Great news: Elected officials know less about the Constitution than the public

posted at 11:36 am on January 14, 2011 by Ed Morrissey

So claims the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, which just concluded a five-year study on the American public’s knowledge of its foundational legal document.  The bad news: the general public gets an F, with just a 54% average on the 33-question civics test.  The worse news: those who identified themselves as public officeholders scored an average of five points worse than the general public:

The survey asks 33 basic civics questions, many taken from other nationally recognized instruments like the U.S. Citizenship Exam. It also asks 10 questions related to the U.S. Constitution.

So what did we find? Well, to put it simply, the results are not pretty.

Elected officials at many levels of government, not just the federal government, swear an oath to “uphold and protect” the U.S. Constitution.

But those elected officials who took the test scored an average 5 percentage points lower than the national average (49 percent vs. 54 percent), with ordinary citizens outscoring these elected officials on each constitutional question. Examples:

  • Only 49 percent of elected officials could name all three branches of government, compared with 50 percent of the general public.
  • Only 46 percent knew that Congress, not the president, has the power to declare war — 54 percent of the general public knows that.
  • Just 15 percent answered correctly that the phrase “wall of separation” appears in Thomas Jefferson’s letters — not in the U.S. Constitution — compared with 19 percent of the general public.
  • And only 57 percent of those who’ve held elective office know what the Electoral College does, while 66 percent of the public got that answer right. (Of elected officials, 20 percent thought the Electoral College was a school for “training those aspiring for higher political office.”)

There are a couple of caveats about this test. First, the sample for the general public was a robust 30,000 respondents, but the subsample of elected officials only comprised 165 of those. That is a pretty small group from which to extrapolate conclusions about the entire population of elected officials.

Still, these results are less than confidence-building, aren’t they? Of the 165, 33 apparently thought the Electoral College was a school.  Over 80 of the elected officials couldn’t name the three branches of federal government.  The “wall of separation” quote causes quite a few errors in public discourse, most recently in the gotcha question asked of Christine O’Donnell, and to be fair, some Presidents have had some trouble understanding that the power to declare war belongs in the legislature and not the executive branch.

In one sense, this demonstrates that elections don’t always promote our best and brightest — but then again, most of us already knew that much.  But it does call into question how we can expect elected representatives to “uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States” when many of them appear not to comprehend it — and when many of us don’t comprehend it, either.  The biggest lesson here is that we need to do a much better job of teaching the Constitution in primary education … and that maybe a reading of the Constitution at the beginning of the session of Congress ought to be a regular event, with mandatory attendance.

Update: I thought the public scored 49% and the elected officials 44%, but it was 54% and 49%, respectively.  I’ve corrected it, thanks to Rob Port.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Where’s the link to the survey?

I wanna take it.

RarestRX on January 14, 2011 at 11:38 AM

And here I was embarrassed that I missed one of the 33(not on the Constitution) questions on the long form. And a stupid one at that.

http://www.americancivicliteracy.org/resources/quiz.aspx

OBQuiet on January 14, 2011 at 11:39 AM

Every one of the elected officials should be intimately familiar with the Constitution, less than half could identify the three branches of government? I’ve got an 8 year old who can do that and identify what their main purpose is; our government is sad.

Bishop on January 14, 2011 at 11:39 AM

All this retoric piled up on the island of Okinawa would likley tip it over into the sea!

swimcoachmike on January 14, 2011 at 11:41 AM

Still, these results are less than confidence-building, aren’t they? Of the 165, 33 apparently thought the Electoral College was a school.


H.R. 127: Rename the Electoral College Act

H.R. 128: Political Aspiration Education Act

This Act establishes the Electoral College as a government agency with the purpose of providing education for US citizens and others who desire to serve in public office.

BobMbx on January 14, 2011 at 11:43 AM

Its not so much that our elected leaders don’t understand our Constitution, that’s the symptom, they don’t care about our highest most important law, that’s where the harm comes from.

Speakup on January 14, 2011 at 11:43 AM

Very easy quiz. Anyone who does not ace it should have their high school diploma torn up and shoved in their mouth.

warden on January 14, 2011 at 11:44 AM

But Obama, his wife, liberals, and the GOP elite insist that we shouldn’t be incensed about this.

They’ll whistle for us when they want to feed us a treat.

