837 on January 19, 2011 at 5:04 PM

It’s almost as if the lefties are taunting conservatives, hoping somebody will do something idiotic?

Naaah, can’t be…

darclon on January 19, 2011 at 5:04 PM

Moore is missing out. Just think of all the places on his body he could effectively conceal a firearm.

Mind bleach, aisle seven, on your left.

pugwriter on January 19, 2011 at 5:04 PM

Didn’t I see at Daily Caller that Moore is a lifetime NRA member?

JamesLee on January 19, 2011 at 5:05 PM

The alarming fact is that blacks shoot blacks, so often, it is common place in the inner cities. Moore only needs to watch about 5 episodes of “The First 48″ to get the drift. And then, he should give instances where white people are firing guns at blacks/Hispanics, and other minorities just for the heck of it….’cause I’d like to see that stat.

betsyz on January 19, 2011 at 5:05 PM

I guess they let ol’ Jabba out of food jail. I heard he’d been in some fancy weight loss resort. Doesn’t look like it worked – he still looks (and acts) like the pointless mass that he’s always been – still bitterly clinging to those Twinkies.

wadikitty on January 19, 2011 at 5:05 PM

I am not a racist gun owner, I have a matte black one, a couple of stainless steel ones, a couple blued ones, even a couple laminated multi colored stock rifles.

fourdeucer on January 19, 2011 at 5:07 PM

I guess Somalia is full of racists.

rob verdi on January 19, 2011 at 5:08 PM

He made that same charge in the cartoon part of Bowling For Columbine.

John the Libertarian on January 19, 2011 at 5:08 PM

Later that same day, Michael Moore was outside talking to his neighbor who said,” Gee Mr. Moore, you sure do have a lot of shade in your backyard.” To which Michael Moore replied, “Yeah, but with all those trees back there, I can’t see what’s causing it”.

MrFreeman07 on January 19, 2011 at 5:08 PM

I am a gun owner. I will shoot anyone who tries to break into my house or kill me or my family, regardless of their skin color.

I am an equal opportunity self defender.

portlandon on January 19, 2011 at 5:09 PM

Later that same day, Michael Moo

re was outside talking to his neighbor who said,” Gee Mr. Moore, you sure do have a lot of shade in your backyard.” To which Michael Moore replied, “Yeah, but with all those trees back there, I can’t see what’s causing it”.

MrFreeman07 on January 19, 2011 at 5:08 PM

bah dum bum

pugwriter on January 19, 2011 at 5:10 PM

Is that a banjo playing in the background as he is talking..dueling banjo’s?

right2bright on January 19, 2011 at 5:11 PM

How does MM explain all the racist gun control laws in the past?

modnar on January 19, 2011 at 5:02 PM

Hey, please don’t insult Hot Air by using the initials MM to refer to Lumpy Riefthenstal. After all, the Boss Emeritus owns them.

Del Dolemonte on January 19, 2011 at 5:12 PM

Michael Moore – now there’s an ‘intellectual heavyweight’.

GarandFan on January 19, 2011 at 5:12 PM

Le me get this straight. The neighborhoods and the places where guns are owned and carried has less crime then the areas where they are not. Did I hear him straight? I ran it four times. What is his point again?

Jdripper on January 19, 2011 at 5:14 PM

Why do we have fast food outlets on every corner? To maintain the bulk of fabasterds like Michael Moore. So what’s his next movie going to be called? Ice hockey for Tucson.

Kuffar on January 19, 2011 at 5:15 PM

Why we love guns.

Socratease on January 19, 2011 at 5:16 PM

Okay, you fat bastard. What do your bodyguards carry to protect your worthless ass? Slingshots? ✪

TXUS on January 19, 2011 at 5:16 PM

Really? REALLY?? Let me get this straight: They can see the cause & effect of a year old political poster causing a lone lunatice to shoot a congressman, but cannot see that the effect that a prospective crime victim will have a gun & protect themselves is a deterrent to crime, therefore CAUSING the reduced rate of crime?

Inconvenient truths…..

mgman on January 19, 2011 at 5:17 PM

Moore is missing out. Just think of all the places on his body he could effectively conceal a firearm.

*retch* Hand me that mind bleach, STAT!

wadikitty on January 19, 2011 at 5:18 PM

You know, for a grossly obese man he doesn’t sweat much.

(Trying desperately to find something nice to say about him)

Ok, enough of that. When Hank Johnson worried out loud about Guam tipping over, he was thinking of an impending MM visit there.