BuckeyeSam on January 14, 2011 at 11:44 AM

click on the link. scroll down, and you can take a 10 question quiz. I got 80%…

viviliberoomuori on January 14, 2011 at 11:44 AM

Remember Phil Hare, the Congressmen who said he didn’t care about the Constitution when it came to ObamaCare? And was caught on video saying as much?

I like this part of his Wikipedia entry:

In the November 2 election, Schilling defeated Hare taking 53 percent of the vote to Hare’s 42 percent. Hare lost his home district, normally solidly Democratic Rock Island County, by 1,000 votes.

Good times. Good times.

amerpundit on January 14, 2011 at 11:44 AM

Someone’s got to help me out with the relation to that fat bloat Hare.

Red Cloud on January 14, 2011 at 11:44 AM

(Of elected officials, 20 percent thought the Electoral College was a school for “training those aspiring for higher political office.”)

WTF?

• . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘”. . . . . . . . . .“~.,
. . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .“-.,
. . . . .. . . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ”:,
. . . . . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\,
. . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,}
. . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.}
. . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:”. . . ./
. . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./
. . . . . . . /__.(. . .“~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . . .. ./
. . . . . . /(_. . ”~,_. . . ..“~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/
. . . .. .{.._$;_. . .”=,_. . . .“-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~”; /. .. .}
. . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . .”=-._. . .“;,,./`. . /” . . . ./. .. ../
. . . .. . .\`~,. . ..“~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../
. . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-”
. . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . /\
. . . . . . \`~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./…..\,__
,,_. . . . . }.>-._\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ..`=~-,
. .. `=~-,_\_. . . `\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `\. . . . . . ..__
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`>–

darwin-t on January 14, 2011 at 11:45 AM

Surprised? No.

ORconservative on January 14, 2011 at 11:46 AM

Every member of Congress should be required to take that test–as well as agency heads and WH types–with results to be made public.

who will sponsor the bill? Jim DeMint?

james23 on January 14, 2011 at 11:47 AM

Only 49 percent of elected officials could name all three branches of government, compared with 50 percent of the general public.

Really? Really?

alwaysfiredup on January 14, 2011 at 11:47 AM

Drats. Got one wrong!

blatantblue on January 14, 2011 at 11:47 AM

Just 15 percent answered correctly that the phrase “wall of separation” appears in Thomas Jefferson’s letters — not in the U.S. Constitution — compared with 19 percent of the general public.

It’s in there dammit.
-NotSoPROUDRINO

/

CWforFreedom on January 14, 2011 at 11:47 AM

Are you smarter then a Fifth Grader?
If a politician flunks this game, a consolation prize is waiting for you at the dooor.

Electrongod on January 14, 2011 at 11:47 AM

Kind of puts the 52%ers into context, doesn’t it?

james23 on January 14, 2011 at 11:48 AM

I must admit, I missed the one about the Anti-Federalists.

And the three branches of government… I had to assume they were talking theoretically, because the answer in practice (Larry, Moe, and Curly) was not offered.

malclave on January 14, 2011 at 11:49 AM

Just 15 percent answered correctly that the phrase “wall of separation” appears in Thomas Jefferson’s letters — not in the U.S. Constitution — compared with 19 percent of the general public.

Well, that explains a lot.

bighead4 on January 14, 2011 at 11:50 AM

irst, the sample for the general public was a robust 30,000 respondents, but the subsample of elected officials only comprised 165 of those.

if they’ve got plenty of data like this, why not merely randomly sample a representative sample of the 30K respondents. It doesn’t take n=30K to ascertain the gen public’s knowledge of the Constitution, particularly when you’re comparing it to gov’t officials (and the n will be far lower).

stats.

ted c on January 14, 2011 at 11:50 AM

We’ve always suspected this. They don’t know it because when confronted they can always claim ignorance as a defense. No wonder the Dems heads were exploding last week at the reading of the Constitution. They’ve been outed, again!

BetseyRoss on January 14, 2011 at 11:51 AM

I got 79% and I’m not an American citizen….

CityFish on January 14, 2011 at 11:52 AM

Every one of the elected officials should be intimately familiar with the Constitution, less than half could identify the three branches of government?
Bishop on January 14, 2011 at 11:39 AM

1 Ministry of Information
2 Ministry of Truth
3 Ministry of Peace

Most frequent response given by elected Officials.

Geochelone on January 14, 2011 at 11:52 AM

I took a culture course from a college on a military post where we discussed that most American citizens could not pass an American citizenship test. The subject was brought up because we had a number of foreign military wives who wanted to become American citizens and were taking the test. This study fits right in with that discussion. Test yourself if you get time.

canditaylor68 on January 14, 2011 at 11:53 AM

I don’t think you understand democrats. It isn’t that democrats don’t know….they flat out don’t care about anything that might limit their power. Swearing to uphold the constitution is just some silly tradition to them…like marriage.

GardenGnome on January 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM

Well, somebody just scored 100% on the quiz. :)

Of course, I disagree with their rather broad definition of a public good, but I run into that problem all the time.

JohnGalt23 on January 14, 2011 at 11:55 AM

Well, that explains a lot.

bighead4 on January 14, 2011 at 11:50 AM

Yes . The Constitution was simply saying there could not be an official religion. It is not meant to keep religion completely out of government. If one does not like this fact amend it.

CWforFreedom on January 14, 2011 at 11:55 AM

Surprised?

No.

As to the sample size, that’s irrelevant. If they’re elected officials, then it’s their job to know this.

It’s like having a doctor who flunked medical school.

INC on January 14, 2011 at 11:55 AM

Surprised….why would I be surprised?

They don’t like it or abide by it now, why in the world would they read it?

I mean after all, if they (D & R’s) followed the Constitution we would not have 14 trillion in debt, we would not have the Fed, we would not be engaged in un-ending wars, we would not have Obamacare, there’s not much that Congress does these days that is constitutional.

PatriotRider on January 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM

There are a couple of caveats about this test. First, the sample for the general public was a robust 30,000 respondents, but the subsample of elected officials only comprised 165 of those. That is a pretty small group from which to extrapolate conclusions about the entire population of elected officials.

What this tells me is that there were probably a large number of “elected officials” who were afraid to take the test because they thought they’d score poorly.

The ones who actually did take the test probably felt somewhat confident that they’d do OK.

We are screwed.

UltimateBob on January 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM

Yes . The Constitution was simply saying there could not be an official religion. It is not meant to keep religion completely out of government. If one does not like this fact amend it.

CWforFreedom on January 14, 2011 at 11:55 AM

I guess all of the idiots who go on and on about the Constitution mentioning the separation of church and state have “conscience [sic] dreamed” it into being.

bighead4 on January 14, 2011 at 11:58 AM

I seriously question the elected officials sample here and not just because of its small size. The fact is, a large majority of congressmen and members of most state legislatures are attorneys, and very likely would score pretty well on the simple questions posed in this survey.

Whether they follow the Constitution is, unfortunately, an entirely different issue. ✪

TXUS on January 14, 2011 at 11:59 AM

But it does call into question how we can expect elected representatives to “uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States” when many of them appear not to comprehend it

Dude, it’s, like, 100 years old and stuff…

Aquateen Hungerforce on January 14, 2011 at 12:01 PM

Imagine: you’re a student from Mars working on your Ph.D, tasked with observing the US congress, the senate, POTUS, and SCOTUS for one year then writing your thesis: based on my observations, without having peeked at their Constitution, this is what it must contain.

Can you imagine what he’d come up with?

Akzed on January 14, 2011 at 12:02 PM

I got 79% and I’m not an American citizen….

CityFish on January 14, 2011 at 11:52 AM

Well, then you’re obviously not qualified to run for President here. You performed too well on the test to run for office in this country.

Don’t worry about the part where you’re not a citizen. That shouldn’t hold you back; the guy currently holding that office may (or may not) share that trait with you.

UltimateBob on January 14, 2011 at 12:02 PM

No D/R breakdown unfortunately. I’d like to see a simple test, much simpler than this one, given before a citizen could vote. That would filter out the real idiots that are destroying our country.

slickwillie2001 on January 14, 2011 at 12:05 PM

Damn, only scored a 90.

Midas on January 14, 2011 at 12:07 PM

Someone’s got to help me out with the relation to that fat bloat Hare.

Red Cloud on January 14, 2011 at 11:44 AM

Here you go.

Christien on January 14, 2011 at 12:07 PM

Its not so much that our elected leaders don’t understand our Constitution, that’s the symptom, they don’t care about our highest most important law, that’s where the harm comes from.