GnuBreed on January 19, 2011 at 5:20 PM

Moore endorsed a white NRA member for President in 2004. Guess that makes him a racist too.

Speaking of which, I stumbled across one of Mikey’s screeds from that year I hadn’t read before. He takes issue with the hundreds of Swift Boat colleagues who called Botox out on his lies, accusing them of “deserting their posts to attack a wounded comrade.” Yes, he said those words.

This guy is shoveling with two hands. Here he whines against Bush.

excerpt:

The reason that I think you know so much about other men’s war wounds is because, during your time in the Texas Air National Guard, you suffered so many of them yourself. Consider the paper cut you received on September 22, 1972, while stationed in Alabama, working on a Senate campaign for your dad’s friend (when you were supposed to be on the Guard base). A campaign brochure appeared from nowhere, ambushing your right index finger, and blood trickled out onto your brand new argyle sweater.

Then there was the incident with the Crazy Glue when your fraternity brothers visited you one weekend at the base and glued your lips together while you were “passed out.” Though initially considered “friendly fire,” it was later ruled that you suffered severe post traumatic stress disorder from the assault and required certain medicinal attention — which, it seems, was provided by those same fraternity brethren.

But nothing matched your heroism when, on July 2, 1969, you sustained a massive head injury when enemy combatants from another Guard unit dropped a keg of Coors on your head during a reconnaissance mission at a nearby all-girls college. Fortunately, the cool, smooth fluids that poured out of the keg were exactly what was needed to revive you.

That you never got a purple heart for any of these incidents is a shame. I can fully appreciate your anger at Senator Kerry for the three he received. I mean, Kerry was a man of privilege, he could have gotten out just like you. Instead, he thinks he’s going to gain points with the American people bragging about how he was getting shot at every day in the Mekong Delta. Ha! Is that the best he can do? Hell, I hear gunfire every night outside my apartment window! If he thinks he is going to impress anyone with the fact that he volunteered to go when he could have spent the Vietnam years on the family yacht, he should think again. That only shows how stupid he was! True-blue Americans want a president who knows how to pull strings and work the system and get away with doing as little work as possible!

Del Dolemonte on January 19, 2011 at 5:21 PM

Mr. Moore meet Robert Hicks, gun toting Southerner.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/25/us/25hicks.html

tmitsss on January 19, 2011 at 5:21 PM

Michael Moore -Gun Expert????

Does he even know which end is which?

On second thought, after seeing the video, I have my answer based on where the voice was coming from…

taznar on January 19, 2011 at 5:22 PM

Hmmm… why does an area with high gun ownership have low crime and low murder rates? Liberals really are that dumb – they can’t see the cause and effect.

AbaddonsReign on January 19, 2011 at 5:23 PM

I’m glad they posted the Bowling for Columbine cartoon — it’s about the only part of that movie I’ve seen (and was enough).

eforhan on January 19, 2011 at 5:24 PM

Michael, dude the faded baseball cap is soooooo 1998. Come on man.

angryed on January 19, 2011 at 4:58 PM

It’s okay. Moore himself is soooo 1988.

Mallard T. Drake on January 19, 2011 at 5:28 PM

Who care’s what Pizza The Hut says?

Kini on January 19, 2011 at 5:28 PM

Del Dolemonte on January 19, 2011 at 5:12 PM

Oops, brain fart. =P

modnar on January 19, 2011 at 5:30 PM

Never trust statistics Tubby Riefenstahl quotes. I do love how he and other leftists never connect the dots. If there are so few home invasions, could it be that criminals are leery about whether the homeowner has a gun? Perhaps the possibility of being shot during a burglary keeps the crime rate down.

None are so obsessed with race as liberals complaining about how “obsessed” the right is about race.

Mallard T. Drake on January 19, 2011 at 5:32 PM

He will change his tune when they come for his cheeseburgers.

faol on January 19, 2011 at 5:35 PM

Most people think King would be the last person to own a gun. Yet in the mid-1950s, as the civil rights movement heated up, King kept firearms for self-protection. In fact, he even applied for a permit to carry a concealed weapon.

A recipient of constant death threats, King had armed supporters take turns guarding his home and family. He had good reason to fear that the Klan in Alabama was targeting him for assassination.

Who’s a racist, Michael?