Speakup on January 14, 2011 at 11:43 AM

They view the Constitution as an impediment that’s best ignored. And why that is is partly due to an educational system (both public & private) that has been taken over by “progressives” (i.e., marxists in sheep’s clothing) and their own incuriosity to the founding of this country.

rbj on January 14, 2011 at 12:07 PM

Who’s responsible for this? The public willing to vote in civic illiterates to public office.

I was horrified by Christine O’Donnell and her lack of sense or knowlege, but looking at these figures I have to confess she fit right in, near the very top of the ruling, ie dunce class.

SarahW on January 14, 2011 at 12:08 PM

Only 49 percent of elected officials could name all three branches of government, compared with 50 percent of the general public.
Only 46 percent knew that Congress, not the president, has the power to declare war — 54 percent of the general public knows that.
Just 15 percent answered correctly that the phrase “wall of separation” appears in Thomas Jefferson’s letters — not in the U.S. Constitution — compared with 19 percent of the general public.
And only 57 percent of those who’ve held elective office know what the Electoral College does, while 66 percent of the public got that answer right. (Of elected officials, 20 percent thought the Electoral College was a school for “training those aspiring for higher political office.”)

But at least 99.99% know the name, location, phone number, GPS latitude and longitude, and website of their representing special interests group or union headquarters of choice.

pilamaye on January 14, 2011 at 12:08 PM

As to religion, that was applied at the federal level. There were several states who had an officially sanctioned state religion into the 1800s.

INC on January 14, 2011 at 12:11 PM

From Walter Williams’ latest column

Here’s what Thomas Jefferson said: “Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated.”

Madison added, “With respect to the two words ‘general welfare,’ I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators.”

John Adams warned, “A Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty, once lost, is lost forever.” I am all too afraid that’s where our nation stands today and the blame lies with the American people.

CWforFreedom on January 14, 2011 at 12:11 PM

93%–didn’t remember sh_t about Puritans, and misread the tax/spending question (actually I think the wording of the ‘correct’ answer on that one makes the question pointless).

How does one get half of those wrong?!

ElectricPhase on January 14, 2011 at 12:12 PM

O/T Rush just mentioned the T-shirt logo coming from 2008 Obama’s campaign.
Good work to the ones here that got that message out.

Electrongod on January 14, 2011 at 12:13 PM

Why would anyone pay to discover what we already know?

JIMV on January 14, 2011 at 12:13 PM

On the long form, I missed the one on the Lincoln-Douglas debate. I do question the ‘correct’ answer.

Seems to me that while the topic revolved around territorial expansion of slavery, this was pretty much settled with the awful Gred Scott decision the year before. The true issue, which Lincoln brought up often, was whether it was right to allow slavery to expand At ALL since it was morally wrong.

But if I know this much about these items, why don’t those who claim to be representing me know at least that much?

OBQuiet on January 14, 2011 at 12:13 PM

In one sense, this demonstrates that elections don’t always promote our best and brightest — but then again, most of us already knew that much.

It’s a catch-22: the best and brightest might do a better job as elected officials, but they’re also bright enough to know they don’t want the job.

Now if only we could devise a system whereby the best and brightest make the decisions, but don’t know they’re actually in charge… hmmm…

LastRick on January 14, 2011 at 12:14 PM

Most average people don’t need to know this kind of stuff. Would you care if your doctor knew that our Congress is bi-camaral, and not know human anatomy 100%?

The only real problem is when the Senate tries to create legislation creating new taxes, which it did recently, which is the domain of the Legislature.

Neo on January 14, 2011 at 12:15 PM

Phil. Phil. You need to get on Michelle’s “It’s Happy Hour Somewhere Diet”.

crash72 on January 14, 2011 at 12:16 PM

Shoot. Got 5 wrong on the test.

mizflame98 on January 14, 2011 at 12:17 PM

First, the sample for the general public was a robust 30,000 respondents, but the subsample of elected officials only comprised 165 of those. That is a pretty small group from which to extrapolate conclusions about the entire population of elected officials.

Not necessarily. If I sample 100 people out of population of 1000, that’s 10%. If I then sample 10,000 out of another population of 100,000, it’s still 10%

In this case (if my math is correct), a sample of 30,000 of a population of around 300 million is .01%

A sample of 165 that is .01% would represent a population 1,650,000. Are there that many elected officials in this country?