Socratease on January 19, 2011 at 5:42 PM

I would be afraid to interview him…I would be afraid that he would eat me.

right2bright on January 19, 2011 at 5:47 PM

To quote David Letterman many moons ago:

“Fat tub of goo!”

nukemhill on January 19, 2011 at 5:48 PM

Eh … let’s just keep him fat. When food supplies get low a man Moore’s size can provide for weeks.

darwin on January 19, 2011 at 5:50 PM

FTG

Kenosha Kid on January 19, 2011 at 5:55 PM

L-e-t h-i-m t-a-l-k!!!!

He says most of the people who own guns live in places with very low murder rates. And he is CORRECT!

But:

A: The murder rates are low BECAUSE of the armed citizens, and;

B: All those guns are NOT causing everyone there to kill each other.

MikeA on January 19, 2011 at 6:00 PM

No.

DDT on January 19, 2011 at 6:05 PM

This is easily refuted. Imagine living near the Kennedy compound. You’d have to be constantly worrying about drugged, drunken Kennedys climbing through your window, boosting your liquor, and molesting your daughters, then skating free because of connections with the local DA.

Your only protection from the local miscreants is a trusty 12-guage.

blofeld42 on January 19, 2011 at 6:06 PM

Instead of Michael Moore speaking, could you just post of video of a skunk defecating? I think it would be far less disgusting. Thank you.

oldleprechaun on January 19, 2011 at 6:06 PM

Pus meet tule (tool).

profitsbeard on January 19, 2011 at 6:17 PM

Moore: just another idiot from the liberal minority.
Nothing to see here, move along.

n0doz on January 19, 2011 at 6:52 PM

So baseless speculation about racial motives takes the place of any real facts about actual gun ownership and usage.

Fantastic.

Logic is always against them so they must always resort to “well you’re a _______” Fill in the blank. Racist, capitalist, sexist, homophobe, xenophobe, evil rich person, nazi, facist, whatever else the villain of the day might be.

And the Olbermans and Maddows just serve to egg them on, not really asking any probing questions.

Scrappy on January 19, 2011 at 6:55 PM

Instead of Michael Moore speaking, could you just post of video of a skunk defecating? I think it would be far less disgusting. Thank you.

It would also be more intellectually stimulating as well as making more sense.

wadikitty on January 19, 2011 at 6:57 PM

*make* more sense.

wadikitty on January 19, 2011 at 6:58 PM

Michael Moore may want to spend less time (pardon the pun) shooting his mouth on and spend more time getting some serious cardio in, not to mention dropping some of that flab.

Because one of these days, he may get to experience what I experienced back in November, namely a heart attack, and based on his pudgy appearance these days, he may not survive it like I did mine.

pilamaye on January 19, 2011 at 7:26 PM

It seems the more he speaks, the less sense he makes. Liberal mind sprain?

GFW on January 19, 2011 at 7:33 PM

…hmmm….

…one day, with a sphincter like Moore, some puckish reporter should try asking him which of the other constitutionally guarenteed rights we’ve “outgrown”, which are not historically irrelevant, or which are a threat to public safety.

…after all, some have said that many a scoundrel takes refuge in self-incrimination protections…

…the Left seems peeved at any “free” speech which criticizes their air-castles…on college campuses and in the media, say something they don’t like and it’s all-hands-on-deck on the cable channels nobody watches to call the speaker a “racist”…maybe that sub-heading of the First Amendment should fall under the axe….

…and, of course, the Clintons and others up to today want to gut that pesky Tenth Amendment…”powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution”…nonsense! All power to the Soviets…er…the caring, compassionate, enlightened comrades on the Left….

…if the Second Amendment upsets/scares/disgusts him so much, maybe he should take his act, and the millions that act has earned him, and put on ‘cross to Fidel’s Worker’s Wonderland…after all…I’ve heard that the healthcare culture there is maaaaaaaarvelous…..

Puritan1648 on January 19, 2011 at 7:34 PM

Eleanor Roosevelt carried a pistol while First Lady. Who knew she was a racist?

rbj on January 19, 2011 at 7:35 PM

Looking at him, gun control or elimination is not the issue. He should be forced to live on 1200 calories a day until he looks normal. I’ll give up my guns when Fat Bastard gives up solid food….Ahole…..

adamsmith on January 19, 2011 at 7:38 PM

Two words

PIE HOLE

rhodeymark on January 19, 2011 at 7:39 PM

Michael Mooreon and Moochelle need to have nutrition and fitness summit… at the all-you-can-eat buffet, of course. Don’t forget to invite Fidel.

viking01 on January 19, 2011 at 8:13 PM

Will not watch but if the summary is the case this guy is projecting heavily. He and Chrissy have serious race issues.

CWforFreedom on January 19, 2011 at 8:16 PM

Funny Moore saying that on the WHITEST news channel. hmmm

CWforFreedom on January 19, 2011 at 8:16 PM

Somebody tell Moore there’s a bill to ban gravy and then we’ll see how two-faced, and chinned, Sluggo really is.

viking01 on January 19, 2011 at 8:29 PM

Isn’t this telling about how racist Michael Moore is?

Schadenfreude on January 19, 2011 at 8:32 PM

Contradictory.
‘Only 500 home invasions a year.’
Then
‘Why are we such a violent people?’
How can he dismiss the 500 home invasions as not being relevant in any measurable fashion as far as one’s individual danger is concerned, but yet return to the canard that we ‘are a violent people?’
And
‘Everyone in Tuscon is packing. What are they afraid of, it’s a very safe area.’
But never considers that it is a safe area because people are packing. Dumbo.

TinMan13 on January 19, 2011 at 8:41 PM

You forgot about this logic, genius – the murder rate is so low in all those “safe” places BECAUSE those people have guns. And by the way, hating white people, even if you’re white, is still being racist. R Tard.

CVMA-Dredd on January 19, 2011 at 8:45 PM

I am seriously asking this question, are these people for real or are they just playing some stupid part in their stupid movie, I really can’t tell? Just asking.

mmcnamer1 on January 19, 2011 at 9:49 PM

I am just one of many counter-examples Moore-on should try to explain away.

Do I imagine a black person breaking into my house? No. I always imagined a white person. This, of course, has everything to do with where I live. The only home invader ever shot by a member of my family just so happened to be white (and crazy, and had already injured someone on our property). Again, considering where I live, this is pretty much the only realistic choice of skin color for a would-be home invader.

Oh. My. Gosh. Am I racist against my own kind? Or is the steaming pile that is Michael Moore a damned idiot? We’ll let you decide…

ynot4tony2 on January 19, 2011 at 10:20 PM

Fat, retarded bastard.

In one breath, he says we don’t need so many guns because crime isn’t that bad, and then almost in the very next breath he claims we’re one of the most violent countries on the planet because of all the guns.

xblade on January 19, 2011 at 10:37 PM

This is what M. Moore is qualified to do.

Greed on January 19, 2011 at 10:56 PM

M. Moore would love Kennesaw GA

KENNESAW, Ga – Several Kennesaw officials attribute a drop in crime in the city over the past two decades to a law that requires residents to have a gun in the house.

In 1982, the Kennesaw City Council unanimously passed a law requiring heads of households to own at least one firearm with ammunition.

The ordinance states the gun law is needed to “protect the safety, security and general welfare of the city and its inhabitants.”

Then-councilman J.O. Stephenson said after the ordinance was passed, everyone “went crazy.”

“People all over the country said there would be shootings in the street and violence in homes,” he said. “Of course, that wasn’t the case.”

In fact, according to Stephenson, it caused the crime rate in the city to plunge.

Kennesaw Historical Society president Robert Jones said following the law’s passage, the crime rate dropped 89 percent in the city, compared to the modest 10 percent drop statewide.

“It did drop after it was passed,” he said. “After it initially dropped, it has stayed at the same low level for the past 16 years.”

Mayor Leonard Church was not in office when the law was passed, but he said he is a staunch supporter of it.

“You can’t argue with the fact that Kennesaw has the lowest crime rate of any city our size in the country,” said Church, who owns a denture-making company in Kennesaw.

The author of the ordinance, local attorney Fred Bentley Sr., attributes at least some of the decrease in crime to the bill.

“I am definitely in favor of what we did,” he said. “It may not be totally responsible for the decrease, [but] it is a part.”

Although he is pleased with the outcome, Bentley said he was originally opposed to drafting the law.

“I didn’t think it could be written in a constitutional fashion,” he said. “Obviously, it was constitutional, because the American Civil Liberties Union challenged it in court and we won.”

Jones said the ACLU challenged the law in a federal court just after it was passed. In response, the city added a clause adding conscientious objectors to the list of those exempt.

Although the law is now being credited with a drop in crime, Jones said that was not the law’s original purpose. He also pointed out that Kennesaw did not have a big problem with crime before.

“The crime rate wasn’t that high to start with. It was 11 burglaries per 1,000 residents in 1981,” he said.