RadClown on January 14, 2011 at 12:19 PM

27) Free markets typically secure more economic

E. government planners are too cautious in spending taxpayers’ money

Riiiight…

miConsevative on January 14, 2011 at 12:20 PM

Most average people don’t need to know this kind of stuff.

Neo on January 14, 2011 at 12:15 PM

You couldn’t be more wrong. How can one make an intelligent decision without understanding how the country functions and why it became what it is? In order to discharge our civic duty to vote all US citizens need to know most of this stuff.

ElectricPhase on January 14, 2011 at 12:20 PM

I missed 2/33. Both misses were on economic policy and were arguably not wrong, depending on how you interpret the questions.

James on January 14, 2011 at 12:20 PM

It is good news. I would hate to believe that the public is as ignorant as I believe officials to be.

burt on January 14, 2011 at 12:26 PM

100%. Some of the questions were tricky, particularly the one about how a government would likely act in a severe recession.

I got that one right, because I realized it was not what the government should do, but what they would do. And let’s face it, no modern government will cut spending in a recession.

Good test, but it did encompass more than just the Constitution.

tom on January 14, 2011 at 12:28 PM

It is good news. I would hate to believe that the public is as ignorant as I believe officials to be.

burt on January 14, 2011 at 12:26 PM

Given the sample size, I’m afraid it’s within the margin of error.

ElectricPhase on January 14, 2011 at 12:28 PM

I missed 2/33. Both misses were on economic policy and were arguably not wrong, depending on how you interpret the questions.

James on January 14, 2011 at 12:20 PM

I know what you mean: Which of the following fiscal policy combinations would a government most likely follow to stimulate economic activity when the economy is in a severe recession?

I could almost hear, in a typical Monty Python voice, “What do you mean? A sensible or Liberal government?” “Huh? I… I don’t know that. Auuuuuugh…”

OBQuiet on January 14, 2011 at 12:31 PM

(Of elected officials, 20 percent thought the Electoral College was a school for “training those aspiring for higher political office.”)

I don’t know whether to laugh, or cry at this!

capejasmine on January 14, 2011 at 12:33 PM

Surely we can blame Fox News for this.

MayBee on January 14, 2011 at 12:34 PM

Anyone who does not ace it should have their high school diploma torn up and shoved in their mouth.

warden on January 14, 2011 at 11:44 AM

Mmwhh wwmmhhm hhwwmmmm! (missed 3, but I graduated HS in 75 and have had no fancy book learnin since)

TugboatPhil on January 14, 2011 at 12:40 PM

Very easy quiz. Anyone who does not ace it should have their high school diploma torn up and shoved in their mouth.

warden on January 14, 2011 at 11:44 AM

I missed 5 questions and find your comments embarrassing. You should really stop proving the left’s point about conservatives being violent. I graduated top 1/4 of my class over 20 years ago, so there are just some things that get replaced with other things. Get over yourself and I’m not in the public sector.

Sponge on January 14, 2011 at 12:44 PM

“I wish it were possible to obtain a single amendment to our Constitution. I would be willing to depend on that alone for the reduction of the administration of our government to the genuine principles of its Constitution; I mean an additional article, taking from the federal government the power of borrowing.”–Thomas Jefferson

Basil Fawlty on January 14, 2011 at 12:45 PM

“Do you swear to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America?”
“The what now?”
“The Constitution of the United States of America!’
“TLDR.”

DailyDanet on January 14, 2011 at 12:45 PM

This was not a survey of the general population. They state right in the article that the majority of the people polled are college students.

That right there throws the whole thing to a very skewed portion of the general population.

This survey isn’t worth anything.

ButterflyDragon on January 14, 2011 at 12:45 PM

I got 100% on the 10-question sample quiz, and one wrong (#33) on the full-length quiz.

flipflop on January 14, 2011 at 12:46 PM

blatantblue on January 14, 2011 at 11:47 AM

.