According to the Kennesaw Police Department, the city’s most recent crime statistics show 243 property crimes per 100,000 residents in 1998, or .243 per 1,000.

The city’s crime rate continues to be far below other metro Atlanta city’s with similar populations, like Decatur. In 1998, Decatur recorded 4,049 property crimes per 100,000 residents.

Jones said one motivation for the council passing the ordinance had to do with publicity.

“It was done in response to a law passed by Morton Grove, Ill., outlawing gun ownership within the city limits,” he said. “Several council members were upset Morton Grove had gotten a lot of attention with their ordinance so they decided to top them.

“They figured the gun ownership ordinance would knock that city right off the front pages. They were right.”

Jones said the ensuing publicity surrounding the law has given Kennesaw worldwide name recognition.

Mofugger on January 19, 2011 at 11:15 PM

Have another burger, Mike.

tx2654 on January 20, 2011 at 2:49 AM

LOL

There are few crimes, so why have the guns?

Hey, you didn’t get sunburned out there today! Why did you bother with sunscreen? What are you afraid of? I’ll bet you hate the night.

Good grief.

rasqual on January 20, 2011 at 8:59 AM

Moore fat than brain cells. Rates of crimes where a weapon is used are lower. Because, the balance of power is shifting from those with illegal weapons to those with legal weapons for protection of their lives and property.

I hope that is not to simple for Mr. Moore to understand.

MSGTAS on January 20, 2011 at 9:19 AM

I’ll agree to leftist laws on food when MM gets down to 185 lbs.

Until then? FO!

Inanemergencydial on January 20, 2011 at 10:56 AM

Michael Moore: Americans love guns because we’re racist, right?

Two can play Michael’s game:

Most of the world’s poor are people of color.
Most of the world’s poor don’t have enough to eat.
Eating too much must, therefore, be racist behavior.
Consequently, fat Michael Moore is a racist.

Dr. Charles G. Waugh on January 20, 2011 at 12:11 PM

Great, self defense is racist.

Michael Moore is an evil man.

scotash on January 20, 2011 at 12:26 PM

Just out of curiosity, what ethnic background commits the most gun related crimes and/or violent crimes in the United States?

Not that I’m trying to race bait or anything, but I have a feeling its not white people.

Sponge on January 20, 2011 at 1:10 PM

What a great ability MMoore has to make incredible leaps of illogic…

#1:
Crime rates are low where there is high gun ownership, therefore…gun owners have guns because they are racist.

- Poor stupid MM; gun ownership raises the stakes of criminal behavior greatly. Crime is lower as a direct result of increased gun ownership.
- Poor stupid MM; What does it matter if the gun owner *is* a racist? Do we suddenly proscribe that being a racist makes one ineligible for gun ownership simply because it’s socially distasteful? Even if a gun owner *were* a racist, does that mean that they are going to suddenly be inclined to use that weapon for something other than home protection…exactly what kind of leap are you trying to make here?!? Or, perhaps you just want to try and shame people into giving up their guns?

#2:
Crime rates are higher where there is low legal gun ownership, therefore…we must write and enforce more gun control laws to “prevent” criminals from obtaining weapons.

- Poor stupid MM; criminals by definition do not abide by laws, and will obtain guns illegally, whereas the law abiding citizen will then be woefully outgunned (literally).

#3:
If you are a gun owner and someone does break into your house, your primary fear should be that the criminal will disarm you and use your weapon against you, therefore…don’t buy a gun to arm the criminal with!

- Poor stupid MM; the gun owner can (and should) get sufficient training and practice so that they are better prepared and therefore less likely to be disarmed when protecting themselves and their families. By your reasoning, because you have a high likelihood of dying from a cardio-vascular disease (due to your weight and obvious lack of self control/care), you should just go ahead and starve yourself to death NOW, since it’s just too difficult to try and exercise or positively effect your health through discipline and the motivation to get better.

Perhaps if EVERYONE were to get better firearms training, the US would be a safer place all around (assuming that the majority of citizens are not criminals).

#4:
Countries that don’t allow their citizens to own guns have low gun related violence rates, therefore…those places are great to live in!

- Poor stupid MM; Do you think that because North Korea has low gun violence rates that the citizen there is better off? Of course you do, you think Cuba has the best health care system in the world…

Libtards are just too stupid to actually string two thoughts together (cause and effect), they just ramble off a bunch of nonsense and think because they said it with conviction that everyone else will think it made sense and was logical.

Geministorm on January 20, 2011 at 4:14 PM