100%
Channeling my inner The Last Dragon’s Sho’nuff
Me – “Who’s the Civics Shogun of HotAir?
Chorus – “LincolntheHun”

LincolntheHun on January 14, 2011 at 12:48 PM

Just took it, and got 100% correct. I’m not exactly sure how anyone with a pulse got below an 80% or so.

crr6 on January 14, 2011 at 1:00 PM

And here I was embarrassed that I missed one of the 33(not on the Constitution) questions on the long form. And a stupid one at that.

http://www.americancivicliteracy.org/resources/quiz.aspx

OBQuiet on January 14, 2011 at 11:39 AM

Thanks for the link, I got an 85%, so you 5th graders better watch out.”snort”

USMCDevilDog on January 14, 2011 at 1:10 PM

if they’ve got plenty of data like this, why not merely randomly sample a representative sample of the 30K respondents. It doesn’t take n=30K to ascertain the gen public’s knowledge of the Constitution, particularly when you’re comparing it to gov’t officials (and the n will be far lower).

stats.

ted c on January 14, 2011 at 11:50 AM

Nope, that’s not how it works. You can’t use *less* data to get a more robust conclusion. The problem isn’t that 165 is so small relative to 30k, it’s that 165 is too small on an absolute scale for the differences to be considered meaningful.

I also think that 165 is too small on an absolute scale to be representative of elected officials in general, but I’d need to check (depending on how many elected officials there are).

Either way, the results of this test are embarrassing, but also not too surprising given other surveys I’ve seen of people’s basic knowledge in subjects like science.

By the way, I briefly skimmed the site and couldn’t find the particular numbers about elected officials. Can anyone point me to it?

tneloms on January 14, 2011 at 1:18 PM

Not to surprising since I seem to recall that Obama did not always know either. And…didn’t he teach it or something.

jeanie on January 14, 2011 at 1:26 PM

I got 28 out of 33 right–that is, 5 wrong. That’s 84.85% which is, I guess, a solid B. I was hoping to only get 1 or 2 wrong.

Pilgrimsarbour on January 14, 2011 at 1:28 PM

I disagree with the idea that increasing the government debt, or pulling money out of the lending pool will help stimulate the economy.

Slowburn on January 14, 2011 at 1:29 PM

Thanks, warden, for demonstrating how ugly arrogance is. I agree with Sponge. And I haven’t been in school for over thirty years. Some things one forgets over time.

Pilgrimsarbour on January 14, 2011 at 1:33 PM

I disagree with the idea that increasing the government debt, or pulling money out of the lending pool will help stimulate the economy.

Slowburn on January 14, 2011 at 1:29 PM

That’s not what the question asks, though. It asks what a government would be most likely to do in a severe recession, not what a government should do in a recession.

I really am thankful for people like you. Without you, who would pad the low end of the curve on standardized tests?

crr6 on January 14, 2011 at 1:37 PM

This was not a survey of the general population. They state right in the article that the majority of the people polled are college students.

That right there throws the whole thing to a very skewed portion of the general population.

This survey isn’t worth anything.

ButterflyDragon on January 14, 2011 at 12:45 PM

Perhaps. But you may be giving college students a lot more credit than they deserve and I would expect – or hope – an elected official would know more about the constitution and American history than the average college student.

RadClown on January 14, 2011 at 1:42 PM

I got 79% and I’m not an American citizen….

CityFish on January 14, 2011 at 11:52 AM

I think we should make you an honorary citizen and we’ll deport one of the dopes that failed this test.
Who’s with me?

mizflame98 on January 14, 2011 at 1:42 PM

Here’s my crackpot proposal of the day:

All persons seeking elected office shall be required to:

1. Take and pass a constitutional and American history test similar to this one.

2. Take and pass an Economics 101 course

3. Spend at least three consecutive years working full time in the for-profit private sector.

RadClown on January 14, 2011 at 1:47 PM

Of the 165, 33 apparently thought the Electoral College was a school.

And at least one of THOSE geniuses believes that islands are capable of capsizing when too heavily populated.

oldleprechaun on January 14, 2011 at 1:49 PM

Nebulous idiot Congress critter in mexican voice**

“Con-stee-toooshun? We don’t neeed no steenkine con-stee-tooshun!!”

44Magnum on January 14, 2011 at 1:56 PM

Just took it, and got 100% correct. I’m not exactly sure how anyone with a pulse got below an 80% or so.

crr6 on January 14, 2011 at 1:00 PM

You got question 30 correct? It asks (paraphrasing) during a recession, the government islikelyto do what…. and the correct answer is decrease taxes and decrease spending. I got it wrong because the government is not “likely” to decrease taxes.

Vince on January 14, 2011 at 1:56 PM

This was not a survey of the general population. They state right in the article that the majority of the people polled are college students.

That right there throws the whole thing to a very skewed portion of the general population.

This survey isn’t worth anything.

ButterflyDragon on January 14, 2011 at 12:45 PM
Perhaps. But you may be giving college students a lot more credit than they deserve and I would expect – or hope – an elected official would know more about the constitution and American history than the average college student.

RadClown on January 14, 2011 at 1:42 PM

I would bet that if the general population was surveyed they would have had a higher score than college students.

Vince on January 14, 2011 at 2:00 PM

You answered 33 out of 33 correctly — 100.00 %

Average score for this quiz during January: 73.9%

PJ Emeritus on January 14, 2011 at 2:00 PM

the general public gets an F

Given the current state of ‘public education’, why is anyone surprised? After all, don’t we teach ‘to the lowest common denominator’?

GarandFan on January 14, 2011 at 2:07 PM

Vince on January 14, 2011 at 2:00 PM

Which shows the absolute waste of time and money it is to go to college if a high school graduate like me can pass it but a college student fails miserably.

mizflame98 on January 14, 2011 at 2:09 PM

Given the current state of ‘public education’, why is anyone surprised? After all, don’t we teach ‘to the lowest common denominator’?

GarandFan on January 14, 2011 at 2:07 PM

Actually, we do. That’s the problem. Education has been dumbed down so no child will be left behind.

mizflame98 on January 14, 2011 at 2:10 PM

The one Ed linked to only has 10 questions…? I got em all right of course, ahem, but I want to take the longer one.

Where izzit?

Akzed on January 14, 2011 at 2:12 PM

You got question 30 correct?

Yep.

It asks (paraphrasing) during a recession, the government islikelyto do what…. and the correct answer is decrease taxes and decrease spending. I got it wrong because the government is not “likely” to decrease taxes.

Vince on January 14, 2011 at 1:56 PM

The govt. is more likely to do that than any of the other 3 options.

crr6 on January 14, 2011 at 2:17 PM

Perhaps. But you may be giving college students a lot more credit than they deserve and I would expect – or hope – an elected official would know more about the constitution and American history than the average college student.

RadClown on January 14, 2011 at 1:42 PM

LOL

Actually, I think the scores would be higher if they polled the general population instead of focusing heavily on college students.

These kids are being taught in these liberal cesspools that have no regard for the Constitution, so why should we expect them to know details about it?

It isn’t until after the college years and they actually turn into adults that they go back and revisit what they should have remembered from 7th Grade civics class.

ButterflyDragon on January 14, 2011 at 2:24 PM

Just 15 percent answered correctly that the phrase “wall of separation” appears in Thomas Jefferson’s letters — not in the U.S. Constitution — compared with 19 percent of the general public.

Hmmmm. Even if these people guessed, it should come out to around 50% plus or minus some deviation. 85% sounds like these people were pretty sure about their answer. I wonder where they got the wrong idea?

JavelinaBomb on January 14, 2011 at 2:30 PM

I took the test. I got 100.

Kiss my boot heels, congress-critters.

moochy on January 14, 2011 at 2:31 PM

At least in our school district, it’s not the lack of teaching the Constitution that’s the issue. My kids learned about it over and over through their school years, from basic lessons in 5th grade to a semester-long government class their freshman year of high school.

The problem is that the info is in one ear and out the other, no one seems to retain it. That’s probably the case for other learning as well, if you don’t use it, you lose it.

I don’t know what the answer is, but more education for kids, at least here in Colorado, is not the answer.

Common Sense on January 14, 2011 at 2:54 PM

Got 91%.

A few of the later ones are worded rather oddly.
For example #33: “If taxes equal government spending, then:”

A. government debt is zero
B. printing money no longer causes inflation
C. government is not helping anybody
D. tax per person equals government spending per person
E. tax loopholes and special-interest spending are absent

I put A: Debt = 0 (and Savings = 0 for that matter) when revenue = spending.
They gave D as correct.
Both are correct.
The test makers need to word their questions better; there is an art to writing exams as any educator will attest.

Bubba Redneck on January 14, 2011 at 3:07 PM

Comment pages: 1 2